2034: "Equations"

This forum is for the individual discussion thread that goes with each new comic.

Moderators: Moderators General, Prelates, Magistrates

User avatar
SpitValve
Not a mod.
Posts: 5128
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 9:51 am UTC
Location: Lower pork village

2034: "Equations"

Postby SpitValve » Fri Aug 17, 2018 8:29 am UTC

Image
Title: All electromagnetic equations: The same as all fluid dynamics equations, but with the 8 and 23 replaced with the permittivity and permeability of free space, respectively.

I feel like the fluid dynamics equations needs an outer product of the gradient operator or something.
Last edited by gmalivuk on Fri Aug 17, 2018 10:47 pm UTC, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: added the mouseover text

User avatar
rhomboidal
Posts: 788
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2011 5:25 pm UTC
Contact:

Re: 2034: "Equations"

Postby rhomboidal » Fri Aug 17, 2018 8:42 am UTC

I'm not sure all the equations would fit on a T-shirt, but they would definitely fit as a full-body tattoo.

lorb
Posts: 405
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 10:34 am UTC
Location: Austria

Re: 2034: "Equations"

Postby lorb » Fri Aug 17, 2018 10:10 am UTC

Is the `truly deep physics equations` just because of the simple formulas that involve the planck constant or is there something else?
Please be gracious in judging my english. (I am not a native speaker/writer.)
http://decodedarfur.org/

beojan
Posts: 166
Joined: Mon May 23, 2011 12:11 pm UTC
Location: Oxford / London, United Kingdom, Europe

Re: 2034: "Equations"

Postby beojan » Fri Aug 17, 2018 10:46 am UTC

H_hat is a Hamiltonian (perhaps even a general differential operator), not Planck's constant.

User avatar
Soupspoon
You have done something you shouldn't. Or are about to.
Posts: 3483
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2016 7:00 pm UTC
Location: 53-1

Re: 2034: "Equations"

Postby Soupspoon » Fri Aug 17, 2018 12:20 pm UTC

(Missed out title text: All electromagnetic equations: The same as all fluid dynamics equations, but with the 8 and 23 replaced with the permittivity and permeability of free space, respectively.)

IRT last one as: <something> without You is (nothingness/empty/pointless?)

I'm fairly sure it is that, but it slightly out-geeks me.

richP
Posts: 180
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 3:28 pm UTC

Re: 2034: "Equations"

Postby richP » Fri Aug 17, 2018 1:40 pm UTC

I think I'm going to wait for the explainXKCD article to come up, then I'm going to re-enroll in college to see if Fluids, Thermodynamics, and Fields classes get any easier.

SuperCow
Posts: 12
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 3:53 pm UTC
Location: Indiana

Re: 2034: "Equations"

Postby SuperCow » Fri Aug 17, 2018 2:11 pm UTC

I didn't realize we knew enough about quantum gravity to actually have equations for it.
...or is that just ((representative of) | (a parody of)) a string theory equation?

NotAllThere
Posts: 137
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 12:54 pm UTC

Re: 2034: "Equations"

Postby NotAllThere » Fri Aug 17, 2018 2:19 pm UTC

richP wrote:I think I'm going to wait for the explainXKCD article to come up


I'm still not much the wiser!
yangosplat wrote:So many amazing quotes, so little room in 300 characters!

User avatar
Quizatzhaderac
Posts: 1554
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2008 5:28 pm UTC
Location: Space Florida

Re: 2034: "Equations"

Postby Quizatzhaderac » Fri Aug 17, 2018 3:52 pm UTC

SuperCow wrote:I didn't realize we knew enough about quantum gravity to actually have equations for it.
...or is that just ((representative of) | (a parody of)) a string theory equation?
We don't, at least not ones that belong to a generally accepted theory.

SU(n) and U(n) each indicate a vector space (and certain operations) where each vector has n numbers. Nesting them doesn't make sense because 1) n needs to be an integer 2) n would typically be a specific fixed, small number, as these are less functions than a way to describe what kind of mathematical object we're using.

Those numbers look like someone took the number space for Grand Unified Theory (electromagnetism + weak force + strong force) and made them more complicated, as if they were adding gravity to the mix.
The thing about recursion problems is that they tend to contain other recursion problems.

User avatar
Pfhorrest
Posts: 4785
Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 6:11 am UTC
Contact:

Re: 2034: "Equations"

Postby Pfhorrest » Fri Aug 17, 2018 4:31 pm UTC

Also, that "quantum gravity" expression... actually, several of the things on this... are not even equations. It's not an equation without an equals sign.
Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of All Trades
"I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
The Codex Quaerendae (my philosophy) - The Chronicles of Quelouva (my fiction)

User avatar
el matematico
Posts: 113
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 12:20 pm UTC

Re: 2034: "Equations"

Postby el matematico » Fri Aug 17, 2018 4:51 pm UTC

I'm pretty sure the joke about quantim gravity is that there are no equations at all, just some symmetry groups.
This is my blog (in Spanish). It's not perfect, but it's mine. http://falaci.blogspot.com/

User avatar
da Doctah
Posts: 891
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 6:27 am UTC

Re: 2034: "Equations"

Postby da Doctah » Fri Aug 17, 2018 5:29 pm UTC

beojan wrote:H_hat is a Hamiltonian (perhaps even a general differential operator), not Planck's constant.

Because as any fule kno, Alexander Hamilton was most famous for wearing hats.

qvxb
Posts: 139
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2016 10:20 pm UTC

Re: 2034: "Equations"

Postby qvxb » Fri Aug 17, 2018 8:00 pm UTC

The chemistry equations author was pre-med until he/she wrote the equation.

Elgarak
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2016 4:39 pm UTC

Re: 2034: "Equations"

Postby Elgarak » Fri Aug 17, 2018 9:36 pm UTC

I'm highly suspicious that the "Deep Physics Equation" MUST be normalized to read "= 42", or it won't work.

User avatar
rhhardin
Posts: 63
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 2:11 pm UTC

Re: 2034: "Equations"

Postby rhhardin » Fri Aug 17, 2018 10:43 pm UTC

Number theory itself produces gravity waves, so there's a nesting that ought to be taken into account.

User avatar
Soupspoon
You have done something you shouldn't. Or are about to.
Posts: 3483
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2016 7:00 pm UTC
Location: 53-1

Re: 2034: "Equations"

Postby Soupspoon » Sat Aug 18, 2018 12:34 am UTC

Number theory is your momma?

gcgcgcgc
Posts: 36
Joined: Sun Nov 10, 2013 1:18 pm UTC

Re: 2034: "Equations"

Postby gcgcgcgc » Sat Aug 18, 2018 3:27 am UTC

Given the complexity of many formulae in modern physics, mathematics, etc. and the wide availability of Unicode I'm surprised we haven't gone beyond the standard greek/latin alphabet yet, instead choosing to use diacritics, typeface styles such as blackletter etc.
There are plenty of characters available in other alphabets, Cyrillic, Japanese, Chinese, Egyptian Hieroglyphs and so on. Even emojis might start becoming a standard (why not use a sun for temperature or a car for velocity? just an idea)

rmsgrey
Posts: 3406
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2011 6:35 pm UTC

Re: 2034: "Equations"

Postby rmsgrey » Sat Aug 18, 2018 4:09 am UTC

gcgcgcgc wrote:Given the complexity of many formulae in modern physics, mathematics, etc. and the wide availability of Unicode I'm surprised we haven't gone beyond the standard greek/latin alphabet yet, instead choosing to use diacritics, typeface styles such as blackletter etc.
There are plenty of characters available in other alphabets, Cyrillic, Japanese, Chinese, Egyptian Hieroglyphs and so on. Even emojis might start becoming a standard (why not use a sun for temperature or a car for velocity? just an idea)


Mathematics has ventured into the Arabic alphabet in a few places - such as Alephs for cardinal infinities.

User avatar
Pfhorrest
Posts: 4785
Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 6:11 am UTC
Contact:

Re: 2034: "Equations"

Postby Pfhorrest » Sat Aug 18, 2018 6:29 am UTC

Aleph is Hebrew, not Arabic.

So is bet.

All the standard numerals are Arabic, though.

(Unless you ask an actual Arab, then they're Indian).
Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of All Trades
"I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
The Codex Quaerendae (my philosophy) - The Chronicles of Quelouva (my fiction)

User avatar
somitomi
Posts: 619
Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2015 11:21 pm UTC
Location: can be found in Hungary
Contact:

Re: 2034: "Equations"

Postby somitomi » Sat Aug 18, 2018 8:14 am UTC

gcgcgcgc wrote:Given the complexity of many formulae in modern physics, mathematics, etc. and the wide availability of Unicode I'm surprised we haven't gone beyond the standard greek/latin alphabet yet, instead choosing to use diacritics, typeface styles such as blackletter etc.
There are plenty of characters available in other alphabets, Cyrillic, Japanese, Chinese, Egyptian Hieroglyphs and so on. Even emojis might start becoming a standard (why not use a sun for temperature or a car for velocity? just an idea)

Well, I had friends with absolutely no aptitude for drawing and professor handwriting isn't known to produce easily legible greek letters. Based on those two experiences, I would not venture to read any handwritten calculations with tiny cars and chinese logograms in them, but have fun trying.
—◯-◯

rmsgrey
Posts: 3406
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2011 6:35 pm UTC

Re: 2034: "Equations"

Postby rmsgrey » Sat Aug 18, 2018 4:00 pm UTC

Pfhorrest wrote:Aleph is Hebrew, not Arabic.

So is bet.

All the standard numerals are Arabic, though.

(Unless you ask an actual Arab, then they're Indian).


Good point. The first two letters of the Arabic alphabet are also called "aleph" and "beth" (both with a variety of transliterations), but look very different.

aljohnso
Posts: 13
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 8:17 pm UTC

Re: 2034: "Equations"

Postby aljohnso » Sat Aug 18, 2018 5:46 pm UTC

I am not sure that we are supposed to take this one seriously, at least not literally.

e to the (pi - infinity)? when pi is an index between something finite and infinity? this is probably a joke about using symbols with previous meaning inappropriately

HEAT -> H2EAT is probably a joke.... the equations balances, sort of... but H2EAT? Would give you gas...

Kinematics only for scalar potentials? Wasa matter, you don't like magnetism? And if we were really talking universal, we would have to do everything in at least 4 space...

And a lot of glyphs that I have never seen before...

Secrets of the Universe indeed... 42 belongs there somewhere.

And, so damn it... where are the pyramids in all of this?

ajohnso

(not that I would suggest that RM would not have a secret meaning to his list... but perhaps the secret meaning is the lack of meaning?)

User avatar
CorruptUser
Posts: 9992
Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2009 10:12 pm UTC

Re: 2034: "Equations"

Postby CorruptUser » Sun Aug 19, 2018 5:08 am UTC

I suggest we translate the Hebrew letters into English before using them, based on their original Phoenician meanings. "Aleph" is "ox", "Bet" is "house", "Gimel" is "camel" (at least THAT one didn't change too much)...

User avatar
SpitValve
Not a mod.
Posts: 5128
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 9:51 am UTC
Location: Lower pork village

Re: 2034: "Equations"

Postby SpitValve » Wed Aug 22, 2018 8:15 am UTC

I think we should start using digammas for functions.

User avatar
Sableagle
Ormurinn's Alt
Posts: 1806
Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2015 4:26 pm UTC
Location: The wrong side of the mirror
Contact:

Re: 2034: "Equations"

Postby Sableagle » Wed Aug 22, 2018 10:19 am UTC

rmsgrey wrote:
Pfhorrest wrote:Aleph is Hebrew, not Arabic.

So is bet.

All the standard numerals are Arabic, though.

(Unless you ask an actual Arab, then they're Indian).


Good point. The first two letters of the Arabic alphabet are also called "aleph" and "beth" (both with a variety of transliterations), but look very different.

Using the Arabic aleph would confuse people, because it's just I sloping the other way.

I still hope Doctor Who runs out of letters at the ends of Greek and Roman alphabets and starts using the Arabic one, though, because watching the cast try to maintain straight faces while talking about how long the ha-shielded windows will protect them from the 100% wow-tonic environment while the engineers are repairing the yay-drive could make the show worth watching.
Oh, Willie McBride, it was all done in vain.

Lothario O'Leary
Posts: 33
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2016 3:39 pm UTC

Re: 2034: "Equations"

Postby Lothario O'Leary » Wed Aug 22, 2018 10:43 am UTC

SpitValve wrote:I think we should start using digammas for functions.
Well, in a way, we already do - though that particular digamma is actually coincidental!

There is also one known use of Cyrillic: Ш is the Tate-Shafarevich group (and a few other things, apparently, but this particular use is definitely the Cyrillic letter).

I'm surprised that runes and Japanese kana don't see more use, though...

(Oh, and the one alphabet that I think would be awesome to see in math? Glagolitic.)

User avatar
Soupspoon
You have done something you shouldn't. Or are about to.
Posts: 3483
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2016 7:00 pm UTC
Location: 53-1

Re: 2034: "Equations"

Postby Soupspoon » Wed Aug 22, 2018 2:20 pm UTC

:D + ( :o ^ ( :lol: - :o) ) = :mrgreen: / ( :roll: - :shock: ) + kthanxbye

User avatar
Flumble
Yes Man
Posts: 2017
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2012 9:35 pm UTC

Re: 2034: "Equations"

Postby Flumble » Wed Aug 22, 2018 6:21 pm UTC

I think it's missing the most fundamental equation "f(x) = g(x)".

Lothario O'Leary wrote:(Oh, and the one alphabet that I think would be awesome to see in math? Glagolitic.)

ⰒⰎⰉⰈ ⰐⰑ!

aljohnso
Posts: 13
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 8:17 pm UTC

Re: 2034: "Equations"

Postby aljohnso » Fri Aug 24, 2018 5:36 am UTC

most important equation? My vote is for:

U+2205 U+2260 U+2205

If you want that in a prose form... "everything can be divided into two categories - those things that can be divided into two categories, and those that can't".

watch for inappropriate binaries.

aljohnso

User avatar
GlassHouses
Posts: 122
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2016 12:41 pm UTC

Re: 2034: "Equations"

Postby GlassHouses » Fri Aug 24, 2018 9:33 pm UTC

aljohnso wrote:most important equation? My vote is for:

U+2205 U+2260 U+2205

If you want that in a prose form... "everything can be divided into two categories - those things that can be divided into two categories, and those that can't".

watch for inappropriate binaries.

aljohnso

So,

∅ ≠ ∅

My prose interpretation of that is "an empty set is not equal to an empty set," which doesn't sound like an important equation, but rather, it sounds wrong.

User avatar
Quizatzhaderac
Posts: 1554
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2008 5:28 pm UTC
Location: Space Florida

Re: 2034: "Equations"

Postby Quizatzhaderac » Mon Aug 27, 2018 9:38 pm UTC

It depends on who you are defining things and which axioms you pick. Within ZFC that's wrong, but it's probably true in some formulations of set theory which don't assume an excluded middle (P doesn't necessarily equal ~~P).
The thing about recursion problems is that they tend to contain other recursion problems.


Return to “Individual XKCD Comic Threads”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: wumpus and 40 guests