Breivik sane?

Seen something interesting in the news or on the intertubes? Discuss it here.

Moderators: Rinsaikeru, Zamfir, Hawknc, Moderators General, Prelates

Breivik sane?

Postby addams » Fri Apr 13, 2012 2:24 pm UTC

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-17663958#

I wandered away for the shelter of xkcd and found the above link. I think it has something to do with the Oslo Flowers.
If not; Then google, Breivik.
The part that interests me is the sanity part. Sane? What is sane? Well; Sweden has its standards. I am hoping and praying that the Swedes still have some high fucking standards for themselves.
The following is from the article:
"In a recent letter to Norwegian tabloid Verdans Gang, he said being sent to a psychiatric ward would be a "fate worse than death"."
The following is what I wonder:
O.K. What kind of a Psych Ward is worse than death? Gott'a make ya' wonder.
From the article:
"To send a political activist to an asylum is more sadistic and more evil than killing him!" he wrote.

From me:
Again; What kind of an asylum is more evil than execution?

Hey! It is Norway after all. All people that are incarcerated have access to therapy. Right?

Who needs it more?

That is where the Shield of Religion and Science come in handy. All incarcerated people are allowed to study. Right?

ewww. Yeah. The State really does have a place in drawing a line in the sand for Religion. This man is a Religious Fanatic. Right?

Sure; This man, to himself, is like that guy that fought windmills. But; He is not all that charming to me.

I was reading what I consider an inspired work of literature today. It is the story of a nice walk with a friendly stranger. The book describes the land well. I can very nearly smell the Pepperwood and Eucalyptus trees when I read it. The pages I read today spoke to compassion for evil.

Huh? I am so used to copy and paste from the internet. The following is typed from the book.
Laws of the Spirit, by Dan Millman
Page #43.
"The Law of Compassion is not arbitrary or conditional." she said. "We know that deeply troubled and destructive people do exist in this world, and that distubed people tend to disturb others. Compassion doesn't mean letting such people walk over you or continue their destructive behaviors; Some individuals need to be separated from society. But one can have compassion for evil without succumbing to it."

The last line is of interest to me. Does this speak to the situation the people of Sweden are dealing with?

This man must test the patience of the people that are working with him. What can we do to help? Anything?


The difference between Justice and Revenge is important.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Justice
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revenge


We could wonder. We could do armchair Psychiatry. We could.

What kind of Psychiatric help do the people of Sweden offer one another? Any?

We could make some wild guesses about the Swedish systems of Justice. We could.

This man is seen by some as a political activist?
(I did a political act. I went to an open public meetings. One time the dip shit mayor spent most of the time talking about head bannger rock. So; At the next meeting I read a statement asking him to stop hitting his head. He is an elected official. We can not afford for him to lose any more intelligence. He did not like me. Nor me him.
Maybe, I am, just, lazy. Learning to shoot a gun well is hard work. I have no talent for it.)

I can not tell what is real news that holds important ideas that are worth consideration and what is sensationalist tabloid journalism. Is this article misinformation aimed at entertaining the Super Ego? The Super Ego is the part of the Human that judges, sometimes very harshly.
Spoiler:
Shoot! I lost the internet! Whaa! What happened? Will it come back? I miss it.

Where is the nearest Internet Cafe? Huh?

So, strange. I have become used to the internet.

A Room without books is like a body without a Soul.
A Room without a clock is like a body without a Heart.
Me without the internet is like me without a library for my lap.
Life is, just, an exchange of electrons; It is up to us to give it meaning.

Those that want to Know, Know.
Those that do not Know; Don't tell them.
They do terrible things to people that Tell Them.
addams
 
Posts: 2403
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 4:44 am UTC

Re: Breivik sane?

Postby Arisu » Fri Apr 13, 2012 4:30 pm UTC

It was in Norway, not Sweden.

I believe he considers the psych ward worse than death because it would invalidate his arguments.
Arguments made by the clinically insane are often considered absurd and not worth considering.
He wants to be taken seriously.

Also, he is quite insane to me.
killing 77 people I consider a good marker for insanity.
He was, however, still capable of using reason and as such has to bear the responsibilities.
User avatar
Arisu
 
Posts: 39
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 9:13 pm UTC

Re: Breivik sane?

Postby Diadem » Fri Apr 13, 2012 6:12 pm UTC

If he is declared sane, he can get the maximum sentence, which I believe is 20 years, but no more. If he is declared insane, he can be locked up indefinitely. His case will be reviewed periodically, and he'll only be released if he's deemed no longer dangerous. Which in his case will most likely mean he'll never get out. So obviously not being declared insane is rather important to him.

Also, there's the ideological component. His motives were political. He is clearly not going to agree with his motives being declared madness.
It's one of those irregular verbs, isn't it? I have an independent mind, you are an eccentric, he is round the twist
- Bernard Woolley in Yes, Prime Minister
User avatar
Diadem
 
Posts: 4107
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 11:03 am UTC
Location: The Netherlands

Re: Breivik sane?

Postby Arisu » Fri Apr 13, 2012 6:28 pm UTC

Diadem wrote:If he is declared sane, he can get the maximum sentence, which I believe is 20 years, but no more.


They can extend his sentence indefinitely: bbc
User avatar
Arisu
 
Posts: 39
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 9:13 pm UTC

Re: Breivik sane?

Postby addams » Fri Apr 13, 2012 7:07 pm UTC

Poor me. I did not have the internet and now it is back. Yeah! Happy! Happy! Joy! Joy! I hope it sticks around for a while.

So, funny. I got the country wrong. Pfft.
Someplace sane. All those tall Blonde nations have a reputation for sane. Even in the face of insanity.

O.K. I understand. If, sane, then, when he is like 50 years old, he walks.

There seems to me more to it than that. The political activist part. Man! That is some active activism.

There is no capital punishment where he is. That is reasuring to me. I am unsure why that is true, but, it is.

I listened to a conversation one time. One person said. "Killing people is 'nuts'. Everyone that kills, gets off by reason of insanity."

It got real quiet for a while.

I am not sure how the conversation got there; But; I walked out of that room against executions. I do not want to change my mind. For my own reasons I think the sane answer is not harsh punishment while separated from society. I think the sane answer is not to kill those that kill.

It is a tough one for me. That guy, all by himself, killed nearly 100 persons.

Nothing anyone can do will bring them back. I have no idea why it bothers me. But; It does.
It was the fricking Flowers. How could anyone hurt such nice people?

Nutter. The only answer is Nutter. Busy, Task Oriented, Smarter than a Bread Box, Tall, Blonde, Nutter.

42. I'll go sit by a lake. The internet allows that.
Life is, just, an exchange of electrons; It is up to us to give it meaning.

Those that want to Know, Know.
Those that do not Know; Don't tell them.
They do terrible things to people that Tell Them.
addams
 
Posts: 2403
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 4:44 am UTC

Re: Breivik sane?

Postby Diadem » Fri Apr 13, 2012 7:26 pm UTC

Arisu wrote:
Diadem wrote:If he is declared sane, he can get the maximum sentence, which I believe is 20 years, but no more.


They can extend his sentence indefinitely: bbc

I see. I didn't know that. Thanks.

Not quite sure I agree with such a law on a philosophical level. But well...
It's one of those irregular verbs, isn't it? I have an independent mind, you are an eccentric, he is round the twist
- Bernard Woolley in Yes, Prime Minister
User avatar
Diadem
 
Posts: 4107
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 11:03 am UTC
Location: The Netherlands

Re: Breivik sane?

Postby Angua » Sat Apr 14, 2012 9:58 am UTC

“When we remember we are all mad, the mysteries disappear and life stands explained.” - Mark Twain
User avatar
Angua
Don't call her Delphine
 
Posts: 3131
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 12:42 pm UTC
Location: UK/St. Kitts and Nevis Occasionally, I migrate to the US for a bit

Re: Breivik sane?

Postby addams » Sat Apr 14, 2012 11:37 am UTC

Diadem wrote:
Arisu wrote:
Diadem wrote:If he is declared sane, he can get the maximum sentence, which I believe is 20 years, but no more.


They can extend his sentence indefinitely: bbc

I see. I didn't know that. Thanks.

Not quite sure I agree with such a law on a philosophical level. But well...


From the reading list that someone left lying around:

"Norway's tragedy will be used by some to speak of the dangers of populism. Others will insist that openly and sensitively these questions must be examined and not left to the internet chat rooms."

Why I care. Why does this interest me?

Nothing like this has happened in that land in, for like, 80 years.
I worry. Is it like popcorn?
That is the way it seemed to happen in the US. I was busy. I did not watch the news much. Oh. I stopped and watched as I walked through the kitchen, sometimes.

So; I am not an expert, even though, I was there. There was a school shooting 3 miles from my house. Five blocks from my house a man had a Police man stand over him and empty all the bullets in his Police issued firearm into the man.

I stood in the same little park and had an undercover Police man beat the crap out of one of the guys that was standing with me. I had met that man, before. He was in a bit of a disguise. The first time I met him he was dressed as a jogger. That last time he was dressed in leathers.

Yeah. That makes me sound as nuts as 'What's his name." There are Police people that have the job of dressing like civilians and fucking up other people's day. Sometimes it is nice to have them show up. Other times; Not so much. It is not only their mood. It is the Orders of the Day.

There is a strong anti government, anti intellectual, anti everything movement in the US. The government can do no right. At the same time a Hypocritical view of how wonderful and powerful the Nation is/was.
The people do not trust the Government. It is so bizzare. It was like popcorn over there.



First one school shooting; Then; Another.

Then; A bunch of random violence.
After, 911 I drove out to the coast.

It was weird. I listened to the radio on the way to the Coast. I was looking for something sane. There were Requiem played into the Night. Those Requiem will get to ya' after a while.

I quit listening to the radio. I stopped and listened to the waves. Smelled the salt air and peed along side the road. Yeah. All by my lone self.

"To a mystical destination in the dark."

A dog is a nice companion. They are so much trouble. A small pack can take care of its self, sort of.

This guy, in Norway, said that he did not trust the Government. It was too free wheeling for his tastes? Yuck.



It is the Religion of Same and Different.
It is a Religion. Right? I have met some 'snarky' Religious people.

He has a Right to believe any 'Wing Nut' thing he wants to believe.
God's with Chariots of fire? Fine.
Burning Bush? O.K. With the change in the English Language that one is even funnier than before.

ewww. Some people keep a dead guy on a cross in every room.

Other people have the Gods of the Earth woven into their modern lives. It happens.
Religion. The right to play with our imaginations. The stuff Fairy Tails and Horror Flicks are made of.

This man ran across that line when he involved a bunch of people that did not want to play his game.

Spoiler for even more Off Topic than usual.
Spoiler:
I like a images of real people and Gods. It is so strange to have a poster of Zappa in this room as the God of this room. It is so cool and so very strange all at the same time.
This room has a light show and a poster of Zappa. That is shit I should, just, leave alone. It is so weird and so cool. It's a Poster of Zappa screaming. Thank God; I don't have to listen to it.

I think he is in the wrong place. He should be on the door. The outside of the door. This is Zappa's Room. Frank Zappa has been elevated to God like status. So, weird.

Frank Zappa is the God of this room and I, just, have to get used to it. So, weird. Is it any better than the Dead guy on the cross?


But; Religion based on Race. Yeah. That happens, too.
Some really good Religions can not be entered, except by birth.
They are called Families. Some of those Religions, suck.

Each and every Human being gets their own Religion. It exists in the Right Brain. Hey! It is a good theory!
The left brain is Language and Math busy, busy, busy.

The Right Brain is, just, as big. What is it doing?

Making shit up; Cracking Jokes; Knowing the difference between sex and good sex. See? Religion. Right Brain, stuff. Maybe the Right Brain does need a little guidance. This man's did.

What is going on with this man's Right Brain. I looked at the reading list. He was a little taken with himself. Right? (Narcissism?)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narcissism

http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/self-absorbed

What is up with the portfolio of him dressed as demi Gods. It that real? Did he really do that?
The man looked good in some of those photos.
Were they photo shopped? How can I tell?

Crap. I am having a 'Run Logan Run' moment.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logan%27s_Run
Meets Fahrenheit 451
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fahrenheit_451

Chat Rooms: This is a chat room.

The people of Norway made a statement. They said that they wanted to consider this in a serious way.

"Norway's tragedy will be used by some to speak of the dangers of populism. Others will insist that openly and sensitively these questions must be examined and not left to the internet chat rooms."

This is an internet chat room. Maybe, we should not type about it.

Spoiler:
The Right to Speak is such a big deal. How about the Right to Not Be Spoken To. As I was going along not being spoken to, because, I do not speak the local dialect, I was thinking about Mr. Peabody's way back machine. One of those places prides its self in the Right to not be spoken to. Right?

Speech must be consensual? Like sex? Does that make any sense at all? I think it, kind of, does. More coffee and I will put on gloves. A day of no internet led me to messing around with tools. Now my thumb hurts.


From the article:
"Bjoern Ihler, 20, who survived the massacre on Utoeya and took care of two children aged eight and nine during the ordeal, has been called to testify during the trial. He told the BBC that he was ready to face Breivik and that he had accepted he would have to live with what happened for the rest of his life. "But I don't want Norway to change because of what Breivik did; we need to get back to who we were before the 22nd of July.""


Who were they? Before? Who were they? A quiet people. That is the stereotype.

Another statement from that article:
"The survivors and victims' families want answers and hope that at the end of the trial he will disappear from the public space to allow the healing to begin."


It is so personal. These are real people that experienced sudden loss. Now; The rest of us want to stick our noses into their personal shit.

But; Maybe we can learn by watching what they do. Maybe, they are experts.

This man is not a hero of any kind. Although his planning and follow through are considered virtues in some circles. There is something that is not particular to this man, that is about all people.

Humans can get all fired up and self righteous about their cause. That is the part that is so difficult.

I spent an afternoon with a little old priest that had been released from jail two days earlier. He would not go away from a Nuclear Installation, somewhere. He said that he was praying. It seems some other people joined him. So; He went to jail for some weeks.

It was a sweet afternoon. He told me about taking a bus. He was alone. He turned his back on his luggage and it walked off. The poor sweet man. He wins childlike, not, childish. He had a ticket and he knew the Nuns were waiting for him. He was taking some time at a retreat house.

He lost things that were important to him in his luggage. So, funny. Outside jail is a little more dangerous than inside jail.

I knew a Quaker woman that would not lighten up about US trained death squads. She went to jail for three months.
Both of those people thought that they were doing something for the larger world.

The Twitter guy got about the same kind of punishment. More people heard his message.

Sure. They only got a few months each.

Is it the same part of the brain working? The part of the brain that wants to be a part of something larger than its self? Armies are joined by the willing to do what? Be a part of something right and good. Even if it means walking ankle deep in blood?

I am working on this. I don't, really, 'get' it. The Priest, The Quaker, The Twitter and The Nutter. Something very 'The Same' about each of them.
A passion.= Same.
A faith. =Same.
A need to be engaged in the world. =Same.
They all got arrested. =Same.
They all went to jail. =Same.

Something very different about their methods.
The Twitter and The Nutter really made a splash!

The Priest and the Quaker not so much.
Life is, just, an exchange of electrons; It is up to us to give it meaning.

Those that want to Know, Know.
Those that do not Know; Don't tell them.
They do terrible things to people that Tell Them.
addams
 
Posts: 2403
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 4:44 am UTC

Re: Breivik sane?

Postby Zamfir » Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:26 am UTC

The court case started yesterday, it's becoming quite a show.

Here's a Guardian page that keep up with events: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/blog/2012/apr/16/anders-behring-breivik-trial-live. Read the "day 2" link to get an idea.

Breivik tries to turn his evidence-giving into a statement, with elaborate prepared speeches. The judges will not give him a platform for anything he wants to say, but they have to give him leeway. Since the actual acts are not in question, Breivik's state of mind is the key element of the trial, and his personal evidence plays an important role in that decision.

One lay judge (something like a jury member) has been dismissed. He had made facebook post last year in which he called for the execution of Breivik, and this post turned up last night.
User avatar
Zamfir
 
Posts: 5790
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 2:43 pm UTC
Location: Nederland

Re: Breivik sane?

Postby sourmìlk » Tue Apr 17, 2012 11:01 am UTC

What is the legal definition of sanity in Norway? By the American definition, it seems the Breivik is legally sane (in that he knew what he was doing, that is constituted actually killing people, and that it was against the law), but is also a crazy racist and thinks that justifies his actions.

Also, from the wikipedia article on him:
wikipedia wrote:On 10 April 2012 the second psychiatric evaluation was published with the conclusion that Breivik was not psychotic during the attacks and he was not psychotic during their evaluation.


Which leads me to believe that yeah, he's sane.

Also:
The Guardian wrote:10.13am: The prosecutor is talking about Breivok's playing of World of Warcraft.

Not this shit again. If the prosecution is trying to indicate that playing World of Warcraft indicates violent tendencies, I'm pissed off. I thought that the psychological community had thoroughly trashed this argument as bullshit.
Terry Pratchett wrote:The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it.
User avatar
sourmìlk
If I can't complain, can I at least express my fear?
 
Posts: 6405
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2008 10:53 pm UTC
Location: permanently in the wrong

Re: Breivik sane?

Postby Zamfir » Tue Apr 17, 2012 11:38 am UTC

Yeah, I don't understand why they still spend effort on these trials. In the future, they should just hire you to find the relevant wikipedia article and be done with it.

-- Reverted an edit, as sourmilk had already responded
User avatar
Zamfir
 
Posts: 5790
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 2:43 pm UTC
Location: Nederland

Re: Breivik sane?

Postby sourmìlk » Tue Apr 17, 2012 11:41 am UTC

Zamfir wrote:Yeah, I don't understand why they still spend effort on these trials. In the future, they should just hire you to find the relevant wikipedia article and be done with it.

As much as I'd like (and actually probably hate the responsibility of) making all decisions because I'm obviously always right, you should notice that I used tentative language like "it seems". I'm not offering a final, irrefutable opinion here, these are my initial perceptions of his sanity. Are we not allowed to offer our opinions on trials on this board any more? I recognize that evidence can and probably will arise to challenge my perception of Breivik's sanity.

But if it isn't your point that I'm trying to assert superiority over an entire legal system (as your edit might indicate), what is your point?
Terry Pratchett wrote:The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it.
User avatar
sourmìlk
If I can't complain, can I at least express my fear?
 
Posts: 6405
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2008 10:53 pm UTC
Location: permanently in the wrong

Re: Breivik sane?

Postby Zamfir » Tue Apr 17, 2012 11:55 am UTC

There was a first psychiatric evalution, saying that was criminally insane, then a second one reverting that. At least one point of contention is that the second one might be influenced by the public response to the first evaluation. The public responded very badly to the implication that someone could be capable of planning such a complicated affair, and still be considered insane. Even though there are of course enough examples of people who kept deep delusions going for years, and could function well in that period. It's obviously not an easy case.

And yes, the defense intends to call neonazis as witnesses, to show that other seemingly sane people share his ideas.
User avatar
Zamfir
 
Posts: 5790
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 2:43 pm UTC
Location: Nederland

Re: Breivik sane?

Postby Mambrino » Tue Apr 17, 2012 4:28 pm UTC

Zamfir wrote:There was a first psychiatric evalution, saying that was criminally insane, then a second one reverting that. At least one point of contention is that the second one might be influenced by the public response to the first evaluation. The public responded very badly to the implication that someone could be capable of planning such a complicated affair, and still be considered insane. Even though there are of course enough examples of people who kept deep delusions going for years, and could function well in that period. It's obviously not an easy case.

And yes, the defense intends to call neonazis as witnesses, to show that other seemingly sane people share his ideas.


However, the impartiality of first evaluation was questioned, too. (If I remember correctly the news reports, it was something like that: In Norway, the person being evaluated should be interviewed separately by two psychiatric professionals, but the doctors who were to evaluate A.B.B. were afraid to face him alone and interviewed him together only, so it's plausible that their views influenced each other's analysis.)

Also, in addition to neonazis, etc., if the defense gets their way, mullah Krekar will also testify.
On March 26, 2012 he [Krekar] was sentenced to 5 years in prison for making repeated death threats against Norwegian politicians and other persons if they pursued certain civil actions against him.
Mambrino
 
Posts: 48
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 9:45 pm UTC
Location: Finland

Re: Breivik sane?

Postby addams » Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:46 pm UTC

Afraid to be alone with him?
Yeah. I understand this. I have had it happen to me three times.
Two times the person was Paranoid Schizophrenic, I think.
Not all Paranoid Schizophrenics are frightening. In my experience most need a lot of TLC. It is treatable.

The other was an Anti Social Personality Disorder. He really believed that other people. People like me, do not have 'real' feelings like he does.
I was alone with him. He began to trust me enough to start telling me what he and his friends were doing for fun. Fuck All! I got out as fast as I could. That SOB is still out there. Proof. A person needs proof. So, Psych evaluations done by a team do protect the professional. Those kind of evaluations must have some strict rules. Or; Be recorded. It is so tricky. How do we allow people to trust us and be able to say anything to us; And, us have the right to say, "AHHH! Scary Man!"

It is scary as shit to be alone with what seems to be straight up evil.

Last year I think that I remember this man writing that when asked what he was doing he said playing World of Warcraft. He was busy and did not want to be bothered.

This man was able to stay 'on task'. Frightening as that is in this case it is considered a virtue in some circles.

What it looks like to me is a person that would have been a shinning star in a real war. But; He was not in a real war. He thinks that he was in a real war.
That's nuts. Right?


Pfft. Sourmilk.
Spoiler:
I do not want to derail this thread, but, as long as you are pissed off let's do this. Then, you can start a thread all of its own.
"Not this shit again. If the prosecution is trying to indicate that playing World of Warcraft indicates violent tendencies, I'm pissed off. I thought that the psychological community had thoroughly trashed this argument as bullshit."

I don't play World of Warcraft. I have never seen it.
But; I know other stuff.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypnosis

Any activity that is repetitive will cause a person to fall into a state of hypnosis. There are different levels of hypnosis. All humans are susceptible. Some more than others.
The list of hypnotic behaviors would fill an internet page.
Prayer. Have you ever seen those prayer beads nuns have?
Jogging; Walking. Rythemic motion.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biofeedback
Like a kitchen stove. It can be used to make nutritious and delicious food or poison.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Learning_t ... ucation%29

Hours and hours spent watching violence and having some effect on what happens on the screen fundamentally changes the person that engages in this activity. It is learning.
Hours and hours of math teaches math and changes the person fundamentally.

I know that soldiers can be taught to kill other humans in real life. Most soldiers go back from war and are able to live peaceful and productive lives.

Violent video games place the players in a state of war. Most will go on to live peaceful and productive lives. Yet; These people have learned something.

The sad part is the innocence lost. It will not be unlearned.

Why does this piss you off? Do you think that other people will judge you for playing World of Warcraft? Well, Sourmilk; It is an important piece of information about you. What Religion are you? What is your sun sign? Really? Do you think that you are like all other Virgos?
It is personal and as long as it stays that way, then, you are good.
No. Sourmilk it has not been put to rest.
What has happened is that people have the right to play these games, because, we have been playing war games a long time. Chess is a war game.
Life is, just, an exchange of electrons; It is up to us to give it meaning.

Those that want to Know, Know.
Those that do not Know; Don't tell them.
They do terrible things to people that Tell Them.
addams
 
Posts: 2403
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 4:44 am UTC

Re: Breivik sane?

Postby sourmìlk » Tue Apr 17, 2012 10:27 pm UTC

Spoilered for a bit off-topic:
Spoiler:
That's all very nice addams, but the data don't support the conclusion that video games cause or encourage violent behaviour, despite the potential mechanisms by which it could theoretically do so. You have perfectly reasonable hypotheses there about what could happen, but the reality is that it doesn't. So no, my problem isn't being judged (that's clearly not something I care about). My problem is that people believe things that are provably wrong.
Terry Pratchett wrote:The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it.
User avatar
sourmìlk
If I can't complain, can I at least express my fear?
 
Posts: 6405
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2008 10:53 pm UTC
Location: permanently in the wrong

Re: Breivik sane?

Postby curtis95112 » Wed Apr 18, 2012 2:40 am UTC

Spoilered to prevent thread derailing.
Spoiler:
addams wrote:Why does this piss you off? Do you think that other people will judge you for playing World of Warcraft? Well, Sourmilk; It is an important piece of information about you. What Religion are you? What is your sun sign? Really? Do you think that you are like all other Virgos?
It is personal and as long as it stays that way, then, you are good.
No. Sourmilk it has not been put to rest.
What has happened is that people have the right to play these games, because, we have been playing war games a long time. Chess is a war game.


Sourmilk addressed the validity of your claims, so I'll just say this. Public perception of video games affect related laws. At the very least, it could change the way age ratings are given. The problem with invalid opinions is that they tend to have consequences.
addams wrote: There is no such thing as an Unbiased Jury.
curtis95112
 
Posts: 521
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2011 5:23 pm UTC

Re: Breivik sane?

Postby addams » Wed Apr 18, 2012 5:53 am UTC

Aright.
New Thread needed.
Sourmilk; You do it.

A man in Norway that knew what he was doing and had what he thought were good reasons for doing it, broke the hearts but not the spirits of a people.

That is what this thread is about.

Is that sane? Is that insane?

It seems to me that he was such a conformist that he went all the way around the loop and became a nonconformist.

The people of Norway seem to know what they are doing. They built a whole new building. That part has my interest. What are they going to do with it when this is done?
Life is, just, an exchange of electrons; It is up to us to give it meaning.

Those that want to Know, Know.
Those that do not Know; Don't tell them.
They do terrible things to people that Tell Them.
addams
 
Posts: 2403
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 4:44 am UTC

Re: Breivik sane?

Postby Angua » Wed Apr 18, 2012 3:36 pm UTC

Some of Breivik's comments definitely make me question his sanity. He says that he'd do it all again, but thinks he should be acquitted? He also thinks that the death penalty would be a better punishment than 21 years (though the previous comment means that he'd probably be a threat to the public for much longer than 21 years so Norway would be within their rights to hold him indefinitely).

Anyway, definitely scary.
“When we remember we are all mad, the mysteries disappear and life stands explained.” - Mark Twain
User avatar
Angua
Don't call her Delphine
 
Posts: 3131
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 12:42 pm UTC
Location: UK/St. Kitts and Nevis Occasionally, I migrate to the US for a bit

Re: Breivik sane?

Postby addams » Wed Apr 18, 2012 9:37 pm UTC

Angua wrote:Some of Breivik's comments definitely make me question his sanity. He says that he'd do it all again, but thinks he should be acquitted? He also thinks that the death penalty would be a better punishment than 21 years (though the previous comment means that he'd probably be a threat to the public for much longer than 21 years so Norway would be within their rights to hold him indefinitely).

Anyway, definitely scary.


Yep. I read that, too.

What about this group he is talking about. The knights Templar? Is that real? If, he has a bunch of imaginary friends, that is O.K.
Imaginary friends that tell him to kill people, that is not O.K.

One must be as careful with one's imaginary friends as one is with real friends.
Life is, just, an exchange of electrons; It is up to us to give it meaning.

Those that want to Know, Know.
Those that do not Know; Don't tell them.
They do terrible things to people that Tell Them.
addams
 
Posts: 2403
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 4:44 am UTC

Re: Breivik sane?

Postby buddy431 » Wed Apr 18, 2012 9:47 pm UTC

Angua wrote:Some of Breivik's comments definitely make me question his sanity. He says that he'd do it all again, but thinks he should be acquitted? He also thinks that the death penalty would be a better punishment than 21 years (though the previous comment means that he'd probably be a threat to the public for much longer than 21 years so Norway would be within their rights to hold him indefinitely).

Anyway, definitely scary.


He's sane in that he recognized what he did, in that he is fully aware of the magnitude of his actions, and understands that in the eyes of the law what he did was wrong. Getting the death penalty would make him a martyr, at least in his eyes. That's not something most people want, but it's not crazy either. He's using the trial as a platform for his views, which seems pretty sane to me. His beliefs might be strongly outside the mainstream, but that doesn't make you crazy, not in a criminal or legal sense.
Gellert1984 wrote:Also, bomb president CIA al qaeda JFK twin towers jupiter moon martians [s]emtex.
User avatar
buddy431
 
Posts: 437
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 5:21 pm UTC

Re: Breivik sane?

Postby Nomic » Thu Apr 19, 2012 8:06 am UTC

I would call Breivik crazy in the same sense I think most murderers, dictators and evil people are crazy. Normal people don't do things like that, so therefor these people must by definition be abnormal. A sane man doesn't just shoot seventy innocent people.

On the other hand, I'm not sure if he meets the actual definition of insanity. He didn't just flip out one morning and shoot some random people. He had a reason to do so and doing so was perfectly acceptable according to his own view of the world. Of course objectively we can say his worldview is clearly wrong, but would a person who does something based on his religion (one that you don't believe in) also be insane then? From his point of view his actions make sense, but to you they might seem crazy. Unfortunate implications by comparing religious acts with the acts of a mass murderer aside (I don't really have any problems with religion, it's just the best example of acting under principles that might seem crazy to people who don't share your worldview), I think there's more to being insane than following an unusual (and in this case outright evil) ideology.

I'd say he this wasn't an act of insanity, but a premeditated act committed by a man who was healthy in mind and body, but with a seriously twisted ideology. In any case he should rot in a jail cell for the rest of his life (and that would be for his own good as well. If he ever gets out of jail, you can bet he'll be lynched right there in the street).
User avatar
Nomic
 
Posts: 554
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 12:29 pm UTC
Location: Gibbering in the corner

Re: Breivik sane?

Postby Ulc » Thu Apr 19, 2012 8:47 am UTC

Nomic wrote: Of course objectively we can say his worldview is clearly wrong


Oh, that's a neat thing we can do there. How?

Or to rephrase in a non-snarky way, how are you proposing a objective moral system? I of course agree that his world-view is truly horrible - but I recognise that it's an subjective opinion of mine (that must of society happily for me shares)

He says that he'd do it all again, but thinks he should be acquitted? He also thinks that the death penalty would be a better punishment than 21 years


Doesn't necessitate insanity.

He'd doing it again because he doesn't believe what he did was wrong, it was (in his worldview) a necessary defence of his country, which is also why he claims he should be acquitted. As for the death penalty, the idea seems to be that if society deems him guilty, it should punish properly.

But really, everything the man says and does should be viewed under the light of what he's trying to do. His intent is to foster as much enmity between ethnic and religous groupings, for his purpose, the more attention and debate around himself he can draw, the better it is for him. In that light, all his statements makes sense.
It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it - Aristotle

A White Russian, shades and a bathrobe, what more can you want from life?
User avatar
Ulc
 
Posts: 1303
Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 8:05 pm UTC
Location: Copenhagen university

Re: Breivik sane?

Postby sourmìlk » Thu Apr 19, 2012 8:48 am UTC

Ulc wrote:
Nomic wrote: Of course objectively we can say his worldview is clearly wrong


Oh, that's a neat thing we can do there. How?

Or to rephrase in a non-snarky way, how are you proposing a objective moral system? I of course agree that his world-view is truly horrible - but I recognise that it's an subjective opinion of mine (that must of society happily for me shares).

Even from a non-moral perspective, he's wrong, in that he's used false data to back up his arguments.
Terry Pratchett wrote:The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it.
User avatar
sourmìlk
If I can't complain, can I at least express my fear?
 
Posts: 6405
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2008 10:53 pm UTC
Location: permanently in the wrong

Re: Breivik sane?

Postby curtis95112 » Thu Apr 19, 2012 1:30 pm UTC

@Sourmilk
While that does mean he's wrong, sane people can also be wrong.

addams wrote:It seems to me that he was such a conformist that he went all the way around the loop and became a nonconformist.



What do you mean by this?
addams wrote: There is no such thing as an Unbiased Jury.
curtis95112
 
Posts: 521
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2011 5:23 pm UTC

Re: Breivik sane?

Postby Angua » Thu Apr 19, 2012 1:34 pm UTC

I think Adams means that he likes the status quo so much (ie only Norwegians in Norway) which may be thought of as someone one conforms to society, that he became someone who went completely against normal society in order to protect his idea of the status quo.
“When we remember we are all mad, the mysteries disappear and life stands explained.” - Mark Twain
User avatar
Angua
Don't call her Delphine
 
Posts: 3131
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 12:42 pm UTC
Location: UK/St. Kitts and Nevis Occasionally, I migrate to the US for a bit

Re: Breivik sane?

Postby Heisenberg » Thu Apr 19, 2012 1:38 pm UTC

What I don't understand about Breivik is how his hatred of Arabs compelled him to murder Norwegian children. That's the only reason I see to doubt his sanity.
Heisenberg
 
Posts: 3133
Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 8:48 pm UTC
Location: Uncertain

Re: Breivik sane?

Postby addams » Thu Apr 19, 2012 11:02 pm UTC

Angua wrote:I think Adams means that he likes the status quo so much (ie only Norwegians in Norway) which may be thought of as someone one conforms to society, that he became someone who went completely against normal society in order to protect his idea of the status quo.

Yep. He went all the way around the loop.

What he did has challenged the people of Norway to be Norwegian. Strange. Right? They have a bunch of sane stuff that they do. They treat people that commit crimes with human dignity. They have relatively low imprisonment sentences. They do not do executions. They help people that are released from prison to live wholesome lives. They provide for monetary assistance, social, educational and vocational opportunities.

They are not going to stop being Norwegian. Some have given it some thought. Can you blame them?

This guy made them think. It seems that they are keeping level heads and expressing deeply human emotions. The flowers, really, get to me. I see those flowers and I tear up.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knights_Te ... masonry%29
Yeah. The Knights of Templar are real. It has something to do with the Masons.
I have had some personal experience with them. They come in a ton of flavors. What the men do is weird. What the women do depends on what branch of the thing you are involved with.
In my experence, Rainbow Girls are all about exterior stuff. Like old fashioned beauty pagents. Some of those dresses are amazing.

Jobs daughters get cool dresses, too. But; some of the rituals are creepy.

Eastern Stars are the adults and the ones I knew were a cross between a tea party and a planing session for the next formal Ball. (Shrug.)

They have a thing about blood. A person must prove that they have a blood relative that is a Mason, before, becoming a member of the female brood.
I am. I had to do some paperwork for two people that wanted in. One did not have any blood relation, but, she wanted to wear the dresses, so much. So; I fixed the paper work. The other was related, it was still a task to prove it.

I had no interest in doing that. I wanted to be outside in hiking boots.

They are real. They are weird. Job's Daughters was like a girlie KKK thing, sometimes. It is mostly about the dresses and the parties. Not all that weird. Well; He may have been hanging out with a weird bunch. There are a lot of Masons. Some are going to be stranger than others.

Yep. I think that the best result for this man is sane. He will be treated well. In twenty years he may have a very different outlook on the world.
Insane is a good thing in Norway, too. But, what a burden on his therapists.

Tomorrow we can find out about that building.
Life is, just, an exchange of electrons; It is up to us to give it meaning.

Those that want to Know, Know.
Those that do not Know; Don't tell them.
They do terrible things to people that Tell Them.
addams
 
Posts: 2403
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 4:44 am UTC

Re: Breivik sane?

Postby DaBigCheez » Thu Apr 19, 2012 11:15 pm UTC

Nomic wrote:I would call Breivik crazy in the same sense I think most murderers, dictators and evil people are crazy. Normal people don't do things like that, so therefor these people must by definition be abnormal. A sane man doesn't just shoot seventy innocent people.

Be very, very careful with that line of thinking. Besides the possibility of circularity in the "evil people" part of the definition (they're crazy because normal people aren't that evil, and normal people don't act that evil because they'd have to be crazy to do so), it leads to othering those who commit crimes, or those who you don't agree with, and the circle of those to whom it applies can expand continuously. I'll leave the slippery-slope as an exercise for the reader, but consider the fact that propaganda campaigns in wartime will often do exactly the same thing to one's national enemies, in order to make the soldiering-age populace less likely to empathize with their enemies as fellow human beings, and more willing to shoot the foreign, incomprehensible monsters to death.
existential_elevator wrote:It's like a jigsaw puzzle of Hitler pissing on Mother Theresa. No individual piece is offensive, but together...

If you think hot women have it easy because everyone wants to have sex at them, you're both wrong and also the reason you're wrong.
User avatar
DaBigCheez
 
Posts: 501
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 8:03 am UTC

Re: Breivik sane?

Postby sourmìlk » Thu Apr 19, 2012 11:49 pm UTC

curtis95112 wrote:@Sourmilk
While that does mean he's wrong, sane people can also be wrong.

I know, I said previously that I thought he was legally sane.
Terry Pratchett wrote:The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it.
User avatar
sourmìlk
If I can't complain, can I at least express my fear?
 
Posts: 6405
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2008 10:53 pm UTC
Location: permanently in the wrong

Re: Breivik sane?

Postby Shivahn » Fri Apr 20, 2012 12:15 am UTC

DaBigCheez wrote:
Nomic wrote:I would call Breivik crazy in the same sense I think most murderers, dictators and evil people are crazy. Normal people don't do things like that, so therefor these people must by definition be abnormal. A sane man doesn't just shoot seventy innocent people.

Be very, very careful with that line of thinking. Besides the possibility of circularity in the "evil people" part of the definition (they're crazy because normal people aren't that evil, and normal people don't act that evil because they'd have to be crazy to do so), it leads to othering those who commit crimes, or those who you don't agree with, and the circle of those to whom it applies can expand continuously. I'll leave the slippery-slope as an exercise for the reader, but consider the fact that propaganda campaigns in wartime will often do exactly the same thing to one's national enemies, in order to make the soldiering-age populace less likely to empathize with their enemies as fellow human beings, and more willing to shoot the foreign, incomprehensible monsters to death.

It's also just sort of... wrong. The urge to see other people, even murderers and such, as evil, or somehow intrinsically different, leads us to both ignore bad people because they must be good people (after all, he's such a nice guy!), and also leads us to believe that since we aren't bad people (like those murderers), we aren't bad people, whether or not we're bad in other ways, or even the same way, but we justify ourselves because we're not like those caricatures that other bad people are.
User avatar
Shivahn
 
Posts: 2145
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 6:17 am UTC

Re: Breivik sane?

Postby DaBigCheez » Fri Apr 20, 2012 12:23 am UTC

That's at least part of what I was going for, Shivahn, thank you for clarifying what I meant :)
existential_elevator wrote:It's like a jigsaw puzzle of Hitler pissing on Mother Theresa. No individual piece is offensive, but together...

If you think hot women have it easy because everyone wants to have sex at them, you're both wrong and also the reason you're wrong.
User avatar
DaBigCheez
 
Posts: 501
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 8:03 am UTC

Re: Breivik sane?

Postby Shivahn » Fri Apr 20, 2012 3:44 am UTC

I'm not sure if "clarifying" is the word you want. I mangled our language pretty badly there :P
User avatar
Shivahn
 
Posts: 2145
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 6:17 am UTC

Re: Breivik sane?

Postby Ulc » Fri Apr 20, 2012 8:36 am UTC

Shivahn wrote:I'm not sure if "clarifying" is the word you want. I mangled our language pretty badly there :P


You sure did, but you also managed to make the point a bit clearer.

I'm not sure it has hit the English news yet, but his comments this morning makes me come fairly close to retching. He's talking about how Denmark is the only decent country in the nordics, and how a shift to Danish-like politics would have kept him from murdering 77 people. It's a fairly slimy feeling to have a "seal of approval" for my country by someone like that - at least our country is moving slowly away from the blatant racism these days.
It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it - Aristotle

A White Russian, shades and a bathrobe, what more can you want from life?
User avatar
Ulc
 
Posts: 1303
Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 8:05 pm UTC
Location: Copenhagen university

Re: Breivik sane?

Postby Dauric » Fri Apr 20, 2012 5:27 pm UTC

addams wrote:Yep. I read that, too.

What about this group he is talking about. The knights Templar? Is that real? If, he has a bunch of imaginary friends, that is O.K.
Imaginary friends that tell him to kill people, that is not O.K.

One must be as careful with one's imaginary friends as one is with real friends.


Knights Templar

Also the Freemasons have a division under the same name.

The tl;dr of it is essentially that between the secrecy and (rumored) odd rituals of the order of medieval knights and the Freemasons adopting the name for one of their own sub-organizations and the secrecy and odd rituals associated with the Freemasons, the Knights Templar show up frequently in conspiracy theory rants.

So, yes, the Knights Templar did exist, and there is a separate organization under the same name with the Freemasons, but odds are Breivik's ramblings about them come from the same category of tabloid urban lore as "aliens working with the U.S. government" and the "Pope is secretly cloning an anti-Jesus".
We're in the traffic-chopper over the XKCD boards where there's been a thread-derailment. Later, Garrus was eaten by a shark. It is believed that the Point has perished in the accident. Back to you Bob.
User avatar
Dauric
 
Posts: 3169
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 6:58 pm UTC
Location: If I knew this with any accuracy I wouldn't know if I was going to get a speeding ticket.

Re: Breivik sane?

Postby Jonesthe Spy » Fri Apr 20, 2012 5:47 pm UTC

Heisenberg wrote:What I don't understand about Breivik is how his hatred of Arabs compelled him to murder Norwegian children. That's the only reason I see to doubt his sanity.


Actually, if you expose yourself to current right-wing media (a painful process to be sure) it makes perfect sense. The amount of hate and vitriol aimed at liberals and others who are in the rightwingers' view aiding and abetting the hated non-white group du jour is just as great as the hate for said non-white group. Brevik didn't kill random kids, he killed teens at a leadership camp thing for Norway's ruling Labor party.

It's not like you even need to go to fringe groups to hear that kind of talk, just listen to American right-wing talk radio for a bit, if you have the stomach for it.
Jonesthe Spy
 
Posts: 108
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2011 7:05 pm UTC

Re: Breivik sane?

Postby johnny_7713 » Fri Apr 20, 2012 7:14 pm UTC

Dauric wrote:
addams wrote:Yep. I read that, too.

What about this group he is talking about. The knights Templar? Is that real? If, he has a bunch of imaginary friends, that is O.K.
Imaginary friends that tell him to kill people, that is not O.K.

One must be as careful with one's imaginary friends as one is with real friends.


Knights Templar

Also the Freemasons have a division under the same name.

The tl;dr of it is essentially that between the secrecy and (rumored) odd rituals of the order of medieval knights and the Freemasons adopting the name for one of their own sub-organizations and the secrecy and odd rituals associated with the Freemasons, the Knights Templar show up frequently in conspiracy theory rants.

So, yes, the Knights Templar did exist, and there is a separate organization under the same name with the Freemasons, but odds are Breivik's ramblings about them come from the same category of tabloid urban lore as "aliens working with the U.S. government" and the "Pope is secretly cloning an anti-Jesus".


There are also other organizations that refer to the Templars in some form (this article lists a few).

Given that Breivik designed a military uniform for himself, complete with a bunch of made-up medals and possibly even knightly orders (IIRC) if he does have a bunch of buddies he shared his ideology with I wouldn't be surprised if they named their club after the Knights Templar. It's possible there's a secret society of right-wing extremists calling themselves the Knights Templar without any connection to the tabloid urban lore about the original Knights Templar surviving somehow.
johnny_7713
 
Posts: 449
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 1:31 pm UTC

Re: Breivik sane?

Postby addams » Fri Apr 20, 2012 9:59 pm UTC

You were having such a nice conversation about the Knights Templar.

I am sorry to interrupt. I was having thoughts.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-17781472#
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-17789206#

Jesus Christ! That was one busy man! Fuck!

O.K. I am a big ole' flip-flopper.

I read that and think, "Nah. He is too calm."

Sane? I don't have any books any more. I miss my books. I don't remember the page #. I could find it, if, I had the book.

One man defined sane and normal as fully alive and spontaneous. Not a spontaneous bone left in that man, Breivik's, body. Every move had been thought out.

Flipped back. There is nothing nuts about thinking every move out and then implementing that plan. He even had failure inside his plan.

The only nuts thing is that he thought one car bomb could destroy the entire Norwegian Government. It is a small country. It is not that small.
That is simply not understanding something fundamental about Governments.

eww.
Spoiler:
Am I the only person that remembers the oldest library on the Planet being bombed? To be fair, I was not there. I did not, even, know that it existed until it had been bombed. Was it an accident? I don't know. It was a big target. Just a target, that is all.?
That is the way to destroy a Government. Take its memory away. We keep our collective stories in books. Well; We used to. Who knows what people do now?

It is all on the internet? It isn't. It is not all on the internet.


Totally off topic.
Spoiler:
Snipers are a special class of people. They are, just, people.
They seem to have a talent. Some people pick up a pen and, just, know how to use it. There is no easy way to explain it.
One guy was stationed on a roof top. He was told, "If anything moves on that street; Shoot It!"
Fuck. That guy was a mess. He did what he does. It was all wrong.

A kid. A five year old boy that wanted to go play with the other kids like on most other days was told to say indoors. His mother went pee, or, she was doing some other thing. She was not watching him at every moment. He went looking for his friends.

He went out on the street. He moved.

Yeah. You can imagine the rest. That young man was not nuts when he did the aim, fire. He was a little nuts afterward. He did not ever want to touch another gun. He was following orders. His job was to shoot, not, to think.

He had killed deer. He was good at it. This was different to him. He was sane. He was also innocent by virtue of something. I don't know what. But; He was.

Who would not hold such a man in their arms and coo something sweet? Just let him cry it out. He and the mom were both a mess. War sucks.


Where were we? Me as a one single member of a very large Family of Man do not know. I know the guy needs professional help. (It seems many of us do.) His professional help will work in teams of well trained and moral Norwegians. The therapists will have therapy available to them. Right?

I am thinking that they will do it right. What ever right is. This will be an example to the world how to do it right. Poor Norway. The world is watching.

What do they do? There have been some flowers involved.

I have questions about Mental Health care in Norway. What do they think is therapy?

I am partial to Transactional Analysis, myself.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transactio ... C.29_model

I do not like the way the article is written.
The way I remember it is as follows:
The Parent State is the Executive very Left Brain and linear. (Super Ego, for Freudians.)
The Adult State is the Whole person in Balance. (Ego, for Freudians.)
The Child State is the Right Brain sticking its nose into its own business. (Id, for Freudians.)

Spoiler:
I think that Freud plagiarized the Catholic Church. He may not have known what he was doing. Well; With all that nasty sex talk going on. And; I could discuss the short comings of Freud all night.
Yep. If we keep looking back we will find the wold of human thought divided three ways over and over, again. Different thread. Right?


For Heaven's sake I do not think that TA is for all situations. Not by a long shot. It is useful for the sane that like to be saner.

Have you ever known a calm, responsible, fun loving and innocent adult?
Eric Berne, was aiming at that goal. He was aiming in the right direction.

That stuff is for sane people. If, using TA as the tool, then,This man that is being discussed would look like a person that had the Parent; The Executive; The Left Brain; Dominating the The Child, The Right Brain; Where did the ego go?

Is his ego self, gone. Bye Bye. Or; Has the child within gone, Bye Bye.

Methods of treatment may change over time. They may need to try a bunch of stuff. Torturing of him with mind altering drugs with out his informed consent is still wrong. Right?

Those people have a special case on their hands. So, interesting to me for so many reasons.
The US had this in 1996.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oklahoma_City_bombing

This is dark stuff.
Spoiler:
The jury deliberated for 23 hours. On June 2, 1997, McVeigh was found guilty on eleven counts of murder and conspiracy.[160][161] Although the defense argued for a reduced sentence of life imprisonment, McVeigh was sentenced to death.[162] In May 2001, the FBI announced that it had withheld over 3,000 documents from McVeigh's defense counsel.[163] The execution was postponed for one month for the defense to review the documents. On June 6, federal judge Richard Paul Matsch ruled the documents would not prove McVeigh innocent and ordered the execution to proceed.

This is dark stuff.
The execution was transmitted on closed-circuit television so that the relatives of the victims could witness his death. McVeigh's execution was the first federal execution in 38 years.

"An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind." Was Ghandi, right?

I type the world's longest posts. See? Thoughts.

Monday. It will all be over on Monday.
It is Monday and it is not all over.

2.43pm The judge has read to the court comments from the Norwegian commission for forensic medicine, which has asked for "further work" to be done on the second psychiatric report into Breivik. This is the report which found he was sane.
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

Different Day; Different Thoughts

That man said that he had one hundred voices in his head telling him not to do it.

Maybe, we should listen to the voices in our heads.

I don't have voices in my head. I am a little envious of people that have a head full of imaginary friends.

When I talk to myself I know it is me. Don't you?

Yes. I have had auditory hallucinations, or, something. I heard a man's voice say my name from behind me. That happened several times. I looked. There was no one there.

Maybe, it was an echo that had the right pitch. It may be a common sound. I don't know. That was years ago. I have not had a thing like that happen in a long time. And; That is fine with me.
Life is, just, an exchange of electrons; It is up to us to give it meaning.

Those that want to Know, Know.
Those that do not Know; Don't tell them.
They do terrible things to people that Tell Them.
addams
 
Posts: 2403
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 4:44 am UTC


Return to News & Articles

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Brace, MobTeeseboose, rciapcaoa and 6 guests