MrAwojobi wrote:Doraki

it will be Goldbach's.

For fun, disprove it.

- Sat Aug 14, 2010 6:15 am UTC
- Forum: Mathematics
- Topic: Revised Simple Proof of Beal's Conjecture
- Replies:
**29** - Views:
**4011**

MrAwojobi wrote:Doraki

it will be Goldbach's.

For fun, disprove it.

- Thu Aug 12, 2010 9:38 pm UTC
- Forum: Mathematics
- Topic: Revised Simple Proof of Beal's Conjecture
- Replies:
**29** - Views:
**4011**

MrAwojobi wrote:"It should be clear" "It isn’t difficult to see"

If you choose to revise this more, try to avoid using these phrases and instead show the connections that you imply with them. It may work to your advantage when communicating it.

- Sat Jul 31, 2010 3:30 am UTC
- Forum: Mathematics
- Topic: What exactly do you do for math research projects?
- Replies:
**19** - Views:
**4222**

Didn't the same thing happen with the Feigenbaum constant? Or was that a result from a calculation imposed on the period doubling in a logistic map?

- Fri Jul 30, 2010 1:37 pm UTC
- Forum: Mathematics
- Topic: Proof of the Twin Prime Conjecture
- Replies:
**49** - Views:
**7570**

Seems like you proved it by first assuming its true, then stating it was true. Doesn't quite work out to be a proof at that point.

- Wed Jul 28, 2010 7:02 am UTC
- Forum: Mathematics
- Topic: Thank you for #435
- Replies:
**42** - Views:
**5188**

Sorry to burst your bubble, but I'm a math major, a guy, and have long hair. That could easily have been a guy with long hair in that comic

- Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:27 am UTC
- Forum: Mathematics
- Topic: To be, or not to be?
- Replies:
**27** - Views:
**3362**

Also, does stating "To be or not to be?" in terms of logic count as in terms of mathematics? Or are we considering them separate?

- Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:26 am UTC
- Forum: Mathematics
- Topic: To be, or not to be?
- Replies:
**27** - Views:
**3362**

For me (from New Jersey), "not" is /nat/ and "naught" is /nɔt/ or maybe /nɒt/. ! Im from Pennsylvania bordering New Jersey and I say not with a short o and naught like nawt. I'm going to take a guess and claim you are from northern New Jersey. Its information that is entirely re...

- Mon Jul 26, 2010 1:38 am UTC
- Forum: Mathematics
- Topic: a^3 + b^3 + x = c^3
- Replies:
**16** - Views:
**2569**

Minchandre wrote:gbagcn2 wrote:So do all numbers other than 0 for x work

I would pay - probably like $5 - to see a proof of that.

I would say proof/disproof would revolve around the existence of a maximum distance an an arbitrary integer and it's closest perfect cube. Is there anything known about that?

- Sat Jul 24, 2010 3:59 am UTC
- Forum: Mathematics
- Topic: a^3 + b^3 + x = c^3
- Replies:
**16** - Views:
**2569**

And if it is all posive integers, x=0 has no solution for all n>2.

- Sat Jul 24, 2010 3:57 am UTC
- Forum: Mathematics
- Topic: a^3 + b^3 + x = c^3
- Replies:
**16** - Views:
**2569**

epsilon-delta wrote:Positive integers or all integers? If a, b, c > 0, then x = 0 has no solution due to Fermat's Last Theorem.

That theorem applies only to positive integers? Huh, thought it was for all. Thats what I get for not reading that far into it.

- Sat Jul 24, 2010 1:05 am UTC
- Forum: Mathematics
- Topic: a^3 + b^3 + x = c^3
- Replies:
**16** - Views:
**2569**

Depends, are you asking for all integer values of a,b,c,x? Or is it all real values for a,b,c,x?

- Sat Jun 26, 2010 4:14 am UTC
- Forum: Mathematics
- Topic: Hating on the statisticians
- Replies:
**72** - Views:
**9748**

nash1429 wrote:

This, much more than anything, has earned the field my respect. Nobody else has the same humility.

What about fuzzy-logicians?

- Fri Jun 25, 2010 5:17 am UTC
- Forum: Mathematics
- Topic: Hating on the statisticians
- Replies:
**72** - Views:
**9748**

Velifer wrote:(The mathematicians sit around chewing on pencils, and when someone taps them on the shoulder they startle: "Wha? There's a World? Prove it!" )

I think thats more characteristic of a philosopher.

- Wed Jun 23, 2010 4:49 am UTC
- Forum: Mathematics
- Topic: A quick discussion with myself
- Replies:
**10** - Views:
**2053**

I tried explaining the idea of non-euclidean geometry to someone who believed that "if math is not totally consistent with itself, then what use do we have of it?" He refused to believe me then went on to talk about relativity.

- Tue Jun 22, 2010 5:52 pm UTC
- Forum: Mathematics
- Topic: A question about field-like structures.
- Replies:
**4** - Views:
**876**

Thanks a lot.

- Tue Jun 22, 2010 6:12 am UTC
- Forum: Mathematics
- Topic: A question about field-like structures.
- Replies:
**4** - Views:
**876**

I was reading up on what a field is, and one of the requirements of a field is that the identities differ between the two operators. Say we have a set A, and the operators on the set are + and * but the identity is the same for both. Then for any a in the A and the identity e, a+e=a and a*e=a. Are t...

- Mon Jun 21, 2010 5:40 am UTC
- Forum: Language/Linguistics
- Topic: What is a word?
- Replies:
**77** - Views:
**9299**

Makri wrote:What you're really concerned with "irregardless" being a lexeme, which is quite a different thing from its being a word.

My bad then.

- Sat Jun 19, 2010 9:15 pm UTC
- Forum: Language/Linguistics
- Topic: What is a word?
- Replies:
**77** - Views:
**9299**

This kinda goes along with the original idea: irregardless is indeed a word. I claim so because it has found usage in a dialect of the English Language. Now, it may not be formal English, but I think that is the purpose of a dictionary is to set the basis for what is in the formal language and what ...

- Fri Jun 18, 2010 5:14 am UTC
- Forum: Mathematics
- Topic: 4 digit code
- Replies:
**4** - Views:
**1180**

If, however, you don't need to press "enter" between guesses, then, after entering the, say, fifth digit, then the first is discarded, the second becomes the first..... etc. You should also consider that at the 5th key press the first four digits are discarded. And see which type of code ...

- Wed Jun 16, 2010 2:13 am UTC
- Forum: Mathematics
- Topic: How to become a math professor?
- Replies:
**25** - Views:
**5441**

Not to dash anyone's hopes too severely, but http://www.miller-mccune.com/science/the-real-science-gap-16191/ should be required reading for anyone considering this career path. This makes me glad that its not money that fuels my goals. But, at the same time its a little disconcerting to find out.

- Tue Jun 15, 2010 4:12 am UTC
- Forum: Mathematics
- Topic: Modular arithmetic question
- Replies:
**11** - Views:
**1752**

Just making sure you weren't confusing yourself, haha. Keep up the interest though, its so worth it.

- Tue Jun 15, 2010 4:02 am UTC
- Forum: Mathematics
- Topic: Modular arithmetic question
- Replies:
**11** - Views:
**1752**

Yeah, this isn't homework, this is just what i do :p I wanted to know what modular arithmetic was and now i do. Hmmm, was the example you gave what you consider "modular arithmetic" or was that just a result needed to figure it out? EDIT: Also, study up on matrix reduction and solve a bun...

- Tue Jun 15, 2010 3:56 am UTC
- Forum: Mathematics
- Topic: Modular arithmetic question
- Replies:
**11** - Views:
**1752**

SomeFloridaKid wrote:Thanks

No problem! Now, not sure if you are aware, but it says that you come here for homework help and not direct solutions. And that website will give you a step by step of what is happening to solve your problem.

- Tue Jun 15, 2010 3:53 am UTC
- Forum: Mathematics
- Topic: Modular arithmetic question
- Replies:
**11** - Views:
**1752**

http://www.math.odu.edu/~bogacki/cgi-bin/lat.cgi This is a great tool for you. Click on the "solving a system of linear equations" The number of equations you have is two, and the number of unknowns you have is two. Use x1 as x and x2 as y Then tell us what you got for x and y

- Tue Jun 15, 2010 3:50 am UTC
- Forum: Mathematics
- Topic: Modular arithmetic question
- Replies:
**11** - Views:
**1752**

Ahhh, well then. You could have said that earlier :p But you came to an excellent place to learn. And I'm guessing that is what they are going into with this.

- Tue Jun 15, 2010 3:47 am UTC
- Forum: Mathematics
- Topic: Modular arithmetic question
- Replies:
**11** - Views:
**1752**

Why not use matrix reduction to find the solution set and work from there?

- Thu Jun 10, 2010 3:46 am UTC
- Forum: Mathematics
- Topic: Determinants
- Replies:
**17** - Views:
**2279**

Just to give you a true idea of the scope of the determinant's importance, in the math section alone at my school's library there are 17 different books with a title essentially either "Theory of Determinants", "Applications of Determinants" or even just "Determinants"...

- Wed Jun 09, 2010 6:09 am UTC
- Forum: Mathematics
- Topic: A question about sets.
- Replies:
**3** - Views:
**682**

Thanks!

- Wed Jun 09, 2010 5:54 am UTC
- Forum: Mathematics
- Topic: A question about sets.
- Replies:
**3** - Views:
**682**

An example of what I mean is this. I have a set {1,2} which is the same as {2,1} and something similar to a set {1,2,3,2} which is the same as {2,1,3,2} and so on.

- Wed Jun 09, 2010 5:51 am UTC
- Forum: Mathematics
- Topic: A question about sets.
- Replies:
**3** - Views:
**682**

I'm curious if there is a set-like collection of objects who's only difference from a set is that it allows for repeat elements. So like a set, order does not matter, but unlike a set repeat elements are allowed.

- Mon May 31, 2010 9:29 am UTC
- Forum: Mathematics
- Topic: How to become a math professor?
- Replies:
**25** - Views:
**5441**

Syrin wrote:njperrone wrote:Sorry to budge in kurushimi, but it will compliment your question well.

This one threw me for a loop - I was trying to wrap my mind around just how one would go about complimenting a question.

Whoops, typo. Thanks for that pickup.

- Mon May 31, 2010 6:43 am UTC
- Forum: Mathematics
- Topic: How to become a math professor?
- Replies:
**25** - Views:
**5441**

Sorry to budge in kurushimi, but it will complement your question well. Besides being a professor, what kind of jobs are available at the university with a Phd in mathematics? Because I am setting the Phd as my goal, and I am just curious what kind of work is out there at universities that do not in...

- Wed Mar 03, 2010 7:12 am UTC
- Forum: Mathematics
- Topic: Cartesian Product
- Replies:
**5** - Views:
**829**

Thanks Skeptical Scientist. That pretty much answered my question. I knew that if they were isomorphic, which is the property I had in mind when I asked, their individual structures would differ. But that each one had a point (a,b,c,d) with a,b,c,d belonging to R in the one case and with two of the ...

- Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:17 am UTC
- Forum: Mathematics
- Topic: Cartesian Product
- Replies:
**5** - Views:
**829**

From what I understand R^4, where R is the set of real numbers, is expressed as RxRxRxR where x denotes the Cartesian Product. With that being said is C^2, where C is the set of complex numbers, essentially the same as R^4? But their only difference is that C^2 has 2 real and 2 imaginary components ...

- Fri Feb 26, 2010 6:18 am UTC
- Forum: Mathematics
- Topic: Determinants and an upcoming midterm
- Replies:
**11** - Views:
**2068**

Oh, that link. I seem to have not seen it. Thanks!

- Fri Feb 26, 2010 1:57 am UTC
- Forum: Mathematics
- Topic: Determinants and an upcoming midterm
- Replies:
**11** - Views:
**2068**

I wouldn't invoke the cross product if I were you; among other things, it doesn't generalize (in the way you think it does) to more than three dimensions (except seven), whereas the determinant has the same meaning in all dimensions. If you read Winitzki you'll learn that the cross product and the ...

- Thu Feb 25, 2010 4:11 am UTC
- Forum: Mathematics
- Topic: Determinants and an upcoming midterm
- Replies:
**11** - Views:
**2068**

Finally, the book mentioned that determinants return the area of parallelograms and the volume of parallelepipeds. It also gave some justifications illustrating how elementary row operations would affect the vectors of these shapes, and their relationship with the volume/area of the discussed paral...

- Tue Feb 09, 2010 3:03 am UTC
- Forum: Mathematics
- Topic: Current state of math education
- Replies:
**23** - Views:
**3116**

Not sure how much of a deviation from the conversation this is, but it is relevent. I think the reason the math education system, in the USA at least, is the way it is because most of the people who go onto college usually go into some specialization that does not involve a lot of upper division mat...

- Mon Jan 18, 2010 1:21 pm UTC
- Forum: Mathematics
- Topic: What are some practical uses of Linear Algebra?
- Replies:
**9** - Views:
**9655**

Pretty much anywhere that requires finding an equilibrium with two or more linear equations. One could be with forces, i don't know this for sure i am just guessing, that are exerted by an object or on an object. I have no knowlege of application, so this is just a quasi-wild guess.

- Sun Jan 17, 2010 12:48 am UTC
- Forum: Mathematics
- Topic: Mathematics and intellect
- Replies:
**85** - Views:
**9154**

I love how physicists and mathematicians fail to understand the importance of facts. Not so. I think you have just demonstrated very well a stereotype associated with mathematicians and physicist that helps categorize their intelligence. I would find a professor very boring, and probably even a sta...