is projectile motion 3 dimensional or 2 dimensional?
Moderators: gmalivuk, Moderators General, Prelates

 Posts: 3
 Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2017 2:52 pm UTC
is projectile motion 3 dimensional or 2 dimensional?
can any one answer this please
 Soupspoon
 You have done something you shouldn't. Or are about to.
 Posts: 2384
 Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2016 7:00 pm UTC
 Location: 531
Re: is projectile motion 3 dimensional or 2 dimensional?
What is your current understanding? Under what constraints is your projectile operating, and which freedoms? What are your frames of reference? Is this homework?
Re: is projectile motion 3 dimensional or 2 dimensional?
Projectile motion is 0dimensional, as proven by Zeno.
 doogly
 Dr. The Juggernaut of Touching Himself
 Posts: 5192
 Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 2:31 am UTC
 Location: Somerville, MA
 Contact:
Re: is projectile motion 3 dimensional or 2 dimensional?
Do you know what a dimension is? Can you throw something and check what happens?
LE4dGOLEM: What's a Doug?
Noc: A larval Doogly. They grow the tail and stinger upon reaching adulthood.
Keep waggling your butt brows Brothers.
Or; Is that your eye butthairs?
Noc: A larval Doogly. They grow the tail and stinger upon reaching adulthood.
Keep waggling your butt brows Brothers.
Or; Is that your eye butthairs?
 gmalivuk
 GNU Terry Pratchett
 Posts: 25740
 Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:02 pm UTC
 Location: Here and There
 Contact:
Re: is projectile motion 3 dimensional or 2 dimensional?
It's at least 4dimensional, and possibly 10 or 26 depending on your preference of string theory.
Though admittedly the motion in one or more of those dimensions is generally considered negligible.
Though admittedly the motion in one or more of those dimensions is generally considered negligible.
 doogly
 Dr. The Juggernaut of Touching Himself
 Posts: 5192
 Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 2:31 am UTC
 Location: Somerville, MA
 Contact:
Re: is projectile motion 3 dimensional or 2 dimensional?
I had to do coriolis acceleration in Physics 1, and look how well I turned out! Grumble grumble.
LE4dGOLEM: What's a Doug?
Noc: A larval Doogly. They grow the tail and stinger upon reaching adulthood.
Keep waggling your butt brows Brothers.
Or; Is that your eye butthairs?
Noc: A larval Doogly. They grow the tail and stinger upon reaching adulthood.
Keep waggling your butt brows Brothers.
Or; Is that your eye butthairs?
Re: is projectile motion 3 dimensional or 2 dimensional?
muheedmir007 wrote:can any one answer this please
Go outside and throw a rock. How many spatial dimensions does it take to describe the path? Now repeat the experiment using a frisbee. Does that change your answer?
 Soupspoon
 You have done something you shouldn't. Or are about to.
 Posts: 2384
 Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2016 7:00 pm UTC
 Location: 531
Re: is projectile motion 3 dimensional or 2 dimensional?
LaserGuy wrote:muheedmir007 wrote:can any one answer this please
Go outside and throw a rock. How many spatial dimensions does it take to describe the path? Now repeat the experiment using a frisbee. Does that change your answer?
Warning: If you live in a glass house, do not attempt the first experiment.
Warning: If you live in a Nerf house, you can attempt the second experiment but watch out for light breezes. Like you already have to, unless you've not yet found the right neighbours and like moving every time there's a light gust.
Re: is projectile motion 3 dimensional or 2 dimensional?
Pretty sure it’s onedimensional, though depending on your universe that 1D path may be embedded in some other topology.
wee free kings

 Posts: 2
 Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2017 3:57 pm UTC
Re: is projectile motion 3 dimensional or 2 dimensional?
Simple projectile motion (interpreted as throwing a ball straight forward w/o any outside forces except gravity and initial thrust) would be threedimensional: The ball travels away from you (1), up, then down (2), and through time (3), thus travelling through three dimensions. If there is wind (not parallel to the ball's trajectory), then the ball also travels laterally, bringing our total to four.
 Eebster the Great
 Posts: 2693
 Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2008 12:58 am UTC
Re: is projectile motion 3 dimensional or 2 dimensional?
Qaanol wrote:Pretty sure it’s onedimensional, though depending on your universe that 1D path may be embedded in some other topology.
Only if the projectile is pointlike.
Re: is projectile motion 3 dimensional or 2 dimensional?
Assuming that you have a "point like" projectile (size negligible relative to it's mass) shoy "upwards" in a gravity well (or 45° to maximize reach).
In a flat universe perspective (Newton): It describes a parabolic trayectory that needs two coordinates to describes properly. One is the upward direction (opposite to the "gravity") and one horizontal (that on ideal circunstances) keep velocity constant. There is more ways to decompose the coordenate frames, but this is the most intituive.
Curved (relativity). Here there is no gravity "force", just a "deformed" space. And due the projectile doesn't get any perturbatios (ej: friction) it keeps constant energy in it's reference frame. You could say it's movement is only in 1D, but that dimention is bent alongside the curved spacetime.
But real life should consider fricction and viscosity, so you have neither of thoose. Because wind can bend your trajectory sideways, and the drag steals energy of the system and that get you off your linear trajectory in the curved spacetime.
In a flat universe perspective (Newton): It describes a parabolic trayectory that needs two coordinates to describes properly. One is the upward direction (opposite to the "gravity") and one horizontal (that on ideal circunstances) keep velocity constant. There is more ways to decompose the coordenate frames, but this is the most intituive.
Curved (relativity). Here there is no gravity "force", just a "deformed" space. And due the projectile doesn't get any perturbatios (ej: friction) it keeps constant energy in it's reference frame. You could say it's movement is only in 1D, but that dimention is bent alongside the curved spacetime.
But real life should consider fricction and viscosity, so you have neither of thoose. Because wind can bend your trajectory sideways, and the drag steals energy of the system and that get you off your linear trajectory in the curved spacetime.

 Posts: 6889
 Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 12:21 am UTC
Re: is projectile motion 3 dimensional or 2 dimensional?
Well sure, anyone can. If you don't understand coordinate systems it would be a terrible waste though. If you do understand them then why are you asking? Read about coordinate systems and frames of reference. Then come back and ask a better question.muheedmir007 wrote:can any one answer this please
 doogly
 Dr. The Juggernaut of Touching Himself
 Posts: 5192
 Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 2:31 am UTC
 Location: Somerville, MA
 Contact:
Re: is projectile motion 3 dimensional or 2 dimensional?
Pretty sure they're not coming back, so now it's just a contest to see who can say the cleverest thing about dimensionality.
LE4dGOLEM: What's a Doug?
Noc: A larval Doogly. They grow the tail and stinger upon reaching adulthood.
Keep waggling your butt brows Brothers.
Or; Is that your eye butthairs?
Noc: A larval Doogly. They grow the tail and stinger upon reaching adulthood.
Keep waggling your butt brows Brothers.
Or; Is that your eye butthairs?
 Eebster the Great
 Posts: 2693
 Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2008 12:58 am UTC
Re: is projectile motion 3 dimensional or 2 dimensional?
According to this, there are no twice differentiable planar fractal curves, so I guess we can say with some confidence that projectile motion must have an integer dimension, as no force field could ever produce motion along a fractal dimensional path.
 doogly
 Dr. The Juggernaut of Touching Himself
 Posts: 5192
 Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 2:31 am UTC
 Location: Somerville, MA
 Contact:
Re: is projectile motion 3 dimensional or 2 dimensional?
That's begging the question though.
LE4dGOLEM: What's a Doug?
Noc: A larval Doogly. They grow the tail and stinger upon reaching adulthood.
Keep waggling your butt brows Brothers.
Or; Is that your eye butthairs?
Noc: A larval Doogly. They grow the tail and stinger upon reaching adulthood.
Keep waggling your butt brows Brothers.
Or; Is that your eye butthairs?
 Eebster the Great
 Posts: 2693
 Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2008 12:58 am UTC
Re: is projectile motion 3 dimensional or 2 dimensional?
How's that? Projectile motion by definition is the motion of an object subject to forces, and force is directly proportional to the second derivative of position. If a path is not twice differentiable, then it cannot be produced by any such force, even a discontinuous force. So such a path is impossible for projectiles.
Re: is projectile motion 3 dimensional or 2 dimensional?
Eebster the Great wrote:How's that? Projectile motion by definition is the motion of an object subject to forces, and force is directly proportional to the second derivative of position. If a path is not twice differentiable, then it cannot be produced by any such force, even a discontinuous force. So such a path is impossible for projectiles.
Except if you go up to general relativity, where projectile motion is just "motion along a geodesic", so you don't need to worry about forces, but you do need to worry about whether you can define a manifold in a fractal space that conforms to the appropriate tensor equations (and I don't even know if you can have a fractional dimensional tensor, so that's about as far as I can get in the problem).
pollywog wrote:I want to learn this smile, perfect it, and then go around smiling at lesbians and freaking them out.Wikihow wrote:* Smile a lot! Give a gay girl a knowing "Hey, I'm a lesbian too!" smile.
 Weeks
 Hey Baby, wanna make a fortnight?
 Posts: 1858
 Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2008 12:41 am UTC
 Location: Panama
Re: is projectile motion 3 dimensional or 2 dimensional?
Your face is a plane in 2 dimensions.?.¿doogly wrote:Pretty sure they're not coming back, so now it's just a contest to see who can say the cleverest thing about dimensionality.
Am I gregnant
suffercait wrote:One day I'm gun a go visit weeks and discover they're just a computer in a trashcan at an ice cream shop.
Quercus wrote:Agreed, but "constitutional fetishism" doesn't have that lovely alliteration between fetishism, first and fucking
rath358 wrote:I have been replaced D:
 Soupspoon
 You have done something you shouldn't. Or are about to.
 Posts: 2384
 Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2016 7:00 pm UTC
 Location: 531
Re: is projectile motion 3 dimensional or 2 dimensional?
Weeks wrote:Your face is a plane in 2 dimensions.?.¿doogly wrote:Pretty sure they're not coming back, so now it's just a contest to see who can say the cleverest thing about dimensionality.
Your momma's soooo fat... that any trajectory past her involves a horizontal planar component that is predominantly a hyperbolic orbital segment!
 Eebster the Great
 Posts: 2693
 Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2008 12:58 am UTC
Re: is projectile motion 3 dimensional or 2 dimensional?
ConMan wrote:Eebster the Great wrote:How's that? Projectile motion by definition is the motion of an object subject to forces, and force is directly proportional to the second derivative of position. If a path is not twice differentiable, then it cannot be produced by any such force, even a discontinuous force. So such a path is impossible for projectiles.
Except if you go up to general relativity, where projectile motion is just "motion along a geodesic", so you don't need to worry about forces, but you do need to worry about whether you can define a manifold in a fractal space that conforms to the appropriate tensor equations (and I don't even know if you can have a fractional dimensional tensor, so that's about as far as I can get in the problem).
That paper is admittedly specific to plane curves, which I had considered, but I would be pretty surprised if twice differentiable fractal (or more specifically, selfaffine) curves could exist on any manifold. Perhaps it is an open (in this case, not yet considered) question. The abstract does point out that smooth selfaffine curves do exist, in spite of common sense to the contrary.
 doogly
 Dr. The Juggernaut of Touching Himself
 Posts: 5192
 Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 2:31 am UTC
 Location: Somerville, MA
 Contact:
Re: is projectile motion 3 dimensional or 2 dimensional?
Eebster the Great wrote:How's that? Projectile motion by definition is the motion of an object subject to forces, and force is directly proportional to the second derivative of position. If a path is not twice differentiable, then it cannot be produced by any such force, even a discontinuous force. So such a path is impossible for projectiles.
Yeah, I feel like "No fractal paths" and "Paths well modeled as solutions to F=ma" are equivalent. If someone is imagining something moving along a fractal path, they are probably imagining some deviation form vanilla Newton 2.
Or maybe they are imagining a dumb thing, like just making F super wonky but still keeping F=ma nice and bedrocky. That is not going to get them a fractal and I suppose it is a contentful result to tell them they are wrong. So yes, this is good. I uncomplain.
LE4dGOLEM: What's a Doug?
Noc: A larval Doogly. They grow the tail and stinger upon reaching adulthood.
Keep waggling your butt brows Brothers.
Or; Is that your eye butthairs?
Noc: A larval Doogly. They grow the tail and stinger upon reaching adulthood.
Keep waggling your butt brows Brothers.
Or; Is that your eye butthairs?
Re: is projectile motion 3 dimensional or 2 dimensional?
In 2D space, 3D space, and allhigherdimensional space, Brownian motion has Hausdorff dimension 2. If you model a projectile as being bombarded with a continuum of air particles, then I believe projectile motion is just a transformation away from a Wiener process. We should therefore be able to conclude that projectile motion traces out a fractal with dimension 2, if my intuition is right.
Re: is projectile motion 3 dimensional or 2 dimensional?
Eebster the Great wrote:The abstract does point out that smooth selfaffine curves do exist, in spite of common sense to the contrary.
I would like an example of such a curve. Preferably with a picture. The above paper cites a Russian paper for this claim.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests