Calculator glitch?
Moderators: phlip, Moderators General, Prelates
Calculator glitch?
I was twiddling around with my calculator (TI86) the other day while bored in class and found that entering 0.Pi (the symbol Pi) returns 0 as an answer. I assumed this would be due to the lack of preprocessing of the pi symbol (since typing 0.3.1415 gives a syntax error) and it defaults to 0*Pi, but the same result happened when i typed in 0.(1^0.5) (effectively, 0.i). Any thoughts on why this happens, instead of just giving a syntax error?
 mochafairy
 Posts: 1098
 Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:27 pm UTC
 Location: Ohio
Re: Calculator glitch?
I think your calculator is assuming that you mean "0 * pi" and "0 * i". I'm pretty sure it'd do the same thing if you tried 0.e
"YES. DO IT WITH CONFIDENCE" ~fortune cookie
Re: Calculator glitch?
kirchnal wrote:I was twiddling around with my calculator (TI86) the other day while bored in class and found that entering 0.Pi (the symbol Pi) returns 0 as an answer. I assumed this would be due to the lack of preprocessing of the pi symbol (since typing 0.3.1415 gives a syntax error) and it defaults to 0*Pi, but the same result happened when i typed in 0.(1^0.5) (effectively, 0.i). Any thoughts on why this happens, instead of just giving a syntax error?
I don't know for certain that this is how the calculator works, but here's what the calculator would be thinking if I'd designed it:
0  It's a number part. I'll start figuring out what number it is.
.  Still a number part. Keep processing
π  Not a number part. I'm done with the last number  it's a zero! This isn't an operation, either, so the user must be doing an implicit multiplication. This looks like the start of a variable name.
end of input  Hey, that's Pi! I know what value that has! He's asking for 0 times 3.141592653589, which is 0.
Likewise, for 0.(1^0.5)
0  It's a number part. I'll start figuring out what number it is.
.  Still a number part. Keep processing
(  Not a number part. I'm done with the last number  it's a zero! This isn't an operation, either, so the user must be doing an implicit multiplication. This looks like grouping.
  This is a negation operation. I'll keep that in mind.
1  It's a number part! He's entering a number!
^  Not a number part. The last number was a 1. This is an exponentiation opration. It's higherpriority than the negation operation, so I need to do this before I can do the negation.
0  It's a number part! He's entering a number!
.  Still a number part.
5  Still a number part.
)  Not a number. The last number must have been 0.5. This is an endofgrouping, so I need to do every operation I've got queued up. First is exponentiation: 1 raised to 0.5 is 1. Next is negation: the negation of 1 is 1. I don't have anything else to do.
end of input  He's asking for 0 times 1: that's 0.
For 0.3.1415:
0  It's a number part! He's entering a number.
.  Still a number part.
3  Still a number part.
.  Still a number part. Hey! I've already got one of those! What's the meaning of this, you blockhead?
Hope this helps you understand why the calculator does what it does.
 Generic Protoplasm
 Posts: 90
 Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:49 am UTC
Re: Calculator glitch?
It's thinking 0*pi, but you just have a decimal after the zero.
It's like you typed in the decimal to show that the first decimal place of 0 is a significant figure.
0. = 0
It's like you typed in the decimal to show that the first decimal place of 0 is a significant figure.
0. = 0
Life is like a rock candy, you never know which attribute you're gonna increase next.

 Posts: 230
 Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 10:09 am UTC
Re: Calculator glitch?
I just tried it on a TI85.
0.[pi] returns zero.
1.[pi] returns 3.141...
2.[pi] returns 6.283...
0.3.14159 returns SYNTAX ERROR, as it should.
So, it is seeing the "0." as zero point nothing, and "1." as one point nothing, and then behaving as if you had put in "0 [pi]" or "1 [pi]", where the multiplication is implied.
0.[pi] returns zero.
1.[pi] returns 3.141...
2.[pi] returns 6.283...
0.3.14159 returns SYNTAX ERROR, as it should.
So, it is seeing the "0." as zero point nothing, and "1." as one point nothing, and then behaving as if you had put in "0 [pi]" or "1 [pi]", where the multiplication is implied.

 Posts: 4
 Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 12:26 pm UTC
 Location: Melbourne, Australia
Re: Calculator glitch?
Carnildo wrote:I don't know for certain that this is how the calculator works, but here's what the calculator would be thinking if I'd designed it:
I love the way your calculator gets so excited! It's like, "Ooh! A number!"
Re: Calculator glitch?
muffinmanpoo wrote:Carnildo wrote:I don't know for certain that this is how the calculator works, but here's what the calculator would be thinking if I'd designed it:
I love the way your calculator gets so excited! It's like, "Ooh! A number!"
I wish my calculator went through the steps with me like that. It would always brighten up my day.
Ten points to whoever can write a program to take a calculation and output something like that. Bonus points to be able to configure the text.
 mochafairy
 Posts: 1098
 Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:27 pm UTC
 Location: Ohio
Re: Calculator glitch?
I'll see if I can whip up a matlab script that will do that and draw smilie faces over break...
"YES. DO IT WITH CONFIDENCE" ~fortune cookie
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests