## What does IQ measure?

For the discussion of the sciences. Physics problems, chemistry equations, biology weirdness, it all goes here.

Moderators: gmalivuk, Moderators General, Prelates

zenten
Posts: 3799
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 7:42 am UTC

### What does IQ measure?

I thought I remembered it testing your ability to do grad school, but I might have confused that with another test, as wikipedia doesn't seem to mention anything about that.

So, what does it measure? And saying "intelligence" doesn't help unless you can define that in a concrete way.

Macbi
Posts: 941
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 8:32 am UTC
Location: UKvia
Your ability to do I.Q. test type puzzles.
The reason clever people do well is because they tend to enjoy doing those types of puzzles, and so have practise.

Nevea
Posts: 15
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 4:58 pm UTC
The grad school test you're thinking about is the SAT. Although, colleges are putting less and less emphasis on those scores nowadays.

Anyways, IQ tests (there are a few) give us an individuals "Intelligence Quotient". It pairs everybody up against everyone else as far as knowledge/age is concerned, then gives you a number thats easy to interpret.

Your Intelligence Quotient (IQ) is a nice little formula. It takes your tested Mental Age and divides it by your Chronological Age and multiplies that number by 100. So basically, if you are 25 years old, and know as much as most 25 year olds, your IQ is 100, or average. Also, pretty neat to know that IQ scores are generally stable throughout your entire life and can be tested as early as the age of 3.

The IQ is setup to have nearly a perfect bell curve also. If you have an IQ below 70 (iirc) then you're legally mentally handicapped. If above 150, you're a genius. The only dependable measurement of your IQ has to be given one-on-one with a certified psychologist... none of those little quizzes you find online.

Hope my very brief, simplified version of IQ answers your question. It doesn't really test your ability to do anything, it's just a number to pit you against your age group in an attempt to place just how smart you are. Also, nobody should ever put too much emphasis on it! Let it be known that the APA (American Psychological Association) can't even come up with a proper definition for intelligence that most psychologists can agree with... so how can we test it accurately? We can't. Just a number.

PS - I'm sure there's a Wikipedia article that can do this a hell of a lot better than I can.

zenten
Posts: 3799
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 7:42 am UTC
Nevea: According to wikipedia, and my memories of the two psych courses I took, your description is not accurate for modern IQ tests.

Nevea
Posts: 15
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 4:58 pm UTC
zenten wrote:Nevea: According to wikipedia, and my memories of the two psych courses I took, your description is not accurate for modern IQ tests.

Indeed , apparently, I've just studied the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (although, briefly) and they now use a different method for adults. However, my last point still stands regarding the definition of intelligence... if I'm not mistaken.
In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

Nosforit
Posts: 118
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 7:09 pm UTC
Location: On top
My IQ is a measure of how fast I can find a pattern and then extrapolate that pattern. I don't know why this is more important than how accurate I am at doing so.

Also: I'll show you mine if you'll show me yours'.

Thunderbird4!
It's ketchup, I swear!
Posts: 307
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 3:40 am UTC
Location: Out of my mind
Contact:
Last test I took I had a 143 Nosforit.

And Nosforit is right, IQ tests tend to measure how quickly you can do something not how accurately you do it.
d33p wrote:xkcd: We keep people from jumping off of shit

mudge wrote:Taking cat-proximity laws out of lolcats is like taking friction out of sex.

Nosforit
Posts: 118
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 7:09 pm UTC
Location: On top
148. Just enough to get me accepted into Mensa. I'm the small fish in the big pond there.
Though I wonder if they awarded a few extra points just out of pity...

Macbi
Posts: 941
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 8:32 am UTC
Location: UKvia
The various tests i've taken have put me between 96 and 151.
Which shows how accurate they are.

Gelsamel
Lame and emo
Posts: 8237
Joined: Thu Oct 05, 2006 10:49 am UTC
Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
What is even the point with Mensa?

Tests I've taken put me around 146-162, not that they're particularly meaningful in anyway. My Study Ethic is terrible.
"Give up here?"
- > No
"Do you accept defeat?"
- > No
"Do you think games are silly little things?"
- > No
"Is it all pointless?"
- > No
"Do you admit there is no meaning to this world?"
- > No

Nosforit
Posts: 118
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 7:09 pm UTC
Location: On top
Seems to me its most important function is to get those scarred by years of bullying for being different to dare open up again in the presence of their peers. As a whole, Mensa seems to be very open to new ideas, and it seems to me it contains more liberal artsy types than stuffy intellectual types. Study ethic or education has little to do at all with Mensa.

Xanthir
My HERO!!!
Posts: 5425
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 12:49 am UTC
Contact:
IQ is a measure of a relatively specific kind of intelligence (just exactly what this is varies a bit between tests). Different ethnic groups and cultures perform differently on the IQ test because it is not built toward them. Your IQ is not stable over your lifetime.

Those who say that IQ tests measure your ability to take IQ tests aren't too far off. ^_^ Of course, the ability to take IQ tests is a (bad) proxy for intelligence.

That said, I usually score around 150.

Nosforit
Posts: 118
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 7:09 pm UTC
Location: On top
You can definitely score higher on an IQ test through practice, and I kinda doubt this practice has any effect on your performance on other tasks. And yet, I'm not too shabby at finding patterns in things quite different from the type of test I took. All in all, Mensa shows that people of similar spirit are united through this type of testing, regardless of what exactly is being measured. Mensa doesn't claim to know what intelligence is, but rather is continuously trying to find out just that.

...But I still wish we had a secret handshake or something. :\

McHell
Posts: 322
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 12:52 pm UTC
Location: Ellowen Deeowen
Macbi's answer is the most practical and succinct. The idea arose in the time of phrenology ("shape of your skull indicates: criminal mind") and eugenics.

There's all kinds of fun things. Every 10years or so the average score goes up by 3points, mostly through better education (yes, even in the west, maybe all those "in my day it was better" people are not always right), so it gets corrected.

Also, there's very great cultural bias --- american scientists tend to score very badly on (translated) middle-eastern schoolkiddie IQ-tests. And vice versa. That's actually also why great apes score badly: "there's a thunderstorm: go hide (a) in house or (b) under a tree or (c) in car" BEEP! (b) is wrong. Tell that to thousands of years of gorilla-culture of sticking to the tree in a storm.

There is something there that gets measured, it has mostly something to do with pattern recognition, but that's about it. Some people get trained in that kind of puzzles and get better (you can very easily increase your score by about 30 in a week of exercises), some people are intuitively very good at it. Some very intelligent people misinterprete the questions and make it too difficult (the typical joke "how to measure the height of a building with a barometer") and score badly.

Bondolon
Posts: 436
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2007 7:26 pm UTC
Location: College Station, TX
Contact:
Nevea wrote:The grad school test you're thinking about is the SAT.

ummm, GRE?

Posts: 466
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 6:54 pm UTC
IQ measures how often someone will brag about his or her IQ.

I remember taking some IQ-thingy a while back when I was being considered for a gifted class in elementary school. I don't know what I got, but I do know that it had to be >155 to get into the class.

__Kit
Posts: 1576
Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 5:12 am UTC
Location: 16/M/NZ
Contact:
True story - the other day my sister asked me how to SPELL 'IQ'
=]

recurve boy
Posts: 353
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 5:48 am UTC
Location: Sydney Australia
Contact:
Gelsamel wrote:What is even the point with Mensa?

Smart hot chicks? If so, I should consider applying ...

I hate the puzzles that deal with words and stuff. I am a very bad speller and cannot express myself with words so well. So I always do poorly in those.

Marbas
Posts: 1169
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2007 4:01 am UTC
Location: Down down down at the bottom of the sea
Contact:
From what I remember of my test, it mainly tested pattern finding and memory. I took the WISC-IV.

Examples of the tasks in the IQ test I took include: Find what ____ number of objects have in common, Make this red shape out of these blocks which each have a red triangle on one side, reason through this scenario, each number has a shape assigned -draw the shapes under each line of numbers-, and the ever popular memorize these digits and recite them back to the proctor.

The reason I took the IQ test was because my teachers wanted to see if I qualified for special ed. I don't. In fact, the principal and my teachers were more than a little insulted when she looked at my test scores and then my GPA. I am a very lazy person with regards to most subjects in school.
Jahoclave wrote:Do you have any idea how much more fun the holocaust is with "Git er Done" as the catch phrase?

Toeofdoom
The (Male) Skeleton Guitarist
Posts: 3446
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 10:06 am UTC
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:
^ I did the WISC thing when I was 7, and another followup test on a different scale, but apparently I'm more than 4 standard deviations from the mean, or was then so 160+? I dunno, it doesnt really have a specific meaning, all it really shows is how good you are at the type of test, which is linked to certain forms of "intelligence" but not others.
Hawknc wrote:Gotta love our political choices here - you can pick the unionised socially conservative party, or the free-market even more socially conservative party. Oh who to vote for…I don't know, I think I'll just flip a coin and hope it explodes and kills me.

Website

Marbas
Posts: 1169
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2007 4:01 am UTC
Location: Down down down at the bottom of the sea
Contact:
Toeofdoom wrote:^ I did the WISC thing when I was 7, and another followup test on a different scale, but apparently I'm more than 4 standard deviations from the mean, or was then so 160+? I dunno, it doesnt really have a specific meaning, all it really shows is how good you are at the type of test, which is linked to certain forms of "intelligence" but not others.

Wow...I'm a measly 125. I do believe I've been dwarfed. Anyways I've never set much of a store by IQ myself, it never really struck me as a practical thing to place faith in. I mean, in my case I'm really just limiting myself if I think it has a real bearing on how much I can accomplish.
Last edited by Marbas on Sun Aug 19, 2007 8:16 am UTC, edited 2 times in total.
Jahoclave wrote:Do you have any idea how much more fun the holocaust is with "Git er Done" as the catch phrase?

Toeofdoom
The (Male) Skeleton Guitarist
Posts: 3446
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 10:06 am UTC
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:
I only found that out about a month ago, and read the report and stuff, I didnt remember when I was 7 I was more interested in the puzzles themselves than what they were for.

Personally, I find I learn stuff very fast if I'm paying attention, and I'm really good at maths and reasoning and stuff, but only a bit above average with language skills and stuff.

I personally dont give a shit how smart some test says a person is, and there are way more things than just "intelligence" anyway, stability, initiative, coordination, memory, charisma, etc.

What does an IQ score mean? What does any test score mean? Its how many questions you got right. It's also a vague measure of how good someone is at problem solving and pattern recognition anyway, but as has been mentioned, peoples IQ scores vary depending on the test anyway.
Hawknc wrote:Gotta love our political choices here - you can pick the unionised socially conservative party, or the free-market even more socially conservative party. Oh who to vote for…I don't know, I think I'll just flip a coin and hope it explodes and kills me.

Website

Gelsamel
Lame and emo
Posts: 8237
Joined: Thu Oct 05, 2006 10:49 am UTC
Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
recurve boy wrote:
Gelsamel wrote:What is even the point with Mensa?

Smart hot chicks? If so, I should consider applying ...

:O... If that's true I might consider joining....

What I meant with the study ethic is - I'm not extremely knowledgeable (except in areas I love, like physics etc). But that that is different from having a high IQ.
"Give up here?"
- > No
"Do you accept defeat?"
- > No
"Do you think games are silly little things?"
- > No
"Is it all pointless?"
- > No
"Do you admit there is no meaning to this world?"
- > No

dumbclown
Posts: 230
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 12:45 pm UTC
Location: Hunting Godzilla
Contact:
It helps you prove people wrong with style.

I only have one friend with an IQ lower then mine. Actually that should be only one of my friends who could be bothered to take the test has an IQ lower then me. Anytime I get in an argument with them I always mention that he can't be right because his IQ is lower. He is actually a lot smarter then me but luckily English is his second language, so he tends to do badly because comprehending the questions is harder for him.

Macbi
Posts: 941
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 8:32 am UTC
Location: UKvia
How do they obtain averages to base the scores on?
Iv'e got a feeling that moe inteligent people would take more of them, biasing the average.

Marbas
Posts: 1169
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2007 4:01 am UTC
Location: Down down down at the bottom of the sea
Contact:
Gelsamel wrote:
recurve boy wrote:
Gelsamel wrote:What is even the point with Mensa?

Smart hot chicks? If so, I should consider applying ...

What I meant with the study ethic is - I'm not extremely knowledgeable (except in areas I love, like physics etc). But that that is different from having a high IQ.

I was going to say...people are generally very knowledgeable in a particular subject area if they truly love it.
Jahoclave wrote:Do you have any idea how much more fun the holocaust is with "Git er Done" as the catch phrase?

recurve boy
Posts: 353
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 5:48 am UTC
Location: Sydney Australia
Contact:
Gelsamel wrote:What I meant with the study ethic is - I'm not extremely knowledgeable (except in areas I love, like physics etc). But that that is different from having a high IQ.

They don't take into account learning styles either. I used to not understand what the hell was going on in german class. Then one day (unfortunately after I quit learning german) I realised "SYNTAX!". They never bothered to really explain the foundations of a language and I never had a concept of it at the time.

Same with words and pictures. I used to draw quite a lot and wasn't bad at it. I am hopelessly uncreative with words. Some abstract concepts also confuse me. I can do multi variable calculus in up to 4 dimensions easily. I can draw graphs and have a concept of time. 5 dimensions and I can't.

evilbeanfiend
Posts: 2650
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 7:05 am UTC
Location: the old world
dumbclown wrote:It helps you prove people wrong with style.

I only have one friend with an IQ lower then mine. Actually that should be only one of my friends who could be bothered to take the test has an IQ lower then me. Anytime I get in an argument with them I always mention that he can't be right because his IQ is lower. He is actually a lot smarter then me but luckily English is his second language, so he tends to do badly because comprehending the questions is harder for him.

its not even just comprehension that can make a difference, there is a cultural bias that also shows up despite the tests trying to be as abstract as possible.
in ur beanz makin u eveel

3.14159265...
Irrational (?)
Posts: 2413
Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 12:05 am UTC
They are fun to play with.

I hate them bieng used for actual practical uses.

Like trying to find genetic differences in intelligence of different races.

Or trying to find out who is "brilliant". Though the other opposite of finding out who is "challenged" seems to be working well, when it comes to kids.

Also, anyone know where I can take an official one, in London, Ontario?
"The best times in life are the ones when you can genuinely add a "Bwa" to your "ha""- Chris Hastings

Marbas
Posts: 1169
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2007 4:01 am UTC
Location: Down down down at the bottom of the sea
Contact:
3.14159265... wrote:
Like trying to find genetic differences in intelligence of different races.

I have a person who used to be my friend who really likes The Bell Curve.

Let's just show that it shows in his day-to-day interaction. This is also the reason why I'm not friends with him anymore.
Jahoclave wrote:Do you have any idea how much more fun the holocaust is with "Git er Done" as the catch phrase?

SpitValve
Not a mod.
Posts: 5130
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 9:51 am UTC
Location: Lower pork village
One of my evil plans is to find someone I have a higher IQ than who is mean to people who have lower IQs than him. Then I'll be nice to him _and_ to the people who he's mean to.

That's right! I'll show him!

Vaniver
Posts: 9422
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 2:12 am UTC
Nosforit wrote:148. Just enough to get me accepted into Mensa.
Er, Mensa only requires 132 (unless you took the CFIT, which you should specify, as they appear to have different standard deviations).
I mostly post over at LessWrong now.

Avatar from My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic, owned by Hasbro.

Nosforit
Posts: 118
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 7:09 pm UTC
Location: On top
I dunno... I just got a diploma.

It's the Finnish Mensa, and IIRC the requirement is 148 or more. That makes me their retarded kid.

Macbi
Posts: 941
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 8:32 am UTC
Location: UKvia
Nevea wrote:The IQ is setup to have nearly a perfect bell curve also.

I just realised that that would allow a negative I.Q.
Is that possible?

Cosmologicon
Posts: 1806
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 9:47 am UTC
Location: Cambridge MA USA
Contact:
Just to be clear, mental age (MA) was the basis for IQ tests when they were first created, but it hasn't been for a long time. Now, they're usually normalized to a gaussian distribution (bell curve) with mean of 100 and standard deviation of 15. So, by definition, one in about 20 billion people will have an IQ below 0, assuming I calculated that right.

However, I think that real IQ tests probably don't claim to be accurate for every single member of the population, let alone three times the population of Earth, so practically speaking, I bet a negative IQ is impossible.

Nosforit
Posts: 118
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 7:09 pm UTC
Location: On top
IQs higher than 200 are hardly measurable, and likewise IQs of the opposite extreme, below 0, aren't really measurable either. Still, the number given to a certain position in the bell curve is arbitrary, so there would not be anything special about this hypothetic negative IQ except that it is at one extreme.

Yet, if we were to try fitting 100% of the population within this 0 to 200 points, we'd see a graph approximate to this:

0________|________200

Where the vertical line represents almost 100% of the population and the horizontal part represents the minuscule percentage of the rest. This is because there is no theoretic limit to these upper and lower extremes, so then everybody else gets condensed into the vertical section. Such a graph is almost completely useless.
Submit.

zenten
Posts: 3799
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 7:42 am UTC
Ok, I know where IQ tests come from. I have some idea on how they're measured and all that.

What I don't get is why the questions it has are used, instead of some other ones. I mean, what's to stop someone in charge of IQ tests from picking the sorts of questions that they're really good at to give themselves a high IQ, assuming the standard deviations and means and all that are still the same?

Cosmologicon
Posts: 1806
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 9:47 am UTC
Location: Cambridge MA USA
Contact:
zenten wrote:What I don't get is why the questions it has are used, instead of some other ones. I mean, what's to stop someone in charge of IQ tests from picking the sorts of questions that they're really good at to give themselves a high IQ....

First, IQ tests aren't accepted into use on the basis of one person. I'm not sure what the review process is, but I'm sure that some other psychologists would raise objections if it was clearly biased. Second, there's the fact that having a high IQ doesn't really get you anything. It might let the state think you're mentally competent to stand trial, or place you in grade school if you immigrate from Myanmar, but it's not like they're used to get jobs.

You might as well ask why the person in charge of SATs doesn't tailor the questions to himself.

zenten
Posts: 3799
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 7:42 am UTC
Cosmologicon wrote:
zenten wrote:What I don't get is why the questions it has are used, instead of some other ones. I mean, what's to stop someone in charge of IQ tests from picking the sorts of questions that they're really good at to give themselves a high IQ....

First, IQ tests aren't accepted into use on the basis of one person. I'm not sure what the review process is, but I'm sure that some other psychologists would raise objections if it was clearly biased. Second, there's the fact that having a high IQ doesn't really get you anything. It might let the state think you're mentally competent to stand trial, or place you in grade school if you immigrate from Myanmar, but it's not like they're used to get jobs.

You might as well ask why the person in charge of SATs doesn't tailor the questions to himself.

But the SATs are at least based on something, right? They're calibrated to measure success in university or something, right?

Nosforit
Posts: 118
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 7:09 pm UTC
Location: On top
The functionary in charge of our test, conducted at Helsinki University, said from experience that about half the people present at that occasion would score 148 or more. This means that there existed a disposition among the candidates urging them take such a test in the first place. That is, while 2% of the population in general were eligible, 50% of the people who had actually sought their way there were eligible. Clearly, for some reason we all thought we were smart enough to make it, and half of us indeed were. Additionally we were all willing to bet our fragile egos on the result, rather than forsake certainty for the bliss of ignorance.

This gives some idea about what the test in practice measured, and is indeed the best useful info I can give on the subject since I'm still trying to figure out the rest of the story myself.
Submit.