Tiberius wrote:I'm not arguing that what happened didn't sucked I'm just saying that making her wealthy isn't warranted.
Don't people have the right to donate money even if you think it's not warranted? What, are you trying to rob people of all agency?
If she had done her job properly she would not be wealthy now. She is being rewarded for being bad at her job no matter how much you contribute to her wealth won't change that.
You keep insisting that she just didn't do her job properly - because of this one incident of her "not being able to keep them in line." You're happily assuming an unreasonably high expectation of constant job perfection. It would be like saying that teachers who have more than one student who fail the class are bad at their jobs, since their job is to teach the material to students. All so you can make this rather oddly outraged emotive "she's being rewarded
for being bad at her job
!!!!!1" claim which, no matter how many times you repeat it, does not really qualify as a substantive argument. It's an interesting, somewhat right-winged spin on the story, I grant you, but that doesn't make it very compelling.
Kids don't just start talking like that. It takes a lot of letting people walk all over you for them to get that ballsy.
Like, on what do you base this comment on? Your personal hunches about child psychology? You're basically blaming her
being bullies - isn't that
'robbing her of all agency?'