Need some understanding.
Moderators: gmalivuk, Moderators General, Prelates
Need some understanding.
I've been reading through a calc book for a while, and I'm having trouble understanding two things: the law of the mean and L'Hopital's rule. I don't get either of them.
Re: Need some understanding.
What particularly are you having issue with. The result or the method to get there?
G4!!
Grob FTW,
Hello. Smithers. You're. Quite good. At. Turning. Me. On.
Grob FTW,
Hello. Smithers. You're. Quite good. At. Turning. Me. On.
 Yakk
 Poster with most posts but no title.
 Posts: 11115
 Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 7:27 pm UTC
 Location: E pur si muove
Re: Need some understanding.
How did you approach these things  epsilondelta approach? Hand waving?
The law of the mean states that, given a continuous function, the area under the curve in some interval is the width of the interval times some height that the continuous function actually attains in that interval.
In short, if I drove 1 thousand km in 8 hours, then the area under my speed/time curve is 1 thousand km. That means at some point I must have been going at 1000/8 = 125 km/h. It is possible that I was moving at exactly 125 km/h the entire time, or I could have been going slower at some point (and faster at others).
l'Hopital's rule is a rule about what happens when you take the limit of f(x)/g(x) at some point a where f(x)>0 and g(x)>0.
It states that the limit is the limit of f'(x) / g'(x) (the derivative of f and g, both with respect to x) as x goes to the same spot a, if that limit exists. Together with the result that "if your function is continuous and g is nonzero at a, then limit as x goes to x of f(x)/g(x) = f(a)/g(x)", it makes it easy to evaluate entire categories of limit.
This is a quite powerful result. You can see how it sort of makes sense: with f' and g' being the slopes of f and g, as you approach the point a the ratio of the functions gets close to the ratio of their slopes! As you are really close to a, f(x) approximates 0 + f`(a)*x, and g(x) approximates 0 + g'(a)*x. It goes further than this, which justifies recursively using l'Hopitals rule in the case where the derivatives also end up evaluating to 0.
The law of the mean states that, given a continuous function, the area under the curve in some interval is the width of the interval times some height that the continuous function actually attains in that interval.
In short, if I drove 1 thousand km in 8 hours, then the area under my speed/time curve is 1 thousand km. That means at some point I must have been going at 1000/8 = 125 km/h. It is possible that I was moving at exactly 125 km/h the entire time, or I could have been going slower at some point (and faster at others).
l'Hopital's rule is a rule about what happens when you take the limit of f(x)/g(x) at some point a where f(x)>0 and g(x)>0.
It states that the limit is the limit of f'(x) / g'(x) (the derivative of f and g, both with respect to x) as x goes to the same spot a, if that limit exists. Together with the result that "if your function is continuous and g is nonzero at a, then limit as x goes to x of f(x)/g(x) = f(a)/g(x)", it makes it easy to evaluate entire categories of limit.
This is a quite powerful result. You can see how it sort of makes sense: with f' and g' being the slopes of f and g, as you approach the point a the ratio of the functions gets close to the ratio of their slopes! As you are really close to a, f(x) approximates 0 + f`(a)*x, and g(x) approximates 0 + g'(a)*x. It goes further than this, which justifies recursively using l'Hopitals rule in the case where the derivatives also end up evaluating to 0.
One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision  BR
Last edited by JHVH on Fri Oct 23, 4004 BCE 6:17 pm, edited 6 times in total.
Last edited by JHVH on Fri Oct 23, 4004 BCE 6:17 pm, edited 6 times in total.

 Posts: 135
 Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 3:47 am UTC
Re: Need some understanding.
Yakk wrote:l'Hopital's rule is a rule about what happens when you take the limit of f(x)/g(x) at some point a where f(x)>0 and g(x)>0.
Actually it also works if g(x) tends to either +∞ or to ∞.
To see why L'hopital's rule works, multiply both the numerator and denominator by 1/(xa):
[math]{ f(x) \over g(x) } = {f(x)/(xa) \over g(x)/(xa)}[/math]
Then if f(a) > 0 and g(a) > 0 we can rewrite this as:
[math]{f(x)  f(a) \over (x  a)} \over {g(x)  g(a) \over (x  a)}[/math]
which is the same as f'(x) / g'(x). This doesn't cover the case where g(x) tends to +∞ or to ∞ and it also doesn't show why you can use the rule recursively.
Also "L'Hôspital's rule" has an circumflex on the o.
 Eebster the Great
 Posts: 3405
 Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2008 12:58 am UTC
 Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Re: Need some understanding.
dean.menezes wrote:Also "L'Hôspital's rule" has an circumflex on the o.
Don't you mean "L'Hôpital's rule?"
 Yakk
 Poster with most posts but no title.
 Posts: 11115
 Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 7:27 pm UTC
 Location: E pur si muove
Re: Need some understanding.
Hopital bought the theorem. Unlike Möbius, who earned the use of the Umlaut, I don't think paying a mathematician to name a theorem after you is worthy of bothering with character codes.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%27Analys ... es_Courbes
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%27Analys ... es_Courbes
One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision  BR
Last edited by JHVH on Fri Oct 23, 4004 BCE 6:17 pm, edited 6 times in total.
Last edited by JHVH on Fri Oct 23, 4004 BCE 6:17 pm, edited 6 times in total.
 lu6cifer
 Posts: 230
 Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 4:03 am UTC
 Location: That state with the allimportant stone
Re: Need some understanding.
Eebster the Great wrote:dean.menezes wrote:Also "L'Hôspital's rule" has an circumflex on the o.
Don't you mean "L'Hôpital's rule?"
Actually, I've seen it spelled either way.
lu6cifer wrote:"Derive" in place of "differentiate" is even worse.
doogly wrote:I'm partial to "throw some d's on that bitch."
Re: Need some understanding.
Yakk wrote:Hopital bought the theorem. Unlike Möbius, who earned the use of the Umlaut, I don't think paying a mathematician to name a theorem after you is worthy of bothering with character codes.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%27Analys ... es_Courbes
I always thought he published anonymously?
lu6cifer wrote:Actually, I've seen it spelled either way.
I've seen "piqued" spelt "peaked"  doesn't make it correct.
Re: Need some understanding.
Yakk wrote:Hopital bought the theorem. Unlike Möbius, who earned the use of the Umlaut, I don't think paying a mathematician to name a theorem after you is worthy of bothering with character codes.
I'm confused as to why the story you give is nothing like the one on the wiki page you linked...
All posts are works in progress. If I posted something within the last hour, chances are I'm still editing it.
 Yakk
 Poster with most posts but no title.
 Posts: 11115
 Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 7:27 pm UTC
 Location: E pur si muove
Re: Need some understanding.
Yes, I was being facetious. Exaggerating for the sake of effect. Being silly.
One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision  BR
Last edited by JHVH on Fri Oct 23, 4004 BCE 6:17 pm, edited 6 times in total.
Last edited by JHVH on Fri Oct 23, 4004 BCE 6:17 pm, edited 6 times in total.
Re: Need some understanding.
Humour isn't allowed on a board created for mathematical discussion. Outright silliness is deplorable.
 Yakk
 Poster with most posts but no title.
 Posts: 11115
 Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 7:27 pm UTC
 Location: E pur si muove
Re: Need some understanding.
Doing a bit of the old knock knock. On the paddlewilky. Twiddling my toes in the shallow end.
One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision  BR
Last edited by JHVH on Fri Oct 23, 4004 BCE 6:17 pm, edited 6 times in total.
Last edited by JHVH on Fri Oct 23, 4004 BCE 6:17 pm, edited 6 times in total.
 Eebster the Great
 Posts: 3405
 Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2008 12:58 am UTC
 Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Re: Need some understanding.
Yakk wrote:Hopital bought the theorem. Unlike Möbius, who earned the use of the Umlaut, I don't think paying a mathematician to name a theorem after you is worthy of bothering with character codes.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%27Analys ... es_Courbes
Ah, but umlauts are at a premium, while circumflex diacritics are a dime a dozen.

 Posts: 35
 Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 1:01 am UTC
Re: Need some understanding.
Eebster the Great wrote:dean.menezes wrote:Also "L'Hôspital's rule" has an circumflex on the o.
Don't you mean "L'Hôpital's rule?"
L'Hôpital and L'Hospital are both correct. L'Hôspital is not. The circumflex, among other uses, came into French as shorthand for "there's an s after this vowel that we don't pronounce anymore."
For example, the Latin word noster became French nôtre and the English word isle comes from Old French that became the modern île. Timingwise, the contemporary spelling of his name was L'Hospital.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests