functionally_stupid wrote:There's a word?! There's really a word for that! Fuck yeah! I have an adjective! Yaaaaaay!
Yay. In the future, children, if you feel the need to have a word to describe you, make one up.
We have words like androgynosexual
(attracted to ladies who look a little like dudes) and pansexual
(attracted to people, not danglies/lack thereof). I think the English language can make a little more room if you decide you're gynoandrogynosexual
(attracted to ladies who look like effeminate men) or pangynosexual (attracted to all ladies regardless of orientation) or panhomosexual
(attracted to anyone who identifies as the same gender, regardless of genitalia) or antiandrogynogynosexual
(attracted to ladies except for for ones that look a little like dudes).
Making up words is fun. Anyway, I hope this doesn't come out as a random rant at
anyone. If I'm angry at anyone, it's those people who don't think that there are people like the above. The original Rule 34, as I understand it, was that if you can think of it, it's someone's fetish. That rule 34 : The new rule 34 :: l o l : lulz. (or l o l : lol)
If you need need need a word and can't be bothered to string prefixes together, tell us who you are in your own words, i.e. "I like dudes a little more than women, but I like my dudes to look rather effeminate and guyliner is awesome" and we'll come up with something together.
Anyway, it's time for a group hug. I love all of you.