Moderators: SecondTalon, Moderators General, Prelates
I want to be!Steroid wrote:Don't want to be.bigglesworth wrote:If your economic reality is a choice, then why are you not as rich as Bill Gates?
22/7 wrote:That said, you should really try all beers. Just not on the same night.
22/7 wrote:(if one can not be in the mood for beer).

22/7 wrote:Smithwicks. I actually prefer it to Harp and Guiness. Some may wish to string me up for this opinion.

kira wrote:*piles up some limbs and blood and a couple hearts for good measure*
GUYS. I MADE A HUMAN.
*...pokes at it with a stick*
korora wrote:I was out last weekend and had a Hobgoblin Dark English Ale... holy shit that stuff is good. Anybody know if it shows up in stores anywhere (I'm in St. Louis) or if there's something similar I can drink regularly? I enjoy beers on the dark/bitter end, will drink lighter beers if that's what's there. I have a couple friends who homebrew, so I can't quote a ton of brews, but I like things along the lines of Irish Reds and ESB.
The same bar also had a Delirium on the list that I didn't try, and a lot of other beers that looked good, so I may have to head back out there soon. Any recommendations? Their beer list is here.
Samsoneffect wrote:So I got to try a couple new beers recently. Kronenbourg is a french lager, and for me personally, very much enjoyed. The other was called Le Maudite, which is brewed in Montreal and is also quite delicious, though considerably heavier alcoholically than Kronenbourg, at around 8.3%. I think Le Maudite is brewed by the same company that does Fin Du Monde, but I could be mistaken. Both are recommended my this humble chap.
I actually rather enjoy Harp, but rarely end up drinking it because, generally, wherever Harp is found, so is Smithwick's. But yes, Hobgoblin is a delicious, delicious beer. It's high in the running for my favorite.Dream wrote:I'm tying an elaborate knot right now, just for mentioning Harp in he same sentence as Guinness. Harp is ugly chemical soup. Smithwick's is very good, but there are far better red ales, for my money. Someone mentioned a Wychwood ale somewhere above, their red Hobgoblin kicks Smithwick's ass.
I want to be!Steroid wrote:Don't want to be.bigglesworth wrote:If your economic reality is a choice, then why are you not as rich as Bill Gates?
clintonius wrote:Deschutes makes a red, Cinder Cone, that I was addicted to while living in the northwest. Can't find it out here. If I recall it's got a lot of hops, but is very, very smooth. It lacks the hoppy crack of pain most IPAs give me, and that's a good thing.
korora wrote:Any recommendations? Their beer list is here.

kira wrote:*piles up some limbs and blood and a couple hearts for good measure*
GUYS. I MADE A HUMAN.
*...pokes at it with a stick*
GMontag wrote:Am I the only person who doesn't think the DFH 90 or 120 minute IPAs are good examples of the style? Now don't get me wrong, I love my IPAs, but DFH's IPAs have too much malt that gets in the way. They are far closer to barley wines than to other American IPAs. To me, the IPA should be a natural extension of the Pale Ale style exemplified by the Sierra Nevada Pale Ale, or the Deschutes's Mirror Pond Pale Ale. To me, the definitive IPA is the Bridgeport IPA, and the definitive double or imperial IPA is the Stone Ruination IPA.
I would strongly disagree with that, but I also quite like PBR. I'm a big fan of Lone Star as a cheap, very drinkable beer, but, again, lots of people would disagree with me here.Absolute wrote:On the other end of the price spectrum, I just put my stigma aside and tried Budweiser's American Ale. It's alright, not that good, but drinkable and significantly cheaper than anything as good.
I want to be!Steroid wrote:Don't want to be.bigglesworth wrote:If your economic reality is a choice, then why are you not as rich as Bill Gates?
Absolute wrote:On the other hand, some IPAs are very bitter because they use a broad spectrum of hops in puruit of complex flavors. The best example is Stone's Arrogant Bastard Ale which is very bitter, but has more complexity to it than any beer I have ever tried. If you find it in 22oz botlles, one should be enough for about three people, because the bitterness makes it hard to want more than a glass of it. There's also an Oaked Arrogant Bastard, which is slightly more drinkable, but less complex and harder to find.

Yes. I don't know that I've been drinking it long enough to say that it's hit and miss, but this year it was quite good, both on tap and in the bottle.mosc wrote:Anybody partake in the Sam Adams Octoberfest this year? It seems to be hit an miss, some years it's wonderful, some years it's terrible. I think this is a wonderful year for Sam Adams Octoberfest. Really shows itself as one of the best "pure ales" in the world.
I want to be!Steroid wrote:Don't want to be.bigglesworth wrote:If your economic reality is a choice, then why are you not as rich as Bill Gates?
kira wrote:*piles up some limbs and blood and a couple hearts for good measure*
GUYS. I MADE A HUMAN.
*...pokes at it with a stick*
I want to be!Steroid wrote:Don't want to be.bigglesworth wrote:If your economic reality is a choice, then why are you not as rich as Bill Gates?
22/7 wrote:I've been pleasantly surprised by Yeungling. I just moved and it's essentially unheard of back home but here it's really common, probably the most common out at non-classy bars. Probably. But it's very good for what it is.

Nope. Right coast, wrong end.mosc wrote:Welcome to Pennsylvania?
Hmm... I'll keep that in mind next time I'm at a pub (tonight) and let you know how it turns out. I've had both, but I've never directly compared them.mosc wrote:If you want to put it to the test, get one on tap along with a Sam Adams Boston Lager. The Sam Adams brew is clearly inspired by the Yeungling and to me, clearly out-does it with more hops and a rounder flavor.
I want to be!Steroid wrote:Don't want to be.bigglesworth wrote:If your economic reality is a choice, then why are you not as rich as Bill Gates?


I want to be!Steroid wrote:Don't want to be.bigglesworth wrote:If your economic reality is a choice, then why are you not as rich as Bill Gates?
kira wrote:*piles up some limbs and blood and a couple hearts for good measure*
GUYS. I MADE A HUMAN.
*...pokes at it with a stick*
I want to be!Steroid wrote:Don't want to be.bigglesworth wrote:If your economic reality is a choice, then why are you not as rich as Bill Gates?
22/7 wrote:Maredsous's not really a "beer" so much as it is a "sweet, sweet nectar of all that good in the world".

I want to be!Steroid wrote:Don't want to be.bigglesworth wrote:If your economic reality is a choice, then why are you not as rich as Bill Gates?

Users browsing this forum: Tebychacy and 1 guest