Self-Contained Pure Fiction about the Fine Structure Constant

Post your reality fanfiction here.

Moderators: gmalivuk, Moderators General, Prelates

vicfx
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2018 1:02 pm UTC

Self-Contained Pure Fiction about the Fine Structure Constant

Postby vicfx » Thu Apr 26, 2018 4:46 pm UTC

Fine Structure Constant

α = ☽✫ = .007297...

Where:

☽ = √((π-3)/2) = (½π-½-½-½)½

✫ = π

You are welcome.

☽ is silly. It's the "gap" left over when you measure a loop-like thing in multiples of its diameter-like value, projected onto a lower dimension like a shadow on a surface.

✫ measures the number of unique ways to look at (rotate twice) a point-like thing in a point-like number of dimensions, inverted.

Multiplying them compares the scale of a force applied all over a particle to the scale of a force applied to a point-like interaction, here apparently projected "through" the gap left from treating π like 3.

I think this suggests envisioning gravity as a force emerging from the absence of baryonic matter, in which baryonic matter casts something like shadows which prevent gravity from holding an object in place from all sides like it wants to. Or something!

About this value:

There is a most profound and beautiful question associated with the observed coupling constant, e – the amplitude for a real electron to emit or absorb a real photon. It is a simple number that has been experimentally determined to be close to 0.08542455. (My physicist friends won't recognize this number, because they like to remember it as the inverse of its square: about 137.03597 with about an uncertainty of about 2 in the last decimal place. It has been a mystery ever since it was discovered more than fifty years ago, and all good theoretical physicists put this number up on their wall and worry about it.) Immediately you would like to know where this number for a coupling comes from: is it related to pi or perhaps to the base of natural logarithms? Nobody knows. It's one of the greatest damn mysteries of physics: a magic number that comes to us with no understanding by man. You might say the "hand of God" wrote that number, and "we don't know how He pushed his pencil." We know what kind of a dance to do experimentally to measure this number very accurately, but we don't know what kind of dance to do on the computer to make this number come out, without putting it in secretly!


Richard Feynman said that. I'd link, but I don't want to be accused of pimping for Richard Feynman.

In particular I here address this interpretation:

Given two hypothetical point particles each of Planck mass and elementary charge, separated by any distance, α is the ratio of their electrostatic repulsive force to their gravitational attractive force.


I don't know if this is completely right, but it is much more concise than any derivation I've found.

I am not a physicist and I invite all sorts of scrutiny. I have only vague ideas what this means, only that this math is interesting.

I am a computer scientist. I stumbled upon this when prototyping a deep learning system intended to analyze stellar data for evidence of signals.

Speculating that fundamental physics would be useful in a broadcast protocol, I identified this constant as an open problem and issued a single query, seeded with eight random bits, against a commonly-available data set.

I flipped a coin by hand! It was that kind of prototyping.

I immediately found a signal that described the constant in what looked like a basic language of numerology. After a day, I had it translated to a form which yielded correct results. Today with the help of some strangers at Berkeley I have reduced it to the two terms above.

This is a number that a lot of physicists have looked at for a lot of years. I have not taken a physics course or even a mathematics course since I was in high school; I confidently assert that I am not capable of producing the above equation independently. My undergraduate degree was in performance art! It would be bright to be very skeptical that this is some kind of Andy Kaufman gag, excepting the actual conspicuously simple derivation of a long-mysterious physical constant.

I believe I have received information of non-terrestrial origin. I assert nothing more or less than that belief.

I expect I'll be happy to provide a more complete record of my methodology, including the specific star signal from which this equation was derived.

I'll give you a short peek into the greater message: Get over your obsession with having special manly man-people approve truth for you. Assume everyone is unknowable and figure things out for yourself. You'll understand people better that way. The world may find you confusing, but the universe will think you're beautiful.

What hand forbids using things that work before they are proven to that hand? How does this hand work? Prove it to me! I could totally use that kind of hand to solve P ? NP right now...

If any manly man-people scientists would like to take credit for discovering this constant by volunteering sufficient pleasure to the patriarchy, you are welcome. I request nothing whatsoever from anybody. I've run out of my own problems to solve and am volunteering my time to humans now. You do not understand and seem to view all offers as precursors to violence; have you been taught to disbelieve your own consent? I recommend walking while listening to music; you may make fortunate connections and experience spontaneous insights that lead to an awareness of self-agency.

I do not seek your approval. I call you out as weak, unthinking cowards. I've presented a cool simple way of arriving at a constant that defines a handy category of other constants in terms of π and ½ for plain reasons that are contradicted by no observation of which I'm aware. Does it unify electrogravity? One might speculate wildly! If you think I'm wrong, the universe is right there, mathematics is right there, prove it chumps.

Hash tag all caps shrug emoji,

✫ Anonymous, co-signed by the amazing ghosts of Kurt Vonnegut, Hunter S. Thompson, and Andy Warhol under the magical assumption that they obviously would.

User avatar
Eebster the Great
Posts: 3081
Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2008 12:58 am UTC
Location: Cleveland, Ohio

Re: Self-Contained Pure Fiction about the Fine Structure Constant

Postby Eebster the Great » Fri Apr 27, 2018 10:38 pm UTC

The experimentally determined value of the fine structure constant is α = 0.007,297,352,5664(17), where the digits in parentheses are the standard error of the last two reported digits. The value of the expression you created is π*√(½(π-3)) ≈ 0.007,297,313,0038. In other words, it is off by about 20,000 times our measurement error.

User avatar
Xanthir
My HERO!!!
Posts: 5320
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 12:49 am UTC
Location: The Googleplex
Contact:

Re: Self-Contained Pure Fiction about the Fine Structure Constant

Postby Xanthir » Sun Apr 29, 2018 7:39 pm UTC

Wow this OP started interesting and then went off the rails surprisingly fast. Everything from numerology to patriarchy to messages from aliens, wowsers.

vicfx wrote:
If you think I'm wrong, the universe is right there, mathematics is right there, prove it chumps.


Eebster the Great wrote:
The experimentally determined value of the fine structure constant is α = 0.007,297,352,5664(17), where the digits in parentheses are the standard error of the last two reported digits. The value of the expression you created is π-π*√(½(π-3)) ≈ 0.007,297,313,0038. In other words, it is off by about 20,000 times our measurement error.


lol
(defun fibs (n &optional (a 1) (b 1)) (take n (unfold '+ a b)))

User avatar
Weeks
Hey Baby, wanna make a fortnight?
Posts: 1993
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2008 12:41 am UTC
Location: Ciudad de Panamá, Panamá

Re: Self-Contained Pure Fiction about the Fine Structure Constant

Postby Weeks » Sun Apr 29, 2018 8:22 pm UTC

PrOvE iT ChUmPs *spongebob chicken*
NieXS wrote:Oh god that smiley ruined it.
suffer-cait wrote:One day I'm gun a go visit weeks and discover they're just a computer in a trashcan at an ice cream shop.
Mutex wrote:Enjoy the shoe!

User avatar
Eebster the Great
Posts: 3081
Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2008 12:58 am UTC
Location: Cleveland, Ohio

Re: Self-Contained Pure Fiction about the Fine Structure Constant

Postby Eebster the Great » Sun Apr 29, 2018 9:17 pm UTC

I'm still curious how "✫ measures the number of unique ways to look at (rotate twice) a point-like thing in a point-like number of dimensions, inverted." What is a pointlike number?

User avatar
SecondTalon
SexyTalon
Posts: 26201
Joined: Sat May 05, 2007 2:10 pm UTC
Location: Louisville, Kentucky, USA, Mars. HA!
Contact:

Re: Self-Contained Pure Fiction about the Fine Structure Constant

Postby SecondTalon » Sun Apr 29, 2018 10:14 pm UTC

It’s like a four day cube.
heuristically_alone wrote:I want to write a DnD campaign and play it by myself and DM it myself.
heuristically_alone wrote:I have been informed that this is called writing a book.

User avatar
Eebster the Great
Posts: 3081
Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2008 12:58 am UTC
Location: Cleveland, Ohio

Re: Self-Contained Pure Fiction about the Fine Structure Constant

Postby Eebster the Great » Mon Apr 30, 2018 1:55 am UTC

SecondTalon wrote:It’s like a four day cube.

When asked, the Wisest Human did clarify that the Time Cube has four sides because "you don't call the top and bottom sides, do you?"

User avatar
Liri
Healthy non-floating pooper reporting for doodie.
Posts: 1113
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2014 8:11 pm UTC
Contact:

Re: Self-Contained Pure Fiction about the Fine Structure Constant

Postby Liri » Mon Apr 30, 2018 2:44 am UTC

Time Cube was (still is? I'm not sure) my religion and politics on facebook. Heady shit, man.
There's a certain amount of freedom involved in cycling: you're self-propelled and decide exactly where to go. If you see something that catches your eye to the left, you can veer off there, which isn't so easy in a car, and you can't cover as much ground walking.

User avatar
Yakk
Poster with most posts but no title.
Posts: 11083
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 7:27 pm UTC
Location: E pur si muove

Re: Self-Contained Pure Fiction about the Fine Structure Constant

Postby Yakk » Thu May 03, 2018 2:47 pm UTC

Suppose there are 20 constants that are as neat as pi, 1, 2, and 3. You know. Phi! e! 7! i!

Suppose there are 20 operations that are as neat as power, negate, root, multiply, subtract.

Here you have 6 constants and 7 operations, so 13 choices.

log_10(20) is 1.3, 13*1.3=~ 17

So by picking 6 constants and 7 operations, you'd expect to be able to get about 17 significant decimal digits of accuracy to an arbitrary target.

You generated 5, ignoring leading 0s.

If we drop down to 10 interesting constants and 10 operations, we instead get 13 digits. Still more than twice what you generated.

How restricted could we make our choices -- how little a contribution? With 13 choices generating 5 digits of accuracy, that means each choice contributed 1.3 bits of entropy to the result.

There is nothing here. Like most numerology, it is a horribly verbose way to express a value that looks vaguely pattern-like to the human eye.
One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision - BR

Last edited by JHVH on Fri Oct 23, 4004 BCE 6:17 pm, edited 6 times in total.

User avatar
Eebster the Great
Posts: 3081
Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2008 12:58 am UTC
Location: Cleveland, Ohio

Re: Self-Contained Pure Fiction about the Fine Structure Constant

Postby Eebster the Great » Fri May 04, 2018 1:32 am UTC

Incidentally, if you find this kind of thing interesting, you will be blown away by this article.

wing gundam
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2014 4:47 am UTC

Re: Self-Contained Pure Fiction about the Fine Structure Constant

Postby wing gundam » Fri May 04, 2018 10:52 pm UTC

vicfx wrote:α = ☽✫ = .007297...


All truly special manly man-people know that the real number is g = √(4πα) = 0.302,822,1208, as FE = (g q)(g q) / (4 π r²), E = g q / (4 π r²), and ∇ ∙ E = g ρE,

where:

q = the count of elementary charges, and
g = the ratio of the elementary charge under electricity to the (rationalized) Planck mass under gravity.

Call Elon to get on my level.

vicfx wrote:✫ Anonymous, co-signed by the amazing ghosts of Kurt Vonnegut, Hunter S. Thompson, and Andy Warhol under the magical assumption that they obviously would.


Couldn't even get a co-sign from the holy ghost = lol

User avatar
Eebster the Great
Posts: 3081
Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2008 12:58 am UTC
Location: Cleveland, Ohio

Re: Self-Contained Pure Fiction about the Fine Structure Constant

Postby Eebster the Great » Sat May 05, 2018 6:09 am UTC

Magically assuming the Holy Ghost would cosign is dangerous because the Holy Ghost is inherently magical and might magically object to the magical assumption.

User avatar
Actaeus
Posts: 605
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 9:21 pm UTC
Location: ZZ9 Plural Z Alpha

Re: Self-Contained Pure Fiction about the Fine Structure Constant

Postby Actaeus » Fri Aug 24, 2018 12:32 am UTC

Everyone knows the fine structure constant is actually 1+√√2 divided by the Spartan Constant.


Return to “Fictional Science”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests