The EulerMascheroni constant (also called "Euler's constant", or lower case gamma) is approximately equal to 0.57722.
The square root of 1/3 is approximately equal to 0.57735.
I remember noticing this a while ago, and wondering if there was any informal or intuitive "reason" for it to be true.
Obviously this question is highly subjective, and in a sense, many of these types of things are merely coincidences.
However, there are some arguments out there that do a pretty good job of being intuitive or informal reasons for some of these coincidences. For instance, the coincidence that Pi^2 is slightly less than 10, or the coincidence that Pi is slightly less than 22/7.
If we take the result Sum(1/n^2) = Pi^2/6 as "known", there's a cute argument due to Noam Elkies that compares Sum(1/n^2) to a telescoping series and shows that Pi^2/6 is slightly less than 10/6.
And there's a proof that 22/7Pi is a small positive number, which consists of evaluating a definite integral of a certain "small" nonnegative rational function.
I asked about this on math.stackexchange, but a lot of questions get asked there, and sometimes questions get lost in the shuffle if not answered quickly.
In fact, someone left a comment linking to this, which looked promising at first glance, but I had trouble filling in the details.
So, if we express the EulerMascheroni constant as an integral, can anyone help me come up with a way of approximating that integral which shows that its value must be "close" to the square root of 1/3?
"Why" is the EulerMascheroni constant near sqrt(1/3)?
Moderators: gmalivuk, Moderators General, Prelates
Re: "Why" is the EulerMascheroni constant near sqrt(1/3)?
Mostly coincidence as far as I can tell. Especially the pi ones, as 10 and 22/7 aren't particularly interesting numbers (10 only seems interesting because we happen to have 10 fingers and so picked it as our base). And pi^2 is relatively far from 10, 0.13 off. 26% of numbers are within 0.13 of some integer.
The 22/7 is slightly more interesting, as it's a better approximation than you would expect with such a small denominator. Indeed, it's in some way the best approximation with such a small denominator. See, continued fractions. This also relates to the EulerMascheroni constant and 1/root(3), as their continued fractions agree for 7 terms, so they are good approximations for each other. What's actually interesting here is that the constant has a nice small continued fraction for the first 7 terms, which is why it's comparable to other 'nice' numbers.
Specifically, both continued fractions start with [0;1,1,2,1,2,1] = 15/26, and so both must be nearer to 15/26 than to any fraction with denominator less than 26. In fact they are both within 1/2340th of 15/26.
The 22/7 is slightly more interesting, as it's a better approximation than you would expect with such a small denominator. Indeed, it's in some way the best approximation with such a small denominator. See, continued fractions. This also relates to the EulerMascheroni constant and 1/root(3), as their continued fractions agree for 7 terms, so they are good approximations for each other. What's actually interesting here is that the constant has a nice small continued fraction for the first 7 terms, which is why it's comparable to other 'nice' numbers.
Specifically, both continued fractions start with [0;1,1,2,1,2,1] = 15/26, and so both must be nearer to 15/26 than to any fraction with denominator less than 26. In fact they are both within 1/2340th of 15/26.
addams wrote:This forum has some very well educated people typing away in loops with Sourmilk. He is a lucky Sourmilk.
Re: "Why" is the EulerMascheroni constant near sqrt(1/3)?
skullturf wrote:In fact, someone left a comment linking to this, which looked promising at first glance, but I had trouble filling in the details.
I'll guess coincidence for this part for a start. The 2nddegree Legendre polynomial has roots ±sqrt(1/3) because it's an integral of 3x such that f(1) = 1, and the math works out nicely for its uses. Approximating a value close to sqrt(1/3) using a function involving sqrt(1/3) and then claiming there's a link seems like circular reasoning to me. I imagine you'd get the same result with many other functions that have integral from 0 to 1 close (or equal) to gamma.
Re: "Why" is the EulerMascheroni constant near sqrt(1/3)?
That's very similar to what I thought at first. If the number sqrt(1/3) comes from the method of approximate integration, as opposed to the function being integrated, then it does indeed seem like a bit of a cheat.
However, somewhat ironically, when I tried to work through the details of that Wikipedia comment (i.e. applying twopoint GaussLegendre quadrature to the integral of 1/x), I found that when using the particular function 1/x, the sqrt(1/3) disappeared! I got *some* sort of approximation for gamma, but it didn't contain sqrt(1/3) at all!
Some more details are in the attached PDF.
Maybe I missed something when I tried to fill in the details of the Wikipedia comment. Is there another way to interpret the suggestions in the comment that does end up giving sqrt(1/3) as one's approximation to gamma?
I do admit that ultimately, these kinds of things are probably just coincidences. There simply might not be an "intuitive" answer for "why" sqrt(1/3) is about 0.57735 and gamma is about 0.57722.
However, what if we relax the question a little bit? Can anybody help me find "good" ways of approximating gamma, involving clever use of integrals, series, etc., without worrying about sqrt(1/3) as our "target"? If you lived in the precomputer age and wanted four or five digits of gamma, what specific manipulations would you do?
However, somewhat ironically, when I tried to work through the details of that Wikipedia comment (i.e. applying twopoint GaussLegendre quadrature to the integral of 1/x), I found that when using the particular function 1/x, the sqrt(1/3) disappeared! I got *some* sort of approximation for gamma, but it didn't contain sqrt(1/3) at all!
Some more details are in the attached PDF.
Maybe I missed something when I tried to fill in the details of the Wikipedia comment. Is there another way to interpret the suggestions in the comment that does end up giving sqrt(1/3) as one's approximation to gamma?
I do admit that ultimately, these kinds of things are probably just coincidences. There simply might not be an "intuitive" answer for "why" sqrt(1/3) is about 0.57735 and gamma is about 0.57722.
However, what if we relax the question a little bit? Can anybody help me find "good" ways of approximating gamma, involving clever use of integrals, series, etc., without worrying about sqrt(1/3) as our "target"? If you lived in the precomputer age and wanted four or five digits of gamma, what specific manipulations would you do?
 Attachments

 gammasqrtthird.pdf
 (76.85 KiB) Downloaded 147 times
 Dthen
 Still hasn't told us what comes after D
 Posts: 553
 Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 6:35 pm UTC
 Location: Ayrshire, Scotland
Re: "Why" is the EulerMascheroni constant near sqrt(1/3)?
mikel wrote:The 22/7 is slightly more interesting, as it's a better approximation than you would expect with such a small denominator. Indeed, it's in some way the best approximation with such a small denominator.
I've never understood why people use 22/7 as an approximation of Pi. 22/7 is four characters, but is only accurate to 3.14, which is also 4 characters ... you might as well just remember 3.14. A better approximation is 355⁄113.
Dthen wrote:I AM NOT A CAT.
Re: "Why" is the EulerMascheroni constant near sqrt(1/3)?
Dthen wrote:I've never understood why people use 22/7 as an approximation of Pi. 22/7 is four characters, but is only accurate to 3.14, which is also 4 characters ...
A) because it's a slightly better approximation: log(pi)log(22/7) < log(pi)log(3.14) (about 20% better on a logarithmic scale, however you want to interpret that )
B) because it has a small denominator, so it's useful when working with rationals —when doing calculations with other decimal numbers, you're most often better off with 3.14.
[edit] I accidentally a letter
Last edited by Flumble on Wed Feb 12, 2014 10:05 am UTC, edited 2 times in total.
 Dthen
 Still hasn't told us what comes after D
 Posts: 553
 Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 6:35 pm UTC
 Location: Ayrshire, Scotland
Re: "Why" is the EulerMascheroni constant near sqrt(1/3)?
Hmm, I see. I suppose that sort of makes sense. Thanks.
Dthen wrote:I AM NOT A CAT.

 Posts: 85
 Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2013 11:53 pm UTC
Re: "Why" is the EulerMascheroni constant near sqrt(1/3)?
The 22/7 thing also comes from a continued fraction representation of pi.
Re: "Why" is the EulerMascheroni constant near sqrt(1/3)?
It probably doesn't help, but I noticed these two integrals are a good approximation of each other geometrically, not just numerically:
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=pl ... +0%3Cx%3C1
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=pl ... +0%3Cx%3C1
Re: "Why" is the EulerMascheroni constant near sqrt(1/3)?
That's a neat observation. It's also cool how Wolfram Alpha uses the digamma function to generalize the harmonic numbers.
Re: "Why" is the EulerMascheroni constant near sqrt(1/3)?
Thanks for that, Bloopy.
That's a good example of the type of thing I was missing, and hoping for.
I knew how to write gamma as a slowly converging series, but I didn't know about generalizing the harmonic numbers to noninteger arguments, nor did I know about that specific definite integral that evaluates to gamma.
EDITED TO ADD: For anyone reading this who is curious, a bit more information can be found here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harmonic_n ... _arguments
That's a good example of the type of thing I was missing, and hoping for.
I knew how to write gamma as a slowly converging series, but I didn't know about generalizing the harmonic numbers to noninteger arguments, nor did I know about that specific definite integral that evaluates to gamma.
EDITED TO ADD: For anyone reading this who is curious, a bit more information can be found here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harmonic_n ... _arguments
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests