Dark Loink wrote:
And no posts...well, I'm having some trouble gettings reads on people, which isn't good for activity...infinia and ard were making the most posts.
What may help with that? More analysis!
Good first post. First off he gives two views, and I suppose I understand the meta-game view, but the townie one is just a little more important.
Then he mentions doctor, if he should protect misnomer. Was debatable, but they chose another target. If BN is scum however, then he is trying to throw the doctor off of the kill. This post can go both ways, really. So...neutralish.
Saying that he thinks of, "what would scum do, and why?" I suppose that makes sense. If you haven't been scum, its a bit harder, but you can meta-game yourself to others. Neutral, kinda.
Says that infinia is being like zerker with self voting himself. If he is scum, (WHICH HE BELEIVES)...wait. BN thought infinia was scum. And...didn't vote for him.
Sure, I didn't vote for him either...but. I had no idea what infinia was doing. I've played one other game with him, and needed a response. That could be the explination, but still, it seems odd to me. Somewhat scummy now.
...ok. So. BN doesn't want to vote again. Huh. Again, I find it hard to accuse him, because I did this, but still.
So...BN is somewhat scummy, in my opinion. Infinia was doing some distancing, but then again...he could be trying to do that, to make BN seem more scummy. But lets not get ahead of myself here. I've got 7 to go
First post, after all of our miller discussion. This is a first post, and it makes sense. Mainly because the next one-
Starts off with misnomer claiming miller. Wow. But there have been no counter-claims, I believe him. He is probably townie, hence his protection.
This makes sense, and the last part helps explain part of the reason infinia was lynched (confirmed townie? We should lynch them) His miller talking, debating, and the way he understood it made sense-if this were a closed set-up, maybe we don't want to trust miller claims. Because there could be more than one, or none. But this is open. And he is a confirmed townie, I can see why he was protected. Also, this post leads on to the next person, TLC. But yeah, I think misnomer is townie. Only a counter-claim could really make me think otherwise at this point.
Neutral post-but first post. I don't think I can get anything from this.
Maybe you can't go back in time. I
however am a time-traveling monkey assassin.(For those of you who haven't read DNL, ignore this
) Alright then. So, first thing TLC talks about how we could get more pings if he hadn't claimed. I mean...I guess so, but all this really did was make someone who could be shown as scum trustworthy.
Also- what doesn't sit right with me is this part here
TLC wrote:Isn't keeping the miller alive an anti-town move? It provides a lot of wine.
I really don't think so. As people have said, lynching the miller gives you a 0% chance of getting scum. Besides, if scum we to claim, they would probably die sometime anyways. So this post definantly has enough parts to be scummy
Wondering if infinia was trying to speak wine. A good possibility. Then talk of the miller, not too much. Then saying that lynching the miller is outrageous (did TLC forget that he said to do just that?) and saying the doctor shouldn't protect him...but then scum could realize this and kill him. So this post could go both.
I understand this post, I suppose. Defends pretty much what was said above.
In all, TLC is a bit scummy, but...I think this is a townie TLC, at least for now. Just a scummy townie.
Yeah, this makes sense. If a cop finds someone as "mafia" then why not lynch them? If
the miller doesn't claim, of course. He also says the roleblocker makes follow cop impossible-course, right now, follow the cop is impossible. However, this makes sense. Town, in my opinion.
Two-Fry wrote:I think having the miller claim is a good idea
Makes sense. Townie, because claiming D1 eliminates the wine that goes with being copped as well. Claiming later on is much harder to accept.
Two-Fry explaining that we want a miller claim, with good enough reasoning. Townie, again. Although, scum would say this as well, maybe.
Makes sense. Many people held an infinia vote for a while, and...we wanted to be sure of the misnomer thing. Townie enough, althogh everyone woh stalled the lynch a little (Yes, even me) has to realize that that could be a scumtell as well.
Two-Fry wrote:Actually, it's a 3/8 chance of hitting scum :p
Fractions! um...no, I am not going to get anything from this.
Two-Fry wrote:Okay then. Seeing as a miller counterclaim seems pretty unlikely at this point, I'll go ahead and
Can we get votals please?
Votes for infinia-this does not clear or condem him, I believe there were both scum as town on that bandwagon.
Analysis is a good thing. Speaking your opinion is a good thing. But is done by both sides, so neutraltownie
All in all, however? Two-Fry is seeming townie to me.
There, four down, and four to go.