Silknor wrote:Wombat's "Vote" was pretty obviously a joke. He didn't give any reason (he said vote Bulvox for being a Bulvox), so I don't think you can use that in any analysis. He hasn't posted since then, at least Cycoden is making some posts, so I think he's lurking less than Wombat.
Now who in this thread has been accused of being a Heretic when he wasn't, on the basis of jocular votes he made at the beginning of the game...?
Who was the one that turned them against him...?
You know where I'm heading with this Skilnor, I'll readily admit I'm carrying a grudge, but this is not your "Playstyle", you don't disregard random posts, you analyse everything
Silknor wrote:I played a very aggressive line by line strategy. I was a townie/peasant in both games, that's just my style of play. I'll admit I don't see much of a reason why everyone talking is bad, if someone is accused to lurking and they make fluff posts after, that IS useful in analysis. It shows they're trying to not contribute as much as possible while not appearing to lynch, which is a decent indicator that they're a cornered mobster.
So, what, Joke votes aren't fluff posts? You're being inconsistent. Not that I'm accusing you... yet
. I know you were displaying this attitude in Inquisition and you were a Townie, so I'm willing to accept that this is simply the way you are, but that doesn't vindicate you by any means...
I'll try and Vote sometime this afternoon...