Length of Curve
Moderators: gmalivuk, Moderators General, Prelates
Length of Curve
Is there any connection between the length of a function on a given interval and it's integral or derivative? I know Derivatives and Integrals are related but is length related too?
Re: Length of Curve
Yes. The arc length of a function f(x) from a to b is given by
[math]s=\int_a^b \sqrt{1+f'(x)^2}dx[/math]
[math]s=\int_a^b \sqrt{1+f'(x)^2}dx[/math]
Code: Select all
_=0,w=1,(*t)(int,int);a()??<char*p="[gd\
~/d~/\\b\x7F\177l*~/~djal{x}h!\005h";(++w
<033)?(putchar((*t)(w??(p:>,w?_:0XD)),a()
):0;%>O(x,l)??<_='['/7;{return!(x%(_11))
?x??'l:x^(1+ ++l);}??>main(){t=&O;w=a();}
 MartianInvader
 Posts: 808
 Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 5:51 pm UTC
Re: Length of Curve
Great question. It's usually answered somewhere in the second half of secondsemester calculus. You can determine the answer by breaking up the interval into lots of little pieces and approximating the function with straight lines on each piece (that is, connect the point on the graph at the start of a little interval to the point at the end with a straight line). This works because, as the little intervals get smaller and smaller (and thus more numerous), the total length of the straight lines gets closer and closer to the actual length of the function. If you write out the formula for the total length of the line segments as a summation, and then use the mean value theorem, you can make it look like a Riemann sum for the function Qoppa provided. That means the limit as the intervals get small is just the integral of that function.
Let's have a fervent argument, mostly over semantics, where we all claim the burden of proof is on the other side!
 Sir_Elderberry
 Posts: 4206
 Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 6:50 pm UTC
 Location: Sector ZZ9 Plural Z Alpha
 Contact:
Re: Length of Curve
Qoppa wrote:Yes. The arc length of a function f(x) from a to b is given by
[math]s=\int_a^b \sqrt{1+f'(x)^2}dx[/math]
For further information, note that if the function is defined parametrically, with x and y functions of t, then:
[math]s=\int_a^b \sqrt{x'(t)^2+y'(t)^2}dx[/math]
http://www.geekyhumanist.blogspot.com  Science and the Concerned Voter
Well. You heard him.
Belial wrote:You are the coolest guy that ever cooled.
I reiterate. Coolest. Guy.
Well. You heard him.
Re: Length of Curve
Except then you have to integrate with respect to [imath]t[/imath], not [imath]x[/imath]
Code: Select all
_=0,w=1,(*t)(int,int);a()??<char*p="[gd\
~/d~/\\b\x7F\177l*~/~djal{x}h!\005h";(++w
<033)?(putchar((*t)(w??(p:>,w?_:0XD)),a()
):0;%>O(x,l)??<_='['/7;{return!(x%(_11))
?x??'l:x^(1+ ++l);}??>main(){t=&O;w=a();}
 Sir_Elderberry
 Posts: 4206
 Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 6:50 pm UTC
 Location: Sector ZZ9 Plural Z Alpha
 Contact:
Re: Length of Curve
Qoppa wrote:Except then you have to integrate with respect to [imath]t[/imath], not [imath]x[/imath]
Oh yeah. That too. Sorry.
http://www.geekyhumanist.blogspot.com  Science and the Concerned Voter
Well. You heard him.
Belial wrote:You are the coolest guy that ever cooled.
I reiterate. Coolest. Guy.
Well. You heard him.
 qinwamascot
 Posts: 688
 Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 8:50 am UTC
 Location: Oklahoma, U.S.A.
Re: Length of Curve
A derivation of that is possible with only the fundamental theorem of calculus. the Pythagorean theorem, and a little knowledge of parametric curves. I won't do it here, but you'll almost definitely see it later. For a curve defined in polar coordinates the formula is:
[math]s=\int_a^b \sqrt{r^2+r'(θ)^2}dθ[/math]
[math]s=\int_a^b \sqrt{r^2+r'(θ)^2}dθ[/math]
Quiznos>Subway
 thornahawk
 Posts: 64
 Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2008 3:56 am UTC
 Location: somewhere out in the SEA
 Contact:
Re: Length of Curve
Seeing that everybody's giving their arclength expressions, I always preferred the Argand (complex) form to parametric equations:
[math]s=\int_{a}^b \leftz^\prime\left(t\right)\right\mathrm{d}t[/math]
for a plane curve represented as [imath]z(t)=f(t)+i\,g(t)[/imath], [imath]f(t)[/imath] and [imath]g(t)[/imath] real functions of [imath]t[/imath].
The formula mentioned by Elderberry is quite easily extended to curves in three or higher dimensions; take the derivatives of the component functions (or in vector notation, the vectorvalued function) with respect to the parameter before integrating.
~ Werner
[math]s=\int_{a}^b \leftz^\prime\left(t\right)\right\mathrm{d}t[/math]
for a plane curve represented as [imath]z(t)=f(t)+i\,g(t)[/imath], [imath]f(t)[/imath] and [imath]g(t)[/imath] real functions of [imath]t[/imath].
The formula mentioned by Elderberry is quite easily extended to curves in three or higher dimensions; take the derivatives of the component functions (or in vector notation, the vectorvalued function) with respect to the parameter before integrating.
~ Werner
John Dolan wrote:Cigarettes are insanely expensive and turn lots of poor people into cringing beggars.
Email!

 Posts: 778
 Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2008 10:58 pm UTC
 Location: Palo Alto, CA
Re: Length of Curve
thornahawk wrote:Seeing that everybody's giving their arclength expressions, I always preferred the Argand (complex) form to parametric equations
I always prefered the classical differential geometry approach: parametrize the curve by arc length. Now the arc length is given by:
[math]s = b  a[/math]
Even better, normalize your parameter first. Now the arc length is given by:
[math]s = 1[/math]
Of course, the rest of the expressions you're interested in might have gotten a lot more complicated...
GENERATION 16 + 31i: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum. Square it, and then add i to the generation.
Re: Length of Curve
There's also the put a string down "on top of" the curve then lift the string pull straight and measure.... Incidentally if you want to put the string down correctly you'll need to do some derivatives to make sure that the tangent lines to the string at each point correspond with the tangent lines to the graph, similar with 2nd derivatives... and 3 rd... etc.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests