Game of Throngs

Rot your brains, then rot our boards

Moderators: SecondTalon, Moderators General, Prelates

Re: Game of Throngs

Postby LaserGuy » Fri Apr 20, 2012 7:46 pm UTC

Ixtellor wrote:Question:

Being that this is probably my favorite TV show, should I now go read the books? Or would that ruin the enjoyment and surprise of the series?

When
Spoiler:
Stark got beheaded... I was blown away.. epic moment in TV to kill off the most likeable and best character.


I would hate to ruin moments like that for myself.


I might suggest reading the books only as far as the show has gone. It might help fill in some background details and expand some plot points without giving too much away. If you like the books a lot, keep reading; if you want to keep the show unspoiled, then just wait for a bit.

If you really like the show, though, I'd be very tempted to say that you should not read book 3 until after season 3. And avoid any discussions of the books during that period. A Storm of Swords is very, very intense.
LaserGuy
 
Posts: 2704
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 5:33 pm UTC

Re: Game of Throngs

Postby maybeagnostic » Fri Apr 20, 2012 7:47 pm UTC

Ixtellor wrote:Being that this is probably my favorite TV show, should I now go read the books? Or would that ruin the enjoyment and surprise of the series?
I've read the books and I love almost every single scene in the show. I do, however, know exactly what will happen next so I am not particularly excited for the next episode. I would definitely recommend reading the books because a) they are awesome, b) it helps to follow along with the show, and c) the show includes a lot of references and winks to people who have read the books.

Of course, you can only experience the full impact of each shocking moment once. Spoiler for end of the first season/book:
Spoiler:
I think Ned getting killed was a lot more shocking in the books than in the show but it is hard to judge since I obviously wasn't at all surprised in the show. Still, I had spent many hours looking at the world through his eyes, I was absolutely convinced he was the Good Guy in this fantasy epic (He was even an orphan*! Orphans never die!), and the paragraphs between Geoffrey's order and the beheading were almost unbelievable. The show didn't really have the chance to stretch out the shock and suspension as much.


* Kind of.
T: ... through an emergency induction port.
S: That's a straw, Tali.
T: Emerrrgency induction port.
maybeagnostic
 
Posts: 272
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 3:34 pm UTC

Re: Game of Throngs

Postby pseudoidiot » Fri Apr 20, 2012 7:51 pm UTC

Ixtellor: I think moments like that are just as shocking, if not more so, in the books.

Going beyond the standard cries of "ALWAYS READ THE BOOKS FIRST", you should ask yourself if you would prefer to experience those moments from watching the show, or reading the book and then seeing it again on screen?

I don't feel like reading the books has ruined anything in the series for me. I think there's still a lot of entertainment value. They're doing cool things with the show and fleshing things out in interesting ways, so I think it's fun to be aware of the differences.

Although in my case, it's been a few years since I read the earlier books, so some things aren't quite as fresh as others. Although it helps that my wife recently read them, so that was almost like a refresher course.
Derailed : Gaming Outside the Box.
SexyTalon wrote:*swoons* I love you, all powerful pseudoidiot!
ShootTheChicken wrote:I can't stop thinking about pseudoidiot's penis.
User avatar
pseudoidiot
hookers and blow
 
Posts: 4611
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 9:30 pm UTC
Location: Kansas City

Re: Game of Throngs

Postby Dream » Fri Apr 20, 2012 10:05 pm UTC

My personal opinion from dipping into other people's copies of the first book, is that the prose is massively overwrought and meandering. I just can't face a seven or eight book saga of it. I'm a lot happier watching and enjoying the twists and turns on TV for the moment. It may reach a stage where the plot absolutely requires book length exposition, and the books become by far the better experience, but for now the series is handling its plots very well, and I'm happy. I'm happy to approach it as a series, and not overthink the book related excisions from plot or character.
I knew a woman once, but she died soon after.
User avatar
Dream
WINNING
 
Posts: 4339
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 7:20 pm UTC
Location: The Hollow Scene Epic

Re: Game of Throngs

Postby Adacore » Sat Apr 21, 2012 4:08 am UTC

maybeagnostic wrote:Of course, you can only experience the full impact of each shocking moment once. Spoiler for end of the first season/book:
Spoiler:
I think Ned getting killed was a lot more shocking in the books than in the show but it is hard to judge since I obviously wasn't at all surprised in the show. Still, I had spent many hours looking at the world through his eyes, I was absolutely convinced he was the Good Guy in this fantasy epic (He was even an orphan*! Orphans never die!), and the paragraphs between Geoffrey's order and the beheading were almost unbelievable. The show didn't really have the chance to stretch out the shock and suspension as much.

First season/book still:
Spoiler:
It was kinda the opposite for me. In the book I felt it was really obvious that Ned was going to die, but in the show it wasn't foreshadowed anywhere near as heavily (they stressed the 'adult direwolf killed by a stag with 6 direwolf pups, and the direwolf is totally the symbol of the Starks, and this is totally a metaphor, look at it!' bit way more in the book). So I was convinced fairly early on in the book that it was a novel about the Stark children growing up and making their way into the world and having epic adventures, and in order for them to really strike out on their own, their protector figure (Ned) had to die. I don't think I would've picked up on that at all from the show.

Also, Ned did some really stupid stuff towards the end of book/season 1 that seemed, given he's meant to be an intelligent man, to be things he'd only be doing if the author wanted to set him up for death.

Thus, the most shocking bit of the first book, for me, was Bran's fall from the tower, because I thought he'd died and was expecting him to be one of the main characters.
User avatar
Adacore
 
Posts: 1935
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 12:35 pm UTC
Location: 한국 창원

Re: Game of Throngs

Postby CorruptUser » Sat Apr 21, 2012 5:55 am UTC

Spoiler:
I'm developing an immunity to shock, as major characters suddenly die, minor characters turn out to be huge ones, and alliances constantly shift.


B5 Spoilers
Spoiler:
But what did catch me off guard was at the end of DwD both Jon and Mance die. Possibly. The 3 characters that seemed to have plot immunity were Dany, Tyrion, and Jon/Mance. It's called "A Song of Ice and Fire", Dany is the fire, and either Jon or Mance is the ice, you can't have the song without fire and ice! Or maybe Bran is supposed to be the ice?

Tyrion is the author's (and mine) favorite character, so he can't get killed just yet. Maybe at the end of the series they die, but not till the story is done. Also, Petyr and Varys both seem to have a lot more to add before they get killed off. At least one of the two has to stay around as the Chessmaster. Unless that obese merchant guy is the real Chessmaster?


Back to Tyrion's awesomitude, I love how GoT is the first major series (that I know of) where a dwarf is actually in a real part. Not the comic relief, not a token minority, not a poster child, but a real character. You know, a human, instead of an attraction.

It's something that always bothers me in movies and TV. Have a gay character? He's either a campy comic relief, a depraved bisexual villain, Super-minority*, or the guy who pauses the movie to remind everyone not to be homophobic.

*I really, really hate that archetype. You are recruiting a sports team, and you see someone kicking ass. But oh, it turns out that he's actually a girl! You can't let girls on the team! But the girl isn't just a little better than needed to make the cut, or better than most of your players, oh no, she has to be the best player on your team with no flaws or room for character development whatsoever outside of a love interest!
User avatar
CorruptUser
 
Posts: 3964
Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2009 10:12 pm UTC

Re: Game of Throngs

Postby maybeagnostic » Sat Apr 21, 2012 2:49 pm UTC

CorruptUser wrote:B5 Spoilers
Spoiler:
But what did catch me off guard was at the end of DwD both Jon and Mance die. Possibly. The 3 characters that seemed to have plot immunity were Dany, Tyrion, and Jon/Mance. It's called "A Song of Ice and Fire", Dany is the fire, and either Jon or Mance is the ice, you can't have the song without fire and ice! Or maybe Bran is supposed to be the ice?

Tyrion is the author's (and mine) favorite character, so he can't get killed just yet. Maybe at the end of the series they die, but not till the story is done. Also, Petyr and Varys both seem to have a lot more to add before they get killed off. At least one of the two has to stay around as the Chessmaster. Unless that obese merchant guy is the real Chessmaster?
Massive book 1 through 5 spoilers:
Spoiler:
Martin stopped killing important characters at the end of the third book. I actually like the fourth book but in terms of complexity and suspense it can't even remotely compare to the first three. In the fourth and the fifth books no one important died, a few characters that were supposedly dead were brought back, and all the 'Is this important character going to die?' uncertainty was wasted on ridiculous cliff hangers (Cersei, Brienne, Jaime, John).

The series really needs to take a step back, skip over a few years and let the kid characters grow up a bit.
T: ... through an emergency induction port.
S: That's a straw, Tali.
T: Emerrrgency induction port.
maybeagnostic
 
Posts: 272
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 3:34 pm UTC

Re: Game of Throngs

Postby CorruptUser » Sat Apr 21, 2012 5:11 pm UTC

maybeagnostic wrote:
CorruptUser wrote:B5 Spoilers
Spoiler:
But what did catch me off guard was at the end of DwD both Jon and Mance die. Possibly. The 3 characters that seemed to have plot immunity were Dany, Tyrion, and Jon/Mance. It's called "A Song of Ice and Fire", Dany is the fire, and either Jon or Mance is the ice, you can't have the song without fire and ice! Or maybe Bran is supposed to be the ice?

Tyrion is the author's (and mine) favorite character, so he can't get killed just yet. Maybe at the end of the series they die, but not till the story is done. Also, Petyr and Varys both seem to have a lot more to add before they get killed off. At least one of the two has to stay around as the Chessmaster. Unless that obese merchant guy is the real Chessmaster?
Massive book 1 through 5 spoilers:
Spoiler:
Martin stopped killing important characters at the end of the third book. I actually like the fourth book but in terms of complexity and suspense it can't even remotely compare to the first three. In the fourth and the fifth books no one important died, a few characters that were supposedly dead were brought back, and all the 'Is this important character going to die?' uncertainty was wasted on ridiculous cliff hangers (Cersei, Brienne, Jaime, John).

The series really needs to take a step back, skip over a few years and let the kid characters grow up a bit.


B4/5 spoilers
Spoiler:
Yeah I noticed that characters no longer died as frequently. Rattleshirt did die though, as did Six-skins. And that "I'm going to tame a dragon!" idiot. And Aegon (was that book 4? I forget when). And Lysa Tully. She was a plot-critical character, kinda, even if she was a bit unlikable and won't be missed. She did get her woobie moment in the previous books, when it's revealed that her father forced her to get an abortion.

I think all the major 'villains' are either woobies or complete monsters. The Hound was tortured by his brother, Jamie lost his hand, Reek, Tyrion (not really that evil) has his wife-whore and lifetime of abuse, Petyr would be a woobie if he wasn't so competent, and so on.

If GRRM could somehow turn the Boltons into woobies, then I'd be impressed.
User avatar
CorruptUser
 
Posts: 3964
Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2009 10:12 pm UTC

Re: Game of Throngs

Postby maybeagnostic » Sat Apr 21, 2012 7:50 pm UTC

CorruptUser wrote:B4/5 spoilers
Spoiler:
Yeah I noticed that characters no longer died as frequently. Rattleshirt did die though, as did Six-skins. And that "I'm going to tame a dragon!" idiot. And Aegon (was that book 4? I forget when). And Lysa Tully. She was a plot-critical character, kinda, even if she was a bit unlikable and won't be missed. She did get her woobie moment in the previous books, when it's revealed that her father forced her to get an abortion.

I think all the major 'villains' are either woobies or complete monsters. The Hound was tortured by his brother, Jamie lost his hand, Reek, Tyrion (not really that evil) has his wife-whore and lifetime of abuse, Petyr would be a woobie if he wasn't so competent, and so on.

If GRRM could somehow turn the Boltons into woobies, then I'd be impressed.
Spoiler:
Lysa Tully might have been important to the world but she never had a POV. Maybe I should have said protagonists instead of important characters but here is what I mean- Renly, Ned, Joffrey, Rob, and Tywin died, Bran broke his spine, Jaime lost his hand. In the first three books no one was safe- reading the Battle of the Blackwater chapters, I had no idea if Tyrion will die in the river or whether Davos will starve on that rock.

The last two books have serious life-or-death cliffhangers for Cersei, Brienne, Arya, Jaime, John, Bran, and Daenerys but no one actually gets harmed. Sansa and the North (Theon and Asha) are the only story lines where something significant is lost. The North also happens to be the best (only actually good?) part of the fifth book. Yeah, okay, some named characters die in the fifth book but nothing compares to even Lysa Arryn's death, let alone the Red Wedding.
T: ... through an emergency induction port.
S: That's a straw, Tali.
T: Emerrrgency induction port.
maybeagnostic
 
Posts: 272
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 3:34 pm UTC

Re: Game of Throngs

Postby CorruptUser » Sun Apr 22, 2012 3:18 am UTC

B4/5 spoilers

Spoiler:
Lysa didn't have a POV, but neither did Varys or Petyr IRRC, and they have proven to be among the most important characters so far. Renly didn't have a POV either, I think.

Cersei gets harmed in B5. After her parade, she is mentally broken. She looks like she's done as a major player. Breinne is harmed; she's heavily scarred on her neck, if not dead.

Though a part of me was disappointed that Arya's cliffhanger ending was just a temporary blindness. She's pretty much moving into villain territory.

But like I said, Dany can't die just yet.
User avatar
CorruptUser
 
Posts: 3964
Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2009 10:12 pm UTC

Re: Game of Throngs

Postby Lucrece » Sun Apr 22, 2012 5:02 am UTC

I prefer the pacing of the series, as much as they love to be assholes about each episode and end it on a cliffhanger. The good books are 1-3 anyways, with 4-5 receiving mixed feedback (who would've thought, an author that starts strong but then meanders). I like the cuts they made to make the story efficient thus far. If you dislike when a plot drags on, then the books might ruin the series for you.

And quite honestly? The delightful acting of the cast so far is a big selling point for me. They pop out the characters in a way the book can never do it for me. Maybe I'm just hung up on the visual and auditory. Varys in the TV series is just so ridiculously well done. I love Varys.

Also, hate Renly. God, he's a pansy, and Loras is a brat. Another set of gay characters I find better off left in obscurity. Cate's putdown was rewarding -- now she's one hell of a lady.

The Greyjoy casting is gooooood. Balon is voiced perfectly; and I know that people are bitching that Asha/Yara is"ugly", but that's just how I like her, without fuss and efficient. It makes the message of the world Martin has crafted so much stronger, where women like Margaery and Asha would be superbly suited to positions of leadership but are tragically stymied by a patriarchal culture.
Belial wrote:That's charming, Nancy, but all I hear when you talk is a bunch of yippy dog sounds.
User avatar
Lucrece
 
Posts: 3120
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 12:01 am UTC

Re: Game of Throngs

Postby LaserGuy » Mon Apr 23, 2012 5:06 am UTC

Episode 4...

Spoiler:
Holy shit they're making Joffrey out to be a crazy sociopath. Both of his scenes in this episode really made me cringe.

Other than that, I thought most of this episode was done very well. Very little filler (Robb's scene, maybe). I liked the final scene... very creepy and powerful.


Related book spoilers...

Spoiler:
I'm a little surprised that they had Littlefinger meet Catelyn. From a book point of view, this is a pretty big change and it will be interesting to what see comes of this. It's also interesting to have him feeding her Tyrion's terms for the exchange. I'm not sure what to think of this shift yet.
LaserGuy
 
Posts: 2704
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 5:33 pm UTC

Re: Game of Throngs

Postby ArgonV » Mon Apr 23, 2012 1:18 pm UTC

Latest episode related
Spoiler:
So... That shadow thing is Stannis' promised son?
User avatar
ArgonV
 
Posts: 1606
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 8:08 pm UTC
Location: The Netherlands

Re: Game of Throngs

Postby Lucrece » Mon Apr 23, 2012 2:50 pm UTC

shadow baby
Spoiler:
Yeah, in the book it was hinted that her fucking him was just manipulation to place a hit on Renly. Melisandre isn't some wanton witch. She's a fanatic, and her moves are guided by her faith and vision, but she's also shown as a calculating person like all red priests are. Keeping the workings of their magic secret is their best defense against those around them, so as to increase their perceived threatening image.
Belial wrote:That's charming, Nancy, but all I hear when you talk is a bunch of yippy dog sounds.
User avatar
Lucrece
 
Posts: 3120
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 12:01 am UTC

Re: Game of Throngs

Postby Laserdan » Wed Apr 25, 2012 8:26 pm UTC

Adacore wrote:
Spoiler:
Also, Ned did some really stupid stuff towards the end of book/season 1 that seemed, given he's meant to be an intelligent man, to be things he'd only be doing if the author wanted to set him up for death.


That is the reason there is this meme....

Spoiler:
http://io9.com/5807144/the-best-game-of-thrones-internet-meme-yet-stupid-ned-stark/gallery/3

Best one imho: Littlefinger tells you not to trust him?

...
...
...
TRUST LITTLEFINGER


On the side, he didn't do it because he's stupid, but because honor is literally the most important thing for him there is. Much more intelligent people in real life walked into their doom with open eyes and actually chose death over life (and not only their own) for their convictions. Not saying that this is right; he'd probably let the realm go down in flames if honor demands it. I actually think that he would not have accepted Jaime's kingslaying even if he knew the actual reasons Jaime had - which he calls his finest act, and rightfully so.
"Sobriety is a crutch for people who can't cope with drugs."
User avatar
Laserdan
 
Posts: 162
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 3:12 am UTC

Re: Game of Throngs

Postby Ixtellor » Thu Apr 26, 2012 6:30 pm UTC

Well I decided to hold off reading the books until the series is done. Reason... I won't be able to read the book and see anything but the characters on the TV show.

I am currently reading Dune for the first time and my mind won't allow me to visualize anything but whats in the movie. I find that to be very annoying and distracting while reading the books. "oh this is the scene where he puts his hand in the box... odd that he looks like a 20 something when it says here in the book that he is 15"
Book: They have no whites in their eyes. Me: Their eyes glow blue... damn you movie!

In conclusion for me: Always read the book first.

Can't wait to learn about the shadow baby.
The Revolution will not be Twitterized.
User avatar
Ixtellor
There are like 4 posters on XKCD that no more about ...
 
Posts: 2764
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 3:31 pm UTC

Re: Game of Throngs

Postby gmalivuk » Thu Apr 26, 2012 8:26 pm UTC

Of course, when I do read the book(s) first, I'm distracted by noticing everything they changed, which detracts somewhat from the movie/TV experience even if I think they made the best possible choices in adapting it. For example, speaking of shadow baby (episode 4 and book 2):
Spoiler:
The entire scene following Stannis telling Devos he needed a smuggler got me thinking about how that scene takes place later in the book, when they're laying siege to Storm's End, which I now have to conclude will probably be left out entirely, and also now Renly's death scene won't be nearly the same kind of mystery to the audience as it was in the book, and also why do they need to come into the cave at all when above them is just an open battlefield instead of a castle whose walls are imbued with spells that would prevent the shadow baby from getting through if born on the outside.
I don't object to any of this episode's changes from the book, and am often impressed in general with how well an adaptation fits everything together. It's just that I'm almost invariably distracted when watching it.

On Joffrey as a sociopath (episode 4, book 2 or 3):
Spoiler:
He was definitely at least as much of a sociopath in the books as in this episode, they just elected to show it differently, and with more tits as per HBO contractual obligation. I think it's later in the story that we hear about a younger Joffrey having sliced open a pregnant cat when he heard she had kittens inside her, with animal abuse used as a pretty standard illustration of a child character's latent sociopathy. So it's not so much "they're making Joffrey out to be a crazy sociopath" as it is "they're showing the audience that Joffrey is a crazy sociopath slightly differently from the books".


LaserGuy wrote:Related book spoilers...[regarding episode 4 differences]
Spoiler:
I'm a little surprised that they had Littlefinger meet Catelyn. From a book point of view, this is a pretty big change and it will be interesting to what see comes of this. It's also interesting to have him feeding her Tyrion's terms for the exchange. I'm not sure what to think of this shift yet.
Spoiler:
Yeah, they didn't meet at this point in the book, but I don't know that it'll really have any significant consequences in terms of further diversions.
In the future, there will be a global network of billions of adding machines.... One of the primary uses of this network will be to transport moving pictures of lesbian sex by pretending they are made out of numbers.
Spoiler:
gmss1 gmss2
User avatar
gmalivuk
Archduke Vendredi of Skellington the Third, Esquire
 
Posts: 19274
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:02 pm UTC
Location: Here, There, Everywhere (near Boston, anyway)

Re: Game of Throngs

Postby Ryom » Fri Apr 27, 2012 1:48 am UTC

Image
User avatar
Ryom
 
Posts: 643
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 7:52 am UTC

Re: Game of Throngs

Postby Felstaff » Fri Apr 27, 2012 12:35 pm UTC

That last one cracked me up.

Watching episode 4 this e'en. Looking forward to it!
A hater he came and sat by a ditch,
And he took an old cracked lute;
And he sang a song which was more of a screech
'Gainst a woman that was a brute.
User avatar
Felstaff
Occam's Taser
 
Posts: 4836
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 7:10 pm UTC
Location: ¢ ₪ ¿ ¶ § ∴ ® © ™ ؟ ¡ ‽ æ Þ ° ₰ ₤ ಡಢ

Re: Game of Throngs

Postby Diadem » Fri Apr 27, 2012 12:55 pm UTC

That list was awesome. Though the Daenerys one made me a little bit sad. She is way too cool to be compared to Sarah Palin.
Also she's technically not from a far away land. She was born on Dragonstone (where Stannis currently lives).
It's one of those irregular verbs, isn't it? I have an independent mind, you are an eccentric, he is round the twist
- Bernard Woolley in Yes, Prime Minister
User avatar
Diadem
 
Posts: 4055
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 11:03 am UTC
Location: The Netherlands

Re: Game of Throngs

Postby SecondTalon » Fri Apr 27, 2012 1:25 pm UTC

Diadem wrote:That list was awesome. Though the Daenerys one made me a little bit sad. She is way too cool to be compared to Sarah Palin.
Also she's technically not from a far away land. She was born on Dragonstone (where Stannis currently lives).

See, the thing that irks me about it is the... it's comparing to American politicians so it's going to be America-centric. And that's fine. It just really screams of someone on the East Coast making it and thinking of Alaska as being interchangeable with Antarctica or Nepal or some other distant, hard-to-reach area, relative to the "real" US.

Which, as a resident of what's lovingly called flyover country, annoys the fuck out of me.
"When Archie is too progressive for you, that's how science identifies you as an earlier species" - Luke McKinney, Cracked.com
User avatar
SecondTalon
SexyTalon
 
Posts: 21551
Joined: Sat May 05, 2007 2:10 pm UTC
Location: Louisville, Kentucky, USA, Mars. HA!

Re: Game of Throngs

Postby Yakk » Fri Apr 27, 2012 2:40 pm UTC

Hey: your state is easily reachable from the "real" US.

So long as you have a parachute.
One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision - BR

Last edited by JHVH on Fri Oct 23, 4004 BCE 6:17 pm, edited 6 times in total.
User avatar
Yakk
 
Posts: 10038
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 7:27 pm UTC
Location: E pur si muove

Re: Game of Throngs

Postby CorruptUser » Sat Apr 28, 2012 3:49 pm UTC

Well, Sarah Palin was born in Idaho before being exiled to Yeti-land. Yetis live in Alaska, right? You can't prove they don't.

Anyway, I love that list except for Obama. Showing bias, much? He'd best be compared to Robert Baratheon; initially popular among the peasants, put in place as an alternative to previous madman's administration, spent the treasury until kingdom was broke.

Although, Clinton would need a new comparison.
User avatar
CorruptUser
 
Posts: 3964
Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2009 10:12 pm UTC

Re: Game of Throngs

Postby SlyReaper » Sat Apr 28, 2012 7:37 pm UTC

CorruptUser wrote:Well, Sarah Palin was born in Idaho before being exiled to Yeti-land. Yetis live in Alaska, right? You can't prove they don't.

You're confusing Alaska with Tibet. Tibet has yetis, Alaska has hockeymoms.
Image
I put up my thumb ... and my thumb blotted out ... Earth. I didn't feel like a giant. I felt very, very small." Neil Armstrong 1930-2012
User avatar
SlyReaper
inflatable
 
Posts: 7351
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 11:09 pm UTC
Location: Bristol, Old Blighty

Re: Game of Throngs

Postby CorruptUser » Sat Apr 28, 2012 7:53 pm UTC

But I'm sure Tibet is visible from Palin's house.

Though that Hokeymam sounds like a vicious creature. Like a cross between a boar and a tube of lipstick.
User avatar
CorruptUser
 
Posts: 3964
Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2009 10:12 pm UTC

Re: Game of Throngs

Postby lucrezaborgia » Sun Apr 29, 2012 9:26 am UTC

I'm just loving the cast more and more as the series goes on. Can't wait for tomorrow's episode!
User avatar
lucrezaborgia
 
Posts: 366
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2012 3:20 am UTC
Location: Green Bay, WI

Re: Game of Throngs

Postby Dream » Mon Apr 30, 2012 2:55 pm UTC

Welp, my Throne hopeful carked it. Oh well.

I thought the scene with
Spoiler:
the Maid of Tarth and Catelyn was excruciating. They could have played it as the Maid being lost without a subject for her loyalty, and Catelyn rescuing her, but instead it was a reinforcement of the feudal system that most of the rest of the show seems determined to depict as a meritocracy.


I really like that the meritocracy aspect is given a lot of time. The Tywins and Tyrions do well, the Jamies and Joffreys don't. Seeing that undermined with blind pleges of lifelong servitude just because that's the way things are is a bit disappointing.
I knew a woman once, but she died soon after.
User avatar
Dream
WINNING
 
Posts: 4339
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 7:20 pm UTC
Location: The Hollow Scene Epic

Re: Game of Throngs

Postby lucrezaborgia » Mon Apr 30, 2012 7:43 pm UTC

[quote="Dream"]I thought the scene with
Spoiler:
the Maid of Tarth and Catelyn was excruciating. They could have played it as the Maid being lost without a subject for her loyalty, and Catelyn rescuing her, but instead it was a reinforcement of the feudal system that most of the rest of the show seems determined to depict as a meritocracy.


Spoiler:
Brienne isn't a Maid by any means and Catelyn DID rescue her by dragging her out of that tent and talking some sense into her later on. Catelyn didn't ask for her service personally and of course she is going to advocate for her son and sees in Brienne a powerful friend Catelyn fully recognizes that the pledges are about as useless as the paper they are written on but she's not going to turn down Brienne in her time of need
User avatar
lucrezaborgia
 
Posts: 366
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2012 3:20 am UTC
Location: Green Bay, WI

Re: Game of Throngs

Postby Adam H » Mon Apr 30, 2012 8:00 pm UTC

lucrezaborgia wrote:Brienne isn't a Maid by any means
She's called the Maid of Tarth in the books (and the show? I forget).
Dream wrote:I really like that the meritocracy aspect is given a lot of time. The Tywins and Tyrions do well, the Jamies and Joffreys don't. Seeing that undermined with blind pleges of lifelong servitude just because that's the way things are is a bit disappointing.
The setting is a horrible feudal system that sometimes happens to reward capability. Anytime there's chaos/anarchy, there will be elements of a meritocracy. I imagine it's only when things are overly-bureaucratic that idiots are rewarded for being idiotic.

Book spoilers (through book 5, we'll say)
Spoiler:
And heeheehee all the good rulers live happily ever after!
Goodbye
User avatar
Adam H
 
Posts: 639
Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2011 6:36 pm UTC

Re: Game of Throngs

Postby LaserGuy » Mon Apr 30, 2012 8:09 pm UTC

Adam H wrote:
lucrezaborgia wrote:Brienne isn't a Maid by any means


She's called the Maid of Tarth in the books (and the show? I forget).


Very minor Brienne spoiler, I guess. The show hasn't really discussed it in detail.

Spoiler:
It's a derogatory name that people give her (along with Brienne the Beauty) because of her... non-conformity to gender roles of the day, and because she's perceived to be pretty ugly (although, as others have noted, she's Hollywood ugly in the show) . Hence, people say she's a maid, because nobody would have sex with her. IIRC, we learn later in the series that it is technically accurate, but no less offensive.


[edit]As far as the most recent episode goes... I really like how they're doing the Arya plot. It's not exactly the same as in the books, but it covers the elements really well, and Maise is just rocking that roll. The scene with her and Tywin was great. Then again, pretty much everything Tywin touches turns to awesome in this show. One thing I wish was that (book 2-3 spoilers)...

Spoiler:
They'd made it a little more obvious that the death caused by Jaqen H'ghar was more supernatural. Like in the book how Weese's dog somehow decides to rip his throat out. It will be interesting to see who Arya ends up selecting for her second death choice, since the characters she decides to kill in the book have not been introduced. Also, it's a bit of a shame that the Tickler dies in this way, instead of the really dramatic way he dies in A Storm of Swords.
LaserGuy
 
Posts: 2704
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 5:33 pm UTC

Re: Game of Throngs

Postby Ended » Mon Apr 30, 2012 9:00 pm UTC

LaserGuy wrote:(book 2-3 spoilers)...
Spoiler:
Also, it's a bit of a shame that the Tickler dies in this way, instead of the really dramatic way he dies in A Storm of Swords.

Spoiler:
Totally agree. I felt like that was a pivotal moment for Arya in the books as well as one of the most memorable death scenes of a minor character. I wonder if they will have the same scene except with a different character being killed?
Generally I try to make myself do things I instinctively avoid, in case they are awesome.
-dubsola
Ended
 
Posts: 1458
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 3:27 pm UTC
Location: The Tower of Flints. (Also known as: England.)

Re: Game of Throngs

Postby pseudoidiot » Mon May 07, 2012 3:16 am UTC

I'll never be able to look at Tonks the same way.
Derailed : Gaming Outside the Box.
SexyTalon wrote:*swoons* I love you, all powerful pseudoidiot!
ShootTheChicken wrote:I can't stop thinking about pseudoidiot's penis.
User avatar
pseudoidiot
hookers and blow
 
Posts: 4611
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 9:30 pm UTC
Location: Kansas City

Re: Game of Throngs

Postby Lucrece » Mon May 07, 2012 5:22 am UTC

I didn't know Osha was Tonk until I read the comments on AV Club. Although all that trauma about naked childhood figures no longer happens since my childhood was shattered by seeing Xena/Lucy Lawless's tits in Spartacus.
Belial wrote:That's charming, Nancy, but all I hear when you talk is a bunch of yippy dog sounds.
User avatar
Lucrece
 
Posts: 3120
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 12:01 am UTC

Re: Game of Throngs

Postby Dream » Mon May 07, 2012 5:28 pm UTC

pseudoidiot wrote:I'll never be able to look at Tonks the same way.

Wait, who? I think I've lost a name somewhere along the way. WAIT! I googled it. Crisis averted.

Another triumph for Dinklage in the post-crowd-massacre scene. And I really wasn't expecting
Spoiler:
Theon to just take Winterfell. Didn't he only have a ship and a dozen men when he left the Isles? Methinks some plot development got lost in the translation to TV.

Spoiler:
And I'm betting Littlefinger recognised Arya. I suspect someone as court-savvy as him would only have registered even a flicker of any reaction under the most shocking of realisations. Such as that there's a Stark spying in the Lannister headquarters.
I knew a woman once, but she died soon after.
User avatar
Dream
WINNING
 
Posts: 4339
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 7:20 pm UTC
Location: The Hollow Scene Epic

Re: Game of Throngs

Postby pseudoidiot » Mon May 07, 2012 5:33 pm UTC

Dream wrote:Wait, who? I think I've lost a name somewhere along the way.
The actress that plays Osha played Tonks in the Harry Potter movies.

Dream wrote:And I really wasn't expecting
Spoiler:
Theon to just take Winterfell. Didn't he only have a ship and a dozen men when he left the Isles? Methinks some plot development got lost in the translation to TV.
In the previous episode
Spoiler:
Theon talks about how they'll stage a fake raid on some nearby town (I forget the name) and when Winterfell sends men to defend (we see this in the scene with Bran & Maester Luwin sending men to defend them) the town then Theon will move in and take Winterfell.
Derailed : Gaming Outside the Box.
SexyTalon wrote:*swoons* I love you, all powerful pseudoidiot!
ShootTheChicken wrote:I can't stop thinking about pseudoidiot's penis.
User avatar
pseudoidiot
hookers and blow
 
Posts: 4611
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 9:30 pm UTC
Location: Kansas City

Re: Game of Throngs

Postby Chen » Mon May 07, 2012 5:43 pm UTC

pseudoidiot wrote:
Dream wrote:And I really wasn't expecting
Spoiler:
Theon to just take Winterfell. Didn't he only have a ship and a dozen men when he left the Isles? Methinks some plot development got lost in the translation to TV.
In the previous episode
Spoiler:
Theon talks about how they'll stage a fake raid on some nearby town (I forget the name) and when Winterfell sends men to defend (we see this in the scene with Bran & Maester Luwin sending men to defend them) the town then Theon will move in and take Winterfell.


Spoiler:
Did he actually say it on the show? It was implied when he was talking to his first mate but I don't think he out and said it. That said, my GF figured that was the plan without having read the books so there was definitely some foreshadowing of it on the show
Chen
 
Posts: 2948
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2008 6:53 pm UTC
Location: Montreal

Re: Game of Throngs

Postby Diadem » Mon May 07, 2012 5:46 pm UTC

pseudoidiot wrote:
Dream wrote:And I really wasn't expecting
Spoiler:
Theon to just take Winterfell. Didn't he only have a ship and a dozen men when he left the Isles? Methinks some plot development got lost in the translation to TV.
In the previous episode
Spoiler:
Theon talks about how they'll stage a fake raid on some nearby town (I forget the name) and when Winterfell sends men to defend (we see this in the scene with Bran & Maester Luwin sending men to defend them) the town then Theon will move in and take Winterfell.

Spoiler:
Yeah, remember, pretty much every able-bodied man in the north is off south fighting in the war. There's only a few token defence forces left. That is perfectly fine because Robb's army is still blocking the route to the North, and even if the Lannisters were to get around this, Southern armies generally don't do well in the North, and it's a very very long march. By the time they reach Winterfell Robb will have pillaged Lannisport and King's Landing both. But they weren't counting on raids from the Iron Islands.

Theon still couldn't have taken Winterfell, but he drew away the reserve forces by staging raids on other castles.

It's still a bit unrealistic, imho. Winterfell is still a major town. Nothing compared to King's Landing, but there should be hundreds of peasants and other townsfolk around. Enough to hold off a few dozen invaders.
It's one of those irregular verbs, isn't it? I have an independent mind, you are an eccentric, he is round the twist
- Bernard Woolley in Yes, Prime Minister
User avatar
Diadem
 
Posts: 4055
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 11:03 am UTC
Location: The Netherlands

Re: Game of Throngs

Postby lucrezaborgia » Mon May 07, 2012 5:54 pm UTC

Diadem wrote:
pseudoidiot wrote:
Spoiler:
Yeah, remember, pretty much every able-bodied man in the north is off south fighting in the war. There's only a few token defence forces left. That is perfectly fine because Robb's army is still blocking the route to the North, and even if the Lannisters were to get around this, Southern armies generally don't do well in the North, and it's a very very long march. By the time they reach Winterfell Robb will have pillaged Lannisport and King's Landing both. But they weren't counting on raids from the Iron Islands.

Theon still couldn't have taken Winterfell, but he drew away the reserve forces by staging raids on other castles.

It's still a bit unrealistic, imho. Winterfell is still a major town. Nothing compared to King's Landing, but there should be hundreds of peasants and other townsfolk around. Enough to hold off a few dozen invaders.


Spoiler:
Which is why they snuck in over the walls and used Bran to gain control. Theon grew up there so he would have excellent knowledge of the castle and defenses.
User avatar
lucrezaborgia
 
Posts: 366
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2012 3:20 am UTC
Location: Green Bay, WI

Re: Game of Throngs

Postby Diadem » Mon May 07, 2012 6:00 pm UTC

Haven't watched the latest episode yet, so I'm going on my book-knowledge. (So the next bit contains possible spoilers for the next few episodes since I don't know how much is in this one).
Spoiler:
But doesn't Bran escape? I recall Theon sneaking over the Wall, and killing quite a few characters I liked in the process. But I also recall Bran escaping together with his little brother. Doesn't everybody end up thinking Bran is dead, while Bran thinks Winterfell is still in enemy hands even after it's liberated?
It's one of those irregular verbs, isn't it? I have an independent mind, you are an eccentric, he is round the twist
- Bernard Woolley in Yes, Prime Minister
User avatar
Diadem
 
Posts: 4055
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 11:03 am UTC
Location: The Netherlands

Re: Game of Throngs

Postby LaserGuy » Mon May 07, 2012 6:18 pm UTC

Diadem wrote:Haven't watched the latest episode yet, so I'm going on my book-knowledge. (So the next bit contains possible spoilers for the next few episodes since I don't know how much is in this one).
Spoiler:
But doesn't Bran escape? I recall Theon sneaking over the Wall, and killing quite a few characters I liked in the process. But I also recall Bran escaping together with his little brother. Doesn't everybody end up thinking Bran is dead, while Bran thinks Winterfell is still in enemy hands even after it's liberated?


Bookish spoilers...

Spoiler:
It happens pretty much as you recall, but not immediately. I think Bran escapes a few days later or something.

Where's Reek/Ramsay? Other characters, such as Jojen and the Freys were also left out entirely, which might complicate things later a little bit.


Dream wrote:
Spoiler:
And I'm betting Littlefinger recognised Arya. I suspect someone as court-savvy as him would only have registered even a flicker of any reaction under the most shocking of realisations. Such as that there's a Stark spying in the Lannister headquarters.


Episode only stuff...

Spoiler:
Look at Littlefinger's body language during that scene, particularly after she spills the wine on his hand. He watches her walking away even while Tywin is talking to him, then immediately mentions the Stark girls. I would say that yes, he probably did recognize her (I can't remember if the two actually technically met on camera in the show--maybe during the tournament?--but I think it's fairly safe to assume that he would save seen her around).

I think you can imagine that how Littlefinger would find it very advantageous to be the only person who knows where Arya actually is, especially given that the Lannisters are interested in trading her and Sansa for Jamie, and he's sort of responsible for brokering that deal anyway.
LaserGuy
 
Posts: 2704
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 5:33 pm UTC

PreviousNext

Return to Movies and TV Shows

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Whelan and 1 guest