## If you can reduce something to 0's and 1's...

Things that don't belong anywhere else. (Check first).

Moderators: Moderators General, Prelates, Magistrates

scratch123
Posts: 236
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2011 9:18 pm UTC

### If you can reduce something to 0's and 1's...

...does that mean you fully understand it? This assumes that everything that exists can be broken down into 0's and 1's. The way you would do this is to take the object you wish to break down into 0's and 1's and break it down into smaller objects. Then check to see if any of these objects can be in more than 2 states. If the object can be in more than 2 states but you are not sure how many repeat the process of breaking the new objects down into smaller objects. For example say the object you want to break down to 0's and 1's is a 4 letter word. First you would break it down into 4 letters. Then you would have to know that letters have 26 states that they can be in so you would need to devote 5 0's and 1's (or bits, 2^5 = 32 which is more than enough). You can do this for physical objects too. Just break them down into parts until you get to the atoms that make up the object and since these atoms can be in more than 2 states you can break them up to get sub atomic particles which only have a few states. In addition to breaking up words according to the letters that make them up you could also break them up according to their meaning but I am not sure exactly how you would do this. Another way would be to take a dictionary and assign each word a number a break the words up that way and completely ignore the letters. If you are able to do this for everything that exists does that mean you fully understand it? There is also the problem that things can be broken up more than one way. I guess you could solve this by taking the method for breaking up objects itself and breaking it up into 0's and 1's.

DSenette
Posts: 2418
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2009 8:08 pm UTC

### Re: If you can reduce something to 0's and 1's...

scratch123 wrote:...does that mean you fully understand it? This assumes that everything that exists can be broken down into 0's and 1's. The way you would do this is to take the object you wish to break down into 0's and 1's and break it down into smaller objects. Then check to see if any of these objects can be in more than 2 states. If the object can be in more than 2 states but you are not sure how many repeat the process of breaking the new objects down into smaller objects. For example say the object you want to break down to 0's and 1's is a 4 letter word. First you would break it down into 4 letters. Then you would have to know that letters have 26 states that they can be in so you would need to devote 5 0's and 1's (or bits, 2^5 = 32 which is more than enough). You can do this for physical objects too. Just break them down into parts until you get to the atoms that make up the object and since these atoms can be in more than 2 states you can break them up to get sub atomic particles which only have a few states. In addition to breaking up words according to the letters that make them up you could also break them up according to their meaning but I am not sure exactly how you would do this. Another way would be to take a dictionary and assign each word a number a break the words up that way and completely ignore the letters. If you are able to do this for everything that exists does that mean you fully understand it? There is also the problem that things can be broken up more than one way. I guess you could solve this by taking the method for breaking up objects itself and breaking it up into 0's and 1's.

what do you break a 1 and 0 into?
The Righteous Hand Of Retribution
"The evaporation of 4 million who believe this crap would leave the world an instantly better place." ~Andre Codresu (re: "the Rapture")

pseudoidiot
Sexy Beard Man
Posts: 5100
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 9:30 pm UTC
Location: Kansas City
Contact:

### Re: If you can reduce something to 0's and 1's...

0 and 1, respectively.
Derailed : Gaming Outside the Box.
SecondTalon wrote:*swoons* I love you, all powerful pseudoidiot!
ShootTheChicken wrote:I can't stop thinking about pseudoidiot's penis.

You, sir, name?
Posts: 6983
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 10:07 am UTC
Location: Chako Paul City
Contact:

### Re: If you can reduce something to 0's and 1's...

You could also break it into and 1.
I edit my posts a lot and sometimes the words wrong order words appear in sentences get messed up.

Ptolom
Posts: 1559
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2008 1:55 pm UTC
Location: The entropy pool
Contact:

### Re: If you can reduce something to 0's and 1's...

Werner Heisenberg would like to spoil your fun.

softchews
Posts: 50
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 6:24 pm UTC
Location: Durham, UK.

### Re: If you can reduce something to 0's and 1's...

Is this not like the Auditors in the Terry Pratchett book Thief of Time, who take a picture apart into its component molecules to try and find out what makes it 'art'? Surely the whole is greater then just the sum of its parts (in physical objects at least anyway).

NuclearTide
Posts: 14
Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2008 4:31 am UTC

### Re: If you can reduce something to 0's and 1's...

-
Last edited by NuclearTide on Sat Nov 09, 2013 5:51 am UTC, edited 1 time in total.

Weeks
Hey Baby, wanna make a fortnight?
Posts: 2023
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2008 12:41 am UTC

### Re: If you can reduce something to 0's and 1's...

Ptolom wrote:Werner Heisenberg would like to spoil your fun.
What? Why? We have just begun!
TaintedDeity wrote:Tainted Deity
suffer-cait wrote:One day I'm gun a go visit weeks and discover they're just a computer in a trashcan at an ice cream shop.
Dthen wrote:FUCK CHRISTMAS FUCK EVERYTHING FUCK YOU TOO FUCK OFF

Menacing Spike
Posts: 2982
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 8:25 pm UTC
Location: Fighting the Zombie.

### Re: If you can reduce something to 0's and 1's...

Define understand?

Soralin
Posts: 1347
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 12:06 am UTC

### Re: If you can reduce something to 0's and 1's...

Menacing Spike wrote:Define understand?

01110101011011100110010001100101011100100111001101110100011000010110111001100100

Menacing Spike
Posts: 2982
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 8:25 pm UTC
Location: Fighting the Zombie.

### Re: If you can reduce something to 0's and 1's...

Soralin wrote:
Menacing Spike wrote:Define understand?

01110101011011100110010001100101011100100111001101110100011000010110111001100100

01110100 01101111 01110101 01100011 01101000 11101001

Kewangji
Has Been Touched
Posts: 2253
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 5:20 pm UTC
Location: Lost in Translation
Contact:

### Re: If you can reduce something to 0's and 1's...

01001001 00100000 01110011 01100101 01100101 00100000 01110111 01101000 01100001 01110100 00100000 01111001 00100111 01100001 01101100 01101100 00100000 01100100 01101001 01100100 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100101 01110010 01100101 :l

The Great Hippo wrote:Nuclear bombs are like potato chips, you can't stop after just *one*

eternauta3k
Posts: 519
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 12:19 am UTC
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina

### Re: If you can reduce something to 0's and 1's...

VectorZero wrote:It takes a real man to impact his own radius

TheGrammarBolshevik
Posts: 4878
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 2:12 am UTC
Location: Going to and fro in the earth, and walking up and down in it.

### Re: If you can reduce something to 0's and 1's...

scratch123 wrote:...does that mean you fully understand it? This assumes that everything that exists can be broken down into 0's and 1's. The way you would do this is to take the object you wish to break down into 0's and 1's and break it down into smaller objects. Then check to see if any of these objects can be in more than 2 states. If the object can be in more than 2 states but you are not sure how many repeat the process of breaking the new objects down into smaller objects. For example say the object you want to break down to 0's and 1's is a 4 letter word. First you would break it down into 4 letters. Then you would have to know that letters have 26 states that they can be in so you would need to devote 5 0's and 1's (or bits, 2^5 = 32 which is more than enough).

1000011011000100001101110010000110100001000011100000100001110100110000111000111000011011100100001101010010000110100011000011100001

That's the Unicode representation of a random word I pulled from the featured article on ka.wikipedia.org. But I don't understand anything in Kartuli. Didn't even know that "Kartuli" (which I've never heard of) was the name of the thing I was looking at until I saw the hover text on a link.

scratch123 wrote:In addition to breaking up words according to the letters that make them up you could also break them up according to their meaning but I am not sure exactly how you would do this.

How could you classify a word by its meaning unless you already understood the word?
Nothing rhymes with orange,
Not even sporange.

modularblues
Posts: 689
Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 8:33 am UTC
Location: Escher's Wonderland
Contact:

### Re: If you can reduce something to 0's and 1's...

Weeks wrote:
Ptolom wrote:Werner Heisenberg would like to spoil your fun.
What? Why? We have just begun!

Schrödinger as well. And Ben Schumacher's qubit.

Weeks
Hey Baby, wanna make a fortnight?
Posts: 2023
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2008 12:41 am UTC

### Re: If you can reduce something to 0's and 1's...

You, sir, name? wrote:You could also break it into and 1.
Ptolom wrote:Werner Heisenberg would like to spoil your fun.
Weeks wrote:What? Why? We have just begun!
TaintedDeity wrote:Tainted Deity
suffer-cait wrote:One day I'm gun a go visit weeks and discover they're just a computer in a trashcan at an ice cream shop.
Dthen wrote:FUCK CHRISTMAS FUCK EVERYTHING FUCK YOU TOO FUCK OFF

Menacing Spike
Posts: 2982
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 8:25 pm UTC
Location: Fighting the Zombie.

### Re: If you can reduce something to 0's and 1's...

desperate

userxp
Posts: 436
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 12:40 pm UTC

### Re: If you can reduce something to 0's and 1's...

scratch123 wrote:If you can reduce something to 0's and 1's does that mean you fully understand it?

For most definitions of understand, no.

scratch123 wrote:In addition to breaking up words according to the letters that make them up you could also break them up according to their meaning but I am not sure exactly how you would do this.

Oh that would be very difficult, since words don't inherently have meanings. You could try to define meaning(word, person) as "the things that are linked to that word in that person's brain", then apply that definition for every person that exists and take some sort of average. You may want to read more about words as hidden inferences.

Anyway, I'm not sure that thread is in the right forum.

PM 2Ring
Posts: 3713
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 3:19 pm UTC
Location: Sydney, Australia

### Re: If you can reduce something to 0's and 1's...

scratch123 wrote:...does that mean you fully understand it? .

Not at all. It merely means that you can represent it, which is quite a different thing. Of course, representations can be useful in understanding. However, if your string of bits is not finite (and can't be described in a finite way), or cannot be derived in a finite time, it is of limited utility.

FWIW, there are various threads in the Computer Science forum that touch on this topic.

Turtlewing
Posts: 236
Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 5:22 pm UTC

### Re: If you can reduce something to 0's and 1's...

If I understand the OP correctly the question can be rephrased as: "Is it possible to create a perfect simulation of a system without fully understanding that system?"

Which I would be inclined to say is probably technically possible (by accident), but since you'd never be able to know that your simulation was perfect without perfect understanding of the molded system, for practical purposes it would not be possible to build a perfect simulation without perfect understanding of the simulated system.

TheGrammarBolshevik
Posts: 4878
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 2:12 am UTC
Location: Going to and fro in the earth, and walking up and down in it.

### Re: If you can reduce something to 0's and 1's...

Turtlewing wrote:you'd never be able to know that your simulation was perfect without perfect understanding of the molded system

Hardly. To return to my language example, I can produce a perfect copy of a book in Kartuli without being able to read it (this is basically a boring version of the Chinese Room Argument). More generally, if a system has one set of properties, A, and at least one other set of properties, B, that supervenes on A, I can reproduce the system by copying A without understanding B.
Nothing rhymes with orange,
Not even sporange.

doogly
Dr. The Juggernaut of Touching Himself
Posts: 5531
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 2:31 am UTC
Location: Lexington, MA
Contact:

### Re: If you can reduce something to 0's and 1's...

TheGrammarBolshevik wrote: the Chinese Room Argument

Worst argument ever.
LE4dGOLEM: What's a Doug?
Noc: A larval Doogly. They grow the tail and stinger upon reaching adulthood.

Keep waggling your butt brows Brothers.
Or; Is that your eye butthairs?

Shivahn
Posts: 2200
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 6:17 am UTC

### Re: If you can reduce something to 0's and 1's...

I dunno, man. I've taken some philosophy courses. That one has fierce competition.

Menacing Spike
Posts: 2982
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 8:25 pm UTC
Location: Fighting the Zombie.

### Re: If you can reduce something to 0's and 1's...

Shivahn wrote:philosophy courses

Bahaha :p.

phlip
Restorer of Worlds
Posts: 7572
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 3:56 am UTC
Location: Australia
Contact:

### Re: If you can reduce something to 0's and 1's...

Shivahn wrote:I dunno, man. I've taken some philosophy courses. That one has fierce competition.

Hmm, someone needs to start a bestthing-style poll, for bad philosophical arguments...

Which is worse? The Chinese Room argument, or Pascal's Wager?

Code: Select all

`enum ಠ_ಠ {°□°╰=1, °Д°╰, ಠ益ಠ╰};void ┻━┻︵​╰(ಠ_ಠ ⚠) {exit((int)⚠);}`
[he/him/his]

Posts: 1267
Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2011 6:36 pm UTC

### Re: If you can reduce something to 0's and 1's...

That reminds me of when I was forced to spend time with that insufferable kid in high school that thought she was smart because she asked a lot of annoying questions and got good grades (you know who I'm talking about). We started talking about computers and I said something like, "man I want to know how you first start programming a computer. Like how do you get it to understand an upper level programing language." Her response was to look at me like I was stupid and say "It's 1's and 0's. Binary." Me: "yes I know that, but how does the computer know what the 1's and 0's mean?" Her: "1 means yes, 0 means no. It's binary."

Sigh... thank you, insufferable know-it-all for that extremely unhelpful and condescending answer.

doogly
Dr. The Juggernaut of Touching Himself
Posts: 5531
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 2:31 am UTC
Location: Lexington, MA
Contact:

### Re: If you can reduce something to 0's and 1's...

phlip wrote: Pascal's Wager?

People don't sincerely trot that one out in the company of adults anymore though, do they?
LE4dGOLEM: What's a Doug?
Noc: A larval Doogly. They grow the tail and stinger upon reaching adulthood.

Keep waggling your butt brows Brothers.
Or; Is that your eye butthairs?

Kewangji
Has Been Touched
Posts: 2253
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 5:20 pm UTC
Location: Lost in Translation
Contact:

### Re: If you can reduce something to 0's and 1's...

doogly wrote:
phlip wrote: Pascal's Wager?

People don't sincerely trot that one out in the company of adults anymore though, do they?

They do. All the time. They think it's killer.

The Great Hippo wrote:Nuclear bombs are like potato chips, you can't stop after just *one*

doogly
Dr. The Juggernaut of Touching Himself
Posts: 5531
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 2:31 am UTC
Location: Lexington, MA
Contact:

### Re: If you can reduce something to 0's and 1's...

Well, on the plus side, I would feel justified straight up slappin em, and that gives me a nice feeling of just having slapped someone. The most I can really be justified doing with the chinese room is rolling my eyes and groaning, which is a lot less satisfying.

...this isn't working, I will agree that Pascal is the worst ever.
LE4dGOLEM: What's a Doug?
Noc: A larval Doogly. They grow the tail and stinger upon reaching adulthood.

Keep waggling your butt brows Brothers.
Or; Is that your eye butthairs?

Kewangji
Has Been Touched
Posts: 2253
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 5:20 pm UTC
Location: Lost in Translation
Contact:

### Re: If you can reduce something to 0's and 1's...

Isn't the ontological argument worse?

The Great Hippo wrote:Nuclear bombs are like potato chips, you can't stop after just *one*

doogly
Dr. The Juggernaut of Touching Himself
Posts: 5531
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 2:31 am UTC
Location: Lexington, MA
Contact:

### Re: If you can reduce something to 0's and 1's...

Nah, Pascal's wager requires you to have never heard of an gods other than your god. That seems extremely inexcusable now that we have discovered other continents and shit.
LE4dGOLEM: What's a Doug?
Noc: A larval Doogly. They grow the tail and stinger upon reaching adulthood.

Keep waggling your butt brows Brothers.
Or; Is that your eye butthairs?

Kewangji
Has Been Touched
Posts: 2253
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 5:20 pm UTC
Location: Lost in Translation
Contact:

### Re: If you can reduce something to 0's and 1's...

But… people make the argument still, even after having heard of other gods? It just requires you to dismiss all those other ones.

The Great Hippo wrote:Nuclear bombs are like potato chips, you can't stop after just *one*

Weeks
Hey Baby, wanna make a fortnight?
Posts: 2023
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2008 12:41 am UTC

### Re: If you can reduce something to 0's and 1's...

Fuck Pascal, he convinced me into agnosticism.

And that's terrible.
TaintedDeity wrote:Tainted Deity
suffer-cait wrote:One day I'm gun a go visit weeks and discover they're just a computer in a trashcan at an ice cream shop.
Dthen wrote:FUCK CHRISTMAS FUCK EVERYTHING FUCK YOU TOO FUCK OFF

Kewangji
Has Been Touched
Posts: 2253
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 5:20 pm UTC
Location: Lost in Translation
Contact:

### Re: If you can reduce something to 0's and 1's...

Agnostia is a harsh mistress ._.

The Great Hippo wrote:Nuclear bombs are like potato chips, you can't stop after just *one*

TheGrammarBolshevik
Posts: 4878
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 2:12 am UTC
Location: Going to and fro in the earth, and walking up and down in it.

### Re: If you can reduce something to 0's and 1's...

doogly wrote:Nah, Pascal's wager requires you to have never heard of an gods other than your god. That seems extremely inexcusable now that we have discovered other continents and shit.

Yeah, I'd say Pascal's Wager is the worse for how easy it is to point out what's wrong with it. The ontological argument seems obviously wrong, but it's (notoriously) much harder to say why.
Nothing rhymes with orange,
Not even sporange.