No, the problem is that people change the definition of the entity involved. What is the "you" that has (or doens't have) this "free will"? It only works if you treat it as an atomic entity, and therefore you specifically do not look at just how decisions are made in the first place.Horselover Frost wrote:The problem about arguments about free will is nobody really has a good definition for what "free will" means in the first place.
"Free will" is the temporary name we use for the mechanism we are not looking at.
Jose