ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Things that don't belong anywhere else. (Check first).

Moderators: Moderators General, Prelates, Magistrates

operator[]
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 6:11 pm UTC
Location: Stockholm, Sweden

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby operator[] » Tue Jul 28, 2009 8:17 pm UTC

Spoiler:
References: http://xkcd.com/253/, alt hosting
engineer_pranks.png
What's worse, a inescapable cloverleaf or a rotating supercollider? This should go in Religious Wars.
engineer_pranks.png (50.58 KiB) Viewed 13691 times
Spoiler:
References: http://xkcd.com/590/, alt hosting
heartfelt_cards.png
Giving our heartfelt cards Genuine People Personalities wasn't actually a very good idea.
heartfelt_cards.png (14.55 KiB) Viewed 12444 times
Spoiler:
References: http://xkcd.com/614/, alt hosting
woodpecker.png
It turns out the woodpecker couldn't actually hear him.
Last edited by operator[] on Sun Jan 24, 2010 10:12 pm UTC, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Zohar
COMMANDER PORN
Posts: 8533
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 8:45 pm UTC
Location: Denver

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Zohar » Tue Jul 28, 2009 8:19 pm UTC

Maugchief wrote:
Spoiler:
Sources: 49, 275, 615
avoidance2.PNG

Ahahaha, that is awesome! I stared blankly for a few seconds and then burst out laughing!
Mighty Jalapeno: "See, Zohar agrees, and he's nice to people."
SecondTalon: "Still better looking than Jesus."

Not how I say my name

User avatar
LuNatic
Posts: 973
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2008 4:21 am UTC
Location: The land of Aus

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby LuNatic » Wed Jul 29, 2009 4:31 am UTC

FCN wrote:
Spoiler:
270, 471, 613
threesome3.png


Dear FCN,
You are:
a) Terrible, but in an awesome way.
or
b) Awesome, but in a terrible way.
I'm having difficulty deciding which.
Cynical Idealist wrote:
Velict wrote:Good Jehova, there are cheesegraters on the blagotube!

This is, for some reason, one of the funniest things I've read today.

User avatar
OBrien
Posts: 1478
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 3:05 pm UTC
Location: 1 Bimini Road, downtown Atlantis

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby OBrien » Wed Jul 29, 2009 11:51 am UTC

The latest comic has hit me quite hard because I've just turned 20. So...

Spoiler:
leasesw.png
What? I've only just left my teens? Well... I stopped growing up in my mid-teens then.
leasesw.png (19.49 KiB) Viewed 13611 times


Source: 616


Or:

Spoiler:
startlingsw2.png
You're sitting on your own, who're you talking to?
startlingsw2.png (28.14 KiB) Viewed 13618 times


Sources: 354 and 616
Spelling and grammar can go screw themselves.

User avatar
Red Hal
Magically Delicious
Posts: 1445
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 2:42 pm UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Red Hal » Wed Jul 29, 2009 3:31 pm UTC

Spoiler:
Alt Text: I know Hugh Laurie too, want to go there afterwards and play "House"? / No.
xkcd616madeworse.1.0.png
xkcd616madeworse.1.0.png (100.22 KiB) Viewed 13588 times
Inspiration: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/surrey/8168892.stm
Lost Greatest Silent Baby X Y Z. "There is no one who loves pain itself, who seeks after it and wants to have it, simply because it is pain..."

User avatar
FCN
Posts: 120
Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 7:47 am UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby FCN » Wed Jul 29, 2009 4:44 pm UTC

Thank you, LuNatic. I'm flattered either way. You've been sigged.

Spoiler:
616
alt hosting in case of broken attachment
lease2.png
Well, that wasn't very nice.
lease2.png (61.75 KiB) Viewed 13550 times

alt alt text: Da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da da-da-da-da-dah
Last edited by FCN on Mon Dec 07, 2009 6:54 am UTC, edited 1 time in total.
Spoiler:
LuNatic wrote:
Dear FCN,
You are:
a) Terrible, but in an awesome way.
or
b) Awesome, but in a terrible way.
I'm having difficulty deciding which.

User avatar
ethraax
Posts: 457
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 11:19 pm UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby ethraax » Wed Jul 29, 2009 5:30 pm UTC

FCN, that last one was beautiful. One of the best in weeks (in my opinion).
Meowgan wrote:It's just like knitting, but with less knitting.

User avatar
LuNatic
Posts: 973
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2008 4:21 am UTC
Location: The land of Aus

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby LuNatic » Thu Jul 30, 2009 2:59 am UTC

FCN wrote:Thank you, LuNatic. I'm flattered either way. You've been sigged.

Spoiler:
616
lease2.png

alt alt text: Da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da da-da-da-da-dah


I'm pretty sure this would happen to me if i ever try to rent a house or get a loan.
Cynical Idealist wrote:
Velict wrote:Good Jehova, there are cheesegraters on the blagotube!

This is, for some reason, one of the funniest things I've read today.

User avatar
Amarantha
Posts: 1638
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 4:56 am UTC
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Amarantha » Thu Jul 30, 2009 3:58 am UTC

OT: James May is awesome. That is all.

User avatar
Jebobek
Posts: 2219
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2008 7:19 pm UTC
Location: Harrisburg, Pennsylvania Geohash graticule

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Jebobek » Thu Jul 30, 2009 7:08 pm UTC

Inspiration from FCN's:
Spoiler:
lease damacy.PNG
lease damacy.PNG (120.08 KiB) Viewed 13405 times
Well, that would be awesome

Alt alt text: Na-naa, na-na-na-na-na-na, na na-na na na-na, naa
Last edited by Jebobek on Thu Jul 30, 2009 7:38 pm UTC, edited 1 time in total.
Image

User avatar
setzer777
Good questions sometimes get stupid answers
Posts: 2762
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 9:24 am UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby setzer777 » Thu Jul 30, 2009 7:28 pm UTC

FCN wrote:Thank you, LuNatic. I'm flattered either way. You've been sigged.

Spoiler:
616
lease2.png

alt alt text: Da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da da-da-da-da-dah


Awesome. I actually like that better than the original.
Meaux_Pas wrote:We're here to go above and beyond.

Too infinity
of being an arsehole

lingomaniac88
Posts: 127
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 2:52 am UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby lingomaniac88 » Fri Jul 31, 2009 9:00 pm UTC

Source: 617
Spoiler:
understocked_modified.PNG
Alt-text: But I believe President Obama acted stupidly in not keeping a substantial stock of beer in the White House.
understocked_modified.PNG (59.02 KiB) Viewed 13297 times
"It is common sense to take a method and try it. If it fails, admit it frankly and try another. But above all, try something."
-- Franklin D. Roosevelt

User avatar
FCN
Posts: 120
Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 7:47 am UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby FCN » Fri Jul 31, 2009 11:17 pm UTC

Forgive me.
Spoiler:
617, 613, 442
alt hosting in case of broken attachment
understockedworse.png
I can't tell you how many times this has happened to me.
understockedworse.png (84.88 KiB) Viewed 13277 times
Last edited by FCN on Mon Dec 07, 2009 6:55 am UTC, edited 1 time in total.
Spoiler:
LuNatic wrote:
Dear FCN,
You are:
a) Terrible, but in an awesome way.
or
b) Awesome, but in a terrible way.
I'm having difficulty deciding which.

User avatar
scikidus
Posts: 792
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 9:34 pm UTC
Location: New York, NY
Contact:

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby scikidus » Fri Jul 31, 2009 11:54 pm UTC

Sources: 535, 541
Spoiler:
xkcdeditbanned.png
I guess impersonating John Roberts wasn't such a good idea after all.
xkcdeditbanned.png (118.96 KiB) Viewed 13250 times

EDIT:
Sources: 617, 608
Spoiler:
xkcdeditobama.png
At least he had some alcohol, otherwise they'd call him a Muslim.
xkcdeditobama.png (170.09 KiB) Viewed 13248 times


Sources: 617, 462
Spoiler:
xkcdeditfreeman.png
Gordon don't speak. He smashes.
xkcdeditfreeman.png (82.11 KiB) Viewed 13239 times
Happy hollandaise!

"The universe is a figment of its own imagination" -Douglas Adams

Ended
Posts: 1459
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 3:27 pm UTC
Location: The Tower of Flints. (Also known as: England.)

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Ended » Sat Aug 01, 2009 1:10 am UTC

Source: 614
Spoiler:
woodpecker.png
Woodpeckers: pretty damn annoying.
woodpecker.png (38.82 KiB) Viewed 13240 times


scikidus wrote:
Spoiler:
The attachment xkcdeditobama.png is no longer available
Hehehe :)
Generally I try to make myself do things I instinctively avoid, in case they are awesome.
-dubsola

User avatar
SciJo
Posts: 115
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 9:46 pm UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby SciJo » Sat Aug 01, 2009 2:33 am UTC

Oh boy!

From #613
Spoiler:
Image
"I guess it sounded funnier in my head."

Now a worsening of singlefin's worsening.
Spoiler:
Image
"It wasn't THAT bad!"

Now one from http://xkcd.com/616/
Spoiler:
Image
"No take-sies back-sies!"

Another one
Spoiler:
Image
"I mean it."

And finally one from #617
Spoiler:
Image
The ending of Episode 3 was kind of a let down.

User avatar
LuNatic
Posts: 973
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2008 4:21 am UTC
Location: The land of Aus

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby LuNatic » Sat Aug 01, 2009 3:47 am UTC

SciJo wrote:Oh boy!

From #613
Spoiler:
Image
"I guess it sounded funnier in my head."



Ahahahaha, I love a good pun.
Cynical Idealist wrote:
Velict wrote:Good Jehova, there are cheesegraters on the blagotube!

This is, for some reason, one of the funniest things I've read today.

User avatar
Amnesiasoft
Posts: 2573
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 4:28 am UTC
Location: Colorado
Contact:

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Amnesiasoft » Sat Aug 01, 2009 4:15 am UTC

xkcd...crossed with Perry Bible Fellowship.

Spoiler:
Image
I knew it was the right decision to get my lease through Quick People, Incorporated!

User avatar
OBrien
Posts: 1478
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 3:05 pm UTC
Location: 1 Bimini Road, downtown Atlantis

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby OBrien » Mon Aug 03, 2009 3:51 pm UTC

My most ambitions XKCDSW to date:

Spoiler:
asteroidSW.png
My drawing was not a picture of a hat. It was a picture of a boa constrictor digesting a Rover.
asteroidSW.png (43.16 KiB) Viewed 13070 times


Antoine de Saint-Exupéry,I'm sorry... I'm so sorry...
Spelling and grammar can go screw themselves.

User avatar
lulzfish
Posts: 1214
Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2008 8:17 am UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby lulzfish » Mon Aug 03, 2009 4:30 pm UTC

It's not really worse, it's just different:

Spoiler:
asteroid-worse.png
Maybe this rover is a pastry?
asteroid-worse.png (51.38 KiB) Viewed 13043 times

Burkitt
Posts: 207
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 2:49 pm UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Burkitt » Mon Aug 03, 2009 5:31 pm UTC

Spoiler:
XKCD Tube.png
XKCD Tube.png (63.6 KiB) Viewed 13029 times


Alt text: I was getting off at this station anyway.

From http://xkcd.com/610/

User avatar
OBrien
Posts: 1478
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 3:05 pm UTC
Location: 1 Bimini Road, downtown Atlantis

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby OBrien » Mon Aug 03, 2009 5:36 pm UTC

Burkitt wrote:
Spoiler:
XKCD Tube.png


Alt text: I was getting off at this station anyway.

From http://xkcd.com/610/


Well played, good sir!
Spelling and grammar can go screw themselves.

User avatar
Jebobek
Posts: 2219
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2008 7:19 pm UTC
Location: Harrisburg, Pennsylvania Geohash graticule

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Jebobek » Mon Aug 03, 2009 6:35 pm UTC

OBrien wrote:My most ambitions XKCDSW to date:

Spoiler:
asteroidSW.png


Antoine de Saint-Exupéry,I'm sorry... I'm so sorry...
Good job on this one, I liked the alt text alot.
Image

User avatar
CVSoul
Posts: 460
Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2008 11:23 pm UTC
Location: Seattle
Contact:

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby CVSoul » Mon Aug 03, 2009 7:04 pm UTC

scikidus wrote:Sources: 617, 462
Spoiler:
xkcdeditfreeman.png


I'd just like to point out that I made that one nearly a year ago.

Not that it matters :P

Although I have to say I am stunned by the quality of some of these edits. I remember back in the day when standards were lower and people just used Areal to replace their text. I'm like Grandpa.
kellsbells wrote:My other car is a plain, unmarked white van.

User avatar
scikidus
Posts: 792
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 9:34 pm UTC
Location: New York, NY
Contact:

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby scikidus » Mon Aug 03, 2009 10:19 pm UTC

CVSoul wrote:
scikidus wrote:Sources: 617, 462
Spoiler:
xkcdeditfreeman.png


I'd just like to point out that I made that one nearly a year ago.

Not that it matters :P

Although I have to say I am stunned by the quality of some of these edits. I remember back in the day when standards were lower and people just used Areal to replace their text. I'm like Grandpa.

Well operator[]
s xkcd font helped a bunch.

And sorry for the unintentional plagiarism.
Happy hollandaise!

"The universe is a figment of its own imagination" -Douglas Adams

User avatar
Amnesiasoft
Posts: 2573
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 4:28 am UTC
Location: Colorado
Contact:

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Amnesiasoft » Mon Aug 03, 2009 10:21 pm UTC

Actually, my standards are lower now...I used to copy and paste letters by hand. Then I started using the font. While it certainly looks good, it's not as good as copypasta™.

Nemo-Kver
Posts: 3
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 11:46 pm UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Nemo-Kver » Mon Aug 03, 2009 10:24 pm UTC

618,31
Someone commented that The Little Prince looked like the kid from 'Barrel'.
Spoiler:
Project1.png
Project1.png (263.28 KiB) Viewed 12950 times

User avatar
LuNatic
Posts: 973
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2008 4:21 am UTC
Location: The land of Aus

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby LuNatic » Tue Aug 04, 2009 5:22 am UTC

Burkitt wrote:
Spoiler:
XKCD Tube.png


Alt text: I was getting off at this station anyway.

From http://xkcd.com/610/


This hits home hard :(
Cynical Idealist wrote:
Velict wrote:Good Jehova, there are cheesegraters on the blagotube!

This is, for some reason, one of the funniest things I've read today.

DanielR
Posts: 37
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 1:24 pm UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby DanielR » Tue Aug 04, 2009 12:08 pm UTC

Spoiler:
Sources: 571, 610
Sheeple2.png
I'm wondering how I got here...
Sheeple2.png (11.05 KiB) Viewed 12857 times

Walter.Horvath
Posts: 933
Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 11:33 pm UTC
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Walter.Horvath » Tue Aug 04, 2009 12:28 pm UTC

DanielR wrote:
Spoiler:
Sources: 571, 610
Sheeple2.png

:D

just... :D

User avatar
Nith Azra
Posts: 117
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 6:14 pm UTC
Location: B-Town/Bendighetto
Contact:

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Nith Azra » Tue Aug 04, 2009 12:38 pm UTC

DanielR wrote:
Spoiler:
Sources: 571, 610
Sheeple2.png


That was shear brilliance! :P
Mighty Jalapeno wrote:I wrote "moistly"... wierd.


::.._____..::ROYAL RAINBOW!!!::.._____..::

singlefin
Posts: 377
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 3:12 pm UTC
Location: https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
Contact:

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby singlefin » Tue Aug 04, 2009 12:54 pm UTC

Nith Azra wrote:That was shear brilliance! :P


Good grief. Is that the best ewe can do?

User avatar
OBrien
Posts: 1478
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 3:05 pm UTC
Location: 1 Bimini Road, downtown Atlantis

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby OBrien » Tue Aug 04, 2009 1:47 pm UTC

singlefin wrote:
Nith Azra wrote:That was shear brilliance! :P


Good grief. Is that the best ewe can do?


Am I alone in thinking the last XKCDSW was a bit woolly?
Last edited by OBrien on Tue Aug 04, 2009 2:01 pm UTC, edited 1 time in total.
Spelling and grammar can go screw themselves.

User avatar
Nith Azra
Posts: 117
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 6:14 pm UTC
Location: B-Town/Bendighetto
Contact:

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Nith Azra » Tue Aug 04, 2009 1:55 pm UTC

OBrien wrote:
singlefin wrote:
Nith Azra wrote:That was shear brilliance! :P


Good grief. Is that the best ewe can do?


Am I alone in thinking the last XKCDSW was a bit woolly?



Hoo forgot to italic their puns?
Mighty Jalapeno wrote:I wrote "moistly"... wierd.


::.._____..::ROYAL RAINBOW!!!::.._____..::

User avatar
OBrien
Posts: 1478
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 3:05 pm UTC
Location: 1 Bimini Road, downtown Atlantis

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby OBrien » Tue Aug 04, 2009 2:00 pm UTC

Nith Azra wrote:
OBrien wrote:
singlefin wrote:
Nith Azra wrote:That was shear brilliance! :P


Good grief. Is that the best ewe can do?


Am I alone in thinking the last XKCDSW was a bit woolly?


Hoo forgot to italic their puns?


I'm sorry, I'll just click edit and ram the italic tags in there...
Spelling and grammar can go screw themselves.

User avatar
Chfan
Posts: 2141
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2008 10:26 pm UTC
Location: American East Coast

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Chfan » Tue Aug 04, 2009 2:13 pm UTC

SHUT UP!
Just FYI, the guy isn't avatar isn't me. But he seems pretty cool.

User avatar
Zohar
COMMANDER PORN
Posts: 8533
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 8:45 pm UTC
Location: Denver

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Zohar » Tue Aug 04, 2009 2:28 pm UTC

Chfan wrote:SHUT UP!

Bah. Bah.
Mighty Jalapeno: "See, Zohar agrees, and he's nice to people."
SecondTalon: "Still better looking than Jesus."

Not how I say my name

User avatar
OBrien
Posts: 1478
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 3:05 pm UTC
Location: 1 Bimini Road, downtown Atlantis

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby OBrien » Tue Aug 04, 2009 2:34 pm UTC

Chfan wrote:SHUT UP!


Not until we've emptied at least three bags full of sheep-related puns.
Spelling and grammar can go screw themselves.

User avatar
Nith Azra
Posts: 117
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 6:14 pm UTC
Location: B-Town/Bendighetto
Contact:

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Nith Azra » Tue Aug 04, 2009 2:50 pm UTC

OBrien wrote:
Chfan wrote:SHUT UP!


Not until we've emptied at least three bags full of sheep-related puns.



That was a baaad one. (Frankly, so was that one.)
Mighty Jalapeno wrote:I wrote "moistly"... wierd.


::.._____..::ROYAL RAINBOW!!!::.._____..::

singlefin
Posts: 377
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 3:12 pm UTC
Location: https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
Contact:

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby singlefin » Tue Aug 04, 2009 2:57 pm UTC

Nith Azra wrote:
OBrien wrote:
Chfan wrote:SHUT UP!


Not until we've emptied at least three bags full of sheep-related puns.



That was a baaad one. (Frankly, so was that one.)


Still, if you can't bleat them...


Return to “General”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests