lmjb1964 wrote:NewPage 335/551. Getting further and further behind. Will I ever be caught up again?pelrigg wrote:Spoiler:BytEfLUSh wrote:
Ohh, I just noticed other mentions of delta. I was referring to my post:
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=101043&p=3347139&hilit=1169#p3347139BytEfLUSh wrote:Did anyone link this comic so far?
Though, I don't think there's much sand up there.
And seeing several "rivers" so close to each other in recent newpix.
I know directly mentioned "delta" here:
and I swear I heard crickets as a response,
Two pages, later, "Hey, I think they're on a delta"
Where's my blankie when I need it..........
me and my speling
Just came across this quote from perlrigg. I think the one constant that we can count on in this thread is that every idea and theory will be posited at least twice, with the second (third, fourth, fifth, etc.) positer being absolutely sure they have just come up with the most brilliant original idea. Done it myself. It's not necessarily a bad thing. WIth this many posts, it's pretty unlikely anyone's going to remember everything that's been said. It's just proof that
1) we all spend way too much time (by which I mean just enough time) thinking about the OTC, and
2) great minds think alike....and so do ours.1
1 This is a joke, of course. I'm always amazing at the collective knowledge and cleverness on the OTT.2
2 Speaking of jokes, a while ago someone posted, "When will the drinking stop?" to which I replied, "I say that same thing every night." It's always bothered me that I didn't add a "just kidding." I hate to think that my fellow Waiters are all thinking, "Gee, that's really sad." I mean, it's true, but I don't want you guys thinking that.3
3 It's not really true.4
4 I'm sure that someone in the future has commented on the most recent OTT about footnotes being evidence that Randall follows the OTT at least to some degree. If so, I agree. A little too coincidental, methinks.
That also came from me having a bad "outside" day, so I was a little snippy. Now I really do need to "Outside".