Nice graphs?

For the discussion of math. Duh.

Moderators: gmalivuk, Moderators General, Prelates

Azrael UK
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 5:34 pm UTC

Nice graphs?

Postby Azrael UK » Wed Oct 01, 2008 5:54 pm UTC

Does anybody know of any cool-looking graphs? I spent ages playing with the superellipse formula yesterday, and having [imath]n\propto{}\sin{k}[/imath] and increasing k. (The result is a rectangle whose sides bulge in and outwards). Can anybody point me towards some more complex ones?

User avatar
Sungura
When life gives you banananas, make bananana bread
Posts: 3928
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2008 2:32 am UTC
Location: AL

Re: Nice graphs?

Postby Sungura » Wed Oct 01, 2008 6:30 pm UTC

Use polar coordinates with different trig functions can get you hearts to flowers and a whole bunch of other neat stuff - my brother used to draw pictures with graphs all the time. Parametric curves (I think that is what they are called) also can produce some very pretty results. Try things in 3D too :)

Here is a site with a whole bunch of things you can do.
http://demonstrations.wolfram.com/topic ... hod=recent
"Would you rather fight a Sungura-sized spider or 1000 spider-sized Sunguras?" -Zarq
she/<any gender neutral>/snug

Bullislander05
Posts: 25
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 1:37 am UTC

Re: Nice graphs?

Postby Bullislander05 » Thu Oct 02, 2008 1:29 am UTC

Try the Cornu Spiral. It's the third graph on the right on: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cornu_spiral

I like it. :)

User avatar
z4lis
Posts: 767
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 10:59 pm UTC

Re: Nice graphs?

Postby z4lis » Thu Oct 02, 2008 2:50 am UTC

Just zipping through wikipedia, looking for one...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weierstrass_function

I found this one: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theta_function and I think it's rather pretty.

My calc professor said something about... a non-measurable and additive function (that is, f(a+b)=f(a)+f(b)) is dense in the plane, so the function sort of covers up the whole plane with a cloud of points, which I find rather fascinating. But I don't know what "non-measurable" means...
What they (mathematicians) define as interesting depends on their particular field of study; mathematical anaylsts find pain and extreme confusion interesting, whereas geometers are interested in beauty.

User avatar
mordacil
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2008 9:21 pm UTC

Re: Nice graphs?

Postby mordacil » Thu Oct 02, 2008 4:19 am UTC

The polar graph of Riemann's zeta function (picture here) looks pretty neat.

eltriuqS
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 6:45 pm UTC

Re: Nice graphs?

Postby eltriuqS » Fri Mar 13, 2009 7:04 pm UTC

i tried the following in polar coordinates, but didn't get the exact result i wanted..
    3(1-abs(sin(abs(x+pi/2)/2)))
    sin(0.5abs(abs(x-1.5pi)-pi) )*2
    abs(abs(x-1.5pi)-pi)
    abs(abs(x-1.5pi)-pi) ^0.6
    abs(abs(x-1.5pi)-pi) ^1.4

User avatar
ConMan
Shepherd's Pie?
Posts: 1690
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 11:56 am UTC
Location: Beacon Alpha

Re: Nice graphs?

Postby ConMan » Mon Mar 16, 2009 11:33 am UTC

pollywog wrote:
Wikihow wrote:* Smile a lot! Give a gay girl a knowing "Hey, I'm a lesbian too!" smile.
I want to learn this smile, perfect it, and then go around smiling at lesbians and freaking them out.

User avatar
evilbeanfiend
Posts: 2650
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 7:05 am UTC
Location: the old world

Re: Nice graphs?

Postby evilbeanfiend » Mon Mar 16, 2009 11:55 am UTC

in ur beanz makin u eveel

User avatar
RedWolf
Posts: 236
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 8:19 pm UTC

Re: Nice graphs?

Postby RedWolf » Thu Mar 19, 2009 3:04 am UTC

Sungura wrote:Use polar coordinates with different trig functions can get you hearts to flowers and a whole bunch of other neat stuff - my brother used to draw pictures with graphs all the time.

I was actually messing around with this earlier this year, and came up with something that vaguely resembled a dragonfly by graphing tan(tan(tan(x))). The exact number of tangent functions I used, I can't remember, however.

User avatar
Lancashire McGee
Posts: 16
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 6:13 pm UTC

Re: Nice graphs?

Postby Lancashire McGee » Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:55 pm UTC

mordacil wrote:The polar graph of Riemann's zeta function (picture here) looks pretty neat.


I was very pleased to be able to program my TI-83 to make this happen.

Image

User avatar
GBog
Posts: 114
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 4:57 pm UTC

Re: Nice graphs?

Postby GBog » Thu Mar 19, 2009 10:04 pm UTC

But... how?

Bretteur
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 6:43 pm UTC

Re: Nice graphs?

Postby Bretteur » Thu Mar 19, 2009 10:13 pm UTC

RedWolf wrote:
Sungura wrote:Use polar coordinates with different trig functions can get you hearts to flowers and a whole bunch of other neat stuff - my brother used to draw pictures with graphs all the time.

I was actually messing around with this earlier this year, and came up with something that vaguely resembled a dragonfly by graphing tan(tan(tan(x))). The exact number of tangent functions I used, I can't remember, however.

I came up with something similar a while ago. I didn't use tangent though, I used this:

(sin^4(4x) + cos^4(5x)) * (sin^8(5x)+cos^2(2x)+sin(3x))

Or rather, I made those two as separate functions r1 and r2 and then made r3 r1*r2. That made it a bit easier to experiment.

User avatar
headprogrammingczar
Posts: 3072
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 5:28 pm UTC
Location: Beaming you up

Re: Nice graphs?

Postby headprogrammingczar » Thu Mar 19, 2009 10:48 pm UTC

Why bother with boring old functions when you can use Differential Equations?
Image
<quintopia> You're not crazy. you're the goddamn headprogrammingspock!
<Weeks> You're the goddamn headprogrammingspock!
<Cheese> I love you

User avatar
NathanielJ
Posts: 882
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 9:04 pm UTC

Re: Nice graphs?

Postby NathanielJ » Thu Mar 19, 2009 11:35 pm UTC



That becomes profoundly uninteresting (to the point of making me wonder why it even has a name, a wiki page, and/or is called self-referential) once you read about how it works.
Homepage: http://www.njohnston.ca
Conway's Game of Life: http://www.conwaylife.com

User avatar
Lancashire McGee
Posts: 16
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 6:13 pm UTC

Re: Nice graphs?

Postby Lancashire McGee » Fri Mar 20, 2009 1:37 am UTC

GBog wrote:But... how?


Basically, the program I wrote calculates every value of the Riemann Zeta Function for Zeta(1/2 +it), t between 0 and 35, inclusive, going by some tiny increment. After calculating, Pt-on(Re(z), Im(z)).

Place in oven, wait two to three hours, and presto! Delicious Zetacakes.

afarnen
Posts: 157
Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 12:12 pm UTC

Re: Nice graphs?

Postby afarnen » Fri Mar 20, 2009 2:35 am UTC

I'm surprised nobody's mentioned the graphs of fractals, like the Mandlebrot set for instance: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandelbrot_set#Image_gallery_of_a_zoom_sequence

Here's a nice video of a Mandlebrot set zoom: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WAJE35wX1nQ&feature=related

Besides fractals, polytopes of dimension 4 and higher are pretty rad as well (though sometimes more intellectually stimulating than just pretty). Neat visualizations of various 4-polytopes: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convex_regular_4-polytope#Visualizations

susanspy
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2009 1:07 pm UTC

Re: Nice graphs?

Postby susanspy » Thu Mar 26, 2009 6:52 pm UTC

Hello all,

Thanks a million afarnen for the great comment, i was looking for what you have posted, i digged many places but ultimately found it here, happy to do so, please do post some cool links of videos like the once you just did.

Cheers!!!

User avatar
Macbi
Posts: 941
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 8:32 am UTC
Location: UKvia

Re: Nice graphs?

Postby Macbi » Thu Mar 26, 2009 7:06 pm UTC

NathanielJ wrote:


That becomes profoundly uninteresting (to the point of making me wonder why it even has a name, a wiki page, and/or is called self-referential) once you read about how it works.

The wikipedia article didn't explain it very well, does it just fill the entier plane with pixels such that any given picture has to be in there somewhere? If so, it's a lot more lame than I thought.
    Indigo is a lie.
    Which idiot decided that websites can't go within 4cm of the edge of the screen?
    There should be a null word, for the question "Is anybody there?" and to see if microphones are on.

User avatar
Yakk
Poster with most posts but no title.
Posts: 11129
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 7:27 pm UTC
Location: E pur si muove

Re: Nice graphs?

Postby Yakk » Thu Mar 26, 2009 7:35 pm UTC

[math]{1\over 2} < \left\lfloor \mathrm{mod}\left(\left\lfloor {y \over 17} \right\rfloor 2^{-17 \lfloor x \rfloor - \mathrm{mod}(\lfloor y\rfloor, 17)},2\right)\right\rfloor[/math]

The floor( y/17 ) extracts data stored in n.

mod( y, 17 ) extracts a value from 0 to 16 from the y coordinate.

K * 2^(-17x-mod( y, 17 ) )
moves the 17x+mod(y, 17) bit of K to the right spot near the decimal point.

K is floor( y/ 17 ) -- the data stored in n.

The mod operation then throws out the 'higher order' -- data too far away from the decimal point in the other direction.

< 1/2 throws out the 'lower order information'.

So ya, at location (binary encoding for a black and white image with 17 height)*17 in the y coordinate, it will graph that image.

This is a toy problem you throw at someone who writes a graphing package. But it is a funny toy.
One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision - BR

Last edited by JHVH on Fri Oct 23, 4004 BCE 6:17 pm, edited 6 times in total.

User avatar
Torn Apart By Dingos
Posts: 817
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 2:27 am UTC

Re: Nice graphs?

Postby Torn Apart By Dingos » Thu Mar 26, 2009 9:44 pm UTC

I created the following graphs by accident (or, if you will, a mad experiment?!). Quothing myself:

Torn Apart By Dingos wrote:(From this thread: viewtopic.php?f=3&t=3366&p=66875&hilit=bat+curve#p66875 )

My first try was x=cos(t), y=sin(t)+cos(t)sin(1/cos(t)):
Image
It became BAT CURVE!

But maybe something like (x sin(1/x))^2+y^2=1/2?
Image
Coincidentally, it looks a lot like the Batman logo.


Return to “Mathematics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests