Moderators: SecondTalon, Moderators General, Prelates
addams wrote:Politics is hard. I can't do it.
It takes a nasty Jr. High School Girl in a man's body to keep up.
Zarq wrote:I now have a newfound fear of mimes appearing above me. ThanksObamaKewangji!
We’re going to make the Kindle version available in the future; it won’t be by tomorrow though. It won’t have the illustrations, because the Kindle’s screen will just ruin 75% of them, but it’ll be the full text. We’re going to make it a paid download like anything else in the Amazon store, but if you forward us your receipt from a purchase of the printed book we’ll send you a Kindle-compatible file for free! (As soon as we finish formatting the file; might be a week or so.)
addams wrote:Politics is hard. I can't do it.
It takes a nasty Jr. High School Girl in a man's body to keep up.
addams wrote:Politics is hard. I can't do it.
It takes a nasty Jr. High School Girl in a man's body to keep up.
Belial wrote:You are the coolest guy that ever cooled.
I reiterate. Coolest. Guy.
Zarq wrote:I now have a newfound fear of mimes appearing above me. ThanksObamaKewangji!
wisnij wrote:I love the Machine of Death concept. When the project was first announced I considered writing a story for it, but I never got past the initial-premise phase. Premises I'm good at, it's fleshing them out with realistic characters and settings that I still need to work on. -_-
My copy is still shipping so I don't yet know whether or how any of the stories address these points, but for fun I've been thinking about how the Machine would work. If it's 100% accurate even in the face of active defiance then it has to be an acausal effect -- information from the time of death has to be traveling back to the time of prediction in order to keep the two synced up. I'm imagining a Larry Niven-style feedback loop, where the event sequence keeps rewriting itself until it arrives at a self-consistent solution, one in which the prediction and actual death match. (Come to think of it, that could even explain why the predictions are so vague -- the loop effectively terminates at the first prediction that's "close enough", so it never gets a chance to zero in more precisely.)
That then raises the question of what happens if you set up a situation in which there is no self-consistent outcome. Say, three men in a room, one tied down and tested with the Machine, one with a gun, one with a syringe of poison. If the prediction says "POISONED", the man with the gun shoots the victim; if it says anything else, the other one injects the victim. Seeing what the Machine does in that circumstance could be interesting. (Or maybe it just prints "DO NOT MESS WITH TIME".)
Zarq wrote:I now have a newfound fear of mimes appearing above me. ThanksObamaKewangji!
Zarq wrote:I now have a newfound fear of mimes appearing above me. ThanksObamaKewangji!
wisnij wrote:That then raises the question of what happens if you set up a situation in which there is no self-consistent outcome. Say, three men in a room, one tied down and tested with the Machine, one with a gun, one with a syringe of poison. If the prediction says "POISONED", the man with the gun shoots the victim; if it says anything else, the other one injects the victim.
Belial wrote:wisnij wrote:That then raises the question of what happens if you set up a situation in which there is no self-consistent outcome. Say, three men in a room, one tied down and tested with the Machine, one with a gun, one with a syringe of poison. If the prediction says "POISONED", the man with the gun shoots the victim; if it says anything else, the other one injects the victim.
"METEOR"
wisnij wrote:That then raises the question of what happens if you set up a situation in which there is no self-consistent outcome. Say, three men in a room, one tied down and tested with the Machine, one with a gun, one with a syringe of poison. If the prediction says "POISONED", the man with the gun shoots the victim; if it says anything else, the other one injects the victim. Seeing what the Machine does in that circumstance could be interesting. (Or maybe it just prints "DO NOT MESS WITH TIME".)
Belial wrote:You are the coolest guy that ever cooled.
I reiterate. Coolest. Guy.
addams wrote:Torture is Not how to get information.
The way to get information is with Blue Berry Pancakes.
Zarq wrote:I now have a newfound fear of mimes appearing above me. ThanksObamaKewangji!
addams wrote:Torture is Not how to get information.
The way to get information is with Blue Berry Pancakes.
Magnanimous wrote:Awesome! It'd be neat if your story got accepted.
Zarq wrote:I now have a newfound fear of mimes appearing above me. ThanksObamaKewangji!
Czhorat wrote:The problem with submitting to something like this is that it requires a story with a very specific premise which wouldn't likely fit anyplace else. If a given story isn't accepted for the MoD anthology there's not much else one can do with it.
Zarq wrote:I now have a newfound fear of mimes appearing above me. ThanksObamaKewangji!
addams wrote:Torture is Not how to get information.
The way to get information is with Blue Berry Pancakes.
Kewangji wrote:Czhorat wrote:The problem with submitting to something like this is that it requires a story with a very specific premise which wouldn't likely fit anyplace else. If a given story isn't accepted for the MoD anthology there's not much else one can do with it.
I don't really see your point here. Please elaborate?
Zarq wrote:I now have a newfound fear of mimes appearing above me. ThanksObamaKewangji!
TheAmazingRando wrote:I didn't realize they were publishing a sequel. Now I need to read the first one so I don't submit a story whose premise has already been published.
Zarq wrote:I now have a newfound fear of mimes appearing above me. ThanksObamaKewangji!
Jorpho wrote:Well, I'm not going to read the first one until after I'm done. I think my premise is original enough, for now.
Thank you to those who have PM'd.
I agree with this, but...Czhorat wrote:I'd advise reading the first one before you write. It's always better to research a market before subbing to it;
I really don't think amateur writers should be worried about how easily their stories will sell, in general. Amateur writers should be writing, and if they end up with something they can publish, great! But it's important for writers to be writing, because they love to write and because they want to get better at it. If something like Machine of Death is going to push them to get writing, I really don't see the benefit in discouraging them with how unsellable the final product will be on the general market.especially if you're writing a story you can't likely sell elsewhere.
the site wrote:Send an email to submit at machineofdeath dot net.
Finish the story begun by one of the characters in the new novel. Start your version with “The robot felt…” Finish with “In the end, the robot felt nothing. He wasn’t programmed to.” The up-to-2000 words in between are all yours.
Then get friends and fans to vote for your story...
Contest Ends July 04, 2011 @ 11:59 pm (EDT)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests