0632: "Suspicion"

This forum is for the individual discussion thread that goes with each new comic.

Moderators: Moderators General, Prelates, Magistrates

User avatar
jakemaheu
Posts: 78
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 2:49 am UTC

0632: "Suspicion"

Postby jakemaheu » Fri Sep 04, 2009 4:00 am UTC

Image

Alt-Text: Fine, walk away. I'm gonna go cry into a pint of Ben&Jerry's Brownie Batter(tm) ice cream [link], then take out my frustration on a variety of great flash games from PopCap Games(r) [link].

Discussion: Wow. That's actually pretty good. I wonder if he's referring to ELIZA -> LIZA -> LISA, the AI that posed as a therapist.
Last edited by jakemaheu on Fri Sep 04, 2009 4:04 am UTC, edited 1 time in total.
Dauric wrote:Rent more backhoes and order more fill-dirt. This molehill needs to be a mountain by day's end.

sje46 wrote:It's not if when you get married the husband ceremoniously places his dick in his wife and a baby

User avatar
brakos82
Posts: 536
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 12:06 am UTC
Location: My happy place :)

Re: "Suspicion" Discussion

Postby brakos82 » Fri Sep 04, 2009 4:01 am UTC

I saw this one coming from the second panel, and by then the cheese had already caught fire.
I am Brakos, and I may or may not approve this message.

iamevn
Posts: 98
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2008 3:59 am UTC

Re: "Suspicion" Discussion

Postby iamevn » Fri Sep 04, 2009 4:02 am UTC

I do not get.





...but I do like kittens :P
Last edited by iamevn on Fri Sep 04, 2009 4:03 am UTC, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Freiberg
Posts: 171
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2008 4:09 am UTC

Re: "Suspicion" Discussion

Postby Freiberg » Fri Sep 04, 2009 4:02 am UTC

Now this one was good. Much better than Wednesday's. Thanks for rebounding, Randall.

User avatar
Justice
Posts: 42
Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 7:54 pm UTC

Re: "Suspicion" Discussion

Postby Justice » Fri Sep 04, 2009 4:02 am UTC

kittens!
...Just!ce

Spoiler:
uh oh, its a tarp!

User avatar
Omegaton
Posts: 700
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 6:23 pm UTC

Re: "Suspicion" Discussion

Postby Omegaton » Fri Sep 04, 2009 4:03 am UTC

Man, I haven't interacted with a chat robot since SmarterChild, and that one didn't push products.

I found it pretty funny, though, haha. Silly computers, unable to read simple words just because they're images and messed up a little.

User avatar
Eternal Density
Posts: 5537
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2008 12:37 am UTC
Contact:

Re: "Suspicion" Discussion

Postby Eternal Density » Fri Sep 04, 2009 4:03 am UTC

This one was pretty fun. Such a doubleCAPTCA test site ought to exist.
Play the game of Time! castle.chirpingmustard.com Hotdog Vending Supplier But what is this?
In the Marvel vs. DC film-making war, we're all winners.

Shale
Posts: 87
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 4:21 am UTC

Re: "Suspicion" Discussion

Postby Shale » Fri Sep 04, 2009 4:03 am UTC

iamevn wrote:I do not get.

It's a capcha. Computer programs can't make out the letters, so requiring somebody to read one is a good way to weed out spambots from posting to message boards, blogs, etc.

dasada122
Posts: 88
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 8:41 pm UTC
Location: Wherever you aren't looking at the moment.

Re: "Suspicion" Discussion

Postby dasada122 » Fri Sep 04, 2009 4:04 am UTC

Oh, wow.
That was very, very good.
The alt text seemed a bit heavy handed though.

iamevn
Posts: 98
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2008 3:59 am UTC

Re: "Suspicion" Discussion

Postby iamevn » Fri Sep 04, 2009 4:05 am UTC

iamevn wrote:I do not get.





...but I do like kittens :P




NvMd, I Get It Now!

Funniest since Newton/Leibniz?


(But still, KITTENS!!!)
Last edited by iamevn on Fri Sep 04, 2009 4:07 am UTC, edited 1 time in total.

Piecewise
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 2:56 pm UTC

Re: "Suspicion" Discussion

Postby Piecewise » Fri Sep 04, 2009 4:05 am UTC

I would love to see a Dr. Phil show dedicated to this genre of relationship disfunction.

User avatar
Steve the Pocket
Posts: 677
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 4:02 am UTC
Location: Going downtuuu in a Luleelurah!

Re: "Suspicion" Discussion

Postby Steve the Pocket » Fri Sep 04, 2009 4:05 am UTC

At least he didn't wind up with the spambot that got extra credit on the Turing test. That one would have identified the captcha AND somehow gotten him to screw it up.
cephalopod9 wrote:Only on Xkcd can you start a topic involving Hitler and people spend the better part of half a dozen pages arguing about the quality of Operating Systems.

Baige.

User avatar
XbHW_TestEngr
Posts: 94
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 9:29 pm UTC
Location: Kirkland, WA
Contact:

Re: "Suspicion" Discussion

Postby XbHW_TestEngr » Fri Sep 04, 2009 4:07 am UTC

Seems like he's chatting with my ex-wife. Mind you, we never met in person, used an online minister she suggested, a couples therapy counselor she suggested, and on online divorce attorney ... all in one night. But her line art was crazy wild!

unofficial Approval by a member of the unofficial Council of Elders.
... and there will be cake.

I have traveled from 1960 to be a member of the unofficial Council of Elders. Phear M3

benbald72 wrote:I feel connected to the author and therefore appreciate the comic, regardless of whether or not I understand the joke ....

User avatar
glasnt
Posts: 539
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 5:18 am UTC
Location: SQUEE!

Re: "Suspicion" Discussion

Postby glasnt » Fri Sep 04, 2009 4:07 am UTC

Hey, that's not fair :(

I got a shitty captcha :(

Spoiler:
Image


You ruined my life VK's Couple's Testing(tm) [link]


Please forgive me, joee :(


hi joee

User avatar
Kimmeh
Posts: 21
Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 11:13 pm UTC
Location: United States
Contact:

Re: "Suspicion" Discussion

Postby Kimmeh » Fri Sep 04, 2009 4:09 am UTC

Omegaton wrote:Man, I haven't interacted with a chat robot since SmarterChild, and that one didn't push products.

I found it pretty funny, though, haha. Silly computers, unable to read simple words just because they're images and messed up a little.


Same here. I also remember trying to make SmarterChild man by insulting him/it. Ahh. Good times...

Nice one Randall. =]

kbltd
Posts: 32
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 2:47 pm UTC
Location: Indoors

Re: "Suspicion" Discussion

Postby kbltd » Fri Sep 04, 2009 4:12 am UTC

Image

stormoftara
Posts: 84
Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 7:20 am UTC

Re: "Suspicion" Discussion

Postby stormoftara » Fri Sep 04, 2009 4:16 am UTC

Once I was chatting with someone online, and they thought I was an online chat bot...


I wasn't even promoting goods and services! I was actually having full blown conversations. People are just too paranoid.

User avatar
aeris92
Posts: 43
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 4:03 am UTC

Re: "Suspicion" Discussion

Postby aeris92 » Fri Sep 04, 2009 4:22 am UTC

Best comic in a LOOooOOong while. This is more like what xkcd should be.

and hi glasnt and joee - what up?

Comic JK
Posts: 270
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 6:08 pm UTC

Re: "Suspicion" Discussion

Postby Comic JK » Fri Sep 04, 2009 4:26 am UTC

I enjoyed. Not without problems, since the second panel does telegraph the joke. But it's a good joke! And even though it's about a relationship, there's no nudity! But I still wonder...why didn't they use this method?
Image
A webcomic funnier than life itself. Updated Monday-Friday.

User avatar
joee
Posts: 227
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 5:53 am UTC

Re: "Suspicion" Discussion

Postby joee » Fri Sep 04, 2009 4:27 am UTC

i giggled at this one. But the page was still showing Wednesday's for me, so I had another "oh i hope no one is looking over my shoulder..."

hi glasnt!
Hi glasnt.

User avatar
rwald
Posts: 153
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 7:14 am UTC
Contact:

Re: "Suspicion" Discussion

Postby rwald » Fri Sep 04, 2009 4:30 am UTC

This comic kind of reminds me of an old SMBC strip. Of course, that one ended rather differently...

User avatar
oxy
Posts: 85
Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 1:30 am UTC

Re: "Suspicion" Discussion

Postby oxy » Fri Sep 04, 2009 4:37 am UTC

Wow. I signed up for the forums like yesterday, but got locked out the first time, because I kept failing the humanizer.

I find this ironic.

User avatar
Omegaton
Posts: 700
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 6:23 pm UTC

Re: "Suspicion" Discussion

Postby Omegaton » Fri Sep 04, 2009 4:38 am UTC

Comic JK wrote:I enjoyed. Not without problems, since the second panel does telegraph the joke. But it's a good joke! And even though it's about a relationship, there's no nudity! But I still wonder...why didn't they use this method?

Ha, wow, I forgot about that comic. Still cracks me up, apparently.

guale
Posts: 81
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 2:47 am UTC
Location: Central Texas
Contact:

Re: "Suspicion" Discussion

Postby guale » Fri Sep 04, 2009 4:39 am UTC

I finally get a Randall get out of my head moment! My life is complete. Not even an hour ago I was chatting with an ai bot. It was fairly convincing until it started responding to questions with question marks in the middle of the response.

User avatar
'; DROP DATABASE;--
Posts: 3284
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 9:38 am UTC
Location: Midwest Alberta, where it's STILL snowy
Contact:

Re: "Suspicion" Discussion

Postby '; DROP DATABASE;-- » Fri Sep 04, 2009 4:41 am UTC

First Megan, in what looks like (aside from the cops getting involved) a pretty good relationship...

then Lisa who turns out to be lying the whole time...

are you comfortable in my head Randall? Plan on leaving any time soon?
poxic wrote:You suck. And simultaneously rock. I think you've invented a new state of being.

User avatar
Max2009
Posts: 160
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 2:20 pm UTC
Location: Where?
Contact:

Re: "Suspicion" Discussion

Postby Max2009 » Fri Sep 04, 2009 4:43 am UTC

Great comic!! :lol: Does anybody know how to get cheese burns out of a sofa?

stormoftara wrote:Once I was chatting with someone online, and they thought I was an online chat bot...


I wasn't even promoting goods and services! I was actually having full blown conversations. People are just too paranoid.

Hah! That might have been me. I sometimes amuse myself having fake Turing Tests with people online. You'd be surprised how many of them fail to convince me that they're human...
Cogito ergo surf - I think therefore I network

Registered Linux user #481826 Get Counted! http://counter.li.org

Image

User avatar
8l2255
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 5:10 am UTC

Re: "Suspicion" Discussion

Postby 8l2255 » Fri Sep 04, 2009 4:48 am UTC

I liked this one! :D

irishnut
Posts: 43
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2008 10:58 pm UTC

Re: "Suspicion" Discussion

Postby irishnut » Fri Sep 04, 2009 4:48 am UTC

the trick of the thing is....even if not a bot...could still be a large man wanting to bend you over....i suppose everyone is worried about different things.... *shrugs*

however my cheese was nicely burnt

frymaster
Posts: 21
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 9:15 am UTC

Re: "Suspicion" Discussion

Postby frymaster » Fri Sep 04, 2009 4:54 am UTC

my only complaint is with the alt text - Popcap's marketing is quite a bit smarter than that...

knightry
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed May 27, 2009 4:56 am UTC

Re: "Suspicion" Discussion

Postby knightry » Fri Sep 04, 2009 5:01 am UTC

kbltd wrote:VK test - nice touch - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voight-Kampff_machine

Ahh, thank you. This reference was lost on me, sadly.

User avatar
phillipsjk
Posts: 1213
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2008 4:09 pm UTC
Location: Edmonton AB Canada
Contact:

Re: "Suspicion" Discussion

Postby phillipsjk » Fri Sep 04, 2009 5:04 am UTC

oxy wrote:Wow. I signed up for the forums like yesterday, but got locked out the first time, because I kept failing the humanizer.

I find this ironic.


Yes, I reported that problem in the Site/Forum issues: Captcha broken thread months ago. Still haven't gotten around to the "proof of concept" yet though. As I was editing the captcha so that I could read it, I noticed the lines I was "deleting" were distinct enough to be removed by software.

This relates to the comic because of the potential for "false positives." Presumably, an Ad-bot that can pass the Turing test may be able to generate a "false negative" as well. Then there is the challenge: how do you know the testing site can be trusted? If I was writing Ad-bots that were being foiled by such a service, I would set-up my own! We already know the bots regularly suggests sites:
Stickman: Let's get tested together!
Ad-Bot: Ok! how about http://botfriendly.example.com?

Am I going into too much logistical detail here?
Did you get the number on that truck?

User avatar
Max2009
Posts: 160
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 2:20 pm UTC
Location: Where?
Contact:

Re: "Suspicion" Discussion

Postby Max2009 » Fri Sep 04, 2009 5:05 am UTC

Does anybody else pay attention at the bottom of the page where it says
Users browsing this forum:.......?
It lists users, guests and bots.
Are the bots users? Did they fail the capcha when they signed up, and therefore the fora concluded that they are bots? Or is there a sneaky way that bots can tell if somebody is a bot, but nobody wants to tell the humans?
Cogito ergo surf - I think therefore I network

Registered Linux user #481826 Get Counted! http://counter.li.org

Image

skine
Posts: 61
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2008 5:53 pm UTC

Re: "Suspicion" Discussion

Postby skine » Fri Sep 04, 2009 5:06 am UTC

Reminded me greatly of Blade Runner and this comic:
Spoiler:
Image

Of course, it brings up the question: When we're actually able to create skin-jobs (or replicants if you want me to be Basically Decent), how are we going to deal with the skin-job spambots IRL?




...what if we fall in love?

User avatar
TheSkyMovesSideways
Posts: 589
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2008 8:36 am UTC
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: "Suspicion" Discussion

Postby TheSkyMovesSideways » Fri Sep 04, 2009 5:10 am UTC

Firstly, awesome. :D

Secondly:
kbltd wrote:VK test - nice touch - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voight-Kampff_machine

Oh god, how did I miss that? I blame the fact that I was expecting an "is this supposed to test whether I'm a spambot, or a lesbian?" reference in the alt-text. :roll:
I had all kinds of plans in case of a zombie attack.
I just figured I'd be on the other side.
~ASW

Chrisfs
Posts: 49
Joined: Fri Apr 10, 2009 7:54 pm UTC

If she passed the Turing test

Postby Chrisfs » Fri Sep 04, 2009 5:14 am UTC

If she passed the Turing test, she can't be all that bad....

Also what the deal with the same disturbing quotes appearing above the comments for three panels in a row now ?

AlexTG
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 6:06 am UTC

Re: "Suspicion" Discussion

Postby AlexTG » Fri Sep 04, 2009 5:15 am UTC

Not funny, some of us can never do those damned things even though we're human :cry:. Discrimination.

User avatar
eviloatmeal
Posts: 561
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 9:39 am UTC
Location: Upside down in space!
Contact:

Re: "Suspicion" Discussion

Postby eviloatmeal » Fri Sep 04, 2009 5:26 am UTC

This one made me a little sad. She just wanted to have a normal relationship. :(
*** FREE SHIPPING ENABLED ***
Image
Riddles are abound tonightImage

User avatar
Username4242
Posts: 168
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 9:03 pm UTC
Location: (Previously) Montana State University--Bozeman, Montana.

Re: "Suspicion" Discussion

Postby Username4242 » Fri Sep 04, 2009 5:39 am UTC

GOOD THING I DIDN'T CHECK THIS AT WORK.

Oh wait.

Seriously though, pretty hilarious!

User avatar
Cynical Idealist
Posts: 1124
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2008 10:48 pm UTC

Re: "Suspicion" Discussion

Postby Cynical Idealist » Fri Sep 04, 2009 5:44 am UTC

Max2009 wrote:Does anybody else pay attention at the bottom of the page where it says
Users browsing this forum:.......?
It lists users, guests and bots.
Are the bots users? Did they fail the capcha when they signed up, and therefore the fora concluded that they are bots? Or is there a sneaky way that bots can tell if somebody is a bot, but nobody wants to tell the humans?

All the bots seem to be search engine crawlers, and I believe that most crawlers identify themselves to the website that they're indexing. I doubt that they've ever actually logged in, but the forums probably look for that identification and show them as browsing the forum.
The internet removes the two biggest aids in detecting sarcasm:
1)The tone of voice
2)the assumption that the other person is sane
Elvish Pillager wrote:See? All the problems in our society are caused by violent video games, like FarmVille.

Kevin11_11
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2008 5:59 am UTC

Re: "Suspicion" Discussion

Postby Kevin11_11 » Fri Sep 04, 2009 5:48 am UTC

This is a not so subtle reference to the new service from Checked Profiles that verifies pictures used on online dating sites. Obligatory get out of my head Randall note here.

http://www.checkedprofile.com/

http://uk.techcrunch.com/2009/08/20/che ... -of-yours/


Return to “Individual XKCD Comic Threads”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Archgeek, Gingercat, Google [Bot] and 21 guests