xkcd

by **wam** » Mon Sep 10, 2012 5:50 pm UTC

thats hammer proper day end post when im at my computer

by **wam** » Tue Sep 11, 2012 7:57 am UTC

Final Votals
3fj - 4 - Kolko, New User, Roband, bluebambue
New User - 1 - 3fj

The group argued back and forth factions appearing and disappearing like school projects. But in the end it came down to 3fj for the lynch. They strung him up and decided to wait and see what the morning brought.

3fj has been lynched, it is now N3 deadline is in 48 hours at 9 am BST on Thursday the 13th

Please get all night actions in quickly.

by **wam** » Wed Sep 12, 2012 9:50 pm UTC

The voice blares out from the loudspeaker, up up up! We have more threats to find against the school. Things are going to get interesting, you should look at 3fjs body!. WIth that the voice cuts off agian. Examining 3fjs body you find a gun and a pair of binoculars.

3fj was Alex "Star-Burns" Osbourne, mafia watcher

Suddenly you realise the the conversation had lost its quirkiness! Where was abed you all asked. Suddenly you see Roband on the floor wearing and inspector space time outfit with his sonic screwdriver at the ready.
Roband is dead, he was Abed Nadir, Town, Sane Cop, lovers*

*not in the traditional sense, If 1 died the other lost his power

It is now D4

5 left alive

3 to lynch

Deadline in 5 days at 11 pm BST monday the 17th

It is still possible LYLO

by **roband** » Wed Sep 12, 2012 9:53 pm UTC

Notcool. Notcool, notcool, notcool.

by **lynx** » Wed Sep 12, 2012 10:26 pm UTC

Investigated blue, got town. I'm either sane or naive... so basically it's not very helpful.
Kolko and NU are confirmed town, barring another cult (not likely in the slightest).
Kolko is Troy (don't confirm please) and NU was copped as town by roband.
Well, there remains the possibility of NU being a godfather. But for now I'll ignore that.

Kolko, New User, bluebambue, matt and I still remain.
From my perspective, one or both of blue and matt are scum.

I need more information from matt. Roleclaim, targets, give us some fucking content please!
If you're scum, you'll get lynched if you don't give us something.
If you're town, you'll lose the g-ame for us if you don't give us something.
Basically I want to know what's going on with you.

I'd vote to motivate you but don't want to take any unnecessary risks.

by **Kolko** » Wed Sep 12, 2012 11:39 pm UTC

My emotions! MY EMOTIONS!

I watched Roband last night and saw Blue visiting him. Seems odd, seeing as Blue claimed survivor. Could we get an explanation for that?

by **lynx** » Wed Sep 12, 2012 11:40 pm UTC

Hmm. Blue, what happened?
I suppose I could be naive, especially considering roband was sane.

by **lynx** » Wed Sep 12, 2012 11:41 pm UTC

Also, blue has been pinging me all game. I was pretty surprised at the town result TBH.

by **bluebambue** » Thu Sep 13, 2012 12:31 am UTC

Kolko, I don't know what is up with that. I don't have a power that can target anyone. Didn't you lose your power when Roband died?

by **lynx** » Thu Sep 13, 2012 1:31 am UTC

Kolko, you're sure there couldn't have been any mix-up?
Blue, sorry but it looks bad. You either targeted the NK victim, or lied earlier saying you had no powers.

I doubt there's a redirecting power that hasn't been accounted for by now with all the investigative powers in play.
Blue, are you a vanilla indie survivor? As in, no power and no win condition besides survival to the end?

by **lynx** » Thu Sep 13, 2012 1:35 am UTC

Just had a thought. roband targeted Snark N1 and got an indie result. I got a town result on blue last night when she has claimed indie.
Thus I am very likely to be naive, and my investigations have no value.

So both myself and Kolko are now vanilla, while blue is either indie survivor or scum.
NU and matt are the only two who are unclaimed.
Results please, you two. It's LYLO and we need to do this right.

by **bluebambue** » Thu Sep 13, 2012 1:37 am UTC

lynx wrote:Blue, are you a vanilla indie survivor? As in, no power and no win condition besides survival to the end?

My power is being NK immune.

by **lynx** » Thu Sep 13, 2012 8:26 am UTC

Okay. So either you or Kolko is scum, most likely.
And considering everyone knows his role, added to the fact that you've been pinging me all game, I might be voting you tonight.

Why shouldn't I?

by **New User** » Thu Sep 13, 2012 3:01 pm UTC

I agree. As far as I can tell, Kolko is confirmed town watcher. Unless matt claims redirector, we have caught you red handed.

by **lynx** » Fri Sep 14, 2012 6:32 pm UTC

Matt, claim.
blue, why should we trust you?

by **matt96** » Fri Sep 14, 2012 6:43 pm UTC

lynx wrote:Matt, claim.

I'm not going to roleclaim at possible lylo, but I will tell everyone I am a listener, and I have got nothing useful at all as far as results go.

by **lynx** » Fri Sep 14, 2012 6:52 pm UTC

Don't nameclaim. Please post all your results here.

by **lynx** » Fri Sep 14, 2012 6:53 pm UTC

NU, have you got any results you can share with us? Anything to figure this out would be appreciated.

by **bluebambue** » Fri Sep 14, 2012 6:56 pm UTC

Matt, tell us what your results are even if they aren't at all useful.

by **New User** » Fri Sep 14, 2012 8:36 pm UTC

I'm sorry for my inactivity, I've been quite busy lately. I don't have any useful results to share. As I mentioned earlier, I don't have a role that gets any feedback at all. I need to look back a bit and decide what I should claim. I am definitely against any nameclaims, since it's known that takes away our votes, right? That would be a disaster right now. Also, are we sure that claiming is okay as long as it's not a name? Also, should we just go ahead and lynch bluebambue before sorting out this claiming business? I mean, the less information the scum has during the night phase, the better. I suspect there is at least one more anti-town player for us to be at possible LYLO. I have a good feeling that lynx and Kolko are town (lynx from his behavior in the game I guess, Kolko pretty much just on roband's word), and since I'm town, that means if blue is the last scum player, we wouldn't be at possible LYLO. Frankly, I think blue and matt are both scum, but I guess lynx could just be a scum player who has played well.

I just thought of this. If blue is scum and not a survivor, she probably has some kind of night action also. 3fj did, so I have no reason to believe that there is a vanilla goon. I guess saying that doesn't really help much, it's just a thought I had.

by **lynx** » Fri Sep 14, 2012 8:54 pm UTC

I can see blue being scum but I'd rather give her a chance to change her story. Also forgive me for still not fully trusting you but I'd sort of prefer you claimed today. You can't nameclaim but we've had many roleclaims without votes being lost.

I'm a bit suspicious at these aversions to claiming, it makes me think at least one of NU and matt just don't want to mess up with their fabrication of results before they can get a townie lynched. But anyway, benefit of the doubt for now as I haven't made my mind up yet. I'd like to go through the posts with everyone's claimed roles and results in mind as I have some time this weekend.

by **New User** » Fri Sep 14, 2012 11:29 pm UTC

I am afraid my role doesn't make me look very towny. That's why I've avoided claiming.

At night, I choose a target and whatever power they use is redirected onto me. It doesn't work on factional powers like the mafia's kill.

The only thing I have by way of a breadcrumb is when I asked Snark to claim his new one-shot power when Day Two started. At the time, I thought it was true that Snark had one-shot powers like he claimed, since it looked like he had legitimately caught TMG. Since I figured Snark was going to be killed after the doctor died, I thought it seemed helpful to know Snark's new power because we could all decide how he best use it to help the town, and if I found it necessary I could use my power on Snark.

Since it basically roleblocks whoever I use it on, I opted not to use it. The first night, I didn't know who was a doctor, and I thought Snark was an obvious doctor target. I didn't want to upset that or any cop investigations (I thought it better if a cop got a scum result instead of investigating me). The second night, nobody seemed to be a good target for me, and the same held for not wanting to upset a cop. The third night, I targeted bluebambue. I didn't receive any feedback from this, so if she used any power at all, it should have been redirected onto me but I don't know what it was.

by **lynx** » Sat Sep 15, 2012 12:47 am UTC

It doesn't sound very townie at all. I'll think about it more tomorrow after work though.
Still waiting on a full honest claim from matt. If you're going to fabricate it, at least do so quickly!
Or give up and claim scum.
If you're town, hurry up as I'd hate to have to call for your lynch if we don't have the information to decide whether that's a good idea.

by **Kolko** » Sat Sep 15, 2012 12:18 pm UTC

If that is actually NU's power in addition to a mafia kill power, I may have very easily seen NU visiting Roband instead of Blue. I really don't see in what way that power makes you look even the least bit town, so that's a weird falseclaim to make.

I think we still need to lynch Blue today, but if the game is still going on tomorrow, we have to lynch NU.

Vote: Blue

by **lynx** » Sat Sep 15, 2012 4:33 pm UTC

When is deadline? If it's very soon can we please have a little extension so matt can claim?
Kolko, while I agree in principle with lynching Blue, I'd prefer to hear from matt first as I'm quite suspicious of NU at the moment.
I just don't want to rush things before we've had a chance to compile all the facts.

by **lynx** » Sat Sep 15, 2012 4:54 pm UTC

Sorry, please ignore that last question. I thought it was today for some reason.

by **Kolko** » Sat Sep 15, 2012 5:00 pm UTC

In the worst case scenario in which both Blue and NU are scum together, town loses its majority if Matt claims his rolename. I'm not sure what happens in a stalemate, but I can't imagine it's positive for town.

by **lynx** » Sat Sep 15, 2012 5:03 pm UTC

I don't want his name. I want his results. Sorry if I've been unclear.

by **New User** » Sun Sep 16, 2012 2:21 am UTC

I understand if you distrust me, I guess. Distrust is pretty much the name of the game. I don't see how there is any question that bluebambue is scum. Unless you distrust Kolko, I mean.

Vote: bluebambue

by **lynx** » Sun Sep 16, 2012 10:17 am UTC

New User wrote:I don't see how there is any question that bluebambue is scum. Unless you distrust Kolko, I mean.

If you're scum, you likely lied about your claim and have a slightly different power or different targets. You may have brought this on with Blue.
I'd like to hear from matt, as the two of you had the weakest claims and these are the most likely possibilities IMO:

Blue and NU
matt and NU
Blue and matt

But basically I don't want to mess anything up by rushing.
Matt!

by **lynx** » Mon Sep 17, 2012 9:53 am UTC

Matt has been online today but hasn't posted. I'm starting to come round to lynching him instead of blue--his lurking might be enough evidence for me soon.
We do have a watcher result on blue, I suppose. Blue, no explanation for that?

by **Kolko** » Mon Sep 17, 2012 11:32 am UTC

Unvote

Might as well not put someone at L-1 with a lurker on board

. Blue has refused to give more information on my result, which firmly puts her in the scum camp for me. We're way past the point where Lynch A Lurker is viable, though, but I agree we need some kind of post from Matt.

I will check this thread again before day ends and put a vote down.

by **lynx** » Mon Sep 17, 2012 2:02 pm UTC

Blue, if you want to fulfil your stated win condition (ie. so we won't lynch you), you need to tell us:

How Kolko obtained the result he did on you. If you don't know, give us speculation.
Who we should lynch instead of you, out of matt or NU as I won't accept a Kolko lynch (or my own of course)
Why you think the one you chose is scum, even if you have to copy others' thoughts but I'd prefer your own.

by **lynx** » Mon Sep 17, 2012 2:04 pm UTC

We're close to deadline

Come on, guys. Discussion!

Any chance of a deadline extension so that matt can post?

by **matt96** » Mon Sep 17, 2012 3:06 pm UTC

Actually the reason I didn't post when I was online yesterday was because I was checking with wam to make sure I could claim without violating the 8th rule in the section standard rules which prohibits directly quoting or posting verbatim from pms, my power results were

N1:
I think we should not kill [REDACTED BY MOD]

lied about [REDACTED BY MOD]

I also agree that [REDACTED BY MOD] is an excellent idea

I still haven't decided who to kill.

N2:
It's obvious I'll do the [REDACTED BY MOD]

Personally I advocate killing the cop to ensure you get out of this without anyone to suspect you

I said my power could combination [REDACTED BY MOD]

I don't think [REDACTED BY MOD] is a cop, we already have [REDACTED BY MOD] If we're going to kill a cop, it should be a claimed one.

N3:
]think we should kill [REDACTED BY MOD] If both [REDACTED BY MOD] and [REDACTED BY MOD], there will be a [REDACTED BY MOD]

Since [REDACTED BY MOD] . it will make l [REDACTED BY MOD] , unless he gets [REDACTED BY MOD] in which case he could [REDACTED BY MOD] .

I think that some people think I'm [REDACTED BY MOD]

But, one would think they would attack me based [REDACTED BY MOD] [/i][/quote]

by **lynx** » Mon Sep 17, 2012 5:39 pm UTC

matt96 wrote:Vote: Kolko
please remember it is Britta claiming Kolko is town, which to me, seems quite incriminating, as it appears quite likely that Britta Britta'd the investigation, and got the wrong result, which would make sense with what I got from my power, which isn't even close to as useful as an investigation, and the last time it was used it was insane, but right now, it seems to be the best thing I have to go on, as everyone else seems to be just accusing people of being over-aggressive.

matt, please explain this then. I'm going to assume this is true for now though and see if we can get anything from it.

"I also agree that [REDACTED BY MOD] is an excellent idea"
Also agree: most likely a three-man mafia. Meaning we're dealing with two more. If we get one in the lynch there will be no more chat.

"I don't think [REDACTED BY MOD] is a cop, we already have [REDACTED BY MOD] If we're going to kill a cop, it should be a claimed one."
Not sure what this means, but with the multitude of claimed cops it could be me, rob or Snark. But it appears they're talking about an unclaimed one!

"But, one would think they would attack me based [REDACTED BY MOD]"
Quite a weak one here but from among blue, matt and NU I'd say NU was most likely to refer to himself as 'one'. This is from N3 so 3fj was already lynched.
If we have another day I'd say it might be a good idea to look very closely at NU next.

If I get a satisfactory answer from matt (barring one from blue), let's hammer.
I'm around for deadline so can ensure there aren't any last-minute antics.

by **wam** » Mon Sep 17, 2012 5:40 pm UTC

As per various requests there is a 24 hour deadline extension.

by **lynx** » Mon Sep 17, 2012 6:08 pm UTC

Thanks wam! Although now that matt has been around we may be able to hammer whenever he and blue have answered my questions.

by **matt96** » Mon Sep 17, 2012 7:49 pm UTC

Ok lynx, regarding your question, it based on what I have seen of Community, Britta is definitely not sane, which I do believe everyone is in agreement on, but from what I've seen, it would be more likely for Britta to be insane than to be naive or random, but I have only seen the episode where Peirce's dad had died and was a total bastard, where they all were playing a video game and Britta made the "health" potion which ended up being used by Pierce's illegitimate half-brother and killed him, and the end of the Halloween episode where it turns out that Britta put the tests in the machine upside down, and got 6 sane results and 1 insane result rather than the true 1 sane result and 6 insane results, which seem to indicate that Britta would be insane rather than naive or random.

by **lynx** » Mon Sep 17, 2012 7:54 pm UTC

Sorry, should've taken that part out of the quote. I meant the bit regarding your claim.

Who is online