Science Rules - Updated 2009/10/21
Moderators: gmalivuk, Moderators General, Prelates
- gmalivuk
- GNU Terry Pratchett
- Posts: 26577
- Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:02 pm UTC
- Location: Here and There
- Contact:
Science Rules - Updated 2009/10/21
Science, it works bitches.
Alright dudes/dudettes here's the shake down.
The following rules are in addition to standard fora etiquette.
Rule the first:
If it's doesn't have anything to do with Science, and especially if it doesn't have anything to do with the original idea behind the thread (if it goes off-topic but is still about science we can split it so that's not a huge deal, but you should be starting new threads on your own initiative) it will most likely be <strongbad>DELETED</strongbad>
Rule the second:
Only a small amount of pseudo-science is permitted, mostly to debunk it, and if we feel everything has been said we'll probably lock it (if you're still convinced after 3 pages that 0.999... is not equal to 1 it gets boring)
Rule the third:
Keep things civil. Sticks on the ice boys and girls. If you don't agree with someone on a particular theory/question do not attack them. Attack their math all you like, but for the most part we want to see people working together to help reach a common goal. Things like, what happens at the singularity of a black hole are not things anyone is close to determining for sure so we're going to have differing opinions, but that's no reason to get nasty. Flames will definitely be deleted, as it's easier to delete a post than edit out the flameness you run the risk of a perfectly good argument being deleted because you wanted to make someone feel like an idiot.
If you have the words "idiot" or "arrogant" in your post, reconsider it.
Rule the fourth:
While these are the forums for a humour comic, don't get carried away with silliness. The mudkip thing was kinda funny, but as you can see it only encourages offtopic discussion which is a bit annoying. There's always General for that sorta thing. We herd they leik mudkips.
Rule the fifth - Homework and things that look like homework:
If the question you're asking is homework, say so, and let us know what work you've already done on the problem. If it's the sort of question that looks like homework but isn't, tell us that as well. If you don't, you may not find our answers particularly helpful. In fact, we may very well purposely write overly complicated and/or impractical solutions. (See this thread for an example.)
Seriously, we don't mind offering homework help to people who are honest in requesting it, and who have clearly done some work on their own before getting stuck. But we are not here to do your homework for you, so please don't just copy math or science questions directly from your problem set and expect us to kindly do all your work for you. Also, any person who abuses this and posts little other than homework questions will start to wear on our patience.
2008-12-22 Update: If you've figured out a homework problem, let us know. It means people no longer need to continue giving hints. (And if it's not a problem I expect to involve much discussion, it means I can go ahead and lock the thread.)
2009/10/21 Update: Rule/suggestion the sixth - Please make thread titles somewhat indicative of the content therein
I don't expect the title to give all the details of the content of the thread; that's what the OP is for. But I would like to be able to skim through the forum and know whether I've looked at or posted in a thread simply by reading the title. So things like "Interesting question" or "What if..." are not helpful. I've been editing these threads to change the subject line, but it would be helpful if you did the same. "Interesting question about a mirrored sphere" or "What if pi were 4?" would be much, much more useful to everyone.
Alright dudes/dudettes here's the shake down.
The following rules are in addition to standard fora etiquette.
Rule the first:
If it's doesn't have anything to do with Science, and especially if it doesn't have anything to do with the original idea behind the thread (if it goes off-topic but is still about science we can split it so that's not a huge deal, but you should be starting new threads on your own initiative) it will most likely be <strongbad>DELETED</strongbad>
Rule the second:
Only a small amount of pseudo-science is permitted, mostly to debunk it, and if we feel everything has been said we'll probably lock it (if you're still convinced after 3 pages that 0.999... is not equal to 1 it gets boring)
Rule the third:
Keep things civil. Sticks on the ice boys and girls. If you don't agree with someone on a particular theory/question do not attack them. Attack their math all you like, but for the most part we want to see people working together to help reach a common goal. Things like, what happens at the singularity of a black hole are not things anyone is close to determining for sure so we're going to have differing opinions, but that's no reason to get nasty. Flames will definitely be deleted, as it's easier to delete a post than edit out the flameness you run the risk of a perfectly good argument being deleted because you wanted to make someone feel like an idiot.
If you have the words "idiot" or "arrogant" in your post, reconsider it.
Rule the fourth:
While these are the forums for a humour comic, don't get carried away with silliness. The mudkip thing was kinda funny, but as you can see it only encourages offtopic discussion which is a bit annoying. There's always General for that sorta thing. We herd they leik mudkips.
Rule the fifth - Homework and things that look like homework:
If the question you're asking is homework, say so, and let us know what work you've already done on the problem. If it's the sort of question that looks like homework but isn't, tell us that as well. If you don't, you may not find our answers particularly helpful. In fact, we may very well purposely write overly complicated and/or impractical solutions. (See this thread for an example.)
Seriously, we don't mind offering homework help to people who are honest in requesting it, and who have clearly done some work on their own before getting stuck. But we are not here to do your homework for you, so please don't just copy math or science questions directly from your problem set and expect us to kindly do all your work for you. Also, any person who abuses this and posts little other than homework questions will start to wear on our patience.
2008-12-22 Update: If you've figured out a homework problem, let us know. It means people no longer need to continue giving hints. (And if it's not a problem I expect to involve much discussion, it means I can go ahead and lock the thread.)
2009/10/21 Update: Rule/suggestion the sixth - Please make thread titles somewhat indicative of the content therein
I don't expect the title to give all the details of the content of the thread; that's what the OP is for. But I would like to be able to skim through the forum and know whether I've looked at or posted in a thread simply by reading the title. So things like "Interesting question" or "What if..." are not helpful. I've been editing these threads to change the subject line, but it would be helpful if you did the same. "Interesting question about a mirrored sphere" or "What if pi were 4?" would be much, much more useful to everyone.
- LE4dGOLEM
- is unique......wait, no!!!!
- Posts: 5972
- Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 7:10 pm UTC
- Location: :uoıʇɐɔol
Rule suggestion: If possible (ie not a crossover) all threads should begin with a declaration of the particular field at the start of the title, for example
[PHYSICS] Particle Acceleration
[CHEMISTRY] Interesting Carbon Structures!
[BIOLOGY] The Human Eye vs the Octopus Eye
Just to help people get to only the threads they want, without making the frontpage of the fora over nine thousand feet long.
EDIT:
Or even shortening to P, C and B for crossovers, for example (maybe)
[P&C] Bucky Ball collisions at .5c!
[PHYSICS] Particle Acceleration
[CHEMISTRY] Interesting Carbon Structures!
[BIOLOGY] The Human Eye vs the Octopus Eye
Just to help people get to only the threads they want, without making the frontpage of the fora over nine thousand feet long.
EDIT:
Or even shortening to P, C and B for crossovers, for example (maybe)
[P&C] Bucky Ball collisions at .5c!

doogly wrote:It would just be much better if it were not shitty.
- LE4dGOLEM
- is unique......wait, no!!!!
- Posts: 5972
- Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 7:10 pm UTC
- Location: :uoıʇɐɔol
But it would help declare the intent of the discussion - If people want to talk about how the human eye has developed upside down (or backwards, or soemthing) versus the octopus eye, they want to talk about that, not have a large discussion about how much carbon is in an eye versus a different piece of flesh.

doogly wrote:It would just be much better if it were not shitty.
- cmacis
- Posts: 754
- Joined: Wed Dec 13, 2006 5:22 pm UTC
- Location: Leeds or Bradford, Thessex
- Contact:
Just remember:
biologists think they are biochemists
biochemists think they are physical chemists
physical chemists think they are physicists
physicists think they are God...
and God? He thinks he's a mathematician.
biologists think they are biochemists
biochemists think they are physical chemists
physical chemists think they are physicists
physicists think they are God...
and God? He thinks he's a mathematician.
li te'o te'a vei pai pi'i ka'o ve'o su'i pa du li no
Mathematician is a function mapping tea onto theorems. Sadly this function is irreversible.
QED is Latin for small empty box.
Ceci n’est pas une [s]pipe[/s] signature.
Mathematician is a function mapping tea onto theorems. Sadly this function is irreversible.
QED is Latin for small empty box.
Ceci n’est pas une [s]pipe[/s] signature.
- Belial
- A terrible sound heard from a distance
- Posts: 30450
- Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2006 4:04 am UTC
- Contact:
But it would help declare the intent of the discussion - If people want to talk about how the human eye has developed upside down (or backwards, or soemthing) versus the octopus eye, they want to talk about that, not have a large discussion about how much carbon is in an eye versus a different piece of flesh.
I know, LE4d. I'm just being a dick. It happens.
addams wrote:A drunk neighbor is better than a sober Belial.
They/them
- LE4dGOLEM
- is unique......wait, no!!!!
- Posts: 5972
- Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 7:10 pm UTC
- Location: :uoıʇɐɔol
Or at least stop people putting things in science that doesn't belong in science.

doogly wrote:It would just be much better if it were not shitty.
- You, sir, name?
- Posts: 6983
- Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 10:07 am UTC
- Location: Chako Paul City
- Contact:
- gmalivuk
- GNU Terry Pratchett
- Posts: 26577
- Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:02 pm UTC
- Location: Here and There
- Contact:
You, sir, name? wrote:cmacis wrote:Just remember:
biologists think they are biochemists
biochemists think they are physical chemists
physical chemists think they are physicists
physicists think they are God...
and God? He thinks he's a mathematician.
What the heck do mathematicians think they are, biologists?
No, that would be silly and circular.
Mathematicians just know they are mathematicians, and that they therefore have no need to delude themselves into thinking they're something "better". (As if such a concept isn't self-contradictory on its face.)
- bbctol
- Super Deluxe Forum Title of DESTINYâ„¢
- Posts: 3137
- Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 10:27 pm UTC
- Location: The Twilight Zone
- Contact:
You, sir, name? wrote:cmacis wrote:Just remember:
biologists think they are biochemists
biochemists think they are physical chemists
physical chemists think they are physicists
physicists think they are God...
and God? He thinks he's a mathematician.
What the heck do mathematicians think they are, biologists?
Mathemiticians think they are D&Ders.
- The LuigiManiac
- Posts: 695
- Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 4:09 am UTC
- Location: Trapped in a hypothetical situation somewhere in Ontario...help?
bbctol wrote:You, sir, name? wrote:cmacis wrote:Just remember:
biologists think they are biochemists
biochemists think they are physical chemists
physical chemists think they are physicists
physicists think they are God...
and God? He thinks he's a mathematician.
What the heck do mathematicians think they are, biologists?
Mathemiticians think they are D&Ders.
So then, do D&Ders think they are biologists?
Spoiler:
- cmacis
- Posts: 754
- Joined: Wed Dec 13, 2006 5:22 pm UTC
- Location: Leeds or Bradford, Thessex
- Contact:
If I understand D&D properly, they think they are wizards.
Why would there need to be anything above maths? Even God wants to be a mathematician.
Why would there need to be anything above maths? Even God wants to be a mathematician.
li te'o te'a vei pai pi'i ka'o ve'o su'i pa du li no
Mathematician is a function mapping tea onto theorems. Sadly this function is irreversible.
QED is Latin for small empty box.
Ceci n’est pas une [s]pipe[/s] signature.
Mathematician is a function mapping tea onto theorems. Sadly this function is irreversible.
QED is Latin for small empty box.
Ceci n’est pas une [s]pipe[/s] signature.
- skeptical scientist
- closed-minded spiritualist
- Posts: 6142
- Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 6:09 am UTC
- Location: San Francisco
bbctol wrote:You, sir, name? wrote:What the heck do mathematicians think they are, biologists?
Mathemiticians think they are D&Ders.
Guilty as charged.
I'm looking forward to the day when the SNES emulator on my computer works by emulating the elementary particles in an actual, physical box with Nintendo stamped on the side.
"With math, all things are possible." —Rebecca Watson
"With math, all things are possible." —Rebecca Watson
- LE4dGOLEM
- is unique......wait, no!!!!
- Posts: 5972
- Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 7:10 pm UTC
- Location: :uoıʇɐɔol
Belial wrote:If I understand D&D properly, they think they are wizards.
Or barbarians!
Pfft. Everyone knows Sorcerors is where it's at.

doogly wrote:It would just be much better if it were not shitty.
- German Sausage
- 3 of 5
- Posts: 2933
- Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 9:45 am UTC
gmalivuk wrote:Mathematicians just know they are mathematicians, and that they therefore have no need to delude themselves into thinking they're something "better". (As if such a concept isn't self-contradictory on its face.)
Mathematicians find the axioms "I am a mathematician" and "I am not a mathematician" to be interesting in their own rights, with one being consistent if and only if the other is consistent, but of course most of them assume the former for most of their work.
-
- Posts: 611
- Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 3:39 pm UTC
I would like to point out that it was in fact SpitValve who derailed my scientifically accurate and relevant mudkip on a scale on a spring.
I mostly post over at LessWrong now.
Avatar from My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic, owned by Hasbro.
Avatar from My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic, owned by Hasbro.
We've been trying to ween SV off the 'kip (as it's called on the streets) for some time, we're just looking to you all for support.
Meaux_Pas wrote:I do that too, but for an entirely different reason.RealGrouchy wrote:I still remember the time when Gordon left. I still wake up in the middle of the night crying and screaming his name.
RealGrouchy wrote:Our daughter is in high school now.Gordon wrote:How long have I been asleep?!
- gmalivuk
- GNU Terry Pratchett
- Posts: 26577
- Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:02 pm UTC
- Location: Here and There
- Contact:
Re: Science Rules - Updated 2008/12/22
Added a request to let us know if you've solved HW problems.
- PhatPhungus
- Posts: 321
- Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 5:40 pm UTC
- Contact:
Re: Science Rules - Updated 2008/12/22
Can I make a thread for the discussion of making things explode, or would that go better in FaiD?
__________
_____
__
_
_____
__
_
Re: Science Rules - Updated 2008/12/22
PhatPhungus wrote:Can I make a thread for the discussion of making things explode, or would that go better in FaiD?
Go to totse.
General_Norris: Taking pride in your nation is taking pride in the division of humanity.
Pirate.Bondage: Let's get married. Right now.
Pirate.Bondage: Let's get married. Right now.
- PhatPhungus
- Posts: 321
- Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 5:40 pm UTC
- Contact:
Re: Science Rules - Updated 2008/12/22
sje46 wrote:PhatPhungus wrote:Can I make a thread for the discussion of making things explode, or would that go better in FaiD?
Go to totse.
It's been down for over a month. Way to be insensitive.
Edit: Down as in gone forever.
__________
_____
__
_
_____
__
_
Re: Science Rules - Updated 2008/12/22
PhatPhungus wrote:sje46 wrote:PhatPhungus wrote:Can I make a thread for the discussion of making things explode, or would that go better in FaiD?
Go to totse.
It's been down for over a month. Way to be insensitive.
Edit: Down as in gone forever.
I knew this actually, ha.
General_Norris: Taking pride in your nation is taking pride in the division of humanity.
Pirate.Bondage: Let's get married. Right now.
Pirate.Bondage: Let's get married. Right now.
- PhatPhungus
- Posts: 321
- Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 5:40 pm UTC
- Contact:
Re: Science Rules - Updated 2008/12/22
sje46 wrote:PhatPhungus wrote:sje46 wrote:PhatPhungus wrote:Can I make a thread for the discussion of making things explode, or would that go better in FaiD?
Go to totse.
It's been down for over a month. Way to be insensitive.
Edit: Down as in gone forever.
I knew this actually, ha.
So now you're intentionally insensitive?
__________
_____
__
_
_____
__
_
Re: Science Rules - Updated 2008/12/22
are social sciences not included?
- gmalivuk
- GNU Terry Pratchett
- Posts: 26577
- Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:02 pm UTC
- Location: Here and There
- Contact:
Re: Science Rules - Updated 2008/12/22
Pretty sure there's already a thread on the social sciences. So yes, they're included.
Re: Science Rules - Updated 2009/10/21
is it just me, or does this thread topic remind anyone else of Bill Nye the Science Guy?
Re: Science Rules - Updated 2009/10/21
I'm surprised there's not a (easily searchable) thread on this, since awesome teacher quotes seem to pop up a lot here. Anyhow, I think it's pretty clear what this is about, so I shall lead off with a funny story that happened today.
Re: Science Rules - Updated 2009/10/21
I think there's a danger in thinking that science is actually more intelligent than it actually is. Remember that for 2000 years even every major scientific idea we've had turns out later to be inaccurate. Yes religion is stupid but a little humility goes a long, long way.
...and I quote.
"Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. It's just that yours is stupid."
...and I quote.
"Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. It's just that yours is stupid."
Last edited by crates on Tue Jun 14, 2011 4:31 pm UTC, edited 1 time in total.
- gmalivuk
- GNU Terry Pratchett
- Posts: 26577
- Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:02 pm UTC
- Location: Here and There
- Contact:
Re: Science Rules - Updated 2009/10/21
For 1500 of those 2000 years, no one was really doing science. And for the past 500, it's not so much that ideas have been proved wrong as they've been refined and improved upon.
- Cheezwhiz Jenkins
- Posts: 365
- Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 11:52 pm UTC
Re: Science Rules - Updated 2009/10/21
gmalivuk wrote:For 1500 of those 2000 years, no one was really doing science. And for the past 500, it's not so much that ideas have been proved wrong as they've been refined and improved upon.
*cough* luminiferous aether *cough*
Methinks the point is valid - the *successful* ideas have been refined and improved upon, but even the greatest scientific minds (or essentially the whole scientific community, in this example) have had some flat-out dead wrong ideas.
That explosion was so big it blew off his mullet :-O
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests