1904: Research Risks

This forum is for the individual discussion thread that goes with each new comic.

Moderators: Moderators General, Prelates, Magistrates

jazzman616
Posts: 12
Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 4:14 pm UTC

1904: Research Risks

Postby jazzman616 » Wed Oct 18, 2017 1:35 pm UTC

Image
Title text: The 1919 Great Boston Molasis Flood remained the deadliest confectionary containment accident until the Canadian Space Agency's 2031 orbital maple syrup delivery disaster.

I was very disappointed "Linguistics" wasn't replaced by "Etymology".

Edit: I know these are different things, but it would have stood opposite "Entomology" well and also served as a nice callback.
Who put the glad in gladiator?

speising
Posts: 2078
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 4:54 pm UTC
Location: wien

Re: 1904: Research Risks

Postby speising » Wed Oct 18, 2017 1:44 pm UTC

I'm a bit surprised by the positioning of "dentistry"?
Image

pebkac
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2016 8:50 pm UTC

Re: 1904: Research Risks

Postby pebkac » Wed Oct 18, 2017 2:02 pm UTC

@jazzman616

Yeah, me too. It was the first thing that sprang to mind after seeing the bug-one.

We need more Etymology-man!

User avatar
cellocgw
Posts: 1768
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 7:40 pm UTC

Re: 1904: Research Risks

Postby cellocgw » Wed Oct 18, 2017 2:05 pm UTC

Quoting our pal George,
"He who controls the present, controls the past. He who controls the past, controls the future."
Therefore I propose that History should be pushed way up the Y-axis. Whether an entity known as 'history" could escape in a sociological sense is probably open to interpretation.

Since this forum is chock-full of nerds, I'll suggest that javascript has broken free and is threatening the world. Even supervillains fear its wrath.
https://app.box.com/witthoftresume
Former OTTer
Vote cellocgw for President 2020. #ScienceintheWhiteHouse http://cellocgw.wordpress.com
"The Planck length is 3.81779e-33 picas." -- keithl
" Earth weighs almost exactly π milliJupiters" -- what-if #146, note 7

wumpus
Posts: 501
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 12:16 am UTC

Re: 1904: Research Risks

Postby wumpus » Wed Oct 18, 2017 2:11 pm UTC

So does that mean Larry Ellison qualifies as a super villain? I wouldn't be surprised. No idea if that was what has been pushing Elon Musk into building a volcano lair.

For those wondering about molasses storage:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Molasses_Flood
I assume it should be a higher threat than plenty of others (botony, orinthology) due to proven risks. I'd have guesses mycology should be even higher, especially if unsuspecting mushroom hunters suddenly have to deal with an intrusive species without warning.

syberspot
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 7:37 pm UTC

Re: 1904: Research Risks

Postby syberspot » Wed Oct 18, 2017 2:15 pm UTC

To add to the dentistry scandal, what about Steve Martin in little shop of horrors?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bOtMizMQ6oM

User avatar
Wee Red Bird
Posts: 145
Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2013 11:50 am UTC
Location: In a tree

Re: 1904: Research Risks

Postby Wee Red Bird » Wed Oct 18, 2017 2:18 pm UTC

Surely prosthetics should be on the right edge and not the left.
With all the intelligence being built in to arms and legs (eg when to grab a can or when to bend the knee when walking) all it takes is for them to be tired of being walked all over and decide to kick off. It will be an arms race that no one wins.

User avatar
moody7277
Posts: 523
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 7:06 pm UTC
Location: Extreme south Texas

Re: 1904: Research Risks

Postby moody7277 » Wed Oct 18, 2017 2:23 pm UTC

Wee Red Bird wrote:Surely prosthetics should be on the right edge and not the left.
With all the intelligence being built in to arms and legs (eg when to grab a can or when to bend the knee when walking) all it takes is for them to be tired of being walked all over and decide to kick off. It will be an arms race that no one wins.


So, the Doctor Octopus scenario?

Based on several movie and one soap opera plot, meteorology should be on the graph about the same place as laser optics.
The story of my life in xkcdmafia:

Tigerlion wrote:Well, I imagine as the game progresses, various people will be getting moody.

wgrandbois
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 4:07 am UTC

Re: 1904: Research Risks

Postby wgrandbois » Wed Oct 18, 2017 2:23 pm UTC

Either Randall has a pretty narrow definition of paleontology, or he's never seen / read "Jurassic Park."

Velo Steve
Posts: 18
Joined: Thu May 05, 2011 12:27 am UTC

Re: 1904: Research Risks

Postby Velo Steve » Wed Oct 18, 2017 2:50 pm UTC

Marine biology may look low-threat today, but don't forget that a lot of the carbon going into the atmosphere ends up in the ocean in compounds that lower the pH. When barnacles and clams have trouble building calcium carbonate shells but find that they can use acid to drill homes in steel structures, watch out for weaponized seafood!

Kit.
Posts: 1020
Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2011 5:14 pm UTC

Re: 1904: Research Risks

Postby Kit. » Wed Oct 18, 2017 2:51 pm UTC

wgrandbois wrote:Either Randall has a pretty narrow definition of paleontology, or he's never seen / read "Jurassic Park."

Isn't that technically "Genetic Engineering"?

Psycholinguist
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2017 3:08 pm UTC

Re: 1904: Research Risks

Postby Psycholinguist » Wed Oct 18, 2017 3:12 pm UTC

As a computational linguist whose research gets used for AI, I like to believe I'm very threatening. If this lack of respect continues, I may be forced to use my powers for world domination.

anonymouscat
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2017 3:22 pm UTC

Re: 1904: Research Risks

Postby anonymouscat » Wed Oct 18, 2017 3:24 pm UTC

Most likely I'm not the only one who wonders where to place Mathematics in this chart?

It doesn't seem that threatening to me, but it's really hard to tell...

FOARP
Posts: 71
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 7:36 am UTC

Re: 1904: Research Risks

Postby FOARP » Wed Oct 18, 2017 3:27 pm UTC

Disagree, researching history can quite often be dangerous when the local population find out about what you're researching and don't like it (which I guess can be kinda-sorta shoehorned into "breaking lose from your facility") and psychology is one of the primary weapons of real-world supervillains like Putin.

EDIT: And obviously molasses storage should be higher for reasons that Randall is probably already aware of: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Molasses_Flood

User avatar
cellocgw
Posts: 1768
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 7:40 pm UTC

Re: 1904: Research Risks

Postby cellocgw » Wed Oct 18, 2017 3:31 pm UTC

FOARP wrote:Disagree, researching history can quite often be dangerous when the local population find out about what you're researching and don't like it (which I guess can be kinda-sorta shoehorned into "breaking lose from your facility") and psychology is one of the primary weapons of real-world supervillains like Putin.

EDIT: And obviously molasses storage should be higher for reasons that Randall is probably already aware of: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Molasses_Flood

ummmm.... you failed to read the title-text?
https://app.box.com/witthoftresume
Former OTTer
Vote cellocgw for President 2020. #ScienceintheWhiteHouse http://cellocgw.wordpress.com
"The Planck length is 3.81779e-33 picas." -- keithl
" Earth weighs almost exactly π milliJupiters" -- what-if #146, note 7

Brian-M
Posts: 77
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 6:31 am UTC

Re: 1904: Research Risks

Postby Brian-M » Wed Oct 18, 2017 3:48 pm UTC

wumpus wrote:For those wondering about molasses storage:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Molasses_Flood

For those who either can't be bothered reading it for themselves, or would prefer to listen to the information with a lot of NSFW humor mixed in with it, you can listen to this podcast: http://citationpod.com/episode-016-the- ... ses-flood/

User avatar
somitomi
Posts: 459
Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2015 11:21 pm UTC
Location: can be found in Hungary
Contact:

Re: 1904: Research Risks

Postby somitomi » Wed Oct 18, 2017 4:28 pm UTC

Isn't astronautical engineering missing from somewhere far in the top right? Ignoring the destructive potential rockets have under the control of either a supervillain or a rogue onboard computer is a serious oversight from someone previously employed by NASA.
"It's like he's his own alt account. Saves all the logging in and out."/poxic
they/them/theirs = he/him/his ❖ If you want to use something else out of dadaist spite, I won't mind.
✆ Hello? This is Forum Games Discord, what is your emergency?

XiphiasGladius
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2017 5:08 pm UTC

Re: 1904: Research Risks

Postby XiphiasGladius » Wed Oct 18, 2017 5:11 pm UTC

Two interesting and currently relevant facts about the Great Molasses Flood:
1. The company that owned the tank was aware that it was leaking, and dealt with local complaints that it was causing a hazard by painting the tank brown so that people wouldn't see the leaks, and would stop complaining.
2. When it burst and killed people, they tried to blame it on terrorists.

User avatar
Pfhorrest
Posts: 3969
Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 6:11 am UTC
Contact:

Re: 1904: Research Risks

Postby Pfhorrest » Wed Oct 18, 2017 5:20 pm UTC

Where does philosophy fit on this chart?

Bear in mind the existential risks of a philosophical zombie apocalypse.
Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of All Trades
"I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
The Codex Quaerendae (my philosophy) - The Chronicles of Quelouva (my fiction)

User avatar
Steve the Pocket
Posts: 646
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 4:02 am UTC
Location: Going downtuuu in a Luleelurah!

Re: 1904: Research Risks

Postby Steve the Pocket » Wed Oct 18, 2017 5:47 pm UTC

XiphiasGladius wrote:Two interesting and currently relevant facts about the Great Molasses Flood:
1. The company that owned the tank was aware that it was leaking, and dealt with local complaints that it was causing a hazard by painting the tank brown so that people wouldn't see the leaks, and would stop complaining.
2. When it burst and killed people, they tried to blame it on terrorists.

People never change.
cephalopod9 wrote:Only on Xkcd can you start a topic involving Hitler and people spend the better part of half a dozen pages arguing about the quality of Operating Systems.

Baige.

User avatar
pminva
Posts: 14
Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2008 7:34 pm UTC

Re: 1904: Research Risks

Postby pminva » Wed Oct 18, 2017 6:42 pm UTC

Heh heh heh ... We hid mathematics from the grid - it permeates everything... already breaking out

ECK138
Posts: 10
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2008 5:38 am UTC

Re: 1904: Research Risks

Postby ECK138 » Wed Oct 18, 2017 7:53 pm UTC

I'm totally surprised by the lack of beer on this chart.

The London Beer Flood happened on 17 October 1814[2] in the parish of St. Giles, London, England. At the Meux and Company Brewery[1] in Tottenham Court Road,[1][3] a huge vat containing over 135,000 imperial gallons (610,000 L) of beer ruptured, causing other vats in the same building to succumb in a domino effect. As a result, more than 323,000 imperial gallons (1,470,000 L) of beer burst out and gushed into the streets. The wave of beer destroyed two homes and crumbled the wall of the Tavistock Arms pub, killing teenage employee Eleanor Cooper under the rubble.[4] Within minutes neighbouring George Street and New Street were swamped, seriously injuring a mother, and killing a daughter and young neighbour who were taking tea, and beer surged through a room of people gathered for a wake, killing five of them


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_Beer_Flood

ericgrau
Posts: 83
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 7:14 pm UTC

Re: 1904: Research Risks

Postby ericgrau » Wed Oct 18, 2017 7:57 pm UTC

Image

Iranon
Posts: 49
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:30 am UTC

Re: 1904: Research Risks

Postby Iranon » Wed Oct 18, 2017 8:03 pm UTC

I also believe Randall vastly underestimates the villainous applications of social sciences.
LEGO won't be ready for the average user until it comes pre-assembled, in a single unified theme, and glued together so it doesn't come apart.

User avatar
da Doctah
Posts: 812
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 6:27 am UTC

Re: 1904: Research Risks

Postby da Doctah » Wed Oct 18, 2017 8:20 pm UTC

Iranon wrote:I also believe Randall vastly underestimates the villainous applications of social sciences.


Quite. In fact, Orangehead McTInyhands is president of the US precisely because a sociology experiment ("write fake news stories and see how many likes you can get") got out of hand.

Yosarian2
Posts: 29
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2011 9:28 pm UTC

Re: 1904: Research Risks

Postby Yosarian2 » Wed Oct 18, 2017 8:25 pm UTC

I'm thinking that AI research wasn't shown just because it would be so far above and off to the right of the whole chart that you wouldn't even be able to see it.

User avatar
somitomi
Posts: 459
Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2015 11:21 pm UTC
Location: can be found in Hungary
Contact:

Re: 1904: Research Risks

Postby somitomi » Wed Oct 18, 2017 8:51 pm UTC

Yosarian2 wrote:I'm thinking that AI research wasn't shown just because it would be so far above and off to the right of the whole chart that you wouldn't even be able to see it.

I don't see an AI trapped in a box being more dangerous than rockets, but maybe those are even further away on the chart.
"It's like he's his own alt account. Saves all the logging in and out."/poxic
they/them/theirs = he/him/his ❖ If you want to use something else out of dadaist spite, I won't mind.
✆ Hello? This is Forum Games Discord, what is your emergency?

User avatar
Heimhenge
Posts: 168
Joined: Thu May 01, 2014 11:35 pm UTC

Re: 1904: Research Risks

Postby Heimhenge » Wed Oct 18, 2017 8:55 pm UTC

I immediately got that this was another Randall graph. But when I saw the vertical axis labeled as "RISK OF YOUR RESEARCH BEING USED BY A SUPERVILLAIN FOR WORLD DOMINATION" I had to wonder if "RISK" meant "DAMAGE" or if it meant "LIKELIHOOD" or "PROBABILITY".

The way the graph scans I suspect Randall was using "RISK" as "DAMAGE".

That said, labeling the horizontal axis as "RISK OF THE THING YOU'RE STUDYING BREAKING FREE FROM YOUR FACILITY AND THREATENING THE LOCAL POPULATION" just seemed kinda arbitrary, and not particularly interesting, or funny.

Was expecting something like maybe "PROBABILITY OF YOUR RESEARCH BEING USED BY A SUPERVILLAIN" or "PROBABILITY OF YOUR RESEARCH BEING FUNDED BY THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION" or "PROBABILITY THE PLAN WILL BACKFIRE".

Just sayin' ... I've seen better Randall graphs.

Mikeski
Posts: 876
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 7:24 am UTC
Location: Minnesota, USA

Re: 1904: Research Risks

Postby Mikeski » Wed Oct 18, 2017 9:04 pm UTC

somitomi wrote:Isn't astronautical engineering missing from somewhere far in the top right? Ignoring the destructive potential rockets have under the control of either a supervillain or a rogue onboard computer is a serious oversight from someone previously employed by NASA.

We have ICBMs already; no need to research them. I think increased deadliness of rocketry, at this point, will come from payloads (many of the other dots on the chart), and not the the delivery system.

And top-left, if anything; rockets don't often escape of their own free will, and misprogrammed guidance is most likely to create a bright streak in the sky as it burns up, or some ripples in the surface of the ocean (a two-to-one favorite over land, for random landings), and not an accidental strike on Peoria or Pyongyang.

Yosarian2 wrote:I'm thinking that AI research wasn't shown just because it would be so far above and off to the right of the whole chart that you wouldn't even be able to see it.

And that point is a gray dot that, if you zoom in on it, is a small copy of the original chart. (Stuff developed by a rogue AI is more likely to be dangerous, since we won't know about, or possibly even understand, the research.)

...fractally. (A rogue AI developed by a rogue AI is a danger to us and the original AI, one developed by that is a danger to us and both previous AI's...)

User avatar
Lode
Posts: 65
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 5:16 pm UTC

Re: 1904: Research Risks

Postby Lode » Wed Oct 18, 2017 9:15 pm UTC

Marine bioligy: well what about sharks?

Laser optics: well what if you attach the lasers to the sharks?

qvxb
Posts: 84
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2016 10:20 pm UTC

Re: 1904: Research Risks

Postby qvxb » Thu Oct 19, 2017 12:05 am UTC

George Costanza pretended to a marine biologist and saved a whale from a golf ball.

geomike
Posts: 11
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 4:11 am UTC

Re: 1904: Research Risks

Postby geomike » Thu Oct 19, 2017 3:05 am UTC

The residents of central Oklahoma (and Max Zorin) might argue that geology should be moved up and to the right a bit...

User avatar
serutan
Posts: 88
Joined: Mon May 17, 2010 2:18 pm UTC
Location: Baja Arizona

Re: 1904: Research Risks

Postby serutan » Thu Oct 19, 2017 4:39 am UTC

geomike wrote:The residents of central Oklahoma (and Max Zorin) might argue that geology should be moved up and to the right a bit...


North Dakota as well, if memory serves.
For a sentient herbivore, discretion is the only part of valor. - Larry Niven

leeharveyosmond
Posts: 33
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 11:03 pm UTC

Re: 1904: Research Risks

Postby leeharveyosmond » Thu Oct 19, 2017 7:22 am UTC

Astronomy. Shouldn't that be in the far corner with the genetic engineering etc? Most university astronomy courses are named 'physics and astronomy' to more accurately reflect the syllabus; nuclear fusion and so on

sotanaht
Posts: 182
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2010 2:14 am UTC

Re: 1904: Research Risks

Postby sotanaht » Thu Oct 19, 2017 8:21 am UTC

geomike wrote:The residents of central Oklahoma (and Max Zorin) might argue that geology should be moved up and to the right a bit...

The comic isn't about whether or not the subject of research could be dangerous, it's about whether the product of research is. Lots of people die in geology-based disasters, but I've yet to hear of anyone dying from applied geology-based science. Of course I'm oversimplifying the concept slightly, but that's the train of thought.

I do suppose there is some risk of geology research being used for world domination if someone can find a way to control faults and things of that nature. That's probably why it's on the high end of the low spectrum.

speising
Posts: 2078
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 4:54 pm UTC
Location: wien

Re: 1904: Research Risks

Postby speising » Thu Oct 19, 2017 9:14 am UTC

There's research into the subject:
How can a human cause the Yellowstone to erupt?

Ponyhome
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:58 am UTC

Re: 1904: Research Risks

Postby Ponyhome » Thu Oct 19, 2017 12:31 pm UTC

wgrandbois wrote:Either Randall has a pretty narrow definition of paleontology, or he's never seen / read "Jurassic Park."


That was my first thought as well. There's even a certain amount of "being used by supervillains" in the movie sequels.

Ponyhome
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:58 am UTC

Re: 1904: Research Risks

Postby Ponyhome » Thu Oct 19, 2017 12:36 pm UTC

geomike wrote:The residents of central Oklahoma (and Max Zorin) might argue that geology should be moved up and to the right a bit...


Hey, I saw "Superman: The Movie." That was Lex Luthor's entire plan for wiping out California! (or is that technically not WORLD domination as much as a real estate venture?). There was also that drilling thing from "Our Man Flint" causing earthquakes.

User avatar
Soupspoon
You have done something you shouldn't. Or are about to.
Posts: 2532
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2016 7:00 pm UTC
Location: 53-1

Re: 1904: Research Risks

Postby Soupspoon » Thu Oct 19, 2017 1:25 pm UTC

Ponyhome wrote:Hey, I saw "Superman: The Movie." That was Lex Luthor's entire plan for wiping out California! (or is that technically not WORLD domination as much as a real estate venture?).

#MakeAmericaCalifornialessAgain?

User avatar
Keyman
Posts: 244
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2014 1:56 pm UTC

Re: 1904: Research Risks

Postby Keyman » Thu Oct 19, 2017 1:35 pm UTC

Soupspoon wrote:
Ponyhome wrote:Hey, I saw "Superman: The Movie." That was Lex Luthor's entire plan for wiping out California! (or is that technically not WORLD domination as much as a real estate venture?).

#MakeAmericaCalifornialessAgain?

Probably not the way the #Calexit folks were hoping it would happen.
A childhood spent walking while reading books has prepared me unexpectedly well for today's world.


Return to “Individual XKCD Comic Threads”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ggh, Soupspoon and 39 guests