ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Things that don't belong anywhere else. (Check first).

Moderators: Moderators General, Prelates, Magistrates

User avatar
Zohar
COMMANDER PORN
Posts: 8529
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 8:45 pm UTC
Location: Denver

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Zohar » Mon Nov 09, 2009 6:26 am UTC

Obvious change is obvious?
sympathy.png
Try to be kind to people in need.
sympathy.png (21.25 KiB) Viewed 9376 times
Mighty Jalapeno: "See, Zohar agrees, and he's nice to people."
SecondTalon: "Still better looking than Jesus."

Not how I say my name

User avatar
Khaz
Posts: 72
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 4:20 am UTC
Location: Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Khaz » Mon Nov 09, 2009 7:31 am UTC

Spoiler:
660 + 546 + 299
Image
It worked with Maggie!

Spoiler:
660 + 469
Image
Sometimes I have to suppress the weirdest thoughts...

User avatar
LuNatic
Posts: 973
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2008 4:21 am UTC
Location: The land of Aus

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby LuNatic » Mon Nov 09, 2009 8:14 am UTC

*snicker*

Slightly worse indeed. Slightly funnier too!
Cynical Idealist wrote:
Velict wrote:Good Jehova, there are cheesegraters on the blagotube!

This is, for some reason, one of the funniest things I've read today.

User avatar
TheChewanater
Posts: 1279
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 5:24 am UTC
Location: lol why am I still wearing a Santa suit?

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby TheChewanater » Mon Nov 09, 2009 10:10 pm UTC

I can't read over a hundred pages of posts (I got pretty far, though), so please have mercy on my soul and at least make it short and painless if anything like this has been done.

Original:
Spoiler:
Image


SLIGHTLY Worse:
graph1.png
graph1.png (33.41 KiB) Viewed 9218 times


MUCH Worse:
graph2.png
graph2.png (32.31 KiB) Viewed 9222 times


EDIT
MUCH MUCH WORSE:
graph3.png
graph3.png (22.61 KiB) Viewed 9177 times
ImageImage
http://internetometer.com/give/4279
No one can agree how to count how many types of people there are. You could ask two people and get 10 different answers.

User avatar
FCN
Posts: 120
Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 7:47 am UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby FCN » Tue Nov 10, 2009 6:21 am UTC

Welcome, TheChewanater. I am here to save your soul by sharing with you the scripture of the xkcdsw database. Some consider our text archaic (or at least somewhat out-of-date) and instead recommend searching this thread for the comic number (which reminds me, you should include the comic numbers in your post). Fortunately, your worsenings are all new and all crispy.

And now for something slightly worse:

Spoiler:
649
Image
Can we turn on a light? I can't see what you're saying.

Spoiler:
221, 628
Image
If I wasn't psychic, how would I know that she's RFP 1149.5 compliant?

Inspiration from Vempele on that last one. It's too bad that the image titles don't show with Photobucket (unless you click a couple times to find it), because those are part of the package with these two.
Spoiler:
LuNatic wrote:
Dear FCN,
You are:
a) Terrible, but in an awesome way.
or
b) Awesome, but in a terrible way.
I'm having difficulty deciding which.

User avatar
Khaz
Posts: 72
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 4:20 am UTC
Location: Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Khaz » Tue Nov 10, 2009 8:43 am UTC

Spoiler:
160 + Penny Arcade
Image
See? I can be a popular webcomic artist too!

User avatar
TheChewanater
Posts: 1279
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 5:24 am UTC
Location: lol why am I still wearing a Santa suit?

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby TheChewanater » Tue Nov 10, 2009 8:16 pm UTC

FCN wrote:Welcome, TheChewanater. I am here to save your soul by sharing with you the scripture of the xkcdsw database. Some consider our text archaic (or at least somewhat out-of-date) and instead recommend searching this thread for the comic number (which reminds me, you should include the comic numbers in your post). Fortunately, your worsenings are all new and all crispy.


Thanks for the link. That really saved me since I was about to make a time machine one.

Here's 424 slightly worse:
Attachments
security.png
True story: It only took one try to upload this.
security.png (70.17 KiB) Viewed 8952 times
ImageImage
http://internetometer.com/give/4279
No one can agree how to count how many types of people there are. You could ask two people and get 10 different answers.

User avatar
The Scyphozoa
Posts: 2871
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 6:33 pm UTC
Location: Sector 5

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby The Scyphozoa » Wed Nov 11, 2009 5:21 am UTC

scikidus wrote:Kudos to lulzfish and Mat. Those are hilarious.

Source: 657
Spoiler:
xkcdeditmovies.jpg

...it's just a documentary...
Image
3rdtry wrote:If there ever is another World War, I hope they at least have the decency to call it "World War 2: Episode One"

doogly wrote:murder is a subset of being mean

User avatar
FCN
Posts: 120
Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 7:47 am UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby FCN » Thu Nov 12, 2009 3:03 am UTC

NSFW, contains spoilers, View Image to view full image
Spoiler:
657, 267
Image
The Primer knockoff had a larger budget than the original - you'd be surprised how much it costs to get an actress to have an orgy with herself.
Spoiler:
LuNatic wrote:
Dear FCN,
You are:
a) Terrible, but in an awesome way.
or
b) Awesome, but in a terrible way.
I'm having difficulty deciding which.

User avatar
Khaz
Posts: 72
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 4:20 am UTC
Location: Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Khaz » Thu Nov 12, 2009 5:15 am UTC

Spoiler:
159 + 661 + 285
Image
I wonder if making a "Better than Vista" joke might smooth me out of this embarassment...
Last edited by Khaz on Thu Nov 12, 2009 5:38 am UTC, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
e^iπ+1=0
Much, much better than Gooder
Posts: 2065
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 9:41 am UTC
Location: Lancaster

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby e^iπ+1=0 » Thu Nov 12, 2009 5:31 am UTC

Nice one! Although you somehow lost the i in "fix"...
poxic wrote:You, sir, have heroic hair.
poxic wrote:I note that the hair is not slowing down. It appears to have progressed from heroic to rocking.

(Avatar by Sungura)

User avatar
Khaz
Posts: 72
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 4:20 am UTC
Location: Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Khaz » Thu Nov 12, 2009 5:38 am UTC

e^iπ+1=0 wrote:Nice one! Although you somehow lost the i in "fix"...

Fixed. I must have screwed that up trying to construct a "K" out of an I and half an X. Yes, I do things the hard way...

User avatar
diotimajsh
Posts: 658
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 7:10 am UTC
Contact:

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby diotimajsh » Thu Nov 12, 2009 11:06 am UTC

Nice work Khaz, both on this page and the last one 8). Slightly worse indeed!
Osha wrote:Foolish Patriarchy! Your feeble attempts at social pressure have no effect on my invincible awesomeness! Bwahahahaa


Blog type thing

User avatar
Khaz
Posts: 72
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 4:20 am UTC
Location: Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Khaz » Fri Nov 13, 2009 5:51 am UTC

Spoiler:
662 + 405
Image
But... Uh... Shit.


Again, I'm sorry. :P

User avatar
Amnesiasoft
Posts: 2573
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 4:28 am UTC
Location: Colorado
Contact:

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Amnesiasoft » Fri Nov 13, 2009 1:04 pm UTC

have to be sorry for? That was awesome!

User avatar
Vytron
Posts: 429
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 10:11 am UTC
Location: The Outside. I use She/He/Her/His/Him as gender neutral pronouns :P

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Vytron » Sat Nov 14, 2009 8:11 am UTC

I can't see the attachments of the previous page :cry:

Anyway:
482 + 655

Spoiler:
Image
But you're still ugly.


656
Spoiler:
Image
Sorry, no candy for you!


659
Spoiler:
Image
I can rearrange it if you don't believe me.
Go! Go! You can do it username5243!
Cheers Marsh'n!

Image
THANKS KARHELL!! :)

warflango
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 4:03 am UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby warflango » Mon Nov 16, 2009 4:50 am UTC

Sources are kind of old, but:

Spoiler:
72 and 567
classhole_mission.png
Also, in the future people don't have necks.
classhole_mission.png (60.17 KiB) Viewed 7801 times

User avatar
Vytron
Posts: 429
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 10:11 am UTC
Location: The Outside. I use She/He/Her/His/Him as gender neutral pronouns :P

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Vytron » Mon Nov 16, 2009 11:10 am UTC

Welcome aboard warflango! For a moment I thought it was Abraham Lincoln traveling in time, and the alt is hilarious!
Go! Go! You can do it username5243!
Cheers Marsh'n!

Image
THANKS KARHELL!! :)

User avatar
Hackfleischkannibale
Posts: 171
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2008 7:51 pm UTC
Location: not the moon... yet.

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Hackfleischkannibale » Mon Nov 16, 2009 5:54 pm UTC

462
Spoiler:
morgendorfferian_paracusia.png
It's amazing what it does for wikipedia articles. Or anything else.
morgendorfferian_paracusia.png (35.66 KiB) Viewed 7619 times

426
Spoiler:
geobashing.JPG
Saturday is foam sword night.
geobashing.JPG (247.21 KiB) Viewed 7630 times
If this sentence makes no sense to you, why don't you just change a pig?

User avatar
chridd
Has a vermicelli title
Posts: 843
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 10:07 am UTC
Location: ...Earth, I guess?
Contact:

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby chridd » Mon Nov 16, 2009 7:54 pm UTC

Hackfleischkannibale wrote:426
Spoiler:
geobashing.JPG

Did you draw that by hand?
Anyhow, here's an edit to yours:
Spoiler:
geobashing2.png
-bash: Yeah.: command not found
geobashing2.png (470.61 KiB) Viewed 7576 times
~ chri d. d. /tʃɹɪ.di.di/ (Phonotactics, schmphonotactics) · she · Forum game scores
mittfh wrote:I wish this post was very quotable...

User avatar
FCN
Posts: 120
Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 7:47 am UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby FCN » Tue Nov 17, 2009 12:37 am UTC

Spoiler:
663
Image
Within the past 10 years, cannabis use has become 30% more prevalent and 80% more mind-blowing.
Spoiler:
LuNatic wrote:
Dear FCN,
You are:
a) Terrible, but in an awesome way.
or
b) Awesome, but in a terrible way.
I'm having difficulty deciding which.

User avatar
Maseiken
The Candylawyer
Posts: 2827
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 11:13 am UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Maseiken » Tue Nov 17, 2009 12:42 am UTC

Hackfleischkannibale wrote:462
Spoiler:
morgendorfferian_paracusia.png


I would PAY MONEY to have Morgendorfferian paracusia somehow surgically induced in my brain.
"GRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOWR!!!!"
(Translation: "Objection!")

Maseiken had the ball at the top of the key...

User avatar
TheChewanater
Posts: 1279
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 5:24 am UTC
Location: lol why am I still wearing a Santa suit?

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby TheChewanater » Tue Nov 17, 2009 12:54 am UTC

ImageImage
http://internetometer.com/give/4279
No one can agree how to count how many types of people there are. You could ask two people and get 10 different answers.

User avatar
lulzfish
Posts: 1214
Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2008 8:17 am UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby lulzfish » Tue Nov 17, 2009 4:20 am UTC

I ran short of ideas and only did two:
Spoiler:
Pyro.png
Hudda hudda huh!
Pyro.png (23.86 KiB) Viewed 7371 times

Spoiler:
robotnik_paracusia.png
SnooPING AS usual, I see?
robotnik_paracusia.png (65.65 KiB) Viewed 7370 times

Source is 462.

User avatar
Amnesiasoft
Posts: 2573
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 4:28 am UTC
Location: Colorado
Contact:

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Amnesiasoft » Tue Nov 17, 2009 4:29 am UTC

It's Robotnik. Other than that. That one had me laughing way too much.

User avatar
lulzfish
Posts: 1214
Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2008 8:17 am UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby lulzfish » Tue Nov 17, 2009 4:32 am UTC

Well, the joke is "freemanic paracusia" ~ "Robotnic paracusia". The.. "ic".

gsumbreon
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 4:15 am UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby gsumbreon » Tue Nov 17, 2009 4:40 am UTC

Sources: 663, 239

Bloggers wear capes (left as a link because the image doesn't fully show on the page):


http://i458.photobucket.com/albums/qq30 ... rcapes.png

User avatar
Hackfleischkannibale
Posts: 171
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2008 7:51 pm UTC
Location: not the moon... yet.

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Hackfleischkannibale » Tue Nov 17, 2009 9:43 am UTC

chridd wrote:Did you draw that by hand?

Yes, and I got it into my computer by a camera... I fail at technology.

@ Maseiken: I got the idea when I watched so much Daria in a row that I actually started to get morgendorfferian paracusia.
If this sentence makes no sense to you, why don't you just change a pig?

User avatar
King Author
Posts: 736
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 12:30 pm UTC
Location: Pennsylvania, USA

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby King Author » Wed Nov 18, 2009 4:36 pm UTC

Booyah. Obscurity FTW.
Attachments
xkcd 655 ruined.png
xkcd 655 ruined.png (38.25 KiB) Viewed 7144 times
I have signitures disabled. If you do, too...you can't read this, so nevermind >_>

User avatar
Khaz
Posts: 72
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 4:20 am UTC
Location: Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Khaz » Wed Nov 18, 2009 4:55 pm UTC

Spoiler:
242 + 664
Image
Aren't you the one who assigned me to getting zapped by that thing?

User avatar
Khaz
Posts: 72
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 4:20 am UTC
Location: Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Khaz » Fri Nov 20, 2009 5:49 am UTC

Spoiler:
665
Image
While you were looking for me, I stumbled into such a weird place!

User avatar
Maseiken
The Candylawyer
Posts: 2827
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 11:13 am UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Maseiken » Fri Nov 20, 2009 8:19 am UTC

Hackfleischkannibale wrote:
chridd wrote:Did you draw that by hand?

Yes, and I got it into my computer by a camera... I fail at technology.

@ Maseiken: I got the idea when I watched so much Daria in a row that I actually started to get morgendorfferian paracusia.

Must... replicate...
"GRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOWR!!!!"
(Translation: "Objection!")

Maseiken had the ball at the top of the key...

warflango
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 4:03 am UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby warflango » Fri Nov 20, 2009 3:51 pm UTC

Vytron wrote:Welcome aboard warflango! For a moment I thought it was Abraham Lincoln traveling in time, and the alt is hilarious!


Thanks!

Here's one I'm surprised no one else thought of first:

258 and 663
Spoiler:
sagan-man-seriously.png
Curses! It's one of the 6% of Americans who are immune to me!
sagan-man-seriously.png (88.05 KiB) Viewed 6703 times

User avatar
Khaz
Posts: 72
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 4:20 am UTC
Location: Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Khaz » Fri Nov 20, 2009 4:15 pm UTC

warflango wrote:
Vytron wrote:Here's one I'm surprised no one else thought of first:

Hahaha! YES! By god YES!

User avatar
oxoiron
Posts: 1365
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:56 pm UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby oxoiron » Fri Nov 20, 2009 4:22 pm UTC

warflango wrote:258 and 663
Spoiler:
sagan-man-seriously.png
What really makes that work is the alt-text. You definitely get an internet for that!
"Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to reform (or pause and reflect)."-- Mark Twain
"There is not more dedicated criminal than a group of children."--addams

User avatar
TheChewanater
Posts: 1279
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 5:24 am UTC
Location: lol why am I still wearing a Santa suit?

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby TheChewanater » Sun Nov 22, 2009 2:27 am UTC

Attachments
se.png
se.png (28.17 KiB) Viewed 6458 times
ImageImage
http://internetometer.com/give/4279
No one can agree how to count how many types of people there are. You could ask two people and get 10 different answers.

LTK
Posts: 293
Joined: Sat May 09, 2009 8:46 pm UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby LTK » Sun Nov 22, 2009 10:21 pm UTC

'; DROP DATABASE;-- wrote:This comic is actually posted on the wall of one of the campus computer labs, and someone has made these modifications to it (including the face):
Spoiler:
xkcdsw-csection.png

Holy crap! I was just thinking of that earlier today! Is Randall building some kind of mind-reading cloud into the forum?

User avatar
Khaz
Posts: 72
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 4:20 am UTC
Location: Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Khaz » Mon Nov 23, 2009 7:01 am UTC

Fixed:
Spoiler:
666
Image
Seriously, why do I even bother wearing it if nobody pays attention?

First SW on the devil's comic, yay!

User avatar
scikidus
Posts: 792
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 9:34 pm UTC
Location: New York, NY
Contact:

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby scikidus » Mon Nov 23, 2009 12:48 pm UTC

I am going to hell.

Source: 666
Spoiler:
xkcdedit666.png
"You'd be surprised how easy it is to install working doorknobs on empty walls."
xkcdedit666.png (82.33 KiB) Viewed 6082 times
Happy hollandaise!

"The universe is a figment of its own imagination" -Douglas Adams

User avatar
Zohar
COMMANDER PORN
Posts: 8529
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 8:45 pm UTC
Location: Denver

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Zohar » Mon Nov 23, 2009 12:50 pm UTC

Buy why would you need silent tools for that?
Mighty Jalapeno: "See, Zohar agrees, and he's nice to people."
SecondTalon: "Still better looking than Jesus."

Not how I say my name


Return to “General”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests