Stocks vs Broths

Apparently, people like to eat.

Moderators: SecondTalon, Moderators General, Prelates

User avatar
sardia
Posts: 5812
Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 3:39 am UTC

Stocks vs Broths

Postby sardia » Sun Apr 16, 2017 11:26 pm UTC

I've noticed that broths are much cheaper than Stocks, but I'm biased towards stocks. However, considering the difference in them(stocks made from bone, with gelatin, broths are mostly meat based soup), I think I can cheap out safely if the resulting recipe is really thick/mouthfeel/unctuous that it doesn't need help from stock. Has anyone tried this, desperately or not?

Note: I use chicken stock/broth only because chicken stock has the most protein/particulate matter per unit sold. I'm not paying extra for glorified water in the beef stock/veggie stock. It doesn't affect the flavor of beef/veggie dishes except for the vegetarians who I promptly chase out of my house.

User avatar
PAstrychef
for all intimate metaphysical encounters
Posts: 2769
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 6:24 pm UTC

Re: Stocks vs Broths

Postby PAstrychef » Mon Apr 17, 2017 1:19 am UTC

You use stock when the flavor of the soup/sauce is not that of the broth itself. You make broth from stock when the end result is a broth, like chicken soup with motzah balls, or minestrone. This means that the labels are switched from what I learned in food school, but it doesn't really matter. Stock is a building block, broth is a finished product. "Bone broth" is simply stock with a hip new name.
You can improve any boxed stock/broth by simmering some of the relevant ingredient in it. I get chicken thighs on sale and freeze them, then I add one or two to the stock as I'm cooking with it.
The liquids being marketed as stock are unsalted, and cost more because they sound more "culinary". I use the lower sodium broth without worrying about it.
Don’t become a well-rounded person. Well rounded people are smooth and dull. Become a thoroughly spiky person. Grow spikes from every angle. Stick in their throats like a puffer fish.

User avatar
doogly
Dr. The Juggernaut of Touching Himself
Posts: 5212
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 2:31 am UTC
Location: Somerville, MA
Contact:

Re: Stocks vs Broths

Postby doogly » Mon Apr 17, 2017 3:20 pm UTC

I always just start with water. If the recipe you are using actually has the things in it, this should be fine as well.
LE4dGOLEM: What's a Doug?
Noc: A larval Doogly. They grow the tail and stinger upon reaching adulthood.

Keep waggling your butt brows Brothers.
Or; Is that your eye butthairs?

User avatar
PAstrychef
for all intimate metaphysical encounters
Posts: 2769
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 6:24 pm UTC

Re: Stocks vs Broths

Postby PAstrychef » Mon Apr 17, 2017 8:11 pm UTC

Just found this linky from epicurios about their favorite boxed broth/stock, which has its own link to an article about the differences.
Don’t become a well-rounded person. Well rounded people are smooth and dull. Become a thoroughly spiky person. Grow spikes from every angle. Stick in their throats like a puffer fish.

User avatar
sardia
Posts: 5812
Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 3:39 am UTC

Re: Stocks vs Broths

Postby sardia » Tue Apr 18, 2017 10:06 pm UTC

doogly wrote:I always just start with water. If the recipe you are using actually has the things in it, this should be fine as well.

So if I made potato leek soup, you'd use water? Or are you referring to something complex like making beef stew, add water to that?

User avatar
freezeblade
Posts: 1082
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 5:11 pm UTC
Location: Oakland

Re: Stocks vs Broths

Postby freezeblade » Tue Apr 18, 2017 11:12 pm UTC

I keep bones/fat/gristle trimmed from everyday meals in freezer bags, frozen until I gather up enough for a batch of stock, which I then freeze in 2-cup portions. Next to them is a bag of onion/leek tops that I save for a similar purpose.

When I'm in a pinch I use "Better Than Bouillon" brand concentrate, which comes as a paste in a jar, pretty decent for what it is, and beats the pants off a cubed or powdered bouillon like herbox or the like.
Belial wrote:I am not even in the same country code as "the mood for this shit."

User avatar
Liri
Healthy non-floating pooper reporting for doodie.
Posts: 923
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2014 8:11 pm UTC
Contact:

Re: Stocks vs Broths

Postby Liri » Wed Apr 19, 2017 12:21 am UTC

sardia wrote:
doogly wrote:I always just start with water. If the recipe you are using actually has the things in it, this should be fine as well.

So if I made potato leek soup, you'd use water? Or are you referring to something complex like making beef stew, add water to that?

I, too, always start with water when making soups. I believe doogly means he begins with a pot of water and adds ingredients to it as desired.
He wondered could you eat the mushrooms, would you die, do you care.

User avatar
poxic
Eloquently Prismatic
Posts: 4622
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2008 3:28 am UTC
Location: Left coast of Canada

Re: Stocks vs Broths

Postby poxic » Wed Apr 19, 2017 12:27 am UTC

I usually use water as the base, if only because proper stock is problematic. (Allergies and other restrictions argh.) Proper stock does add depth and character, for sure.

In lieu of stock, I'll fry up the initial garlic/onion/spices/tough veggies in the same pot that will be cooking the soup. It'll pick up some of the caramelised bits that way.
TEAM SHIVAHN
Pretty much the best team ever

I hope Heaven has a periscope to Hell, because humans are really only happy relative to other humans.
- Zach Weinersmith

User avatar
doogly
Dr. The Juggernaut of Touching Himself
Posts: 5212
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 2:31 am UTC
Location: Somerville, MA
Contact:

Re: Stocks vs Broths

Postby doogly » Wed Apr 19, 2017 12:52 am UTC

sardia wrote:
doogly wrote:I always just start with water. If the recipe you are using actually has the things in it, this should be fine as well.

So if I made potato leek soup, you'd use water? Or are you referring to something complex like making beef stew, add water to that?

Yup, potato leek works great! I mean it's not just potatoes and leeks though, you probably have another green, maybe an onion and a whole bunch of garlic sauteed in olive oil, and I'd sneak in barley. Carrots too, probably a parsnip.

If your soup did only have the two things in it then it might need something from somewhere else.
LE4dGOLEM: What's a Doug?
Noc: A larval Doogly. They grow the tail and stinger upon reaching adulthood.

Keep waggling your butt brows Brothers.
Or; Is that your eye butthairs?

User avatar
Bakemaster
pretty nice future dick
Posts: 8915
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2007 2:33 pm UTC
Location: One of those hot places

Re: Stocks vs Broths

Postby Bakemaster » Tue Aug 01, 2017 4:02 am UTC

When I make chicken soup I put four leg quarters in a stock pot with a bunch of smashed-up celery, a quartered onion, a sliced carrot, a couple cloves of garlic and a mix of whole spices. I preferentially choose older or less attractive bits of veg for this step. You can use whatever veg you want the flavor of in your soup. Which spices varies, but usually includes a star anise and some peppercorns. Simmer it gently for a couple hours, or until the meat's ready to fall off the bone, then careful remove the leg quarters to a dish and let cool enough to handle, putting the rest through a chinois in the meantime. Discard the veg pulp and spices, which have been Bunnicula'd into the water to produce broth or stock or soup juice or whatever. Cut your fresher, more attractive veg into the soup juice and simmer while picking out the meat from the leg quarters. If you want to add rice, barley, or pasta, give the veg a bit of a head start first; add the chicken back in last. Season it along the way. Salt, thyme, whatever; I always use at least a little turmeric for color.

You can do this with any pieces that have at least a little fat on them. Leg quarters are the most economical, but sometimes render too much fat into the soup juice; you can skim it and store it in the fridge or freezer to make matzo balls with.
Image
c0 = 2.13085531 × 1014 smoots per fortnight
"Apparently you can't summon an alternate timeline clone of your inner demon, guys! Remember that." —Noc

User avatar
sardia
Posts: 5812
Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 3:39 am UTC

Re: Stocks vs Broths

Postby sardia » Sun Aug 06, 2017 9:57 pm UTC

Bakemaster wrote:When I make chicken soup I put four leg quarters in a stock pot with a bunch of smashed-up celery, a quartered onion, a sliced carrot, a couple cloves of garlic and a mix of whole spices. I preferentially choose older or less attractive bits of veg for this step. You can use whatever veg you want the flavor of in your soup. Which spices varies, but usually includes a star anise and some peppercorns. Simmer it gently for a couple hours, or until the meat's ready to fall off the bone, then careful remove the leg quarters to a dish and let cool enough to handle, putting the rest through a chinois in the meantime. Discard the veg pulp and spices, which have been Bunnicula'd into the water to produce broth or stock or soup juice or whatever. Cut your fresher, more attractive veg into the soup juice and simmer while picking out the meat from the leg quarters. If you want to add rice, barley, or pasta, give the veg a bit of a head start first; add the chicken back in last. Season it along the way. Salt, thyme, whatever; I always use at least a little turmeric for color.

You can do this with any pieces that have at least a little fat on them. Leg quarters are the most economical, but sometimes render too much fat into the soup juice; you can skim it and store it in the fridge or freezer to make matzo balls with.

Have you ever considered joining the pressure cooker revolution? You put all the ingredients into a pressure cooker, cook for an hour, and then cook what you actually wanted. Unless you're making one of those 16+ quart stock pots, it should suffice for most families or singles.

~From a harried, rushed home chef.

User avatar
Bakemaster
pretty nice future dick
Posts: 8915
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2007 2:33 pm UTC
Location: One of those hot places

Re: Stocks vs Broths

Postby Bakemaster » Tue Aug 08, 2017 1:51 pm UTC

I have two pressure cookers, and have used the electric for this recipe when I have less time for the first step. Doesn't make it one step, though, when using bone-in, skin-on chicken pieces.
Image
c0 = 2.13085531 × 1014 smoots per fortnight
"Apparently you can't summon an alternate timeline clone of your inner demon, guys! Remember that." —Noc

User avatar
sardia
Posts: 5812
Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 3:39 am UTC

Re: Stocks vs Broths

Postby sardia » Tue Aug 08, 2017 11:06 pm UTC

Bakemaster wrote:I have two pressure cookers, and have used the electric for this recipe when I have less time for the first step. Doesn't make it one step, though, when using bone-in, skin-on chicken pieces.

So you don't or you do use pressure cookers to make stock? Like I never got around to it because I don't have spare chicken parts. (I really ought to buy a whole chicken for me to butcher.)

User avatar
Bakemaster
pretty nice future dick
Posts: 8915
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2007 2:33 pm UTC
Location: One of those hot places

Re: Stocks vs Broths

Postby Bakemaster » Wed Aug 09, 2017 1:39 am UTC

I usually make stock over the course of an afternoon, meaning no need to use the pressure cooker, which has more parts to wash than a regular stock pot. But I've used it on occasion when time constraints demanded it.
Image
c0 = 2.13085531 × 1014 smoots per fortnight
"Apparently you can't summon an alternate timeline clone of your inner demon, guys! Remember that." —Noc


Return to “Food”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests