0487: "Numerical Sex Positions"

This forum is for the individual discussion thread that goes with each new comic.

Moderators: Moderators General, Prelates, Magistrates

User avatar
Cheshire Smile
Posts: 194
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 12:09 am UTC
Location: Imaginationland! (Not actually the UK)
Contact:

Re: "Numerical Sex Positions" Discussion

Postby Cheshire Smile » Sat Oct 11, 2008 8:03 pm UTC

Haha, damnit, now I wish I had someone to try those out on... I could totally pull off the square root of 8...

Comic sucks in that it reminds me I'm all aloooonnneeeeee [/emo], but otherwise fecking hilarious.

connorsname wrote:Any chance I can get a poster of this?


Srsly, it would make for much hilarious bedroom posterage. And would hve driven my roommates in college nuts...
“Once upon a time, I was a girl. Now, I am the idea that once there was a girl that was me.”

20/F/Florida/Taken/Garth Nix/LONGHAIR!!!
[Age/sex/location/heart's status/favorite author/fetish]

Flarous
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2008 11:58 pm UTC

Re: "Numerical Sex Positions" Discussion

Postby Flarous » Sun Oct 12, 2008 12:05 am UTC

Aww, is ln(2π) actually that hard?
Image
(The person on the left is on all four.)

User avatar
Cheshire Smile
Posts: 194
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 12:09 am UTC
Location: Imaginationland! (Not actually the UK)
Contact:

Re: "Numerical Sex Positions" Discussion

Postby Cheshire Smile » Sun Oct 12, 2008 12:23 am UTC

That looks more like ln π, though...
“Once upon a time, I was a girl. Now, I am the idea that once there was a girl that was me.”

20/F/Florida/Taken/Garth Nix/LONGHAIR!!!
[Age/sex/location/heart's status/favorite author/fetish]

User avatar
oracle989
Posts: 65
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 5:00 am UTC
Location: Terra, Segmentum Solar

Re: "Numerical Sex Positions" Discussion

Postby oracle989 » Sun Oct 12, 2008 3:30 am UTC

What would e to the pi minus pi look like you think?
Ulc wrote:Evolutionary psychology makes sense yes. But you're not just making a mockery of it here, we're talking full scale orgy abuse while it cries.

I reserve the right to quote you both out of context and incorrectly.

User avatar
Cheshire Smile
Posts: 194
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 12:09 am UTC
Location: Imaginationland! (Not actually the UK)
Contact:

Re: "Numerical Sex Positions" Discussion

Postby Cheshire Smile » Sun Oct 12, 2008 3:58 am UTC

oracle989 wrote:What would e to the pi minus pi look like you think?



e^(π-π) = e^0 = 1. That's fairly easy, and you'd only need one person for it.

Unless, of course, you meant (e^π)-π, which is significantly different...
“Once upon a time, I was a girl. Now, I am the idea that once there was a girl that was me.”

20/F/Florida/Taken/Garth Nix/LONGHAIR!!!
[Age/sex/location/heart's status/favorite author/fetish]

JohnDoe
Posts: 14
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2008 9:03 am UTC

Re: "Numerical Sex Positions" Discussion

Postby JohnDoe » Sun Oct 12, 2008 9:05 am UTC

I wonder how intergation looks like... hmm...

User avatar
cephalopod9
Posts: 1929
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 7:23 am UTC

Re: "Numerical Sex Positions" Discussion

Postby cephalopod9 » Sun Oct 12, 2008 11:10 am UTC

That's easy, one lies tangent to the other's curves, and/or one fills the other's area.

The more I think about it, the more "sex position 34" seems weirdly redundant. Maybe it's trying something you saw on the internet.
Also, late, but
GodShapedBullet wrote:
cephalopod9 wrote:I think 69 without the 9 would only be for very flexible people.

I think you are thinking of 0.
nah, that'd be feet to face, other wise you've got legs sticking up/out.
Image

User avatar
jessebob
Posts: 64
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2007 9:53 pm UTC
Location: Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

Re: "Numerical Sex Positions" Discussion

Postby jessebob » Sun Oct 12, 2008 2:20 pm UTC

krynd wrote:How long, then, until we discover the "Goatse" number? Note: I don't want to think about it


E0? maybe?
Huh? Did you say something? I couldn't hear you all the way over here!

There is a monkey in your pyjamas! Be Careful!

ymersvennson
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 7:52 am UTC

Re: "Numerical Sex Positions" Discussion

Postby ymersvennson » Sun Oct 12, 2008 6:02 pm UTC

Hm, this is an old idea of mine.

Admittedly, xkcd's is carried out better.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v304/ ... _sigma.jpg

themuffinking
Posts: 52
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 4:42 am UTC

Re: "Numerical Sex Positions" Discussion

Postby themuffinking » Sun Oct 12, 2008 7:02 pm UTC

Wow, seriously? Nobody's come up with this yet?

Masturbation would be OGC

(turn it sideways)

Kutch
Posts: 13
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:12 pm UTC

Re: "Numerical Sex Positions" Discussion

Postby Kutch » Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:54 pm UTC

How come nobody got the In(2π) yet? o.o In-two pi, it's almost spelled out perfectly. Into pee.

Nah, I'm sure there are many interpretations. *cough* In: Two p... *cough*

Lol at the root of eight.

Also: 666, the devil's number, is an all-male spooning sandwich O.O

User avatar
Cheshire Smile
Posts: 194
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 12:09 am UTC
Location: Imaginationland! (Not actually the UK)
Contact:

Re: "Numerical Sex Positions" Discussion

Postby Cheshire Smile » Sun Oct 12, 2008 9:10 pm UTC

themuffinking wrote:Masturbation would be OGC


Wooooowwww, that's amazingly perfect. Not a number, but still, hahaha. Wow.
“Once upon a time, I was a girl. Now, I am the idea that once there was a girl that was me.”

20/F/Florida/Taken/Garth Nix/LONGHAIR!!!
[Age/sex/location/heart's status/favorite author/fetish]

steek
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 2:52 pm UTC

Re: "Numerical Sex Positions" Discussion

Postby steek » Sun Oct 12, 2008 10:28 pm UTC

i want to have exponential sex
Last edited by steek on Mon Oct 13, 2008 3:56 am UTC, edited 1 time in total.

Jarmel
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 1:53 am UTC

Re: "Numerical Sex Positions" Discussion

Postby Jarmel » Mon Oct 13, 2008 1:57 am UTC

Q: What's 77?

A: It's like 69 but you get 8/ate more.

firestar27
Posts: 11
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 4:26 am UTC

Re: "Numerical Sex Positions" Discussion

Postby firestar27 » Mon Oct 13, 2008 4:34 am UTC

SwissArmyAnts wrote:I'm surprised he didn't mention 81.


Nah, that what the square root of 8 is. Randal just didn't want to draw it. (Or would that be the 0th root of 0?)

mattcelt
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Oct 18, 2008 5:49 pm UTC

Re: "Numerical Sex Positions" Discussion

Postby mattcelt » Sat Oct 18, 2008 5:50 pm UTC

Well, I'm not sure about continued fractions, but an exponential sequence would simply involve getting her pregnant...

Millimificent
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 2:21 am UTC

Re: "Numerical Sex Positions" Discussion

Postby Millimificent » Thu Oct 23, 2008 2:29 am UTC

I registered just to say that I saw this comic whilst surfing craigslist. Here it is under the title "Looking to try new things"

Warning: Possible NSFW text?

soniku64
Posts: 16
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:59 pm UTC

Re: "Numerical Sex Positions" Discussion

Postby soniku64 » Sun Oct 26, 2008 11:30 pm UTC

Randall (two ll's?) should of changed 34 to the guy looking at porn after the girl walked off and then put it at the end

User avatar
H3Knuckles
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2008 12:04 am UTC
Location: Southeastern Pennsylvania

Re: "Numerical Sex Positions" Discussion

Postby H3Knuckles » Wed Mar 11, 2009 3:43 pm UTC

Sorry to necropost, but I was reading through old strips and this popped in my head as a possible 34-ing, and I thought someone might find it interesting. *shrugs* It's not very clear, but I think it works fairly well.

Image

PS. Yes, I did just see Watchmen last week, why do you ask? :wink:

User avatar
HawkDesigns
Posts: 37
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 2:53 am UTC
Contact:

Re: "Numerical Sex Positions" Discussion

Postby HawkDesigns » Fri Mar 13, 2009 1:26 am UTC

Vaelin wrote:There is the old Group Sex font that is probably appropriate to mention here.

It takes things a bit further with multiple figures per character though.

And besides: Bessel functions


I need that font.
Spoiler:
Image
^Clicky clicky^

User avatar
dennisw
Posts: 441
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2008 9:09 am UTC
Location: Appearing pro se AND pro bono!
Contact:

Re: "Numerical Sex Positions" Discussion

Postby dennisw » Fri Mar 13, 2009 4:03 am UTC

HawkDesigns wrote:
Vaelin wrote:There is the old Group Sex font that is probably appropriate to mention here.

It takes things a bit further with multiple figures per character though.

And besides: Bessel functions


I need that font.

The integer positions from the comic rendered using the Group Sex font:
Image
Try the Printifier for xkcd. You can now scale the comic between 50 and 150%.

I find these very useful: Common Errors in English Usage (web site) and Eats, Shoots & Leaves (book). You may, too.

e pluribus unum
Unleash unlicensed ungulates!

User avatar
Minerva
Posts: 946
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 2:58 pm UTC
Location: Australia
Contact:

Re: "Numerical Sex Positions" Discussion

Postby Minerva » Fri Mar 13, 2009 3:29 pm UTC

root 8 = 2 root two? :)
...suffer from the computer disease that anybody who works with computers now knows about. It's a very serious disease and it interferes completely with the work. The trouble with computers is you play with them. They are so wonderful. - Richard Feynman

User avatar
mturyn
Posts: 19
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 3:11 pm UTC

Re: "Numerical Sex Positions" Discussion

Postby mturyn » Sat Mar 14, 2009 1:22 pm UTC

Every time I pass by an instance of Cambridge's 1369 Coffee House, I think in quick succession 'Square' and 'Unlucky sex'.

User avatar
Xyros
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 8:03 am UTC
Location: The bottom of the center of the sun.

Re: "Numerical Sex Positions" Discussion

Postby Xyros » Mon Mar 16, 2009 12:46 am UTC

I shall do it in a quantum box! Where a radioactive element has a half-life of an hour. I Geiger counter shall then pick up any radiation and if there is a decay, we shall go sixty-nine, other wise we shall 71.

For the math people...
ΣΨ+(x)|69> + Ψ-(x)|71>
Tantum aliquid quisnam est bardus insisto alius.

User avatar
mturyn
Posts: 19
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 3:11 pm UTC

Re: "Numerical Sex Positions" Discussion

Postby mturyn » Mon Mar 16, 2009 3:13 am UTC

Xyros wrote:[...]
ΣΨ+(x)|69> + Ψ-(x)|71>

That sounds like one super position, Xyros.

Fun fact: Schrodinger developed his imaginary diffusion equation whilst on a week-end getaway with his mistress, supposedly slipping pearls into his ears when he wanted absolute quite in which to work...or maybe that's "work", I don't know.

User avatar
Xyros
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 8:03 am UTC
Location: The bottom of the center of the sun.

Re: "Numerical Sex Positions" Discussion

Postby Xyros » Mon Mar 16, 2009 4:44 am UTC

mturyn wrote:
Xyros wrote:[...]
ΣΨ+(x)|69> + Ψ-(x)|71>

That sounds like one super position, Xyros.

Fun fact: Schrodinger developed his imaginary diffusion equation whilst on a week-end getaway with his mistress, supposedly slipping pearls into his ears when he wanted absolute quite in which to work...or maybe that's "work", I don't know.


As Schrödinger stated: The psi-function of the entire system would express this by having in it the 69-position and 71-position (pardon the expression) mixed or smeared out in equal parts.

Also, that was a both a bad and awesome pun.
Tantum aliquid quisnam est bardus insisto alius.

User avatar
william
Not a Raptor. Honest.
Posts: 2418
Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 5:02 pm UTC
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Contact:

Re: "Numerical Sex Positions" Discussion

Postby william » Mon Mar 16, 2009 1:20 pm UTC

Cynical Idealist wrote:
'; DROP DATABASE;-- wrote:Wouldn't it be zero? Or maybe 303...

1000?
(1E03, in some notation or another. Ignore the 1, I just needed a number to justify the "E")

scientific. But, um, hex?
SecondTalon wrote:A pile of shit can call itself a delicious pie, but that doesn't make it true.

Wolfkeeper
Posts: 131
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 1:59 am UTC

Re: "Numerical Sex Positions" Discussion

Postby Wolfkeeper » Mon Nov 30, 2009 6:22 am UTC

Not sure what position it is but [math]e^{ i \pi} + 1[/math] always gives an 0 from the stick figures!

mamon
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2011 2:29 pm UTC

Re: 0487: "Numerical Sex Positions"

Postby mamon » Wed Apr 20, 2011 2:32 pm UTC

I belive there is also position 12.

http://wikisend.com/download/549500/12.png

Where 1 is defenitely female, because tail of 1 is a pigtail.

navigatr85
Posts: 60
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 5:21 am UTC

Re: 0487: "Numerical Sex Positions"

Postby navigatr85 » Sun Apr 24, 2011 6:07 am UTC

OK, I thought of something that vaguely makes sense for ln 2π:
Spoiler:
Image
The girl is on her knees, and leaning back against a table. The guy is bent over in front of her, with his hands and feet on the floor. He has his feet pushed up against a wall to maintain stability. Also, the girl is cradling the guy's head in her hands. And I'm sure you can figure out what the guy is doing to the girl. ;)

scarletmanuka
Posts: 525
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 4:29 am UTC
Location: Perth, Western Australia

Re: 0487: "Numerical Sex Positions"

Postby scarletmanuka » Wed Apr 27, 2011 4:28 pm UTC

The girl must be in a bit of pain from her broken elbows bending the wrong way.

Zalde Ocga
Posts: 8
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2011 1:41 am UTC

Re: "Numerical Sex Positions" Discussion

Postby Zalde Ocga » Thu Apr 28, 2011 3:13 am UTC

sje46 wrote:
krynd wrote:
sje46 wrote:I dont like this one because i hate it when other people have sex and i dont
thanks a lot, randall.

Think of it this way: when you have sex, you can try out a few of these positions. Just be careful to use appropriate amounts of lube, and never, ever, use Poison Ivy as a substitute for Ethernet cable.

Fix'd.

By the way:
96:
Farting on eachother's heads.

ok... normally ,if I new you better, I'd ask how you new that, but I don't really want to know in this case... :?
This IS my other signature

Demosthenes
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2011 11:18 pm UTC

Re: 0487: "Numerical Sex Positions"

Postby Demosthenes » Sat Apr 30, 2011 3:52 am UTC

They should derive eachother. Then they could lie tangent to the other's curves.


Return to “Individual XKCD Comic Threads”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: markfiend and 37 guests