I've got a question:

For the discussion of math. Duh.

Moderators: gmalivuk, Moderators General, Prelates

Internetmeme
Posts: 1405
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2008 3:16 pm UTC
Location: South Carolina, USA

I've got a question:

I've been drawing while I was bored, and I had an idea.

I have a stack of paper on my desk, and I crumpled up the top and was about to throw it away when an idea struck me:

Doesn't there have to be at least one part of the paper that above the corrosponding part of the paper(s) under it?
Think of it this way:
Crumple a plane and put it on a plane, and there is at least one corrosponding point between the two. I'm sure someone else has thought of this if I could think of it. What's the name of this theory/theorem/postulate?
Spoiler:

mike-l
Posts: 2758
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 2:16 am UTC

Re: I've got a question:

Yes. Look up fixed point theorems, one of them applies here.
addams wrote:This forum has some very well educated people typing away in loops with Sourmilk. He is a lucky Sourmilk.

Ended
Posts: 1459
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 3:27 pm UTC
Location: The Tower of Flints. (Also known as: England.)

Re: I've got a question:

A similar result (using the contraction mapping theorem) is that if you put a standard map of the world on the floor, exactly one* point on the map will be touching the point it represents on the earth.

*this may break down if you're standing somewhere (e.g. north pole) which is at the edge of your map, or if the map has repeated regions. I think in these cases you will get at least one point.
Generally I try to make myself do things I instinctively avoid, in case they are awesome.
-dubsola

Harg
Posts: 130
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 8:24 pm UTC

Re: I've got a question:

Yes, the Banach fixed point theorem works for the map. For the OP's question and the crumpled paper, the Brouwer fixed point theorem applies.

Buttons
Posts: 858
Joined: Wed May 02, 2007 3:27 pm UTC
Location: Somerville

Re: I've got a question:

Ended wrote:*this may break down if you're standing somewhere (e.g. north pole) which is at the edge of your map, or if the map has repeated regions. I think in these cases you will get at least one point.

You can get zero in certain situations. For instance, take a Mercator projection map that has the Americas on the left, and lay it across the 180th meridian (or whatever its western boundary is) with the north side facing north.

quintopia
Posts: 2906
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 2:53 am UTC
Location: atlanta, ga

Re: I've got a question:

You will be very cold, though, since it seems the only place you can do this is in Chukot (I'm assuming here that the deck of a boat doesn't count as a particular point on Earth).

skeptical scientist
closed-minded spiritualist
Posts: 6142
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 6:09 am UTC
Location: San Francisco

Re: I've got a question:

Ended wrote:if you put a standard map of the world on the floor, exactly one* point on the map will be touching the point it represents on the earth.
Just look for the little red dot labeled, "You are here."
Buttons wrote:You can get zero in certain situations. For instance, take a Mercator projection map that has the Americas on the left, and lay it across the 180th meridian (or whatever its western boundary is) with the north side facing north.
This is because a map of the world is not exactly a contraction - it mostly is, but (depending on the projection) it may stretch the poles into lines, or map adjacent points onto opposite edges of the map. It's true if you have a globe though, or if you place the map in some region where locally it's a contraction.
I'm looking forward to the day when the SNES emulator on my computer works by emulating the elementary particles in an actual, physical box with Nintendo stamped on the side.

"With math, all things are possible." —Rebecca Watson

z4lis
Posts: 767
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 10:59 pm UTC

Re: I've got a question:

I'm not sure how to respond to this. My interest in mathematics is fueled by theorems like these.
What they (mathematicians) define as interesting depends on their particular field of study; mathematical anaylsts find pain and extreme confusion interesting, whereas geometers are interested in beauty.

Buttons
Posts: 858
Joined: Wed May 02, 2007 3:27 pm UTC
Location: Somerville

Re: I've got a question:

skeptical scientist wrote:This is because a map of the world is not exactly a contraction.

The biggest problem, of course, is that it's not continuous.

Posts: 804
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 5:51 pm UTC

Re: I've got a question:

If we want a map of the world to be continuous, how about a beach-ball globe? Deflate the beach ball, crumple/stretch it however you want, then press it flat - two opposite sides of the world will always be right on top of each other (Borsuk-Ulam Theorem).
Let's have a fervent argument, mostly over semantics, where we all claim the burden of proof is on the other side!