Adacore: doesn't like NaR's play. Says we should play as standard vanilla. Votes Lataro as a lurker vote. Unvotes Lataro and goes to EH. Goes back to Lataro for the lynch. Away at a conference. Complains about über-activity of thread. Not a lot of information in post, as he had not yet read the thread.
Mavketl: Don't lynch NaR, Day 1 doldrums. Votes EH as the reasons given for the Lataro vote (failing to grasp the importance of certain game elements) are not unique to Lataro. Unvotes EH and jumps to Lataro to save the calimed cop. Proves from her own perspective that she can't be scum. Speculates on the reasons for Dr Ug's death. Analysis of all players (Adacore, Silknor, myself townish, others hard to read). Concedes error in analysis of self and EH. Makes relationships table. Silknor not there. Says that I was copying kells. Last post off. Votes me.
Silknor: points out the roleblocker. Ignore NaR. Rolespec, particularly value of torture in endgame. Weak defense of Lataro's OMGUS. Makes explicit possible scenarios where Makvetl is not town. Says there is no evidence of EH's claim being true, but admits that Makvetl is likely town. Sees no utility in NaR craziness. Says nothing of his alignment. Points out NaR's lapse of reading. EH's analysis is right if he is really a cop. More analysis about possibilities. Says that regardless of what EH is, he would have claimed roleblock. Points out lack of input from NaR, RR and Adacore.
Lataro: OMGUS Adacore. Dislikes EH and calls him his second choice for lynching. Unvotes Adacore, votes EH.
AngrySquirrel: Votes Kells as lurker. (Notes that RR has posted even less, though.) Unvotes Kells. Defends giving unsupported gut feelings as townie. Sees Silknor, EH, NaR, AS, Mak, RR as leaning townie -- despite noting RR's lurkiness. Sees myself, Kells, Adacore as scummy. I'm playing to safe, Kells doesn't vote, Adacore has been vote jumping, downplaying torture, etc. Votes me. Decides afterwards that RR is actually scummy (2nd place). Trusts EH. Explains not voting Lataro, disagrees with adacore lynch. Wonders if Silknor is trying to warn me off of NaR. Agrees that Kells and myself are probably scumbuddies.
EH: Analysis of Lataro (downplaying torture). Votes Lataro. Would consider a RR lynch, but stays with Lataro. Panics and claims cop. Defends claim and outlines possibilities. Notes that Dr Ug and Lataro read the forum without posting in thread. Points out how arbitrary bandwagon was -- only Makvetl gave a reason. Claims having been roleblocked N1. Roleblock implies all of scum were active. Adacore was the last to be voting EH who is as yet uncleared. Analysis of players - Silknor not voting, myself being lazy, kells playing safe, NaR being crazy, AS neutral, Mak town, Adacore mystery, RR inactive. FoS on kells and myself. Advances theory that Silknor, kells and myself are the scum.
KellsBells: Objects to Angry Squirrel's logic for her lurker vote -- random accusations do not a townie make. FoS. Sees Lataro getting paranoid too easily, but doesn't vote. Sees EH bandwagon as less reasoned than the Lataro lynch. Doesn't know what to make of EH claim. Analysis of all players. Sees Adacore as the scummiest player, followed by RR (lurkage and picking on Makvetl). Nagging doubts about EH. Starts to see scumminess in me, still considers Adacore the most dangerous. Has 5 suspicious types. Who should EH investigate tonight?
Dr Ug: Objects to Lataro bandwagon, votes EH. Notes possible link between EH and Kells. Disbelieves EH's claim.
RR: Points out that he was the first to suspect EH, so that Makvetl's argument is incorrect. (Apologizes for lack of posting.)
Unfortunately, that took me over an hour to compile, so my analysis of what it means will have to wait until after class. By noon I should have something, if all goes well.