1826: "Birdwatching"

This forum is for the individual discussion thread that goes with each new comic.

Moderators: Moderators General, Prelates, Magistrates

joshumax
Posts: 9
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2012 2:16 am UTC

1826: "Birdwatching"

Postby joshumax » Wed Apr 19, 2017 4:11 am UTC

Image

Title Text: No, tell the park rangers to calm down, it's fine--I put a screen on the front. I just want to get the birds a little closer.

Aaaaaand my xkcd comic thumbnail generator just segfaulted...

User avatar
CardcaptorRLH85
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 6:06 am UTC

Re: 1826: "Birdwatching"

Postby CardcaptorRLH85 » Wed Apr 19, 2017 4:18 am UTC

Something tells me that Randall didn't actually intend to put the giant version of the comic on the page.

User avatar
Bloopy
Posts: 164
Joined: Wed May 04, 2011 9:16 am UTC
Location: New Zealand

Re: 1826: "Birdwatching"

Postby Bloopy » Wed Apr 19, 2017 4:22 am UTC

Alright, who pointed their vacuum cleaner at their monitor?

User avatar
rhomboidal
Posts: 754
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2011 5:25 pm UTC
Contact:

Re: 1826: "Birdwatching"

Postby rhomboidal » Wed Apr 19, 2017 4:34 am UTC

Gah, comic reading is hard. It's way too big and close-up!

User avatar
Jorpho
Posts: 6100
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 5:31 am UTC
Location: Canada

Re: 1826: "Birdwatching"

Postby Jorpho » Wed Apr 19, 2017 4:41 am UTC

Is there some ingenious Javascript thing that causes the image to unload as soon as you try to zoom out of the page? Because that's what happens in Firefox. IE11 is immune.

CharonPDX
Posts: 53
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2011 4:55 am UTC

Re: 1826: "Birdwatching"

Postby CharonPDX » Wed Apr 19, 2017 4:56 am UTC

When I saw the first couple words (on my 4K display at "100% DPI", then browser zoomed out to 50%) I figured it was going to be related to the premise of the comic. Something about "viewing through binoculars" or something. Nope, not in the main comic. Mouseover text? Nope. WTF?

User avatar
madock345
Posts: 51
Joined: Mon Apr 12, 2010 12:26 am UTC
Location: My used book store near Seattle WA

Re: 1826: "Birdwatching"

Postby madock345 » Wed Apr 19, 2017 5:00 am UTC

Seems like Randall might have strained his eyes looking for birds, if he needs the comic this big to see it XD
"As the size of an Explosion increses the number of social situations it is incapable of resolving approches zero"
-Vaarsuvius, The Order of the Stick
Spoiler:
ethereal_fire wrote:madock345, I like your sig : )

Qwerty.55 wrote:I like your new recursive sig even better than before.

User avatar
cyanyoshi
Posts: 357
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 3:30 am UTC

Re: 1826: "Birdwatching"

Postby cyanyoshi » Wed Apr 19, 2017 7:10 am UTC

Posting the actual size for posterity. Yowza.

Spoiler:
birdwatching_huge.png
Spoiler:
birdwatching_actual_size.png

MSTK
Posts: 123
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 5:43 am UTC

Re: 1826: "Birdwatching"

Postby MSTK » Wed Apr 19, 2017 7:17 am UTC

Pretty sure this is the start of a huge XKCD ARG. Anyone find any clues?

OP Tipping
Posts: 170
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 6:23 am UTC

Re: 1826: "Birdwatching"

Postby OP Tipping » Wed Apr 19, 2017 8:45 am UTC

As the actress said to the bishop, is the size part of the joke?

CharonPDX
Posts: 53
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2011 4:55 am UTC

Re: 1826: "Birdwatching"

Postby CharonPDX » Wed Apr 19, 2017 9:17 am UTC

Here you go, a screenshot of it at 50% for-pixel size, stretched across a 4K monitor on to the neighboring 1080p monitor.
Spoiler:
5kat50.PNG
big ass-screenshot


And to fit entirely on a 4k display I had to display it at 36% size:
Spoiler:
4kat36.PNG
big-ass screenshot

User avatar
Quercus
Posts: 1548
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2013 12:22 pm UTC
Location: London, UK
Contact:

Re: 1826: "Birdwatching"

Postby Quercus » Wed Apr 19, 2017 11:14 am UTC

Turns out that the minimum zoom level in Chrome is 25%... good to know

User avatar
cellocgw
Posts: 1747
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 7:40 pm UTC

Re: 1826: "Birdwatching"

Postby cellocgw » Wed Apr 19, 2017 11:21 am UTC

"Math Birdwatching is hard!" <-- Birder Barbie.

As a lifelong birder, I have to agree. That's why there's a Facebook group "Shitty Bird Photos."
https://app.box.com/witthoftresume
Former OTTer
Vote cellocgw for President 2020. #ScienceintheWhiteHouse http://cellocgw.wordpress.com
"The Planck length is 3.81779e-33 picas." -- keithl
" Earth weighs almost exactly π milliJupiters" -- what-if #146, note 7

DanAxtell
Posts: 27
Joined: Mon May 07, 2012 9:59 am UTC
Location: USA (Vermont)

Re: 1826: "Birdwatching"

Postby DanAxtell » Wed Apr 19, 2017 11:58 am UTC

The original size of Comic 1826 was 10,679 × 3,577 pixels.
That’s 38198783 pixels or 10010001101101110111110111 in binary.
In base twenty it’s biegif.
Here’s bie.gif from Wikimedia:
Image
Googling 38198783 brings up a picture of Uma Thurman and Quentin Tarantino that includes the number in the file name.
It’s the number of sheep in the United States in 1896 according to one source.
As a Unix timestamp, it’s the birthday of German Supermodel Nadja Auermann.
I’m beginning to think that maybe the image size was just a mistake.
Last edited by DanAxtell on Wed Apr 19, 2017 7:13 pm UTC, edited 1 time in total.

hamjudo
Posts: 86
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2011 6:56 pm UTC

Re: 1826: "Birdwatching"

Postby hamjudo » Wed Apr 19, 2017 12:18 pm UTC

Has anyone found the birds in the image yet?

Draco18s
Posts: 84
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2008 7:50 am UTC

Re: 1826: "Birdwatching"

Postby Draco18s » Wed Apr 19, 2017 12:49 pm UTC

No, but I found a single, solitary, black pixel in the last frame.

It's about stick-figure waist-high, just directly below the sucking air of the vacuum.

User avatar
Keyman
Posts: 235
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2014 1:56 pm UTC

Re: 1826: "Birdwatching"

Postby Keyman » Wed Apr 19, 2017 12:54 pm UTC

Also Google:
Lux Intelligence tolmukotid - 8 tk (38198783) - Osta.ee
https://osta-ee.postimees.ee › ... › Vacuum cleaners
Translate this page
Jul 11, 2013 - Lux Intelligence tolmukotid - 8 tk in category: Home, Other household items (Item ID 38198783)

https://osta-ee.postimees.ee/en/lux-intelligence-tolmukotid-8-tk-38198783.html
Hmmm...?
A childhood spent walking while reading books has prepared me unexpectedly well for today's world.

User avatar
Soupspoon
You have done something you shouldn't. Or are about to.
Posts: 2360
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2016 7:00 pm UTC
Location: 53-1

Re: 1826: "Birdwatching"

Postby Soupspoon » Wed Apr 19, 2017 12:57 pm UTC

Draco18s wrote:No, but I found a single, solitary, black pixel in the last frame.
Does it possibly, given the resolution, have aircraft wings on its avian body? ;)

(Gotta admit, I thought from the title that I'd be getting the reverse of Identification Chart. Either Randall's not that unimaginative, or I am... ;))

slackcc
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2017 1:11 pm UTC

Re: 1826: "Birdwatching"

Postby slackcc » Wed Apr 19, 2017 1:16 pm UTC

Seems unlikely that this was accidental, if you look in the page source the path to the uploaded image is:

//imgs.xkcd.com/comics/birdwatching_huge.png

it would seem that it was intended to be "huge" for some reason.

User avatar
DennyMo
Posts: 46
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 10:50 am UTC

Re: 1826: "Birdwatching"

Postby DennyMo » Wed Apr 19, 2017 1:41 pm UTC

I thought the third frame showed bird poop landing on his head, which would at least help you know where the birds *were* just a few seconds ago...

User avatar
Soupspoon
You have done something you shouldn't. Or are about to.
Posts: 2360
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2016 7:00 pm UTC
Location: 53-1

Re: 1826: "Birdwatching"

Postby Soupspoon » Wed Apr 19, 2017 1:50 pm UTC

DennyMo wrote:I thought the third frame showed bird poop landing on his head, which would at least help you know where the birds *were* just a few seconds ago...

I think that's cartoony "grizzling", the visualisation of angry frustration.

User avatar
Copper Bezel
Posts: 2416
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 6:35 am UTC
Location: Web exclusive!

Re: 1826: "Birdwatching"

Postby Copper Bezel » Wed Apr 19, 2017 2:01 pm UTC

slackcc wrote:Seems unlikely that this was accidental, if you look in the page source the path to the uploaded image is:

//imgs.xkcd.com/comics/birdwatching_huge.png

it would seem that it was intended to be "huge" for some reason.

Yeah, explainxkcd's theory seems right that it's meant to resemble looking at the comic through a pair of binoculars. Perhaps it's funny to someone who's recently been birdwatching and experienced the corresponding disorientation.
So much depends upon a red wheel barrow (>= XXII) but it is not going to be installed.

she / her / her

DanAxtell
Posts: 27
Joined: Mon May 07, 2012 9:59 am UTC
Location: USA (Vermont)

Re: 1826: "Birdwatching"

Postby DanAxtell » Wed Apr 19, 2017 2:11 pm UTC

Soupspoon wrote:
Draco18s wrote:No, but I found a single, solitary, black pixel in the last frame.
Does it possibly, given the resolution, have aircraft wings on its avian body? ;)

Here's a screenshot of the pixel at position 9725, 2655 magnified 1200% to bring out the detail.
Image
I was unable to find any hidden meaning to the numbers 9725 and 2655, but I note that the Hex Color Code for the pixel is 000000. As a Unix Timestamp, that's Jan. 1, 1970. Googling that date, I find that it's the very beginning of the Unix Epoch, so I think my numerological sleuthing is bearing fruit (or maybe it's nuts).

User avatar
Flumble
Yes Man
Posts: 1938
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2012 9:35 pm UTC

Re: 1826: "Birdwatching"

Postby Flumble » Wed Apr 19, 2017 3:26 pm UTC

That's a weird pixel. It has a black square inside of it and it's 6 5/6th by 6 1/12th.

Zowayix
Posts: 9
Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2012 7:20 pm UTC

Re: 1826: "Birdwatching"

Postby Zowayix » Wed Apr 19, 2017 4:06 pm UTC

I usually read xkcd in the morning on my phone, and it seems like most mobile browsers (tried Firefox and Safari) will just outright refuse to load in any way an image that's too large. You only get the two [|<][Prev][Random][Next][>|] button rows on top of each other. Maybe that's part of the reason why Randall resized it.

Unclevertitle
Posts: 31
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 4:20 am UTC

Re: 1826: "Birdwatching"

Postby Unclevertitle » Wed Apr 19, 2017 5:16 pm UTC

cyanyoshi wrote:Posting the actual size for posterity. Yowza.

Spoiler:
Image
Spoiler:
Image


Now properly labeled for Actual Size.

User avatar
Copper Bezel
Posts: 2416
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 6:35 am UTC
Location: Web exclusive!

Re: 1826: "Birdwatching"

Postby Copper Bezel » Wed Apr 19, 2017 6:11 pm UTC

...

Well done, sir or madam XD
So much depends upon a red wheel barrow (>= XXII) but it is not going to be installed.

she / her / her

User avatar
Jorpho
Posts: 6100
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 5:31 am UTC
Location: Canada

Re: 1826: "Birdwatching"

Postby Jorpho » Wed Apr 19, 2017 7:05 pm UTC

It's back to normal. We now have birdwatching.png instead of birdwatching_huge.png . How mysterious. (birdwatching_huge.png is still on the server, but is normal size.)

It only just occurred to me that there was no April Fool's gag this year.

User avatar
Heimhenge
Posts: 163
Joined: Thu May 01, 2014 11:35 pm UTC

Re: 1826: "Birdwatching"

Postby Heimhenge » Wed Apr 19, 2017 8:18 pm UTC

Jorpho wrote:It's back to normal. We now have birdwatching.png instead of birdwatching_huge.png . How mysterious. (birdwatching_huge.png is still on the server, but is normal size.)

It only just occurred to me that there was no April Fool's gag this year.


Well if this was it, that was a pretty lame joke. Way below XKCD norms. I think it was a play on magnified sizes that backfired.

And speaking of magnified ... at the angle Cueball is holding his camera, if the bird is "a mile up" then it's gotta be like 2-3 miles away. And that doesn't look like a telephoto lens. No way you could see a hawk at that distance. Randall usually gets that stuff right. Unless maybe that was part of the joke?

User avatar
cyanyoshi
Posts: 357
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 3:30 am UTC

Re: 1826: "Birdwatching"

Postby cyanyoshi » Wed Apr 19, 2017 8:36 pm UTC

Unclevertitle wrote:
cyanyoshi wrote:Posting the actual size for posterity. Yowza.

Spoiler:
Image
Spoiler:
Image


Now properly labeled for Actual Size.

Perfect! :lol:

User avatar
Copper Bezel
Posts: 2416
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 6:35 am UTC
Location: Web exclusive!

Re: 1826: "Birdwatching"

Postby Copper Bezel » Wed Apr 19, 2017 10:07 pm UTC

Heimhenge wrote:Well if this was it, that was a pretty lame joke. Way below XKCD norms. I think it was a play on magnified sizes that backfired.

And speaking of magnified ... at the angle Cueball is holding his camera, if the bird is "a mile up" then it's gotta be like 2-3 miles away. And that doesn't look like a telephoto lens. No way you could see a hawk at that distance. Randall usually gets that stuff right. Unless maybe that was part of the joke?

I like that what was probably a technical glitch has us ready to accept that nearly anything is a part of the joke in a hidden way. The strip is surprisingly normal and even pedestrian now that it's about a vacuum cleaner.

DanAxtell did it best, though!
So much depends upon a red wheel barrow (>= XXII) but it is not going to be installed.

she / her / her

User avatar
ggh
Posts: 1933
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 6:45 am UTC
Location: Wellington, New Zealand

Re: 1826: "Birdwatching"

Postby ggh » Wed Apr 19, 2017 11:10 pm UTC

Heimhenge wrote:And speaking of magnified ... at the angle Cueball is holding his camera, if the bird is "a mile up" then it's gotta be like 2-3 miles away. And that doesn't look like a telephoto lens. No way you could see a hawk at that distance. Randall usually gets that stuff right. Unless that was part of the joke?
It's this camera, no?


Whether the huge size was part of the joke or not, it's neat to get a glimpse of Randall's drawings close up. Those little slivers - like in Cueball's armpit in the last frame - do they imply some cut-repo-paste going on? And in the first frame, it looks like the small gap between the head and body was deliberately added.
Requested a magnet? I'm sorry I'm so super-slow, but you will get it
Agatha the Awesomeful

In a Comically Tragic Turn of Events Addams Didn't Die. Please help. (Wait, does that sound like I want you to kill addams?)

Fungo4
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2014 2:48 pm UTC

Re: 1826: "Birdwatching"

Postby Fungo4 » Wed Apr 19, 2017 11:30 pm UTC

Yeah, crazy size glitch aside, I don't really get the "joke" here. The vacuum cleaner is so absurd that it crosses the line between "joke" and "what". Like if he just pulled out a lasso I'd at least get it but the vacuum just... eh...

The second guy in the strip, who contributes nothing, only seems to make it more clear how nonsensical it is.

User avatar
Soupspoon
You have done something you shouldn't. Or are about to.
Posts: 2360
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2016 7:00 pm UTC
Location: 53-1

Re: 1826: "Birdwatching"

Postby Soupspoon » Wed Apr 19, 2017 11:35 pm UTC

BTW, "a mile up" might be the hypotenuse of the slope, not the riser, being described. Upwardsly pitching. A mile up thus being simply "a mile away" (still not near) without trigonometric conversion. Until you want its actual altitude and ground-distance, at least.

keldor
Posts: 49
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2012 9:18 am UTC

Re: 1826: "Birdwatching"

Postby keldor » Thu Apr 20, 2017 3:36 am UTC

Soupspoon wrote:BTW, "a mile up" might be the hypotenuse of the slope, not the riser, being described. Upwardsly pitching. A mile up thus being simply "a mile away" (still not near) without trigonometric conversion. Until you want its actual altitude and ground-distance, at least.


I don't think I've ever heard of "a mile up" being anything other than the altitude (from the ground, not sea level). This would let you say "a mile up" when referring to an airplane a mile away just about to touch down on the runway, maybe 30 feet from the ground. No matter how far away from the observer, I do not believe this qualifies as "a mile up".

User avatar
Copper Bezel
Posts: 2416
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 6:35 am UTC
Location: Web exclusive!

Re: 1826: "Birdwatching"

Postby Copper Bezel » Thu Apr 20, 2017 4:15 am UTC

Fungo4 wrote:The second guy in the strip, who contributes nothing,

He has a cute hat!
So much depends upon a red wheel barrow (>= XXII) but it is not going to be installed.

she / her / her

User avatar
ysth
Posts: 181
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 7:21 pm UTC

Re: 1826: "Birdwatching"

Postby ysth » Thu Apr 20, 2017 5:35 am UTC

Powerful shop vac. Pulled the middle right out of the — in the title text.
A math joke: r = | |csc(θ)|+|sec(θ)| |-| |csc(θ)|-|sec(θ)| |

User avatar
da Doctah
Posts: 795
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 6:27 am UTC

Re: 1826: "Birdwatching"

Postby da Doctah » Thu Apr 20, 2017 6:30 am UTC

Fungo4 wrote:The vacuum cleaner is so absurd that it crosses the line between "joke" and "what". Like if he just pulled out a lasso I'd at least get it but the vacuum just... eh...


How would you feel about a big honkin' U-shaped magnet?

Morgan Wick
Posts: 36
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 9:21 pm UTC

Re: 1826: "Birdwatching"

Postby Morgan Wick » Thu Apr 20, 2017 7:45 am UTC


User avatar
Soupspoon
You have done something you shouldn't. Or are about to.
Posts: 2360
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2016 7:00 pm UTC
Location: 53-1

Re: 1826: "Birdwatching"

Postby Soupspoon » Thu Apr 20, 2017 9:24 am UTC

keldor wrote:
Soupspoon wrote:BTW, "a mile up" might be the hypotenuse of the slope, not the riser, being described. Upwardsly pitching. A mile up thus being simply "a mile away" (still not near) without trigonometric conversion. Until you want its actual altitude and ground-distance, at least.


I don't think I've ever heard of "a mile up" being anything other than the altitude (from the ground, not sea level). This would let you say "a mile up" when referring to an airplane a mile away just about to touch down on the runway, maybe 30 feet from the ground. No matter how far away from the observer, I do not believe this qualifies as "a mile up".


It'd be an imprecise contraction of "It's a mile away, and up there", sure, and you probably need to have an angle measured in tens of degrees (more than a half radian?) to make the "up (there)" more significant than "away (there)", but getting someone to visually (aided or unaided by lens-based apparatus) focus in on a spec in the air, often getting your eyes/binoculars/zoom lens primed for "mile away" focussing is the big part of the battle when trying to discern even a noisy aircraft against a big blue sky.

The azimuth and (angular) altitude coming from your binaural sensing directly (or by your companion gesturing or frustratingly adding "three o'clock.... See the church steeple, then the two trees, and the small gap in the hill on the horizon..? Just right of that, and upwards by four hands or so... Got it yet? It's now drifted to the left a bit... Why can't you see it yet?!?"), the trickiest assessment to accurately convey is the one where a rough depth-of-field is needed, and how many of us even can sight (or, indeed, cite) a range to a mid-air target, within a factor of two either way.?

Naw, never mind. It's gone down behind that clump of trees now. But I'll tell you if it pops up again...


Return to “Individual XKCD Comic Threads”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: mscha and 34 guests