I'm completely stumped on how to start this integra, any help would be much appreciated!!
edit: no hyperbolic trig since we haven't touched on that yet.
i tried usubstituting sqrt(1+e^x) and then doing integration by parts but i ended up being stuck with the integral (u^2 / (u^2  1)) which i couldn't solve
other than that I have no luck
Integral help
Moderators: gmalivuk, Moderators General, Prelates
Re: Integral help
I started with u = sqrt(1+e^{x}).
That got me to (1/2)log(u^{2}1) (unless I messed up). That should be doable. (Just factor u^{2}1).
That got me to (1/2)log(u^{2}1) (unless I messed up). That should be doable. (Just factor u^{2}1).

 Posts: 77
 Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:56 pm UTC
Re: Integral help
++$_ wrote:I started with u = sqrt(1+e^{x}).
That got me to (1/2)log(u^{2}1) (unless I messed up). That should be doable. (Just factor u^{2}1).
yes, then id do integration by parts from there. But that ends me up with a u^2 / (u^21) which i have no idea about how to do
Re: Integral help
If you want to do u^{2}/(u^{2}1), just add and subtract 1 from the numerator to get 1 + 1/(u^{2}1). That you should know how to do.

 Posts: 77
 Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:56 pm UTC
Re: Integral help
++$_ wrote:If you want to do u^{2}/(u^{2}1), just add and subtract 1 from the numerator to get 1 + 1/(u^{2}1). That you should know how to do.
could you please expand on the adding and subtracting 1 to the numerator?
If you add and subtract you'd get; (u^{2}+11)/(u^{2}1); i can split it up to integral 1 + integral 1/(u^{2}1). but the 2nd integral would be a hyperbolic trig which i can't do
Re: Integral help
You can't integrate 1/(u^21)?
Try partial fractions. (Yes, you could also do it with hyperbolic trigonometric functions, but that will just get you the same answer in a more obscure form.)
Try partial fractions. (Yes, you could also do it with hyperbolic trigonometric functions, but that will just get you the same answer in a more obscure form.)

 Posts: 77
 Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:56 pm UTC
Re: Integral help
++$_ wrote:You can't integrate 1/(u^21)?
Try partial fractions. (Yes, you could also do it with hyperbolic trigonometric functions, but that will just get you the same answer in a more obscure form.)
ah. yes. I understand now, thank you very much

 Posts: 76
 Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 12:29 pm UTC
Re: Integral help
Spoilered for that math code stuff.
...Now I'm not sure what to do from here  I don't know how to integrate log functions, even after a quick google search.
This is xkcd. I'm sure someone will know.
Spoiler:
...Now I'm not sure what to do from here  I don't know how to integrate log functions, even after a quick google search.
This is xkcd. I'm sure someone will know.
Last edited by Annihilist on Sun Apr 08, 2012 12:21 pm UTC, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Integral help
Your last line has an error (it should be u^{1/2}). It's strongly advised that you now put v = sqrt(u).
One way to integrate log(x) is by parts. One part is log(x). The other part is dx.
One way to integrate log(x) is by parts. One part is log(x). The other part is dx.

 Posts: 76
 Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 12:29 pm UTC
Re: Integral help
Fixed, thanks.++$_ wrote:Your last line has an error (it should be u^{1/2}). It's strongly advised that you now put v = sqrt(u).
One way to integrate log(x) is by parts. One part is log(x). The other part is dx.
I haven't learned how to do integration by parts. I'm leaving it to others in this forum, if anyone can be bothered.
Re: Integral help
Annihilist wrote:I haven't learned how to do integration by parts. I'm leaving it to others in this forum, if anyone can be bothered.
Integration by parts is fun  it's just using the product rule for derivatives in reverse.
d(uv)/dx = vdu/dx + udv/dx
Therefore, vdu/dx = d(uv)/dx  udv/dx
Or in differential form,
vdu = d(uv)  udv
So the integral of vdu = uv  the integral of udv
To actually use this to do integrals can be a little tricky, since you have to find appropriate v and du/dx by guesswork. But with practice you soon get to recognise likely suspects.
Sometimes, the application of integration by parts doesn't lead to an integral that's immediately solvable but it does give you a relationship that can be used to solve (or at least simplify) the original integral.
Re: Integral help
PM 2Ring wrote:d(uv)/dx = vdu/dx + udv/dx
While correct for the trivial case of u,v : R > R, I would highly discourage remembering this form. The product rule is, and shall always be, "d(uv)/dx = (du/dx) v + u (dv/dx)". I actually checked this in my analysis text, and found they had the "wrong" form there, too. While the difference may seem pedantic, it will eventually matter. For instance, what if u,v : R > M_{nxn}(R)? Does it matter which order you write it in that case? If so, what does the quotient rule look like?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider] and 9 guests