ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Things that don't belong anywhere else. (Check first).

Moderators: Magistrates, Prelates, Moderators General

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Linux0s » Thu Apr 12, 2012 12:22 pm UTC

Title text: The Colonel was a dick that way.
Attachments
Wote1.png
If the male mind truly were a machine it would consist of a shaft and a bushing.
User avatar
Linux0s
 
Posts: 223
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 7:34 pm UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Ken_g6 » Sat Apr 14, 2012 4:01 am UTC

A quickie for the latest one:

1042_how_could_you.png
'Like what? Wait! Don't pull me in! Noooooo!'
1042_how_could_you.png (3.75 KiB) Viewed 7197 times
User avatar
Ken_g6
 
Posts: 45
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 10:45 pm UTC
Location: in yer GPUz fakterin' primez in wardrobez

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Linux0s » Sat Apr 14, 2012 7:30 am UTC

1042 Title text: If the male mind truly were a machine it would consist of a shaft and a bushing.
Attachments
xkcdsw-1042.png
xkcdsw-1042.png (12.64 KiB) Viewed 7168 times
If the male mind truly were a machine it would consist of a shaft and a bushing.
User avatar
Linux0s
 
Posts: 223
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 7:34 pm UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Ephemeron » Wed Apr 18, 2012 7:51 pm UTC

Image

It's obvious they're really the same person, right? I mean they have the same initials.

1044, various quotes from interviews, the xkcd sucks blog
User avatar
Ephemeron
 
Posts: 280
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 12:39 pm UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Роберт » Wed Apr 18, 2012 8:05 pm UTC

Ephemeron wrote:
Spoiler:
Image

It's obvious they're really the same person, right? I mean they have the same initials.

1044, various quotes from interviews, the xkcd sucks blog

I actually got some of these wrong. At least I think I did. Maybe I shouldn't have been writing the initials for quiz.
The Great Hippo wrote:[T]he way we treat suspected terrorists genuinely terrifies me.
Роберт
 
Posts: 4301
Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 1:56 am UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby pseudoidiot » Wed Apr 18, 2012 8:23 pm UTC

That just means you got them all right!
Derailed : Gaming Outside the Box.
SecondTalon wrote:*swoons* I love you, all powerful pseudoidiot!
ShootTheChicken wrote:I can't stop thinking about pseudoidiot's penis.
User avatar
pseudoidiot
Sexy Beard Man
 
Posts: 4900
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 9:30 pm UTC
Location: Kansas City

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Ephemeron » Wed Apr 18, 2012 11:10 pm UTC

Роберт wrote:I actually got some of these wrong. At least I think I did. Maybe I shouldn't have been writing the initials for quiz.


Lol, which ones?
User avatar
Ephemeron
 
Posts: 280
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 12:39 pm UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby snowyowl » Thu Apr 19, 2012 8:11 am UTC

Ephemeron wrote:
Роберт wrote:I actually got some of these wrong. At least I think I did. Maybe I shouldn't have been writing the initials for quiz.


Lol, which ones?

R and M.
The preceding comment is an automated response.
User avatar
snowyowl
 
Posts: 455
Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2009 7:36 pm UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Linux0s » Fri Apr 20, 2012 12:00 pm UTC

Image

Whenever "Singing in the Rain" plays on my iPod shuffle.
1038
Last edited by Linux0s on Fri Apr 20, 2012 4:05 pm UTC, edited 2 times in total.
If the male mind truly were a machine it would consist of a shaft and a bushing.
User avatar
Linux0s
 
Posts: 223
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 7:34 pm UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby KrazyerKate » Fri Apr 20, 2012 1:35 pm UTC

http://i.imgur.com/Gz3Vk.png

I'm not sure what to do with this.
User avatar
KrazyerKate
 
Posts: 432
Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 2:04 pm UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby gingermrkettle » Mon Apr 23, 2012 12:58 pm UTC

skynet faces the fact.PNG

August 29th, 2:23am. Skynet comments on a Youtube video.

1046+481+a lack of imagination
Last edited by gingermrkettle on Wed Apr 25, 2012 4:41 pm UTC, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
gingermrkettle
 
Posts: 65
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2011 11:00 pm UTC
Location: Suburbia

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Linux0s » Mon Apr 23, 2012 3:08 pm UTC

Image

Spoiler:
What website?

1043
If the male mind truly were a machine it would consist of a shaft and a bushing.
User avatar
Linux0s
 
Posts: 223
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 7:34 pm UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby e^iπ+1=0 » Mon Apr 23, 2012 3:22 pm UTC

Unfortunately not true. Blag is, in fact, too low to appear on the graph:

Spoiler:
Screen shot 2012-04-23 at 4.17.03 PM.png


So, let's find something that just barely squeaks along the bottom of the graph:

Spoiler:
Screen shot 2012-04-23 at 4.17.26 PM.png


And now if we compare that to blag, we see how ridiculously low blag is compared to blog:

Spoiler:
Screen shot 2012-04-23 at 4.17.57 PM.png
poxic wrote:You, sir, have heroic hair.

(Avatar by Sungura)
User avatar
e^iπ+1=0
Much, much better than Gooder
 
Posts: 1994
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 9:41 am UTC
Location: 54.0367˚N, 2.7961˚W; Lancaster

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Elvish Pillager » Mon Apr 23, 2012 3:29 pm UTC

Looks like we all have to pitch in. I just did Google searches for "blag", "blagging", and "blagosphere". :P
Also known as Eli Dupree. Check out elidupree.com for my comics, games, and other work.

GENERATION A(g64, g64): Social experiment. Take the busy beaver function of the generation number and add it to your signature.
User avatar
Elvish Pillager
 
Posts: 985
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 9:58 pm UTC
Location: Everywhere you think, nowhere you can possibly imagine.

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Kewangji » Mon Apr 23, 2012 3:33 pm UTC

What accounts for the 2007 dip in blogs in news reports? o_o
e^iπ+1=0 wrote:Unfortunately not true. Blag is, in fact, too low to appear on the graph:

Spoiler:
Screen shot 2012-04-23 at 4.17.03 PM.png
If you like my words sign up for my newsletter, Airport Tattoo Parlour: https://tinyletter.com/distantstations
Belial wrote:
Kewangji wrote:On of them is clearly vastly cooler than the other, roband. :roll:


Don't you fucking "to the fairest" this forum.
User avatar
Kewangji
Has Been Touched
 
Posts: 2078
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 5:20 pm UTC
Location: Lost in Translation

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby e^iπ+1=0 » Mon Apr 23, 2012 9:00 pm UTC

Yeah, I was wondering about that too. Only one person in ICT gave a possible explanation (link), although it's just speculation, so who knows.
poxic wrote:You, sir, have heroic hair.

(Avatar by Sungura)
User avatar
e^iπ+1=0
Much, much better than Gooder
 
Posts: 1994
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 9:41 am UTC
Location: 54.0367˚N, 2.7961˚W; Lancaster

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Ephemeron » Tue Apr 24, 2012 12:58 pm UTC

Image

Plus the reaction in the Bierberverse is always 'get hit by a water bottle and never say never'.

1043

Spoiler:
This would be funnier if I hadn't had to doctor the data so much.
User avatar
Ephemeron
 
Posts: 280
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 12:39 pm UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby OBrien » Tue Apr 24, 2012 1:39 pm UTC

I think the spoilered bit should be the alt text.
Spelling and grammar can go screw themselves.
User avatar
OBrien
 
Posts: 1481
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 3:05 pm UTC
Location: 1 Bimini Road, downtown Atlantis

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby philsov » Fri Apr 27, 2012 1:14 pm UTC

Source: http://xkcd.com/1048/

Image
Screw you politics and coding, I'm going to the movies.
The time and seasons go on, but all the rhymes and reasons are wrong
I know I'll discover after its all said and done I should've been a nun.
User avatar
philsov
Not a fan of Diane Kruger
 
Posts: 1350
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2008 7:58 pm UTC
Location: Texas

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby roband » Fri Apr 27, 2012 1:17 pm UTC

IT SAYS WORSE NOT BETTER.

And congrats on having exactly the same thought as me ;)
User avatar
roband
Psychedelic Shrub
 
Posts: 2334
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 2:52 pm UTC
Location: UK

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Elvish Pillager » Fri Apr 27, 2012 2:09 pm UTC

My first thought was

xkcdsw-5.png
On the other hand, my partner's emotions are all caused by Libra.
Also known as Eli Dupree. Check out elidupree.com for my comics, games, and other work.

GENERATION A(g64, g64): Social experiment. Take the busy beaver function of the generation number and add it to your signature.
User avatar
Elvish Pillager
 
Posts: 985
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 9:58 pm UTC
Location: Everywhere you think, nowhere you can possibly imagine.

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby roband » Fri Apr 27, 2012 2:11 pm UTC

It was looking worse, but the alt-text there is brilliant! :D
User avatar
roband
Psychedelic Shrub
 
Posts: 2334
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 2:52 pm UTC
Location: UK

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Роберт » Fri Apr 27, 2012 2:52 pm UTC

roband wrote:It was looking worse, but the alt-text there is brilliant! :D

Yes, the alt-text is hilarious.
The Great Hippo wrote:[T]he way we treat suspected terrorists genuinely terrifies me.
Роберт
 
Posts: 4301
Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 1:56 am UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Linux0s » Sat Apr 28, 2012 12:41 am UTC

Image

Spoiler:
No recovery plan? Are you serious?


1046 in the Spirit of 695
If the male mind truly were a machine it would consist of a shaft and a bushing.
User avatar
Linux0s
 
Posts: 223
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 7:34 pm UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby ostrichguy » Sat Apr 28, 2012 11:31 pm UTC

4chan.png
ALT TEXT: By "Romance" I mean porn.
User avatar
ostrichguy
 
Posts: 22
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2010 1:15 am UTC
Location: I'm right behind you.

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby SirBryghtside » Sun Apr 29, 2012 12:11 am UTC

Excitement.png
FTFY
Spambot5546 wrote:Well...who used it? I'd sleep next to Felicia Day's used bacon.
User avatar
SirBryghtside
 
Posts: 893
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 6:42 pm UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby SecondTalon » Sun Apr 29, 2012 3:16 am UTC

ostrichguy wrote:
4chan.png

See, I have a problem with that.

4chan launched on October 1, 2003. The whole "cancer kiling it" thing started October 2, 2003.

I mean, if there weren't people complaining about the people people complaining about the people people complaining about the people people complaining about the people people complaining about the people people complaining about the people people complaining about the people people complaining about the people people complaining about the people people complaining about the people people complaining about the people people complaining about the people people complaining about the people people complaining about the people people complaining about the people people complaining about the people people complaining about the people people complaining about the people people complaining about the people people complaining about the people people complaining about the people people complaining about the people people complaining about the people people complaining about the people killing the site, it just wouldn't be the same, you know?
"When Archie is too progressive for you, that's how science identifies you as an earlier species" - Luke McKinney, Cracked.com

Honestly, if you're talking BBQ and 'a guy in a parking lot' isn't part of the conversation, something's wrong."
User avatar
SecondTalon
SexyTalon
 
Posts: 23008
Joined: Sat May 05, 2007 2:10 pm UTC
Location: Louisville, Kentucky, USA, Mars. HA!

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Goplat » Sun Apr 29, 2012 4:55 am UTC

It had to be done:
emotions.png
Don't tell me you didn't think the same thing when you saw the big section starting in late 2010.
Goplat
 
Posts: 490
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 11:41 pm UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby poxic » Sun Apr 29, 2012 5:05 am UTC

Goplat wrote:Don't tell me you didn't think the same thing when you saw the big section starting in late 2010.

OK, I won't.
TEAM SHIVAHN
Pretty much the best team ever

Well historically speaking, we Jews do tend to be great at Christmas. Just ask Irving Berlin. Or Jesus.
- a random xkcd forumite
User avatar
poxic
Eloquently Prismatic
 
Posts: 4131
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2008 3:28 am UTC
Location: Left coast of Canada

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Menacing Spike » Sun Apr 29, 2012 1:42 pm UTC

Goplat wrote:Don't tell me you didn't think the same thing when you saw the big section starting in late 2010.


Some people grew up past ponies, you know.

(says the guy with a pokemon avatar)
User avatar
Menacing Spike
 
Posts: 2984
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 8:25 pm UTC
Location: Fighting the Zombie.

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Kirby » Sun Apr 29, 2012 7:51 pm UTC

Goplat wrote:It had to be done:
emotions.png
Don't tell me you didn't think the same thing when you saw the big section starting in late 2010.


Well played. I don't know how I missed that...
User avatar
Kirby
 
Posts: 199
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 11:08 pm UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby WolfieMario » Mon Apr 30, 2012 7:10 am UTC

Shelf Life
Image
Scientists are still researching how stick figures are thinner than their own skeletal structures.
Sources:1049, 777
"Sometimes game development isn't about doing what is nice to everyone all the time." - Jens Bergensten
User avatar
WolfieMario
 
Posts: 118
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 10:45 pm UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby TheChewanater » Wed May 02, 2012 1:47 am UTC

ImageImage
http://internetometer.com/give/4279
No one can agree how to count how many types of people there are. You could ask two people and get 10 different answers.
User avatar
TheChewanater
 
Posts: 1286
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 5:24 am UTC
Location: lol why am I still wearing a Santa suit?

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby e^iπ+1=0 » Wed May 02, 2012 1:54 am UTC

Can't be arsed actually making right now: normal 1048 plus last frame of 925 with normal guy's dialogue the same and BHG's dialogue "Shut up, SirMustapha!"
poxic wrote:You, sir, have heroic hair.

(Avatar by Sungura)
User avatar
e^iπ+1=0
Much, much better than Gooder
 
Posts: 1994
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 9:41 am UTC
Location: 54.0367˚N, 2.7961˚W; Lancaster

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Linux0s » Wed May 02, 2012 6:15 am UTC

Image

Spoiler:
And apparently you use that more than you should.

1050
If the male mind truly were a machine it would consist of a shaft and a bushing.
User avatar
Linux0s
 
Posts: 223
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 7:34 pm UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Linux0s » Fri May 04, 2012 4:50 am UTC

Edit: Point taken.
Last edited by Linux0s on Fri May 04, 2012 5:21 am UTC, edited 1 time in total.
If the male mind truly were a machine it would consist of a shaft and a bushing.
User avatar
Linux0s
 
Posts: 223
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 7:34 pm UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby poxic » Fri May 04, 2012 4:51 am UTC

Slightly worse, please, not soul-crushing.

:|
TEAM SHIVAHN
Pretty much the best team ever

Well historically speaking, we Jews do tend to be great at Christmas. Just ask Irving Berlin. Or Jesus.
- a random xkcd forumite
User avatar
poxic
Eloquently Prismatic
 
Posts: 4131
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2008 3:28 am UTC
Location: Left coast of Canada

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby W3ird_N3rd » Sat May 12, 2012 8:41 am UTC

Found the uncensored original. :)

xkcd_causeofemotions_alcohol.png


http://xkcd.com/1048/
http://xkcd.com/323/
W3ird_N3rd
 
Posts: 53
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2011 3:43 am UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Burkitt » Sat Jun 02, 2012 12:47 am UTC

Image

And thus began the rise to office of Comrade Classhole, Chairman of the Supreme World Soviet.
Burkitt
 
Posts: 153
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 2:49 pm UTC

Re: ITT: We make xkcd slightly worse.

Postby Magnanimous » Sat Jun 02, 2012 4:23 am UTC

The commie hat is a nice touch.
The card wrote:GO TO THE CIRCUS. FIREWORKS AND WHISTLES, LION TAMERS AND CLOWNS. HOO RAH.
User avatar
Magnanimous
 
Posts: 3333
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 7:11 pm UTC
Location: Land of Hipsters and Rain (LOHAR)

PreviousNext

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests