Moderators: gmalivuk, Moderators General, Prelates
clockworkmonk wrote:Except for Warren G. Harding. Fuck that guy.
clockworkmonk wrote:Except for Warren G. Harding. Fuck that guy.
A plasma is an hardly containable state of matter.It contains negative and positif ions,as well as netral atoms.So,you cant contain it with just a magnetic field.
The idea of a super heated blade of some sort of very high melting point material is "more thinkable",but as far as i know,not much matter can still be solid(and very hot)at the temperature needed to make a light-saber-type thing.Maybe something carbonish(since it have the highest melting point)?
clockworkmonk wrote:Except for Warren G. Harding. Fuck that guy.
KrO2 wrote:Another problem, ignoring the power for a moment, is that no matter what magic material you make it out of, you're holding a superheated something inches from your hand. Anything hot enough to melt through a steel (excuse me, I mean "durasteel") blast door is going to be fairly unpleasant. Especially if you start actually using it to cut through something, leaving you with melted and/or vaporized material floating around. Also, what is the handle made of?
Technical Ben wrote:They have hyper drives right?
These must bend space or break a hole through it.
So, make a tiny hyper drive device. Put it in your sword, and project the "hyperdrive" effect in a sword shape. Anything that touches the edge of your sword is moved to another part of the galaxy. Else turn it on and of really fast, at a high frequency. Now anything that touches it is accelerated at extreme velocities for a fraction of a second, then stopped again. So it would heat up or disintegrate. Use plasma as a visible tracker to the size and shape of the hyperdrive field. So the plasma does no damage, but accelerating your enemies arm across the room at FTL speeds does!
clockworkmonk wrote:Except for Warren G. Harding. Fuck that guy.
zmatt wrote:KrO2 wrote:Another problem, ignoring the power for a moment, is that no matter what magic material you make it out of, you're holding a superheated something inches from your hand. Anything hot enough to melt through a steel (excuse me, I mean "durasteel") blast door is going to be fairly unpleasant. Especially if you start actually using it to cut through something, leaving you with melted and/or vaporized material floating around. Also, what is the handle made of?
yes there is a great deal of hand waving going on with them. What we can discern is that lightsabers are hot and they do burn so it's none of that "cold plasma" that sci types like to toss around. The handle has to be insulated either in it's design or that uber field they use to contain the plasma does it. But if so, then how does the saber burn to begin with?
Waffles to space = 100% pure WIN.
zmatt wrote:When I woke up this morning I was thinking about this and different ways to make it work. One thing i notice after a quick google search if that people incorrectly assume because of the name that a light saber or more generally beam saber is a laser. That is absurd, they don't posses any properties of lasers. I have always thought they were plasma. Which makes a lot more sense but also has some unique challenges of its own. Taking baby steps, I got some inspiration after seeing an instructable on making a lightsaber with a tap emeasurer. Why not make it so that it is a reinforced telescoping rod not unlike a baton, but longer and then on the sides either have some way to expose plasma, or just a super heated blade to facilitate cutting. You wouldn't be able to stab, but that would get you most fo the functionality of a lightsaber. As far as a plasma "blade" with no obvious containment I guess you could use magnetic fields, but those would be subject to distortion by the environment you are in and would be very impractical.
Xanthir wrote:To be fair, even perfectly friendly antimatter wildebeests are pretty deadly.
clockworkmonk wrote:Except for Warren G. Harding. Fuck that guy.
Wolydarg wrote:That was like a roller coaster of mathematical reasoning. Problems! Solutions! More problems!
clockworkmonk wrote:Except for Warren G. Harding. Fuck that guy.
clockworkmonk wrote:Except for Warren G. Harding. Fuck that guy.
clockworkmonk wrote:Except for Warren G. Harding. Fuck that guy.
Waffles to space = 100% pure WIN.

clockworkmonk wrote:Except for Warren G. Harding. Fuck that guy.

clockworkmonk wrote:Except for Warren G. Harding. Fuck that guy.
Technical Ben wrote:I still think it would work by warping space. This thing causes the "laser" blaster bolt to return in the direction they came from.
clockworkmonk wrote:Except for Warren G. Harding. Fuck that guy.
Steax wrote:In defense of the original Lightsabers, yes, they used to use external power sources, before they figured out how to put batteries in it.
My problem is with the concept that the weapon doesn't actually consume much energy when they aren't cutting through anything - that would probably mean that it's maintaining the plasma completely inside itself, and that explains the lack of radiation (except, well, light). The blade's barrier only opens up when it hits something, at which point the plasma somehow exposes all that deadly power. I can't think of a plausible method for this containment. Of course, they just handwave it as "a containment field". Magnetic, I guess. Apparently it "loops" back in, so no energy is lost.
Oh, and as to why starwars used lightsabers at all: it was really due to their elegance and portability. They do have grenades and guns for the dirty business, but usually not carried by Jedi themselves. They believe that such harsh methods are dark etc etc etc. Yeah, I know.
I do agree, though. The only reason why lightsabers are effective in the movies is because of the Jedi/Sith - a real person couldn't swing a sword fast enough to block an incoming bullet, much less hit it.
Xanthir wrote:To be fair, even perfectly friendly antimatter wildebeests are pretty deadly.
Waffles to space = 100% pure WIN.
Steax wrote:I do agree, though. The only reason why lightsabers are effective in the movies is because of the Jedi/Sith - a real person couldn't swing a sword fast enough to block an incoming bullet, much less hit it.

clockworkmonk wrote:Except for Warren G. Harding. Fuck that guy.
Ah, but a 'blaster rifle bolt' could be described as harmful particles/radiation, could it not?zmatt wrote:I read up on force fields IRL and they all seem to be based on using plasma to prevent radiation and harmful particles from hitting space craft. Nobody is even thinking about stopping large objects or weapons at this point.
bigglesworth wrote:Ah, but a 'blaster rifle bolt' could be described as harmful particles/radiation, could it not?zmatt wrote:I read up on force fields IRL and they all seem to be based on using plasma to prevent radiation and harmful particles from hitting space craft. Nobody is even thinking about stopping large objects or weapons at this point.
clockworkmonk wrote:Except for Warren G. Harding. Fuck that guy.
scarecrovv wrote:The thing about lightsabers is that I can't think of any situation where they are the right tool for the job.
Want to kill someone? Shoot them. Want to dodge bullets? If you're not also a jedi/sith, a lightsaber won't help you. Want to destroy a building/vehicle in a hurry? Use a bomb/grenade. Want to get through a locked door? Explosives to the rescue again.
Yes, a lightsaber does all of those things at once, and it fits in your pocket, but it doesn't do any of them as well as tools we already have, or even if it does do a bit better, it doesn't justify the cost. I honestly don't see why the jedi don't use handheld miniguns (Terminator 2 style) instead, since the force would allow them to not get bowled over backwards, and carry around a boatload of ammunition on their backs. They'd be far more effective on the battlefield.
clockworkmonk wrote:Except for Warren G. Harding. Fuck that guy.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest