1851: "Magnetohydrodynamics"

This forum is for the individual discussion thread that goes with each new comic.

Moderators: Moderators General, Prelates, Magistrates

Raidri
Posts: 15
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2016 10:39 am UTC

1851: "Magnetohydrodynamics"

Postby Raidri » Fri Jun 16, 2017 8:54 am UTC

Image

Title text: "Magnetohydrodyanmics combines the intuitive nature of Maxwell's equations with the easy solvability of the Navier-Stokes equations. It's so straightforward physicists add "relativistic" or "quantum" just to keep it from getting boring."

My physics study days are some years behind me, but I am fairly sure that is not how I thought at the time ...
But of course the computational models (and the computing power) should have gotten some upgrades in the meantime.

User avatar
markfiend
Posts: 472
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2007 9:59 am UTC
Location: UK (Leeds)

Re: 1851: Magnetohydrodynamics

Postby markfiend » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:11 am UTC

Note the typo "Magnetohydrodyanmics" in the title text
Attoc dna Sublab evol eht teews secoiv fo eht slrug
pronouns: he/him/his

User avatar
rhomboidal
Posts: 754
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2011 5:25 pm UTC
Contact:

Re: 1851: Magnetohydrodynamics

Postby rhomboidal » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:18 am UTC

My brain does the same whenever I heard the word "economics."

User avatar
cellocgw
Posts: 1747
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 7:40 pm UTC

Re: 1851: Magnetohydrodynamics

Postby cellocgw » Fri Jun 16, 2017 11:06 am UTC

rhomboidal wrote:My brain does the same whenever I heard the word "economics."


Economics is closer to fundamentalist religion than to (white) magic.

BTW, IAAP and heck, even gravity is topologically equivalent to magic. I mean, who ever heard of two things just pulling each other together? Fucking gravity: how does it work? :P
https://app.box.com/witthoftresume
Former OTTer
Vote cellocgw for President 2020. #ScienceintheWhiteHouse http://cellocgw.wordpress.com
"The Planck length is 3.81779e-33 picas." -- keithl
" Earth weighs almost exactly π milliJupiters" -- what-if #146, note 7

gd1
Posts: 56
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 5:42 am UTC

Re: 1851: Magnetohydrodynamics

Postby gd1 » Fri Jun 16, 2017 11:31 am UTC

rhomboidal wrote:My brain does the same whenever I heard the word "economics."


Let me try my hand some economics magic...

If demand (price) goes up when supply goes down, why are wages low in certain sectors and people are saying there's high demand for labor in those sectors?

User avatar
Flumble
Yes Man
Posts: 1938
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2012 9:35 pm UTC

Re: 1851: Magnetohydrodynamics

Postby Flumble » Fri Jun 16, 2017 11:36 am UTC

cellocgw wrote:
rhomboidal wrote:My brain does the same whenever I heard the word "economics."


Economics is closer to fundamentalist religion than to (white) magic.

BTW, IAAP and heck, even gravity is topologically equivalent to magic. I mean, who ever heard of two things just pulling each other together? Fucking gravity: how does it work? :P

The apple falls and hits Newton's head. End of story.
Elementary, my dear Watt.

Now deep-fried butter, that is magic. It defies all laws of gastronomics, ethics and whatnot.

User avatar
pkcommando
Posts: 461
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 3:22 pm UTC
Location: Allston, MA

Re: 1851: Magnetohydrodynamics

Postby pkcommando » Fri Jun 16, 2017 12:04 pm UTC

cellocgw wrote:Fucking gravity: how does it work? :P

Quite well, really.
"The Universe is for raptors now!" say Raptors, as they take over all of Universe.

gcgcgcgc
Posts: 27
Joined: Sun Nov 10, 2013 1:18 pm UTC

Re: 1851: Magnetohydrodynamics

Postby gcgcgcgc » Fri Jun 16, 2017 2:17 pm UTC

Magnetohydrodynamics: The Gathering.
Now there's a card game that never caught on.

E_H
Posts: 27
Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 9:16 pm UTC

Re: 1851: Magnetohydrodynamics

Postby E_H » Fri Jun 16, 2017 4:02 pm UTC

Look for my forthcoming paper: "Magnetohydrodynamic Topological Invariants of Quantum-Relativistic Neutron-Gluon Superplasmas in Supernova / Black Hole Transitions"

User avatar
cellocgw
Posts: 1747
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 7:40 pm UTC

Re: 1851: Magnetohydrodynamics

Postby cellocgw » Fri Jun 16, 2017 4:20 pm UTC

E_H wrote:Look for my forthcoming paper: "Magnetohydrodynamic Topological Invariants of Quantum-Relativistic Neutron-Gluon Superplasmas in Supernova / Black Hole Transitions"


You left out "... on an N-brane"
https://app.box.com/witthoftresume
Former OTTer
Vote cellocgw for President 2020. #ScienceintheWhiteHouse http://cellocgw.wordpress.com
"The Planck length is 3.81779e-33 picas." -- keithl
" Earth weighs almost exactly π milliJupiters" -- what-if #146, note 7

dtobias
Posts: 18
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2011 1:09 pm UTC

Re: 1851: Magnetohydrodynamics

Postby dtobias » Fri Jun 16, 2017 4:44 pm UTC

Any mention of Maxwell's Equations gets a silly Beatles song about a silver hammer embedded in my head (the song, not the hammer)...

User avatar
Pfhorrest
Posts: 3778
Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 6:11 am UTC
Contact:

Re: 1851: Magnetohydrodynamics

Postby Pfhorrest » Fri Jun 16, 2017 4:55 pm UTC

cellocgw wrote:Fucking gravity: how does it work? :P


Funny enough, as I'm sure you know, the answer is the same as for magnets: relativity. (General instead of special in this case, but still).

What really gets me is "fucking electrostatic interaction, how does that work?" Mumble mumble sea of virtual photons somethingsomething?

gd1 wrote:If demand (price) goes up when supply goes down, why are wages low in certain sectors and people are saying there's high demand for labor in those sectors?

Simple: there's high demand for low-price labor, and too low (from the buyer's point of view) a supply of it, so they're calling for more people to come do those jobs for low prices so that the supply of cheap labor goes up and its prices goes (or stays) down.

The sleight-of-hand in your magic trick is "people are saying". If wages were low and demand was high, yeah that would be something weird going on. But people are saying demand is high so that supply will increase and wages will stay low (or get lower).
Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of All Trades
"I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
The Codex Quaerendae (my philosophy) - The Chronicles of Quelouva (my fiction)

Zylon
Posts: 140
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 5:37 pm UTC

Re: 1851: Magnetohydrodynamics

Postby Zylon » Fri Jun 16, 2017 5:32 pm UTC

This just raises the question why he's hearing the word "magnetohydrodynamics" so often that he needs a substitution rule for it.

fnostro
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2017 7:29 pm UTC

Re: 1851: Magnetohydrodynamics

Postby fnostro » Fri Jun 16, 2017 7:32 pm UTC

"Hunt for Red October"...noone? really?

qvxb
Posts: 73
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2016 10:20 pm UTC

Re: 1851: Magnetohydrodynamics

Postby qvxb » Fri Jun 16, 2017 8:10 pm UTC

Economics 101 Principles

"...the masters make the rules for the wise men and the fools ... ." - R. Zimmerman

"Money changes everything." - C. Lauper

"And there are no truths outside the gates of Eden." - B. Dylan

Tomasin
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2017 8:59 pm UTC

Re: 1851: Magnetohydrodynamics

Postby Tomasin » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:04 pm UTC

I think its just a contraction:

Magnetohydrodynamics

So it's Mag'ic

RCT Bob
Posts: 74
Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2015 2:05 pm UTC
Location: Netherlands

Re: 1851: Magnetohydrodynamics

Postby RCT Bob » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:08 pm UTC

Navier-Stokes equations are so weird in that they are basically just Newton's Laws of motion (time derivative of momentum equals force) applied to a gas, which is among the most elementary of all mechanics, yet combined with conservation of mass and energy they're coupled non-linear partial differential equations with chaotic solutions. Adding Maxwell's equations primarily adds some extra terms, like the electromagnetic force term and some energy terms.

Aerodynamics is one of those weird places where we add more equations and more unknowns to actually solve our problems faster with numerical systems, primarily in the Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes equations. I think it has a certain kind of irony to it that one of the most difficult things to solve in all of engineering physics is just basically Newton's Second Law.

User avatar
Reka
Posts: 142
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2012 10:21 pm UTC

Re: 1851: Magnetohydrodynamics

Postby Reka » Fri Jun 16, 2017 10:44 pm UTC

This is one of those comics where I'm kind of afraid to go look at explainxkcd's description.

rmsgrey
Posts: 3052
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2011 6:35 pm UTC

Re: 1851: Magnetohydrodynamics

Postby rmsgrey » Fri Jun 16, 2017 10:49 pm UTC

rhomboidal wrote:My brain does the same whenever I heard the word "economics."


Nah, for "economics" I always hear "voodoo"...

User avatar
Whizbang
The Best Reporter
Posts: 2238
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2012 7:50 pm UTC
Location: New Hampshire, USA

Re: 1851: Magnetohydrodynamics

Postby Whizbang » Fri Jun 16, 2017 10:57 pm UTC

Who do?

User avatar
colonel_hack
Posts: 28
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2010 5:50 am UTC

Re: 1851: Magnetohydrodynamics

Postby colonel_hack » Sat Jun 17, 2017 7:10 am UTC

Whizbang wrote:Who do?

You do.

xtifr
Posts: 289
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 6:38 pm UTC

Re: 1851: Magnetohydrodynamics

Postby xtifr » Sat Jun 17, 2017 7:16 am UTC

rmsgrey wrote:Nah, for "economics" I always hear "voodoo"...


A bit offensive to the people of Haiti, innit?
"[T]he author has followed the usual practice of contemporary books on graph theory, namely to use words that are similar but not identical to the terms used in other books on graph theory."
-- Donald Knuth, The Art of Computer Programming, Vol I, 3rd ed.

User avatar
zjxs
Posts: 46
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 6:04 am UTC
Location: Te Ao

Re: 1851: Magnetohydrodynamics

Postby zjxs » Sat Jun 17, 2017 9:24 am UTC

Any sufficiently advanced sun is indistinguishable from magic.

User avatar
orthogon
Posts: 2641
Joined: Thu May 17, 2012 7:52 am UTC
Location: The Airy 1830 ellipsoid

Re: 1851: Magnetohydrodynamics

Postby orthogon » Sat Jun 17, 2017 9:46 am UTC

cellocgw wrote:
E_H wrote:Look for my forthcoming paper: "Magnetohydrodynamic Topological Invariants of Quantum-Relativistic Neutron-Gluon Superplasmas in Supernova / Black Hole Transitions"


You left out "... on an N-brane"


Insane in the N-brane.
xtifr wrote:... and orthogon merely sounds undecided.

gd1
Posts: 56
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 5:42 am UTC

Re: 1851: Magnetohydrodynamics

Postby gd1 » Sun Jun 18, 2017 2:27 am UTC

orthogon wrote:Insane in the N-brane.


What is the name of the next rockstar band comprised entirely of engineers and physicists?

Pfhorrest wrote:The sleight-of-hand in your magic trick is "people are saying". If wages were low and demand was high, yeah that would be something weird going on. But people are saying demand is high so that supply will increase and wages will stay low (or get lower).


Reminds me a little of diamond cartels for some reason.

leafar
Posts: 9
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2014 3:57 pm UTC

Re: 1851: Magnetohydrodynamics

Postby leafar » Mon Jun 19, 2017 10:27 am UTC

qvxb wrote:Economics 101 Principles

"...the masters make the rules for the wise men and the fools ... ." - R. Zimmerman

"Money changes everything." - C. Lauper

"And there are no truths outside the gates of Eden." - B. Dylan


Now I am really curious why the first quote is attributed to Zimmerman and the second one to Bobby D. Is this a way to increase the authority count on this post?

User avatar
drachefly
Posts: 187
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 3:25 pm UTC

Re: 1851: Magnetohydrodynamics

Postby drachefly » Mon Jun 19, 2017 1:38 pm UTC

Pfhorrest wrote:What really gets me is "fucking electrostatic interaction, how does that work?" Mumble mumble sea of virtual photons somethingsomething?


Photons are a thing in the interaction picture. The interaction picture is the worst way of understanding statics.

The problem is, no one really works with the Schrodinger picture in QED because it doesn't mesh well with relativity (doesn't contradict it, but doesn't make things as simple as in the interaction or Heisenberg pictures).

DanD
Posts: 259
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2010 12:42 am UTC

Re: 1851: Magnetohydrodynamics

Postby DanD » Mon Jun 19, 2017 3:10 pm UTC

gd1 wrote:
rhomboidal wrote:My brain does the same whenever I heard the word "economics."


Let me try my hand some economics magic...

If demand (price) goes up when supply goes down, why are wages low in certain sectors and people are saying there's high demand for labor in those sectors?


Because there are multiple interacting supply and demand curves, and the demand for, say, tomatoes, drops off sharply if the cost rises noticeably. Therefore, there is a limit to how much can be paid for people to pick tomatoes where the farmer still makes a profit. Eventually, if the supply of workers remains consistently low, the number of acres planted in tomatoes will fall to meet the demand at the new, higher price, but in areas that iterate annually, or semiannually at best, that fall off is relatively slow. Alternatively, since the demand for cheap labor is high, someone will develop a method that reduces the demand by automating part of the process, but that is a complex issue.

User avatar
DennyMo
Posts: 46
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 10:50 am UTC

Re: 1851: Magnetohydrodynamics

Postby DennyMo » Tue Jun 20, 2017 5:36 pm UTC

fnostro wrote:"Hunt for Red October"...noone? really?

+1 for the Caterpillar!

Anonymous37
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 3:10 am UTC

Re: 1851: "Magnetohydrodynamics"

Postby Anonymous37 » Sun Aug 06, 2017 11:51 am UTC

Ah, magnetohydrodynamics. The topic of those chapters of Jackson's Classical Electrodynamics that I never got around to tackling, and now I'm too afraid to try.

morriswalters
Posts: 6885
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 12:21 am UTC

Re: 1851: Magnetohydrodynamics

Postby morriswalters » Sun Aug 06, 2017 12:04 pm UTC

markfiend wrote:Note the typo "Magnetohydrodyanmics" in the title text
Randall evidently reads the board. He's trolling his readers with this. +1


Return to “Individual XKCD Comic Threads”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: chridd, Google [Bot] and 42 guests