New form of cloaking...

Seen something interesting in the news or on the intertubes? Discuss it here.

Moderators: Rinsaikeru, Zamfir, Hawknc, Moderators General, Prelates

New form of cloaking...

Postby dbeard92 » Wed Jan 04, 2012 9:23 pm UTC

Apparently a new form of cloaking is being developed. Give this a read:

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/ ... 4-13-57-03

However, and it just might be me, but something seems a little off about that article. It fails to address a few issues...
Firstly, if you (they) can't tell that the action has occurred, then how can they prove that it actually has? (especially on that scale)
Secondly, maybe someone can explain to me how it is affecting time rather than just velocity and furthermore why it wouldn't delay the action instead of totally cloaking it.
I can't seem to find anymore info on the matter though. Maybe someone can clear things up for me.

Link OK'ed -hawknc
dbeard92
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 9:12 pm UTC

Re: New form of cloaking...

Postby the_bandersnatch » Thu Jan 05, 2012 4:21 pm UTC

I think in this case "temporal cloaking" is a bit of a misnomer, you are correct in saying it's "merely" messing with the velocities of the beam components. So, not as exciting as it initially sounds but promising research nonetheless, and will no doubt lead to avenues of research thus far unexpected.
In girum imus nocte, et consumimur igni
User avatar
the_bandersnatch
Actually not so frumious.
 
Posts: 939
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 11:46 am UTC
Location: on a bed in a room inside a TV in a hotel room in a hotel on a Monopoly board

Re: New form of cloaking...

Postby Heisenberg » Thu Jan 05, 2012 6:16 pm UTC

Lagging IRL? Gross.
Heisenberg
 
Posts: 3068
Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 8:48 pm UTC
Location: Uncertain

Re: New form of cloaking...

Postby schmiggen » Fri Jan 06, 2012 9:24 am UTC

dbeard92 wrote:Firstly, if you (they) can't tell that the action has occurred, then how can they prove that it actually has? (especially on that scale)
Secondly, maybe someone can explain to me how it is affecting time rather than just velocity and furthermore why it wouldn't delay the action instead of totally cloaking it.

You can tell that the action has occurred, but the idea is that you don't observe that it has happened until later than you ordinarily would have. That is why they say it is affecting time; the event is not observed at the time it would otherwise have been, and from the observer's perspective it seems to happen later.

...I think.
Kabann wrote:Aw hell, as far as I'm concerned the world started in late 1967. Everything else is just semantics and busy-work.
User avatar
schmiggen
 
Posts: 383
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 12:15 am UTC
Location: location, location

Re: New form of cloaking...

Postby dbeard92 » Wed Jan 11, 2012 7:37 pm UTC

OK that makes a little more sense, but I still wouldn't necessarily say it is affecting time, rather delaying it, and even still it wouldn't really be cloaking so much as it would be, as previously mentioned, lagging. And agreed, gross. Also it doesn't even affect the velocity necessarily, it just increases the distance it has to travel over the same amount of time and at the same speed as the unaffected light... Wait, I guess it would affect velocity because its a vector (maybe? or would the coiling of the fiber optics cancel each other out directionally?)
dbeard92
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 9:12 pm UTC


Return to News & Articles

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests