Big Magical Numbers
Moderators: gmalivuk, Moderators General, Prelates
Big Magical Numbers
This isn't really a FS question, but it's for FS, so...
Are there any nice big (preferably integer) numbers as magical as Pi? I.E. constant across all bases? (so I guess it would be a proportion)
Are there any nice big (preferably integer) numbers as magical as Pi? I.E. constant across all bases? (so I guess it would be a proportion)
How can I think my way out of the problem when the problem is the way I think?
 gmalivuk
 GNU Terry Pratchett
 Posts: 25395
 Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:02 pm UTC
 Location: Here and There
 Contact:
Re: Big Magical Numbers
What do you mean "constant across all bases"? Any constant is constant across all bases, but all of them (except 0 and 1) have different digit representations in different bases.
If you want it to be "as magical as pi", you'll need to specify more than that.
If you want it to be "as magical as pi", you'll need to specify more than that.
 sevenperforce
 Posts: 658
 Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2015 8:01 am UTC
Re: Big Magical Numbers
Perhaps by "across all bases" you mean "across all units"? If so, then yes. The protonelectron mass ratio is 1836.15, though it's not actually an integer. The fine structure constant is roughly 1/137 at low energies and 1/127 at high energies. Euler's number, 2.71828, is marginally more important to science than pi, though it's not an integer.
If your FS is set on Earth, there are some constants related to the ratios of masses and distances in the solar system that might prove interesting. For example, the ratio of the Sun's mass to the Earth's mass is about 330,060:1 while the ratio of their diameters is 109:1. The ratio of the Earth's orbit around the Sun to the Moon's orbit around the Earth is about 373:1.
If your FS is set on Earth, there are some constants related to the ratios of masses and distances in the solar system that might prove interesting. For example, the ratio of the Sun's mass to the Earth's mass is about 330,060:1 while the ratio of their diameters is 109:1. The ratio of the Earth's orbit around the Sun to the Moon's orbit around the Earth is about 373:1.
Re: Big Magical Numbers
sevenperforce wrote:Perhaps by "across all bases" you mean "across all units"? If so, then yes. The protonelectron mass ratio is 1836.15, though it's not actually an integer. The fine structure constant is roughly 1/137 at low energies and 1/127 at high energies. Euler's number, 2.71828, is marginally more important to science than pi, though it's not an integer.
If your FS is set on Earth, there are some constants related to the ratios of masses and distances in the solar system that might prove interesting. For example, the ratio of the Sun's mass to the Earth's mass is about 330,060:1 while the ratio of their diameters is 109:1. The ratio of the Earth's orbit around the Sun to the Moon's orbit around the Earth is about 373:1.
Here is a nice list by physicist John Baez of all the known dimensionless (unitindependent) physical constantsnote that when he refers to various particle masses, he's really talking about the ratio between the particle's mass and the Planck mass, since this ratio doesn't have any units even though the masses do. It's not really clear if this is what the OP was asking about though, since pi is not a physical constant at all, but a purely mathematical one (though of course it does appear in many physics equations). Here is a list of common mathematical constantsthough the very notion of a "mathematical constant" is fairly qualitative, defined on the page as a real number that is "significantly interesting in some way".
Re: Big Magical Numbers
sevenperforce wrote:Perhaps by "across all bases" you mean "across all units"?
Indeed I do  and apologies, gmalivuk  I should have said something like "independent of any units of measurement" or something. Brain fart.
The math constants are interesting but too small, but the particle ratio looks about right (and I quite like it having a fractional part, since that makes even less sense in context).
Tnx all.
How can I think my way out of the problem when the problem is the way I think?
 sevenperforce
 Posts: 658
 Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2015 8:01 am UTC
Re: Big Magical Numbers
tomandlu wrote:The math constants are interesting but too small, but the particle ratio looks about right (and I quite like it having a fractional part, since that makes even less sense in context).
Tnx all.
The various particle ratios (proton:electron, neutron:electron, W boson:electron, Higgs:electron) are neat because they're going to be the same on every world in every solar system in every galaxy, and you can begin to figure a few of them out using chemistry alone (though for the more complicated ones you're going to need a particle accelerator). I actually have a tattoo that incorporates a bunch of particle ratios along with some other fun stuff like pi, tau, the alpha constant, Euler's number, and so forth.
Re: Big Magical Numbers
tomandlu wrote:The math constants are interesting but too small
graham's number is a notsmall number
Please be gracious in judging my english. (I am not a native speaker/writer.)
http://decodedarfur.org/
http://decodedarfur.org/
 ThirdParty
 Posts: 252
 Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2012 3:53 pm UTC
 Location: USA
Re: Big Magical Numbers
Does it have to be a proportion? Maybe you could count something instead. For example, 624 = maximum number of quarks that can be found in a nonradioactive atomic nucleus. (Admittedly, what counts as "nonradioactive" depends somewhat on perspective. But only somewhat.)
Re: Big Magical Numbers
The order of the monster group is a nice one:
808017424794512875886459904961710757005754368000000000
808017424794512875886459904961710757005754368000000000

 Posts: 534
 Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2014 3:15 pm UTC
Re: Big Magical Numbers
The golden ratio is another good choice. It is Φ = (1 + √5)/2. Its most famous property is if you draw a rectangle that is 1 by Φ and then remove a 1 by 1 square from it, the left over rectangle is similar to the original rectangle. Repeating this over and over results is that spiral people add to a bunch of images for some reason. In addition Φ = √(1 + √(1 + √(1 + √(1 + √(1 + √(1 + √(1 + ..., Φ1 = 1/Φ and the ratio between two adjacent numbers in an Lucas sequence (such as the Fibonacci sequence) approaches Φ as the number grow larger. The Lucas Numbers is the Lucas sequence that starts with 1,3; the nth number in this sequence is equal to Φ^n rounded.
Brought to you by the Interstellar Frungy League. "Frungy, the Sport of Kings!"
commodorejohn wrote:I wish that someone would tell them that it is not a good idea to mock the giants you are standing on.
But man, that's the entire cultural foundation of the 21st century!
 Xanthir
 My HERO!!!
 Posts: 5156
 Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 12:49 am UTC
 Location: The Googleplex
 Contact:
Re: Big Magical Numbers
I really, truly love that φ^{1} + 1 = φ^{2}, and φ^{1}  1 = φ^{1}.
Also, if you use the resulting recurrence that φ^{n} = φ^{n1} + φ^{n2} to break down φ^{n} to a sum of a*φ + b, a and b will be successive Fibonacci numbers (which shouldn't be surprising, given the form of the recurrence, but still).
Also, if you use the resulting recurrence that φ^{n} = φ^{n1} + φ^{n2} to break down φ^{n} to a sum of a*φ + b, a and b will be successive Fibonacci numbers (which shouldn't be surprising, given the form of the recurrence, but still).
(defun fibs (n &optional (a 1) (b 1)) (take n (unfold '+ a b)))
Re: Big Magical Numbers
Of course, there's also the e^(pi*sqrt(163))= about 640320^3+744 thing...
The math behind that I don't really understand. I guess I'm just too tired to try most of the time.
The math behind that I don't really understand. I guess I'm just too tired to try most of the time.
Free markets, free movement, free plops
Blitz on, my friends Quantized, GnomeAnne, and iskinner!
Obvious avatar suggestion by flicky.
Blitz on, my friends Quantized, GnomeAnne, and iskinner!
Obvious avatar suggestion by flicky.
Re: Big Magical Numbers
>) wrote:The order of the monster group is a nice one:
808017424794512875886459904961710757005754368000000000
Or if you need a smaller number:
60  the order of the smallest nonabelian simple group.
7920  the order of the smallest sporadic simple group.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests