Thor: Ragnarok

Rot your brains, then rot our boards

Moderators: SecondTalon, Moderators General, Prelates

OP Tipping
Posts: 188
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 6:23 am UTC

Thor: Ragnarok

Postby OP Tipping » Sun Oct 29, 2017 10:13 am UTC

I enjoyed this movie but the levels of silliness are off the charts, coming close at some points to self-parody, which potentially ruins the "spell" of a movie. It's fair to say that all three MCU films this year have been lighthearted. I don't mind it: it's nice that they can vary the tone. But I hope they can still turn on the gravitas when they need to.

Highlights are:

*The Odd Couple feel between the roomies Thor and Hulk

*Great post-credit scene with the Grandmaster. Goldblum cracks me up.

*Hulk
Spoiler:
beating himself up to stay angry, in order to forestall the return of Banner


*An Asgardian play with
Spoiler:
Sam Neill
as Odin,
Spoiler:
Luke Hemsworth
as Thor, and
Spoiler:
Matt Damon
as Loki. Some nice meta-links there if you look for them.

Sadly, no Sif or Selvig.

User avatar
Zohar
COMMANDER PORN
Posts: 7647
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 8:45 pm UTC
Location: Denver

Re: Thor: Ragnarok

Postby Zohar » Mon Oct 30, 2017 2:27 pm UTC

I'll only be seeing it in a couple of weeks with my brothers when I'm visiting my family, but I'm looking forward to it a lot. I don't mind the lighthearted nature of the MCU, it's kind of what I'm looking for in it, and a major differentiation from the drab DC universe at the moment (though yes Wonder Woman was decent).
Mighty Jalapeno: "See, Zohar agrees, and he's nice to people."
SecondTalon: "Still better looking than Jesus."

Not how I say my name

User avatar
charliepanayi
Posts: 1525
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2008 7:26 pm UTC
Location: London, UK

Re: Thor: Ragnarok

Postby charliepanayi » Mon Oct 30, 2017 6:27 pm UTC

I thought it was decent, pretty funny in places, wish there’d been more of the rock guy Taika Waititi voices. I preferred the other two Marvel films this year though, there’s nothing in this quite as funny as the Mary Poppins line in Guardians 2 and no moment as impressive as the twist in Spider-Man: Homecoming.
"Excuse me Miss, do you like pineapple?"

"I don't want to achieve immortality through my work, I want to achieve it through not dying"

maybeagnostic
Posts: 612
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 3:34 pm UTC

Re: Thor: Ragnarok

Postby maybeagnostic » Mon Oct 30, 2017 6:42 pm UTC

I enjoyed it. Certainly the best of the Thor movies, not that that is saying a great deal as the first two were among the most forgettable in the MCU. Tessa Thompson and Taika Waititi were certainly a bit incidental to the actual story and could have used a bigger role but I suppose Ragnarok should be focused on the Aesir. Not that the events in the movie have much connection to the mythological Ragnarok.

I found the mid-credits scene rather bizarre though.
Spoiler:
We had this whole "home is the people and the people are still alive" mood going and then this big scary ship appears. Trying to find some explanation online of what it all means, the only thing I could discover was some speculation that this is Thanos coming for the Tesseract (makes sense) and he'll wipe out the surviving Asgardians before Infinity War starts.


OP Tipping wrote:It's fair to say that all three MCU films this year have been lighthearted. I don't mind it: it's nice that they can vary the tone.
Lighthearted as opposed to what? The only MCU film I wouldn't quite describe as lighthearted were Winter Soldier and Civil War but even they aren't too far off. All the other MCU films are colorful and lighthearted with (sometimes) deeper issues for people who care to look beyond the surface without spoiling the fun in the moment.

Homecoming had a twist?
T: ... through an emergency induction port.
S: That's a straw, Tali.
T: Emerrrgency induction port.

User avatar
Zohar
COMMANDER PORN
Posts: 7647
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 8:45 pm UTC
Location: Denver

Re: Thor: Ragnarok

Postby Zohar » Mon Oct 30, 2017 7:20 pm UTC

The villain's identity. I agree with charliepanayi, that was a pretty great moment.
Mighty Jalapeno: "See, Zohar agrees, and he's nice to people."
SecondTalon: "Still better looking than Jesus."

Not how I say my name

OP Tipping
Posts: 188
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 6:23 am UTC

Re: Thor: Ragnarok

Postby OP Tipping » Tue Oct 31, 2017 10:15 am UTC

maybeagnostic wrote:
OP Tipping wrote:It's fair to say that all three MCU films this year have been lighthearted. I don't mind it: it's nice that they can vary the tone.
Lighthearted as opposed to what? The only MCU film I wouldn't quite describe as lighthearted were Winter Soldier and Civil War but even they aren't too far off. All the other MCU films are colorful and lighthearted with (sometimes) deeper issues for people who care to look beyond the surface without spoiling the fun in the moment.


Well these things are relative. There's humour in all the movies, but yeah, Winter Soldier and Civil War are designed to be taken seriously, and the same can be said to a lesser extent of the two Avengers films: they ain't just for the lols.

User avatar
Zohar
COMMANDER PORN
Posts: 7647
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 8:45 pm UTC
Location: Denver

Re: Thor: Ragnarok

Postby Zohar » Sun Nov 19, 2017 1:17 pm UTC

Oh I saw it! It was tons of fun. I don't know if I'll remember anything about the movie, but it sure was entertaining.

Also rename this thread to Thor: Reykjavik.
Mighty Jalapeno: "See, Zohar agrees, and he's nice to people."
SecondTalon: "Still better looking than Jesus."

Not how I say my name

User avatar
EdgarJPublius
Official Propagandi.... Nifty Poster Guy
Posts: 3568
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 4:56 am UTC
Location: where the wind takes me

Re: Thor: Ragnarok

Postby EdgarJPublius » Sun Nov 19, 2017 4:22 pm UTC

Zohar wrote:Also rename this thread to Thor: Reykjavik.


Or y'know... maybe consider not doing that. It's hard enough to find threads in this forum already.
Roosevelt wrote:
I wrote:Does Space Teddy Roosevelt wrestle Space Bears and fight the Space Spanish-American War with his band of Space-volunteers the Space Rough Riders?

Yes.

-still unaware of the origin and meaning of his own user-title

maybeagnostic
Posts: 612
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 3:34 pm UTC

Re: Thor: Ragnarok

Postby maybeagnostic » Mon Nov 20, 2017 7:26 am UTC

d'Or: Ragnarok?
T: ... through an emergency induction port.
S: That's a straw, Tali.
T: Emerrrgency induction port.

rmsgrey
Posts: 3148
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2011 6:35 pm UTC

Re: Thor: Ragnarok

Postby rmsgrey » Mon Nov 20, 2017 11:23 am UTC

Short version: it feels like the movie's trying too hard to be a comedy. It's a movie about the prophesied end of the world (or realm or whatever Asgard is) but that's not important - what's important is that Thor and Loki are together again and Thor gets to fight as a gladiator...

User avatar
SDK
Posts: 568
Joined: Thu May 22, 2014 7:40 pm UTC
Location: Canada

Re: Thor: Ragnarok

Postby SDK » Mon Nov 20, 2017 4:05 pm UTC

"Trying too hard" doesn't count if you succeed at being a comedy! It felt to me a lot like Guardians of the Galaxy in flavor. Which isn't really a bad thing.

The scene with Dr. Strange was... strange. Pretty pointless. Apart from that, this was a pretty great movie.
The biggest number (63 quintillion googols in debt)

User avatar
Pfhorrest
Posts: 4120
Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 6:11 am UTC
Contact:

Re: Thor: Ragnarok

Postby Pfhorrest » Mon Nov 20, 2017 7:44 pm UTC

Yeah my general impression of the movie was "Guardians of the Galaxy, if it were a Thor movie".
Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of All Trades
"I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
The Codex Quaerendae (my philosophy) - The Chronicles of Quelouva (my fiction)

User avatar
ConMan
Shepherd's Pie?
Posts: 1636
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 11:56 am UTC
Location: Beacon Alpha

Re: Thor: Ragnarok

Postby ConMan » Mon Nov 20, 2017 10:46 pm UTC

T'was a bit silly, but the whole concept is silly when you really think about it, so it's nice that they have fun with the ideas. Taika Waititi made "What We Do In The Shadows" which is the best vampire comedy film to come out of New Zealand, and he threw in a few nice antipodean references including one throwback to "The Castle", a classic Australian film from the 90s.
pollywog wrote:
Wikihow wrote:* Smile a lot! Give a gay girl a knowing "Hey, I'm a lesbian too!" smile.
I want to learn this smile, perfect it, and then go around smiling at lesbians and freaking them out.

rmsgrey
Posts: 3148
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2011 6:35 pm UTC

Re: Thor: Ragnarok

Postby rmsgrey » Mon Nov 20, 2017 11:35 pm UTC

Pfhorrest wrote:Yeah my general impression of the movie was "Guardians of the Galaxy, if it were a Thor movie".


The Guardians movies have genuine emotion to them too - Ragnarok kept feeling like there were moments that should have carried emotional weight but didn't. I might feel differently after a rewatch, which will be after it comes out on DVD, but my experience in the cinema was that there was nothing like the "bunch of losers" speech, or Rocket crying over a handful of twigs, or Peter giving Gamora his mask, or the moment of pelvic sorcery, or...

User avatar
Carlington
Posts: 1585
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2009 8:46 am UTC
Location: Sydney, Australia.

Re: Thor: Ragnarok

Postby Carlington » Tue Nov 21, 2017 12:44 am UTC

Probably my only qualms were the doctor strange segment and the sometimes awkward Korg, like when

Spoiler:
he's used as comic relief during the otherwise weighty scene where Asgard is being destroyed in front of the fleeing Aesir
Kewangji: Posdy zwei tosdy osdy oady. Bork bork bork, hoppity syphilis bork.

Eebster the Great: What specifically is moving faster than light in these examples?
doogly: Hands waving furiously.

Please use he/him/his pronouns when referring to me.

maybeagnostic
Posts: 612
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 3:34 pm UTC

Re: Thor: Ragnarok

Postby maybeagnostic » Tue Nov 21, 2017 7:25 am UTC

rmsgrey wrote:The Guardians movies have genuine emotion to them too - Ragnarok kept feeling like there were moments that should have carried emotional weight but didn't.
Maybe there weren't as many but there were still some. The best ones were (weirdly?) about The Hulk like when he
Spoiler:
started punching himself to keep himself angry because he was using it as a tool to not deal with his other emotions.


I found Taika Waititi's character to be even more out of place than Doctor Strange. A lot of the supporting cast wasn't all that well developed but still had some personality. Korg seemed to have no personality at all. It felt like every single line he had was a wisecrack, not only devoid of emotion itself but often used to relieve the tension of an otherwise emotional scene.
T: ... through an emergency induction port.
S: That's a straw, Tali.
T: Emerrrgency induction port.

User avatar
SecondTalon
SexyTalon
Posts: 25767
Joined: Sat May 05, 2007 2:10 pm UTC
Location: Louisville, Kentucky, USA, Mars. HA!
Contact:

Re: Thor: Ragnarok

Postby SecondTalon » Fri Nov 24, 2017 9:01 pm UTC

SDK wrote:"Trying too hard" doesn't count if you succeed at being a comedy! It felt to me a lot like Guardians of the Galaxy in flavor. Which isn't really a bad thing.

The scene with Dr. Strange was... strange. Pretty pointless. Apart from that, this was a pretty great movie.

It's so when he shows up later as the Sorceror Supreme, everyone (in the audience) takes him seriously. We have concrete evidence that he's gotten better even since his film.

It also resolves the "If X is looking for Y and Z exists, why didn't X ask Z about it, and why didn't Z track down X and just spill the beans?" issue.

Part of Strange's job is "Don't let the universal order fuck itself".

Hela is attempting to fuck said universal order. Better for Strange to get involved early.
heuristically_alone wrote:I want to write a DnD campaign and play it by myself and DM it myself.
heuristically_alone wrote:I have been informed that this is called writing a book.

User avatar
SDK
Posts: 568
Joined: Thu May 22, 2014 7:40 pm UTC
Location: Canada

Re: Thor: Ragnarok

Postby SDK » Fri Nov 24, 2017 10:20 pm UTC

SecondTalon wrote:Part of Strange's job is "Don't let the universal order fuck itself".

Hela is attempting to fuck said universal order. Better for Strange to get involved early.

I understand Strange's motivations, but he didn't have anything to do with Hela. He didn't have anything to do with this movie. I know they're trying to remind us that he exists so they can tie it all together, but they should have done a better job making me care that he was there. Or at least have Strange wrap up the conversation with a "Great, you've convinced me that you're not going to let the universal order fuck itself, now I'm a busy man, so off you go!" I found the (amusing) five-minute scene pretty jarring in that respect.
The biggest number (63 quintillion googols in debt)

rmsgrey
Posts: 3148
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2011 6:35 pm UTC

Re: Thor: Ragnarok

Postby rmsgrey » Sat Nov 25, 2017 12:30 am UTC

SDK wrote:
SecondTalon wrote:Part of Strange's job is "Don't let the universal order fuck itself".

Hela is attempting to fuck said universal order. Better for Strange to get involved early.

I understand Strange's motivations, but he didn't have anything to do with Hela. He didn't have anything to do with this movie. I know they're trying to remind us that he exists so they can tie it all together, but they should have done a better job making me care that he was there. Or at least have Strange wrap up the conversation with a "Great, you've convinced me that you're not going to let the universal order fuck itself, now I'm a busy man, so off you go!" I found the (amusing) five-minute scene pretty jarring in that respect.


He did pretty much say "I don't want Loki around, so I'm going to help you find Odin so you'll leave and take your brother with you."

Given that Odin had disappeared from where Loki left him, Strange provides a way of tracking him down that doesn't require Heimdall and doesn't involve giving Thor or Loki an ability that might be inconvenient later.

User avatar
SDK
Posts: 568
Joined: Thu May 22, 2014 7:40 pm UTC
Location: Canada

Re: Thor: Ragnarok

Postby SDK » Mon Nov 27, 2017 3:08 pm UTC

Yep... but the movie would have been exactly the same if Odin hadn't disappeared at all. He could have been sitting in the retirement home where Loki left him and nothing would have changed, except for the out-of-nowhere cameo. Lazy.
The biggest number (63 quintillion googols in debt)

rmsgrey
Posts: 3148
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2011 6:35 pm UTC

Re: Thor: Ragnarok

Postby rmsgrey » Mon Nov 27, 2017 9:54 pm UTC

SDK wrote:Yep... but the movie would have been exactly the same if Odin hadn't disappeared at all. He could have been sitting in the retirement home where Loki left him and nothing would have changed, except for the out-of-nowhere cameo. Lazy.

And the implications of Odin and Loki's relative power levels, losing an example of Loki's drop in competence having "won", having Hela appear in the heart of a crowded city rather than an empty cliffside, not having the tease of potentially rehoming the Asgardians in Norway, Loki potentially having to move out into the open to call for the Bifrost...

Just the demonstration of how lazy Loki has gotten since taking over is a worthwhile contirbution to the story in itself.


Return to “Movies and TV Shows”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Feedfetcher and 6 guests