4chan will be angry

Things that don't belong anywhere else. (Check first).

Moderators: Moderators General, Prelates, Magistrates

User avatar
Babam
the Nearly Deleted
Posts: 1170
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 2:05 am UTC
Location: A multiverse, wandering the couch
Contact:

4chan will be angry

Postby Babam » Thu Apr 24, 2008 10:54 pm UTC

I am one step closer to finding out the identity of anomynous, as this photoshows; for a while he/she was a women, and is now a man. The Truth is Out there...
Attachments
untitled.JPG
4chan will be angry
untitled.JPG (12.29 KiB) Viewed 3915 times
Spoiler:
crucialityfactor wrote:I KNEW he could club bitches!

SecondTalon wrote:Reality - More fucked up than Photoshop.

s/notwittysig/wittysig

User avatar
Blubb3r3ng3l
Posts: 352
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 3:41 am UTC

Re: 4chan will be angry

Postby Blubb3r3ng3l » Fri Apr 25, 2008 12:43 am UTC

lol, well, there was a 'documentary' made about Anonymous that claims that it was a movement started in the early 70s with a gay psychiatrist (the article was, in fact, written by a Scientologist) who wore a mask, voice distorter, and called himself 'Dr. Anonymous. Took place in 1972. linky
Let us a little permit Nature to take her own way; she understands Her own affairs better than we ~ Montaigne
embarrass the hell out of me
The only emotion ducks can feel is hate. -__Kit

User avatar
Cornelius
Posts: 155
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 4:54 am UTC
Location: New York
Contact:

Re: 4chan will be angry

Postby Cornelius » Fri Apr 25, 2008 12:51 am UTC

No, 4chan will DO A BARREL ROLL.
ImageImageImage

Bassoon
Posts: 476
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 10:58 pm UTC
Location: Wisconsin

Re: 4chan will be angry

Postby Bassoon » Fri Apr 25, 2008 3:31 am UTC

Blubb3r3ng3l wrote:lol, well, there was a 'documentary' made about Anonymous that claims that it was a movement started in the early 70s with a gay psychiatrist (the article was, in fact, written by a Scientologist) who wore a mask, voice distorter, and called himself 'Dr. Anonymous. Took place in 1972. linky


Clearly it's wrong seeing as Anonymous has appeared throughout history even before the 1970s. I knew your post was in jest, but I need to vent.

The Mighty Thesaurus
In your library, eating your students
Posts: 4399
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 7:47 am UTC
Location: The Daily Bugle

Re: 4chan will be angry

Postby The Mighty Thesaurus » Fri Apr 25, 2008 7:39 pm UTC

No, Anonymous. You are the womens.
LE4dGOLEM wrote:your ability to tell things from things remains one of your skills.
Weeks wrote:Not only can you tell things from things, you can recognize when a thing is a thing

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

User avatar
Delalyra
Posts: 1812
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 12:39 am UTC
Location: Western Mass
Contact:

Re: 4chan will be angry

Postby Delalyra » Sat Apr 26, 2008 1:20 am UTC

Who's in the kitchen now? :twisted:
you may remember me from 2008 or 2009. I left for a while. I'm now sporadically back. I tumble here.

User avatar
Seven
Tertiary Adjunct of Unimatrix Zero-One
Posts: 1964
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 3:05 am UTC
Location: Classified

Re: 4chan will be angry

Postby Seven » Mon Apr 28, 2008 5:47 am UTC

Fox News has teh (old) story. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNO6G4ApJQY
Spoiler:
FEAR ME.JPG

......exploding vans, anyone?

CircleTriangles
Posts: 26
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2008 7:19 am UTC
Location: In the Air!!
Contact:

Re: 4chan will be angry

Postby CircleTriangles » Mon Apr 28, 2008 8:15 am UTC

You know how the official name for Anonymous is David?

Well, at one point, on /r9k/, it was decided that the official female name for Anonymous is Andrea.
then, everyone forgot about that, because it couldn't be posted again. Oh.
The Scruffy-Haired Protagonist
Last.fm

User avatar
Nimz
Posts: 580
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 9:49 am UTC
Location: the origin

Re: 4chan will be angry

Postby Nimz » Mon Apr 28, 2008 9:12 am UTC

CircleTriangles wrote:at one point, on /r9k/, it was decided that the official female name for Anonymous is Andrea.
then, everyone forgot about that, because it couldn't be posted again.
I LMAO'd at this, and I've never been to 4chan (XKCD fills my fora needs). To be fair, though, I did read that blag entry.
LOWA

User avatar
Sandry
My cheese is pants?
Posts: 1894
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 3:36 am UTC
Location: Boston area
Contact:

Re: 4chan will be angry

Postby Sandry » Mon Apr 28, 2008 12:04 pm UTC

Several of us met several of Anonymous this weekend, and all any of us can say, to the best of my knowledge, is that Anonymous is upwards of 70% annoying.
He does not spout ever more, new stupidities. He "diversifies his wrongness portfolio."
(My pronouns are She/Her/Hers)

User avatar
Delalyra
Posts: 1812
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 12:39 am UTC
Location: Western Mass
Contact:

Re: 4chan will be angry

Postby Delalyra » Mon Apr 28, 2008 12:06 pm UTC

Sandry wrote:Several of us met several of Anonymous this weekend, and all any of us can say, to the best of my knowledge, is that Anonymous is upwards of 70% annoying.

When I met anonymous, I thought they were 90% awesome. But I know chanspeak, so. :P
you may remember me from 2008 or 2009. I left for a while. I'm now sporadically back. I tumble here.

User avatar
Sandry
My cheese is pants?
Posts: 1894
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 3:36 am UTC
Location: Boston area
Contact:

Re: 4chan will be angry

Postby Sandry » Mon Apr 28, 2008 12:09 pm UTC

Delalyra wrote:
Sandry wrote:Several of us met several of Anonymous this weekend, and all any of us can say, to the best of my knowledge, is that Anonymous is upwards of 70% annoying.

When I met anonymous, I thought they were 90% awesome. But I know chanspeak, so. :P

Initially, they were fun. Opinions, generally speaking, were revised sharply downward as the day wore on. *shrug* They're probably fun when your intention is to be where they're picketing. It's not as much fun when they're the side dish that keeps trying to bump and gyrate the main course off the plate.
He does not spout ever more, new stupidities. He "diversifies his wrongness portfolio."
(My pronouns are She/Her/Hers)

User avatar
Delalyra
Posts: 1812
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 12:39 am UTC
Location: Western Mass
Contact:

Re: 4chan will be angry

Postby Delalyra » Mon Apr 28, 2008 3:23 pm UTC

Sandry wrote:Initially, they were fun. Opinions, generally speaking, were revised sharply downward as the day wore on. *shrug* They're probably fun when your intention is to be where they're picketing. It's not as much fun when they're the side dish that keeps trying to bump and gyrate the main course off the plate.

This is very true. Oh, anon. *shakes head*
you may remember me from 2008 or 2009. I left for a while. I'm now sporadically back. I tumble here.

User avatar
Sprocket
Seymour
Posts: 5951
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 6:04 pm UTC
Location: impaled on Beck's boney hips.
Contact:

Re: 4chan will be angry

Postby Sprocket » Mon Apr 28, 2008 6:40 pm UTC

Sandry wrote: It's not as much fun when they're the side dish that keeps trying to bump and gyrate the main course off the plate.

Oh me yarm Sandry, you are a lingual goddess.

Best I can tell, they're 75% dip shits, and I'm being generous there. And no I'm not remotely offended by the notion of them calling themselves and eachother old fags, new fags, moral fags, booze fags, party fags, Paris Hilton fags, hip hop fags, neo fags, goth fags, nerd fags, roll fags, cell fags, aqua fags, gay fags, pirate fags, ninja fags, pony fags, liberal fags, conservative fags, fauna fags, flora fags, hetero fags, comic fags, fraternity fags, anarchist fags, under age fags, druggy fags, hippy fags or dinosaur fags.

However, I find the term Louis Armstrong Fags to be minorly offensive.
"She’s a free spirit, a wind-rider, she’s at one with nature, and walks with the kodama eidolons”
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Zohar wrote: Down with the hipster binary! It's a SPECTRUM!

User avatar
Seven
Tertiary Adjunct of Unimatrix Zero-One
Posts: 1964
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 3:05 am UTC
Location: Classified

Re: 4chan will be angry

Postby Seven » Tue Apr 29, 2008 5:43 am UTC

You forgot furfags............. then again, Anon is in denial.

User avatar
ThorFluff
Ursus Onanis
Posts: 988
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 10:53 am UTC
Location: Stockholm - Sweden
Contact:

Re: 4chan will be angry

Postby ThorFluff » Tue Apr 29, 2008 7:09 pm UTC

but then again the best suggestion ever for a gravestone was
"Deadfag"
EsotericWombat wrote:You're... calling the Rolling Stones emo.

It might take a while to gather the lynch mob. no one really planned against this eventuality.


krynd wrote:That'd make an awesome sig. Unfortunately, I'm sure self-sigging isn't allowed...

User avatar
Thousand
Posts: 139
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 9:36 pm UTC
Location: Manchester, UK

Re: 4chan will be angry

Postby Thousand » Tue Apr 29, 2008 7:32 pm UTC

CatProximity wrote:
Sandry wrote: It's not as much fun when they're the side dish that keeps trying to bump and gyrate the main course off the plate.

Oh me yarm Sandry, you are a lingual goddess.

Best I can tell, they're 75% dip shits, and I'm being generous there. And no I'm not remotely offended by the notion of them calling themselves and eachother old fags, new fags, moral fags, booze fags, party fags, Paris Hilton fags, hip hop fags, neo fags, goth fags, nerd fags, roll fags, cell fags, aqua fags, gay fags, pirate fags, ninja fags, pony fags, liberal fags, conservative fags, fauna fags, flora fags, hetero fags, comic fags, fraternity fags, anarchist fags, under age fags, druggy fags, hippy fags or dinosaur fags.


What, no fag fags? :D

User avatar
Cornelius
Posts: 155
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 4:54 am UTC
Location: New York
Contact:

Re: 4chan will be angry

Postby Cornelius » Wed Apr 30, 2008 2:10 am UTC

no, no fag fags.

fag fags are straight, and we can't halve that, can we?



[well... actually I do have a large knife we could use.....]
ImageImageImage


Return to “General”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests