A Compact Sized "Why?-BOOM" machine.

A place to discuss the science of computers and programs, from algorithms to computability.

Formal proofs preferred.

Moderators: phlip, Moderators General, Prelates

User avatar
stopmadnessnow
Posts: 83
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 10:58 pm UTC
Location: Somewhere in that country with Big Ben in it.

A Compact Sized "Why?-BOOM" machine.

Postby stopmadnessnow » Thu Mar 09, 2017 4:46 pm UTC

You know those machines in old sci-fi series which can be destroyed by asking them "Why?", don't you? How would you build a compact version of them? Maybe not using transistors or valves? And not looking like any current laptop or tablet (so maybe no circuit boards, which would rule out looking like a Raspberry Pi).
For comic writing or short story writing post-haste, contact the off-the peg joke chap. He has the nous.
http://plwimsett.simplesite.com/ for my site.
https://www.upwork.com/freelancers/~01110048bacb43eae6 to hire me at Upwork.

User avatar
Soupspoon
You have done something you shouldn't. Or are about to.
Posts: 2388
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2016 7:00 pm UTC
Location: 53-1

Re: A Compact Sized "Why?-BOOM" machine.

Postby Soupspoon » Thu Mar 09, 2017 6:51 pm UTC

Why?

User avatar
ahammel
My Little Cabbage
Posts: 2135
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2012 12:46 am UTC
Location: Vancouver BC
Contact:

Re: A Compact Sized "Why?-BOOM" machine.

Postby ahammel » Thu Mar 09, 2017 7:45 pm UTC

stopmadnessnow wrote:You know those machines in old sci-fi series which can be destroyed by asking them "Why?", don't you?

I...do not.
He/Him/His/Alex
God damn these electric sex pants!

User avatar
PM 2Ring
Posts: 3618
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 3:19 pm UTC
Location: Mid north coast, NSW, Australia

Re: A Compact Sized "Why?-BOOM" machine.

Postby PM 2Ring » Fri Mar 10, 2017 7:19 am UTC

I've read a few stories where computers were wrecked / frozen by setting them impossible or difficult tasks, eg, some version of the Liar Paradox, find the last digit of pi, prove Goldbach's conjecture, etc.

One memorable short story in this genre is The Monkey Wrench by Gordon R Dickson.

Spock used the pi trick in the Star Trek episode Wolf in the Fold when the spirit of Jack the Ripper "haunted" the ship's computer.

TVTropes calls this a Logic Bomb.

User avatar
Soupspoon
You have done something you shouldn't. Or are about to.
Posts: 2388
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2016 7:00 pm UTC
Location: 53-1

Re: A Compact Sized "Why?-BOOM" machine.

Postby Soupspoon » Fri Mar 10, 2017 11:09 am UTC

The problem with the "BOOM!" part is that a computing device that hits a computational stone wall (or, rather, never gets to the infinitely regressing far-end-of-the-road) tends not to actually explode. At worst (if designed without true consideration for peak effort, here being sustained) they tend to fizzle and fail. Or a power regulator overloads and (at least until it/the fuse is replaced) the actual gubbins are dead by disconnection and not by destruction.

Let's say, as an attempt to replicate the "using too many processing resources" in the fragile way asked for, there's an array of Babbage Machines powered through a continuously variable gearbox from a steam-engine. As more and more of the clanking machinery is asking for power, the engine speeds up as the gearing shifts down (presumably the governor on the steam device is linked to the speed of the computational side of the gearbox, in this rather odd setup). At some point, if we have supplied more powerable mechanisms than can safely be spun up at once, the engine over-revs and may then pop a throw-rod or crack a clackvalve... But the greater mass of computational machinery then just grinds to a halt. Or maybe the single point of failure is that treaturous gearbox, but similarly it's a "popped fuse/PSU module failure", not a "brain overheat".

A destructive failure of an Analytical Engine itself would be through the overrevving of any individual computational side, through direct linking from the steam-end, still ungoverned or the governor allowed run wilder than strictly wise. Which is a basic design failure. Self-modification of its speed to keep up with an asymptotically demanding task, without practical limit except for the material limits that the designers had apparently been so determined to ignore at design time, to exclude the far more practical sacrificial links. 'Fuses' limits the fuller capabilities, yes, but deliberately so.


On the other hand, in Star Trek (especially!) they tend to put their fusable links directly behind bridge consoles, meaning that if the power surges from the external shields being impacted exceed the levels the GNDN pipes can handle, their primary effect seems to be designed to be to explode directly in the faces of bridge crew, enough to throw them across the room, with numerous opportunities for injuries. (They obviously don't believe in unions, in the 24th Century, or else they content themselves with far superior injury payments that it is not as worth removing the dangers of high-energy feedbacks from the viciniyies of even the highly trained command crew.) So, in the Trekverse, I could imagine a whole galactic blindsidedness affecting every single organisation and independent entity, almost as if you just had to install install a kilogram of C4 in the trunk of every Ford Pinto you made, because it would be unthinkable to not do it...

speising
Posts: 2050
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 4:54 pm UTC
Location: wien

Re: A Compact Sized "Why?-BOOM" machine.

Postby speising » Fri Mar 10, 2017 1:06 pm UTC

Maybe you could strap the battery of an S7 in place of the CPU cooler of a PC. And then induce some CPU intensive computation (the "logic bomb"). After a while, you'll get some nice pyrotechnics.

Anyway, the problem with logic bombs is that any computer advanced enough to even understand the question will just show a virtual middle finger to the malicious questioner.

Kino22x
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2017 8:19 pm UTC

Re: A Compact Sized "Why?-BOOM" machine.

Postby Kino22x » Sun Mar 26, 2017 8:29 pm UTC

speising wrote:Maybe you could strap the battery of an S7 in place of the CPU cooler of a PC. And then induce some CPU intensive computation (the "logic bomb"). After a while, you'll get some nice pyrotechnics.

Or you could just overvolt the battery. Plus it wouldn't be dangerous at all that way. Or at least that's what the TSA told me. 8)

SuicideJunkie
Posts: 143
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2015 2:40 pm UTC

Re: A Compact Sized "Why?-BOOM" machine.

Postby SuicideJunkie » Mon Aug 21, 2017 7:27 pm UTC

Build your droid with the CPU in the head, and use a big hat as the heat sink.
Include an exotic skull material for your system which makes it impervious to the protagonist's physical attacks, but has an autoignition point slightly above your normal thermal cutoffs.

Your enemies can then confuse your droid to heat up the CPU and then when it is at its limit, knock its hat off so the head bursts into flames.


Return to “Computer Science”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests