ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Things that don't belong anywhere else. (Check first).

Moderators: Moderators General, Prelates, Magistrates

User avatar
Mat
Posts: 414
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 8:19 pm UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Mat » Fri Apr 22, 2011 11:33 am UTC

889

Spoiler:
turtles1.PNG
A neatly organised file system? Who wouldn't be?

Spoiler:
allthewaydown.PNG
It's turtles all the way down

Spoiler:
comet.PNG
Yeah, you didn't see that one coming, did you turtle?

Spoiler:
turtles2.PNG
We turtles have a saying to describe situations like this: "fuck. that. shit."

Spoiler:
hungry.PNG
Turtles are for life, not just for christmas

Burkitt
Posts: 207
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 2:49 pm UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Burkitt » Fri Apr 22, 2011 12:07 pm UTC

Image

50 years later - "I am a turtle" - TURTLES ACHIEVE SENTIENCE

User avatar
Giant Speck
Bouncy Sex Marshmallow
Posts: 3819
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 12:30 pm UTC
Location: Tucson, Arizona

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Giant Speck » Fri Apr 22, 2011 12:11 pm UTC

Image
Squirrels have it figured out, man.
776 | 889
"Did I say recently that I love Giant Speck? Because I love Giant Speck. He is the best." - Weeks
BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE BOUNCE

User avatar
sophyturtle
I'll go put my shirt back on for this kind of shock. No I won't. I'll get my purse.
Posts: 3476
Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2008 4:19 pm UTC
Location: it's turtles all the way down, even in the suburbs
Contact:

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby sophyturtle » Fri Apr 22, 2011 3:57 pm UTC

Mat wrote:889
Spoiler:
turtles2.PNG
<3
I feel like mine are saying this all the time, when really they are just turtling around.
I want to get to a place where I am neither conforming nor rebelling but simply being.

Zauderer
Posts: 96
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 6:47 pm UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Zauderer » Sat Apr 23, 2011 10:08 pm UTC

Warning: Might offend religious sensibilities. Source: Atheism soup

Spoiler:
Image

User avatar
Ephemeron
Posts: 282
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 12:39 pm UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Ephemeron » Sun Apr 24, 2011 9:29 am UTC

I didn't want to post all five of these, just this one:

Sharks

Image

You're a shark!
889 | 585

User avatar
MikeStern
Posts: 16
Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 5:37 am UTC
Location: Sioux City

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby MikeStern » Mon Apr 25, 2011 7:10 am UTC

Phew after spending what feels like months (it was actually a couple weeks), reading through this thread to make sure I wouldn't repeat anything, and ignoring the suggestions to use xkcdsw.com/sources so that I could proceed with my original excuse of reading through the whole thread to make sure I wouldn't repeat anything, I am ready to post my own xkcdsw's!!

Sources: 457 513 512
Spoiler:
alternate_currencysw.png
"I can do it in under 10 seconds" "I've heard. Zing!"


Sources: 528
Spoiler:
windows_7sw.png
Does it make it worse that it is a translation to Hebrew?


Finally, I had to make one with portal 2 since it is the one other thing, besides this thread, which I have obsessed over this past week:
Sources: 606 For the alt-text
Spoiler:
cutting_edgesw.png
Bad enough for xkcd, not xkcdsw!

User avatar
I Am Raven
Posts: 2416
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 8:09 am UTC
Location: Amsterdam.
Contact:

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby I Am Raven » Tue Apr 26, 2011 1:40 pm UTC

All of those are really good! Epic internet win for YOU, sir!
Ptolom wrote:penis

User avatar
Ephemeron
Posts: 282
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 12:39 pm UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Ephemeron » Sun May 01, 2011 1:47 pm UTC

Have I posted this yet? No I believe I haven't.

Comic title: Black/White Hats

Image

You should also totally read the Black Hat Guy/White Hat Guy slash-fic I wrote.
455

User avatar
TheChewanater
Posts: 1279
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 5:24 am UTC
Location: lol why am I still wearing a Santa suit?

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby TheChewanater » Mon May 02, 2011 4:36 am UTC

EDIT: Fixed an epic exponent fail.

unixtime.png

Only counting times where Unix Time exists and that can represent it.
Last edited by TheChewanater on Mon May 02, 2011 7:41 pm UTC, edited 1 time in total.
ImageImage
http://internetometer.com/give/4279
No one can agree how to count how many types of people there are. You could ask two people and get 10 different answers.

User avatar
Link
Posts: 1419
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2009 11:33 am UTC
Location: ᘝᓄᘈᖉᐣ
Contact:

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Link » Mon May 02, 2011 6:39 am UTC

TheChewanater wrote:
unixtime.png

Only counting times where Unix Time exists and that can represent it.

That should be -231, not 2-31. Or, actually, -(231) would be even better because it's less ambiguous. (Even though (-2)31 = -(231).)

User avatar
ostrichguy
Posts: 22
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2010 1:15 am UTC
Location: I'm right behind you.

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby ostrichguy » Mon May 02, 2011 7:09 pm UTC

xkcdswschool.png
Well, that's quite a pessimistic view on the education system.
xkcdswschool.png (24.21 KiB) Viewed 8636 times

User avatar
Ephemeron
Posts: 282
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 12:39 pm UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Ephemeron » Wed May 04, 2011 12:16 pm UTC

Saw this on the xkcdsucks blog. I'm probably missing the point, but I thought it was funny enough to post here.

Image

I liked the part where he sprouted three extra arms, turning into some kind of hideous mutant.
836 | 790

User avatar
curtmack
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 3:24 pm UTC
Location: Everywhere including nowhere.
Contact:

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby curtmack » Wed May 04, 2011 5:49 pm UTC

This is what immediately came to mind when I saw this scene.

Image
...and then I said, "JAVA? Are you CRAZY?!"
15 | MLP:FiM
...?

User avatar
cephalopod9
Posts: 2030
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 7:23 am UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby cephalopod9 » Fri May 06, 2011 9:42 am UTC

895, time for stupid internet memes
Untitled.png


and the explicit version
Spoiler:
Untitled.jpg
Image

User avatar
phlip
Restorer of Worlds
Posts: 7573
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 3:56 am UTC
Location: Australia
Contact:

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby phlip » Fri May 06, 2011 9:48 am UTC

Requisite: But how do they work?

Code: Select all

enum ಠ_ಠ {°□°╰=1, °Д°╰, ಠ益ಠ╰};
void ┻━┻︵​╰(ಠ_ಠ ⚠) {exit((int)⚠);}
[he/him/his]

User avatar
tastelikecoke
Posts: 1208
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2010 7:58 am UTC
Location: Antipode of Brazil
Contact:

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby tastelikecoke » Fri May 06, 2011 10:57 am UTC

Nobody cares what those scientists say because they all pissing us off.

User avatar
Ephemeron
Posts: 282
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 12:39 pm UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Ephemeron » Sat May 07, 2011 8:59 am UTC

Image
The kid was being a total asshole. Classroom discipline, it works, bitches!
895 | 793

Idea for a game: I only added a panel to the last comic, so maybe we can keep trying to make this comic worse by adding extra panels.

User avatar
ostrichguy
Posts: 22
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2010 1:15 am UTC
Location: I'm right behind you.

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby ostrichguy » Wed May 11, 2011 12:28 am UTC

Ephemeron wrote:
Idea for a game: I only added a panel to the last comic, so maybe we can keep trying to make this comic worse by adding extra panels.


xkcdsw class.png
Don't throw squirrels.

User avatar
TheChewanater
Posts: 1279
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 5:24 am UTC
Location: lol why am I still wearing a Santa suit?

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby TheChewanater » Wed May 11, 2011 12:34 am UTC

ImageImage
http://internetometer.com/give/4279
No one can agree how to count how many types of people there are. You could ask two people and get 10 different answers.

User avatar
Vaskafdt
Posts: 137
Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2009 8:56 am UTC
Location: Jerusalem

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Vaskafdt » Wed May 11, 2011 10:45 am UTC

Elevator: Unabridged.
Spoiler:
Image
Title text: we don't even have an elevator in this building...


sources: 877, 897, 895
My Art Blog: (Slightly NSFW)
Image

User avatar
Ephemeron
Posts: 282
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 12:39 pm UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Ephemeron » Fri May 20, 2011 10:13 pm UTC

Looks like Black Hat Guy's classhole-ism is defeated by Wikipedian bureaucracy:

Image

Little did they know, Black Hat Guy was ACTUALLY counting the number of words in the deletion discussion.
545

User avatar
AvatarIII
Posts: 2098
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2011 12:28 pm UTC
Location: W.Sussex, UK

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby AvatarIII » Fri May 20, 2011 10:30 pm UTC

:|
Attachments
temperature.png
Alt text: This isn't funny, we're all going to die.

User avatar
Ouch.jars
Posts: 101
Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 11:47 am UTC
Location: Adelaide, Australia

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Ouch.jars » Sat May 21, 2011 3:44 am UTC

Obvious:
901
Attachments
901sw.png
It's in Celsius. Deal with it.
ouchjars: putting the "pie" in "sapience" since '08

User avatar
Levi
Posts: 1294
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:12 am UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Levi » Sun May 22, 2011 2:39 am UTC

kelvin.png
It's a scientific thermometer.

User avatar
TheChewanater
Posts: 1279
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 5:24 am UTC
Location: lol why am I still wearing a Santa suit?

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby TheChewanater » Sun May 22, 2011 3:16 am UTC

http://xkcd.com/441/
http://xkcd.com/901/

temperature.png
I think we did, unless our copy of the Kama Sutra had a mistranslation.
ImageImage
http://internetometer.com/give/4279
No one can agree how to count how many types of people there are. You could ask two people and get 10 different answers.

User avatar
Ephemeron
Posts: 282
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 12:39 pm UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Ephemeron » Sun May 22, 2011 1:46 pm UTC

Comic title: Over 9000

Image

Oh, it was actually measuring my power level. Guess I didn't need to break it then.
901
Last edited by Ephemeron on Mon May 23, 2011 3:28 pm UTC, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
WolfieMario
Posts: 120
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 10:45 pm UTC
Contact:

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby WolfieMario » Mon May 23, 2011 3:16 am UTC

I like how adding another 0 in the middle will make the original comic (901) become OVER 9000 :D
But you probably already noticed that :P
"Sometimes game development isn't about doing what is nice to everyone all the time." - Jens Bergensten

User avatar
cephalopod9
Posts: 2030
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 7:23 am UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby cephalopod9 » Mon May 23, 2011 10:35 am UTC

On my way towards making a different remix:
psychic.jpg


I'm kinda surprised this one, 858 doesn't seem to have gone memetic.
Image

adho
Posts: 139
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2010 8:21 am UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby adho » Thu May 26, 2011 1:11 pm UTC

Image

Ok, ok, non-elementary functions. I think it's funny. 54

User avatar
Roĝer
Posts: 445
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 9:36 pm UTC
Location: Many worlds, but mostly Copenhagen.
Contact:

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Roĝer » Wed Jun 01, 2011 6:01 pm UTC

That expression doesn't seem to have a meaning to me, since you forgot to write the dx.
Ik ben niet koppig, ik heb gewoon gelijk.

User avatar
You, sir, name?
Posts: 6983
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 10:07 am UTC
Location: Chako Paul City
Contact:

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby You, sir, name? » Wed Jun 01, 2011 6:33 pm UTC

Roĝer wrote:That expression doesn't seem to have a meaning to me, since you forgot to write the dx.


I'd say the integration element is superfluous when there is only one variable.
I edit my posts a lot and sometimes the words wrong order words appear in sentences get messed up.

User avatar
chridd
Has a vermicelli title
Posts: 846
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 10:07 am UTC
Location: ...Earth, I guess?
Contact:

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby chridd » Wed Jun 01, 2011 6:37 pm UTC

Roĝer wrote:That expression doesn't seem to have a meaning to me, since you forgot to write the dx.
Fixed:
maths-slightly-worser.png
What non-elementary functions?
maths-slightly-worser.png (33 KiB) Viewed 7212 times

(Source: adho's post, above + Science (54))
~ chri d. d. /tʃɹɪ.di.di/ (Phonotactics, schmphonotactics) · she · Forum game scores
mittfh wrote:I wish this post was very quotable...

User avatar
sunami
Posts: 239
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2007 4:52 am UTC
Location: Arlington. The state of Northern Virginia.

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby sunami » Wed Jun 01, 2011 6:44 pm UTC

citationsquestion.png
If you send this to me one more time, mom, I'm disowning you.
citationsquestion.png (9.9 KiB) Viewed 7207 times
"You heard it here first: all my software is shitty."

User avatar
Ephemeron
Posts: 282
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 12:39 pm UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Ephemeron » Sat Jun 04, 2011 12:28 am UTC

I hope this applies to some people.

Image

“We don't stop playing because we grow old; we grow old because we stop playing.” ~ George Bernard Shaw
786 | 907

User avatar
I Am Raven
Posts: 2416
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 8:09 am UTC
Location: Amsterdam.
Contact:

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby I Am Raven » Sat Jun 04, 2011 1:04 pm UTC

That last one, Ephemeron, is awesome.
Ptolom wrote:penis

adho
Posts: 139
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2010 8:21 am UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby adho » Sat Jun 04, 2011 2:04 pm UTC

Roĝer wrote:That expression doesn't seem to have a meaning to me, since you forgot to write the dx.

Given my track record that wasn't surprising. Seriously considering getting a tattoo of "dx" and "+ c" on the back of my hand. All of those little half marks add up.
I Am Raven wrote:That last one, Ephemeron, is awesome.

I concur.

User avatar
rrwoods
Posts: 1509
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2007 5:57 pm UTC
Location: US

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby rrwoods » Mon Jun 06, 2011 9:24 pm UTC

Ephemeron wrote:http://i1100.photobucket.com/albums/g403/Ephemeronium/Ages.png

yes

<- 26 and still easily excited. I hope this never changes. Live would be so boring otherwise.
31/M/taken/US
age/gender/interest/country

Belial wrote:The sex card is tournament legal. And I am tapping it for, like, six mana.

teelo
Posts: 783
Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2010 11:50 pm UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby teelo » Wed Jun 15, 2011 2:31 am UTC

"How do Magnets work?" + Magic School Bus comic, please. Someone make it happen.

User avatar
Mirko
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 9:47 pm UTC
Location: CA

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Mirko » Wed Jun 15, 2011 2:50 am UTC

I really want to try the mentos thing now.


Return to “General”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests