I noted your hypotheticals, and I wasn't yelling at you, but if you're going to bring up the morality of stem cell research, I think I'm allowed to respond with information and editorial. To talk about "destroying life at will," potentially or otherwise, and the ethics of acquiring embryos (the details of which you had patently wrong) seems like you wanted to talk about it, because obviously Database was kidding. "Har har, saving lives isn't as worthwhile as big boobs..." And you took him seriously by playing devil's advocate for the dethklok objections.
Edit: You're going to get banned if you don't follow the rules. http://echochamber.me/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=37304
Eh, you shouldn't post before I get the chance to edit. Also, "called for?" What is "called for?" Find me a post that is "called for." This is "have an opinion" world. Not "avoid giving Moo excess information" world. I'm all
about ethics lectures. If you're not opposed to stem cells, then I'm obviously not talking to you, and you can feel free to ignore it.
AND another thing. Using stem cells for boobs is
about ethics. It's about talented minds and limited dollars going toward boob fetishes and profits instead of therapeutic research, and it disgusts me. This is the ethical problem.