SoapyHobo wrote:Heh, thanks. I didn't actually play it though
somehow, I could tell.
Now I just have to wait for the stapler covered with jelly to freeze...
Moderators: Moderators General, Prelates
SoapyHobo wrote:Heh, thanks. I didn't actually play it though
Number3Pencils wrote:Question:Do they all have to be in one photo?Mat wrote:
- Five or more clocks




Number3Pencils wrote:A euphemism (kicking the bucket)
Jack Saladin wrote:Goddamn that's an awesome ****, Soapy. Once they get around to making artificial **** and I replace my crappy original ones, I'm gonna make mine look like that.


keozen wrote:We need a rule amendment that lets us post new lists of 5 when our old lists have been done, this game needs to continue FOREVER!
Jack Saladin wrote:Goddamn that's an awesome ****, Soapy. Once they get around to making artificial **** and I replace my crappy original ones, I'm gonna make mine look like that.
Moo wrote:Do we really need to? You never know when someone might find it! What about making a time limit but after that it doesn't get removed, it just gets archived. The person can make a new request and you get different points for finding an archived item. I just can't decide if it should be more or less.


keozen wrote:+32 to Rodan for Spoons and the Amazing Tattoo (Yup, that big is perfect)



SoapyHobo wrote:I think it would make more sense to get more points than usual if no one else is able to find the elusive item.
Users browsing this forum: WarDaft and 16 guests