Greenlover (2 posts): 1) Apologises for not posting as they had a busy few days. Doesn't react much to bf and webby for voting for them. Says that infina's discussion generating post was winey, but as they couldn't see how it would be anti-town, decided to let it slide. Votes for Roadie-rich, lurker.
2)Again, seems busy. Counters entropy's vote on them by saying that they are Charles of Winston's gang. Says that they are night action immune, so Entropy must be lying. Votes entropy.
My thoughts - Greenlover's behaviour has actually been pretty suspicious D2 now that I look more closely. They have already been called out on voting for Roadierich as a lurker, even though Roband has already said that all those not to post would be modkilled. They also chose the only lurker(nb, mav's early post was also contentless and just a checking in one, but I guess she had been more active on D1) that had posted earlier that day (though, granted, it was only a one-line, contentless post, so maybe it stuck out more). When saying that Entropy must be lying, they missed the important point that entropy voted for them mid-day, which would seem to suggest a day action, which greenlover would probably not be immune to.
Chandani (2 posts): 1) Quite a content-filled post, which came directly after slbub's vote on them. Started out saying why they didn't vote for GoP at the end of D1 (which was apparently because they weren't used to ties being decided by coin-flip, and wanting to avoid mixing rules between forums even though the other one they post on is tie-happy, which I found a bit odd). There's a lot of the kills, and why there would be 3 of them - ie are they vig, or different factions, as they say that webby implying that there could be two scum factions is suspicious, as it would lead to 8 scum, thus making the game unbalanced (however, they fail to take into account that the scum factions could also be working against each other - at the very least they probably don't know who is in the other faction, so could have a high chance of hitting each other, which I think should help balance things out). They defend greenlover by saying that the same logic that worked for GoP won't necessarily work for greenlover. They say that infina's thing was weird. They then tell slbub that they are at school and busy.
2)Says that entropy telling us to vote for greenlover is suspicious and full of fail, then votes for entropy. Retracts their previous statement about webby being scummy.
Thoughts - all in all, it's hard to tell. I think that them saying that 2 scum factions would be too much, while being on board with GoP being 'scum' for being in Dog's gang (when it seemed like the main 'scum' faction that is most likely would be Harry's gang, possibly followed by Dog's) so if Chandani is acknowledging that Dog's gang is scum, they should be open to the idea that Harry's could be too. I sort of wonder if Chandani was trying to protect greenlover- maybe they are in the same gang.
Phoenix-enigma (1 post) : Seems to have forgotten that they were in a game. Says that the 3 NKs means that they can't all be scum, and so it must be balanced somehow, which may come in handy for role claiming later. Says that they think infina's message may be indicative of a jester, or something similar, as it's main purpose seems to be to make them look suspicious. Says that they think greenlover doesn't seem to be suspicious, and says that lorenz jumping on the wagon seemed a bit weak.
Thoughts - there's not much to say really, other than them picking up on the fact that Lorenz voted greenlover as well. Personally, if you were going to pick up on someone going on the greenlover bandwagon, it should have been webby for basically following behind boomfrog (aat least Lorenz had a reason other than greenlover being scummy D1 - the voting for a lurker after being told lurkers would be modkilled was odd).
Off the three of them, I think that phoenix enigma has been the worst - now that I'm paying more attention, they didn't even vote (Roadie-rich - I apologise for not noticing that earlier, and only picking up on you when you'd already said that you were busy). Greenlover has given us some extra stuff today, so I'm will to let them off for now. Chandani has been acting like a confused player, but I'll remain suspicious until we get a lot more content out of them.
Crabtree's bludgeon: “no set of mutually inconsistent observations can exist for which some human intellect cannot conceive a coherent explanation, however complicated”
GNU Terry Pratchett