Qustion about 3D

For the discussion of math. Duh.

Moderators: gmalivuk, Moderators General, Prelates

Tevin Chung from South Korea
Posts: 7
Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2017 4:10 am UTC

Qustion about 3D

Postby Tevin Chung from South Korea » Sun Apr 16, 2017 4:55 am UTC

What is the best way to represent 3D in 2D?

There is a lot of ways to daw 3D in 2D and which one is the best?
안녕하세요 :!:
만나서 반갑습니다 :D

User avatar
Soupspoon
You have done something you shouldn't. Or are about to.
Posts: 1932
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2016 7:00 pm UTC
Location: 53-1

Re: Qustion about 3D

Postby Soupspoon » Sun Apr 16, 2017 8:15 am UTC

Tevin Chung from South Korea wrote:What is the best way to represent 3D in 2D?

There is a lot of ways to daw 3D in 2D and which one is the best?

(Decided to include quote, as this might end up being transferred to a "loads if little questions" thread (in coding), as with the ATP one kin Science), etc.. )

What are you wanting to represent? One/two/three-point perspectives have their own interesting features, isometric projection can be technically good, other obliques have their own uses, whilst front/top/side views (in US or UK formats, i.e. whether you 'rotate' the object above or below the paper) with the fourth quarter an optional perspective/isometric/oblique overview (or indeed any free-camera version, with the same decision tree as before) is good for conveying maximum information, at the expense of making the space for the details smaller.

But, with computing power behind the visualisation (without having to work it all out with set-square and rulers), camera-style perspective can be done with a 3x3 or 4x4 matrix transform of (modelled) x, y, z onto (displayed) x, y (and optional depth-of-field effects that one might want to apply).

User avatar
Flumble
Yes Man
Posts: 1803
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2012 9:35 pm UTC

Re: Qustion about 3D

Postby Flumble » Mon Apr 17, 2017 5:35 pm UTC

(x' = y' = 0 is trivial, so I'll assume it's not considered)
x' = tanh(x+1)*y*z+1.37+(x+z)*ln(1+x^2+y^2+z^2)
y' = tanh(x)*z-cos(z+x)*y

I dare you to give a better projection.

Demki
Posts: 185
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2012 9:29 pm UTC

Re: Qustion about 3D

Postby Demki » Mon Apr 17, 2017 9:15 pm UTC

Flumble wrote:(x' = y' = 0 is trivial, so I'll assume it's not considered)
x' = tanh(x+1)*y*z+1.37+(x+z)*ln(1+x^2+y^2+z^2)
y' = tanh(x)*z-cos(z+x)*y

I dare you to give a better projection.

Please show how this projects the Utah teapot


Return to “Mathematics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests