Going to be gone when the lynch occurs, and I'm not going to vote for myself. Sorry.
ForAllOfThis wrote:Weeks wrote:1) He initiated the whole argument that because we didn't vote for m_p and argued against him, we were scummy. He says he has evidence because GoP did this and he turned out scum. Yet weiyaoli did this too, and he turned out town! This is why I said, earlier, that he was exaggerating his point.
2) He fucking backed off when he weiyaoli was found town, but didn't hesitate to use the same flawed argument again to attack me.
3) He says I made the whole thing into a big argument, which is blatant lies (first three posters to disagree and argue with FOAT: not me).
It doesn't take a genius to work out that there must be town players who didn't vote for m_p. All I said was that not-voting should be a considered factor on who we decide to vote. Wei did seem to agree that not voting for m_p so that someone else could be lynched was scummy, the same argument that you're mainly voting me for. I haven't backed off from anything. Order is irrelevant, you're the one who made it into such a big deal and seem to think that I'm suggesting everyone who didn't vote must be scum. This is clearly impossible, and twisting the argument I made into something else. If you disagreed with me so much and thought genuinely that I was scum, why did you follow my vote?
It seems like lots of people were feeling like that you were implying that people who didn't vote=scum, and brought it up. Weeks did bring it up in a huge post, though, so maybe left an impression. And that post he made? It mostly focused on your accusations about him and his inaction over more_people, and ended with a smallish talk about his view on the votal thing. Also, I'm not sure what the importance of the underlined section (about wei) is, considering that it seems to be helping Weeks, which is something you might not approve of at this point...FAOT wrote:PhoenixEnigma wrote:I am also very distrustful of the VZ/FOAT position of suspecting people who didn't vote yesterday. Advocating that the townie thing to do would have been to (needlessly and knowingly) place oneself in a place to be suspected, creating wine and, arguably, increasing the odds of town being lynched day 2 is...well, wtf inducing, really. If I could vote for two people, I'd vote for both of them. As I can't, and don't really believe in FoS'ing...gah...scerw it, I'm not going to vote right now, because it's going to force me to come back and make another post in order to vote, and I need the motivation.
Yes because ignoring day one information is a townie thing to do? Whilst we're at it why don't we just ignore all the posts that were made on day one as well?
If you had read my posts you'd realise that I wasn't going "Gee Willikers you didn't vote for scum you MUST all be scum!!!" because that would be stupid. However, using it as evidence alongside how people were acting yesterday and today and you'll realise there is a pretty solid case for suspicion towards some individuals. You'll notice I haven't singled out anyone for not voting and based that on the sole reason for my suspicion.
FAOT wrote:Weeks wrote:4) He himself just said at the beginning of the day that he was shocked about Trooper White. Don't you get it? Once you mentioned that you were X Z instead of X Y, it became exceedingly easy for scum to false claim Trooper [color], vanilla town. It already was suspicious that wei did it. This is also why I reconsidered you not being Trooper [color]. (I have not watched the movie. I don't know how likely it is for another char to be slightly altered this way, but I still considered it, from mere ignorance.) FOAT, again, doesn't hesitate to use this against me.
Except clearly Cj mentioned parallels before Trooper White was shown to be a role. This argument is meaningless given that fact.
Weeks wrote:4. Two days later appears and says mpolo doesn't look too good for jumping on cjdrum. Then says mpolo is more likely to be town because of the town/scum ratio. (o_O)
Zid wrote:The alarming thing is Chandani's response to the heat being turned up with a vote by saying she's thinking about requesting a replacement. In my eyes a replacement is something you just do. Thinking about it out loud just seems to serve as a delay tactic to wait for other things to gain more attention. This combined with my agreement of Mav's reasoning makes me believe Chandani is a better lynch candidate at this stage.
I realize Chandani also included a question for me in that post, I'm just a little suspicious that was the only content she added in that post.
Mavketl wrote:weiyaoli: name one advantage of mpolo and me voting for more_people and ending D1 that way. I don't see any. So yes, on the off chance that we'd get some interesting information and/or a really scummy action/person, I'd be happy to not vote.