Moderators: SecondTalon, Moderators General, Prelates

The Utilitarian wrote:So. Dark Ascension. Opinions?
To me it just seems incoherent. Way too many cards invested in hyper situational mechanics. It feels like all the parts of Innistrad I looked at and went "well, that's kind of neat but has absolutely no place in any of my decks."
There's a couple nice cards of course but the vast majority of it seems too unreliable to build on.
LLCoolDave wrote:I'm not sure if you understand the interaction correctly, but black sun's zenith on an undying creature with a +1/+1 counter on it still kills it proper: It is put into the graveyard for having zero toughness BEFORE the counters are cancelled out.
I'm also not sure what kind of standard metagame you have in mind, but outside of inkmoth nexus and the occassional phyrexian crussader there isn't much infecting going on, and removal is at a fairly low count right now as well. Maybe your local FNM metagame is vastly different to what's happening on the big stage though, so your mileage may vary.
Black Dynamite wrote:People have been saying that WOTC are killing combo in modern, but I don't think that is true at all. I think Ad Nauseum is a wonderful modern combo deck, as well as U/R Past In Flames, Martyr-Proc, Melira-Pod, and Eggs. Combo is my favorite sort of deck; I adore that whole, "oops, I win," feeling.
I have Eggs completely built and have been playing it in live tournaments since modern started as a format. It really is one of the most difficult to pilot combo decks. It's also very unexpected at tournaments.
Roosevelt wrote:I wrote:Does Space Teddy Roosevelt wrestle Space Bears and fight the Space Spanish-American War with his band of Space-volunteers the Space Rough Riders?
Yes.
Roosevelt wrote:I wrote:Does Space Teddy Roosevelt wrestle Space Bears and fight the Space Spanish-American War with his band of Space-volunteers the Space Rough Riders?
Yes.
Zamfir wrote:Yeah, that's a good point. Everyone is all about presumption of innocence in rape threads. But when Mexican drug lords build APCs to carry their henchmen around, we immediately jump to criminal conclusions without hard evidence.
Zamfir wrote:Yeah, that's a good point. Everyone is all about presumption of innocence in rape threads. But when Mexican drug lords build APCs to carry their henchmen around, we immediately jump to criminal conclusions without hard evidence.
doogly wrote:On a scale of Mr Rogers to Fascism, how mean do you think we're being?
Belial wrote:My goal is to be the best brain infection any of you have ever had.

doogly wrote:On a scale of Mr Rogers to Fascism, how mean do you think we're being?
Belial wrote:My goal is to be the best brain infection any of you have ever had.
Zamfir wrote:Yeah, that's a good point. Everyone is all about presumption of innocence in rape threads. But when Mexican drug lords build APCs to carry their henchmen around, we immediately jump to criminal conclusions without hard evidence.
Jessica wrote:I don't think time walk for 1UU and two cards is really all that great... especially if you have to telegraph to your opponent that it's happening

Telchar wrote:Vexing devil is a ridiculous card and has sold out preorders on multiple sites. The red planeswalker also seems underrated with all the graveyard interaction in the set.

Except that you're net 0 cards (after the draw from the turn). And now you're up a land/turn.Jessica wrote:I don't think time walk for 1UU and two cards is really all that great... especially if you have to telegraph to your opponent that it's happening
I think your dread can be fully realized now.mosc wrote:I'm also dreading to find out that this tribal land that got leaked is actually real:


mosc wrote:Telchar wrote:Vexing devil is a ridiculous card and has sold out preorders on multiple sites. The red planeswalker also seems underrated with all the graveyard interaction in the set.
It's not that good. Early game you take the damage, late game you take the creature. Neither is what the person casting it would like. It might as well read:
If your opponent has 11 or more life, they take 4 damage
If your opponent has 10 or less life, you get a 4/3 creature
except that would actually be BETTER than the card as written, substantially. It's browbeat all over again. Novice players continue to misunderstand the power of situational choice. 1-drops are not particularly effective cards in terms of board dominance by nature since they come out quickly. 4 Damage a turn will probably get the job done against the majority of standard decks but once they have their defenses set and can handle a 4/3 creature, the damage potential can go to zero. Clearly a 4/3 for R or a 4 damage for R would both be very strong cards but it's important to understand this is neither. It has all of the flaws of both cards, all the time.
The red plainswalker is very situational. Don't overlook the RR cost over 1R. It's going to be hard to cast in the usual graveyard featuring decks in the format. I don't think he'll have a major impact at all.
Zamfir wrote:Yeah, that's a good point. Everyone is all about presumption of innocence in rape threads. But when Mexican drug lords build APCs to carry their henchmen around, we immediately jump to criminal conclusions without hard evidence.
Roosevelt wrote:I wrote:Does Space Teddy Roosevelt wrestle Space Bears and fight the Space Spanish-American War with his band of Space-volunteers the Space Rough Riders?
Yes.
Zamfir wrote:Yeah, that's a good point. Everyone is all about presumption of innocence in rape threads. But when Mexican drug lords build APCs to carry their henchmen around, we immediately jump to criminal conclusions without hard evidence.

Roosevelt wrote:I wrote:Does Space Teddy Roosevelt wrestle Space Bears and fight the Space Spanish-American War with his band of Space-volunteers the Space Rough Riders?
Yes.

Roosevelt wrote:I wrote:Does Space Teddy Roosevelt wrestle Space Bears and fight the Space Spanish-American War with his band of Space-volunteers the Space Rough Riders?
Yes.
Zamfir wrote:Yeah, that's a good point. Everyone is all about presumption of innocence in rape threads. But when Mexican drug lords build APCs to carry their henchmen around, we immediately jump to criminal conclusions without hard evidence.
Users browsing this forum: EdgarJPublius, Woopate and 2 guests