AngrySquirrel wrote:I must say, so far, FOAT's actions and votes are really not sitting well with me. On day 1, when Conman reviced suspicious looks from several people, FOAT was there, ready to join in.
I said I found him slightly suspicous, and at one point you re-iterated the same point I made in the post directly before:
ForAllOfThis wrote:Even the large post didn't include anything useful, with the speculation being focused on there being 'one town faction' and not making much sense to me. A lot of the other speculation in the large post had already been echoed by previous players so didn't need to be so large.
Then your post that follows has a quote (the exact same post I was referring to) with the following:
I'm wondering exactly how this is relevant and not just a sidetrack? Or to put it more succinctly "What?
So your first point that I was 'ready to join in' has no evidence behind it at all, and on top of that, at the same point you were questioning conmans posts yourself. If your going to critise me, at least don't be guilty of the accusation yourself.
AngrySquirrel wrote:When tlc suggested NL (making himself a very easy target for a vote that didn't require much reasoning), FOAT was there to vote.
It didn't require much reasoning because it was scummy. A NL would have been useless at that point, and it was scummy to suggest otherwise. How do you want me to play? Ignoring the obviously scummy things?
AngrySquirrel wrote:On day 2 when I painted a giant target on myself making me an easy target, FOAT was there, with some additional not-well thought out reasons.
AngrySquirrel wrote:But that doesn't mean I immediately think he's scum, if poor play meant scum then I'd be voting for you, because the only thing you've been doing so far in this game is provide distractions and pointless arguements. You're being an tempting lynch-target that scum can jump on without seeming scummy because you're making it so easy to do so.
So you and Adam H were both easy targets yesterday? Sure you didn't want to throw anyone else in that mix and accuse the person voting them to be scum? How come your not convinced GoP is scum for voting Adam H who you considered to be an easy target? Same reasoning and he was second on the "easy-vote" bandwagon.
AngrySquirrel wrote:And today, he's picking on Timmeh (that's your name now, deal) and b.i.o. B.i.o being an easy target cause of his lurkiness, and Timmeh, with the reasoning that town wouldn't try to defend town (they do, often).
At no point did I say bio was scummy. I actually said I considered the vote on him to be not scummy (in my analysis of t1mms post) because it had some reasoning behind it, and votes without any reasoning are what piss me off (and you can put that in your meta notes). I have no read on bio due to a severe lack of posts and would prefer that the mod deal with him if he doesn't respond by the end of the day. My 'picking on t1mm' is just me applying some pressure to see if there are any inconsistencies or holes in his reasoning, which is how I always play. I see no advantage in defending players as town, the only way to catch scum is to try to catch them is by playing aggressively.
T1mm wrote:Wait. You see me defend townplayers and the first thing you think is: He's scum? No offense, but that's some weird reasoning you got going on there.
Did you not read my post or just not understand my reasoning? Incase it is the latter, my concern is how you were convinced two people were town yesterday when there was no evidence to suggest that they were. You were happy just to accept AS was telling the truth about her role and her sent role. It either means your a cop or scum, and as we know we have at least three scum it's statistically more likely to be the latter. I didn't get a chance to post yesterday to ask you why you thought AS and AH were town, so I'm taking the chance today whilst I have it.