North Korean rocket launch (womp womp)

Seen something interesting in the news or on the intertubes? Discuss it here.

Moderators: Rinsaikeru, Zamfir, Hawknc, Moderators General, Prelates

Re: North Korean rocket launch (womp womp)

Postby Kulantan » Wed Apr 18, 2012 7:08 pm UTC

johnny_7713 wrote:In other news, "classified imagery sources" lead analysts to believe the cause of the crash was the structural collapse of the third stage due to aerodynamic loading: http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/hyper ... h-fai.html


Paint me highly sceptical about the idea of western intelligence analysts who have access to "classified imagery sources" not trolling the NK missile folks by telling them a complete lie.
TEAM SHIVAHN
Pretty much the best team ever

phlip wrote:(Scholars believe it is lost to time exactly which search engine Columbus preferred... though they are reasonably sure that he was an avid user of Apple Maps.)

Blog.
User avatar
Kulantan
WINNING
 
Posts: 968
Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 9:24 pm UTC
Location: Somewhere witty

Re: North Korean rocket launch (womp womp)

Postby maxQ » Wed Apr 18, 2012 7:32 pm UTC

Kulantan wrote:
Paint me highly sceptical about the idea of western intelligence analysts who have access to "classified imagery sources" not trolling the NK missile folks by telling them a complete lie.



Certainly possible... but it seems like they should've picked something to blame that required NK to spend a lot of money to develop or waste time with instead of Rocketry 301.

"Apparently N.Korea either doesn't have a spin-stabilized inertial grokreel or it at least it failed. If it's not functional during first stage ascent, the rocket loses the heliocentric reference frame, particuarly in a polar orbit insertion. That cost NASA $697 million dollars in 1963 money and caused years of delay in the Delta rocket program. Good luck NKers."
maxQ
 
Posts: 15
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 4:59 pm UTC

Re: North Korean rocket launch (womp womp)

Postby addams » Wed Apr 18, 2012 8:21 pm UTC

maxQ wrote:
Kulantan wrote:
Paint me highly sceptical about the idea of western intelligence analysts who have access to "classified imagery sources" not trolling the NK missile folks by telling them a complete lie.



Certainly possible... but it seems like they should've picked something to blame that required NK to spend a lot of money to develop or waste time with instead of Rocketry 301.

"Apparently N.Korea either doesn't have a spin-stabilized inertial grokreel or it at least it failed. If it's not functional during first stage ascent, the rocket loses the heliocentric reference frame, particuarly in a polar orbit insertion. That cost NASA $697 million dollars in 1963 money and caused years of delay in the Delta rocket program. Good luck NKers."

Yeah. See? Someone should send them a note of condolence. It is hard to make a good rocket.
Life is, just, an exchange of electrons; It is up to us to give it meaning.
addams
 
Posts: 2255
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 4:44 am UTC

Re: North Korean rocket launch (womp womp)

Postby eran_rathan » Wed Apr 18, 2012 8:39 pm UTC

addams wrote:
maxQ wrote:
Kulantan wrote:
Paint me highly sceptical about the idea of western intelligence analysts who have access to "classified imagery sources" not trolling the NK missile folks by telling them a complete lie.



Certainly possible... but it seems like they should've picked something to blame that required NK to spend a lot of money to develop or waste time with instead of Rocketry 301.

"Apparently N.Korea either doesn't have a spin-stabilized inertial grokreel or it at least it failed. If it's not functional during first stage ascent, the rocket loses the heliocentric reference frame, particuarly in a polar orbit insertion. That cost NASA $697 million dollars in 1963 money and caused years of delay in the Delta rocket program. Good luck NKers."

Yeah. See? Someone should send them a note of condolence. It is hard to make a good rocket.


Image

(not directed at you, addams - just the thought of NASA trolling NK is too funny to pass up.)
"Greyarcher":Trying to build a proper foundation for knowledge is blippery.
"JimsMaher":Squirrels are crazy enough to be test pilots.
"Aerokid":"I am going to celery you so much for the first time in the world."
User avatar
eran_rathan
 
Posts: 806
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 2:36 pm UTC
Location: trying too hard

Re: North Korean rocket launch (womp womp)

Postby addams » Wed Apr 18, 2012 8:58 pm UTC

eran_rathan wrote:
addams wrote:
maxQ wrote:
Kulantan wrote:
Paint me highly sceptical about the idea of western intelligence analysts who have access to "classified imagery sources" not trolling the NK missile folks by telling them a complete lie.



Certainly possible... but it seems like they should've picked something to blame that required NK to spend a lot of money to develop or waste time with instead of Rocketry 301.

"Apparently N.Korea either doesn't have a spin-stabilized inertial grokreel or it at least it failed. If it's not functional during first stage ascent, the rocket loses the heliocentric reference frame, particuarly in a polar orbit insertion. That cost NASA $697 million dollars in 1963 money and caused years of delay in the Delta rocket program. Good luck NKers."

Yeah. See? Someone should send them a note of condolence. It is hard to make a good rocket.


Image

(not directed at you, addams - just the thought of NASA trolling NK is too funny to pass up.)


So, funny. I am not easily offended. My mom was easy. She was easy to get along with. That may be where I get it.
Life is, just, an exchange of electrons; It is up to us to give it meaning.
addams
 
Posts: 2255
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 4:44 am UTC

Previous

Return to News & Articles

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests